User Panel
The United Nations employees 44,000 bureaucrats who have an average salary of $82,000 and the benefits aren't half bad.
...and what do they actually produce? |
|
Quoted:
The United Nations employees 44,000 bureaucrats who have an average salary of $82,000 and the benefits aren't half bad. ...and what do they actually produce? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
How about nope. (lived there 1987-1988) View Quote 88-89. MCSFCO. instigator of mike boat fishing operations, HMRM Yacht club cultural ambassador by designation(The eyebrow grew back).;) The U.N.(Ivan and the Chinese) can fuck off, along with their non member proxies. If the Brits cave, we need to settle the Chagosians on the other Islands, as a protected territory. |
|
Quoted:
Have you actually read a history book? Txl View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: The particulars are not terribly important. What's important is that the English speaking world stop playing such a dominant role on the world's stage, in every sense. The English speaking world is far and away the biggest source of pernicious social justice ideas. We tend not to think of ourselves that way, but that's exactly what we are. It's terrible. Txl |
|
Quoted: It's spread globally from its roots in the US. These ideas first gained traction in American universities among the faculty, spread to the students, and then outward from there. The only non-English speaking country that even compares to the role the US and the UK played in the global distribution of these ideas is France. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51067667.pdf View Quote https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/former-soviet-spy-we-created-liberation-theology-83634 |
|
Quoted:
Same. 88-89. MCSF.Co. instigator of mike boat fishing operations, HMRM Yacht club cultural ambassador by designation(The eyebrow grew back).;) The U.N.(Ivan and the Chinese) can fuck off, along with their non member proxies. If the Brits cave, we need to settle the Chagosians on the other Islands, as a protected territory. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How about nope. (lived there 1987-1988) 88-89. MCSF.Co. instigator of mike boat fishing operations, HMRM Yacht club cultural ambassador by designation(The eyebrow grew back).;) The U.N.(Ivan and the Chinese) can fuck off, along with their non member proxies. If the Brits cave, we need to settle the Chagosians on the other Islands, as a protected territory. |
|
|
|
Quoted: If they cave, we should invade and take the whole thing the moment sovereignty is relinquished by the UK, like Indonesia did with Portuguese Timor in 1975. View Quote It has already been "Pre-Invaded", and the Chagosians were removed by Tommy long ago and re-settled in Maurtious, where they constantly bitch about getting their "Home land back", despite there being zero chance of them surviving, and zero economic viability of the atolls other than Copra oil....that nobody burns in lamps anymore. It's been a classic Trotsky inspired tactic of the left here, and Britan, in the name of "Human rights", since they were first re-located off of the Copra plantations. None of the Chagosians will last 5 hours on DG, Peros, or any of the others, after leaving the comforts and convenience of the UK, or even the shit hole of Mauritious. It's purely a strategic play by the PRC, and Ivan. The U.N. does even hide their agenda any more. B.I.O.T. has zero value to anyone, other than being a global strategic lynch pin. Control DG/B.I.O.T. and you own the I.O. Make it a U.S. protected territory with open repatriation limited to Chagosians only, so the U.N. is castrated on the Human rights front, and none of the fuckers will take the offer once the "Environmental impact study" is completed, and petitions for exemptions to the protected species limitations are filed, and limiting them to Peros Banhos that can possibly support 5-10K without outside support. Dibs on the first Casino. |
|
Quoted: There is nothing to invade. It has already been "Pre-Invaded", and the Chagosians were removed by Tommy long ago and re-settled in Maurtious, where they constantly bitch about getting their "Home land back", despite there being zero chance of them surviving, and zero economic viability of the atolls other than Copra oil....that nobody burns in lamps anymore. It's been a classic Trotsky inspired tactic of the left here, and Britan, in the name of "Human rights", since they were first re-located off of the Copra plantations. None of the Chagosians will last 5 hours on DG, Peros, or any of the others, after leaving the comforts and convenience of the UK, or even the shit hole of Mauritious. It's purely a strategic play by the PRC, and Ivan. The U.N. does even hide their agenda any more. B.I.O.T. has zero value to anyone, other than being a global strategic lynch pin. Control DG/B.I.O.T. and you own the I.O. Make it a U.S. protected territory with open repatriation limited to Chagosians only, so the U.N. is castrated on the Human rights front, and none of the fuckers will take the offer once the "Environmental impact study" is completed, and petitions for exemptions to the protected species limitations are filed, and limiting them to Peros Banhos that can possibly support 5-10K without outside support. Dibs on the first Casino. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Welfare for Mauritius would be another piece of this. Rent on that base is going to hurt when it has to be negotiated with a 'pay until it hurts or get out' clause. View Quote They are just like the goddamned Spaniards claiming shit they lost in Florida 300 years ago, and the Fucktard Argies claiming the Falklands. The timing of the renewed interest in the matter, is what Americans NOT at the Mall, should be paying attention to. It's a Political chess game, that has been played before, for the same prize, by the same players, during the Cold war. BTDT. The U.N. and it's "rules" is just a force multiplier for Ivan, the Chinese, and the Marx loving useless cunts infesting our Republic and the UK. |
|
Quoted:
You left out the part that the Chagosians were not actually native to Diego Garcia either. If it goes back to its "original inhabitants" that would be France. The Chagosians were hired help (they weren't even slaves brought there against their will) who squatted after their jobs left. To be fair, give them the other, uninhabited, islands in the group and call it a day. Colonialism is bad, I get it, but stop pretending that every square inch of the planet "belongs" to some modern post-colonial country because of it. View Quote Here I am trying to create a New Maldives/Seychelles, and exclusive Eurotrash resort/Casino as a U.S.Protectorate, that takes advantage of U.N. PC/SJW bullshit politically, while maintaining strategic advantage of the I.O. .... and you start projecting. Quit hanging out with liberal trash. They have warped your brain. Get a grip! Damn |
|
Quoted:
It's spread globally from its roots in the US. These ideas first gained traction in American universities among the faculty, spread to the students, and then outward from there. The only non-English speaking country that even compares to the role the US and the UK played in the global distribution of these ideas is France. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51067667.pdf View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The particulars are not terribly important. What's important is that the English speaking world stop playing such a dominant role on the world's stage, in every sense. The English speaking world is far and away the biggest source of pernicious social justice ideas. We tend not to think of ourselves that way, but that's exactly what we are. It's terrible. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51067667.pdf |
|
|
Quoted: It's spread globally from its roots in the US. These ideas first gained traction in American universities among the faculty, spread to the students, and then outward from there. The only non-English speaking country that even compares to the role the US and the UK played in the global distribution of these ideas is France. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51067667.pdf View Quote Should the people displaced for the development of have received greater compensation, perhaps. But the decision to uproot them is not some great travesty of an oppressed indigenous people by Western powers, but more like a case of eminent domain. |
|
Quoted:
You left out the part that the Chagosians were not actually native to Diego Garcia either. If it goes back to its "original inhabitants" that would be France. The Chagosians were hired help (they weren't even slaves brought there against their will) who squatted after their jobs left. To be fair, give them the other, uninhabited, islands in the group and call it a day. Colonialism is bad, I get it, but stop pretending that every square inch of the planet "belongs" to some modern post-colonial country because of it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: There is nothing to invade. It has already been "Pre-Invaded", and the Chagosians were removed by Tommy long ago and re-settled in Maurtious, where they constantly bitch about getting their "Home land back", despite there being zero chance of them surviving, and zero economic viability of the atolls other than Copra oil....that nobody burns in lamps anymore. It's been a classic Trotsky inspired tactic of the left here, and Britan, in the name of "Human rights", since they were first re-located off of the Copra plantations. None of the Chagosians will last 5 hours on DG, Peros, or any of the others, after leaving the comforts and convenience of the UK, or even the shit hole of Mauritious. It's purely a strategic play by the PRC, and Ivan. The U.N. does even hide their agenda any more. B.I.O.T. has zero value to anyone, other than being a global strategic lynch pin. Control DG/B.I.O.T. and you own the I.O. Make it a U.S. protected territory with open repatriation limited to Chagosians only, so the U.N. is castrated on the Human rights front, and none of the fuckers will take the offer once the "Environmental impact study" is completed, and petitions for exemptions to the protected species limitations are filed, and limiting them to Peros Banhos that can possibly support 5-10K without outside support. Dibs on the first Casino. |
|
Quoted:
There is nothing to invade. It has already been "Pre-Invaded", and the Chagosians were removed by Tommy long ago and re-settled in Maurtious, where they constantly bitch about getting their "Home land back", despite there being zero chance of them surviving, and zero economic viability of the atolls other than Copra oil....that nobody burns in lamps anymore. It's been a classic Trotsky inspired tactic of the left here, and Britan, in the name of "Human rights", since they were first re-located off of the Copra plantations. None of the Chagosians will last 5 hours on DG, Peros, or any of the others, after leaving the comforts and convenience of the UK, or even the shit hole of Mauritious. It's purely a strategic play by the PRC, and Ivan. The U.N. does even hide their agenda any more. B.I.O.T. has zero value to anyone, other than being a global strategic lynch pin. Control DG/B.I.O.T. and you own the I.O. Make it a U.S. protected territory with open repatriation limited to Chagosians only, so the U.N. is castrated on the Human rights front, and none of the fuckers will take the offer once the "Environmental impact study" is completed, and petitions for exemptions to the protected species limitations are filed, and limiting them to Peros Banhos that can possibly support 5-10K without outside support. Dibs on the first Casino. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: If they cave, we should invade and take the whole thing the moment sovereignty is relinquished by the UK, like Indonesia did with Portuguese Timor in 1975. It has already been "Pre-Invaded", and the Chagosians were removed by Tommy long ago and re-settled in Maurtious, where they constantly bitch about getting their "Home land back", despite there being zero chance of them surviving, and zero economic viability of the atolls other than Copra oil....that nobody burns in lamps anymore. It's been a classic Trotsky inspired tactic of the left here, and Britan, in the name of "Human rights", since they were first re-located off of the Copra plantations. None of the Chagosians will last 5 hours on DG, Peros, or any of the others, after leaving the comforts and convenience of the UK, or even the shit hole of Mauritious. It's purely a strategic play by the PRC, and Ivan. The U.N. does even hide their agenda any more. B.I.O.T. has zero value to anyone, other than being a global strategic lynch pin. Control DG/B.I.O.T. and you own the I.O. Make it a U.S. protected territory with open repatriation limited to Chagosians only, so the U.N. is castrated on the Human rights front, and none of the fuckers will take the offer once the "Environmental impact study" is completed, and petitions for exemptions to the protected species limitations are filed, and limiting them to Peros Banhos that can possibly support 5-10K without outside support. Dibs on the first Casino. |
|
Quoted:
What part of what I said do you find confusing? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: I'd have to disagree with that, especially as a blanket statement. Honestly, a lot of former colonies would be much better off today if they had remained colonies or had remained under the rule of the Western settlers. A lot of backwards places are at the very least slightly less backward because of colonization, while others have ended up being quite advanced (like Australia or much of the U.S.). Christianity has largely been a positive force and colonialism also insured that it would spread more than it would have, otherwise. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
U.N., you get problem with that? You know what you should do? You should sanction them. Sanction them with your army. Oh! wait a minute! You don't have an army! View Quote And when US needs force to deal with bad shit, don't they beg the US? lol, that would go over well. Trump would probably tweet back the blue helmet with the hole. |
|
|
Quoted:
Social Justice and political correctness are communist creations. PC comes right out of the alinsky playbook to control the language. Social Justice is just a new term for Black Liberation Theology. Black Liberation Theology came from the KGB as a way to undermine black integration into american society. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/former-soviet-spy-we-created-liberation-theology-83634 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: It's spread globally from its roots in the US. These ideas first gained traction in American universities among the faculty, spread to the students, and then outward from there. The only non-English speaking country that even compares to the role the US and the UK played in the global distribution of these ideas is France. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51067667.pdf https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/former-soviet-spy-we-created-liberation-theology-83634 |
|
|
Quoted: Typically, when "colonialism" is invoked, it is understood to mean poor, oppressed non-white people (and sometimes the Irish), not the self-governing colonies. And I disagree with the mechanism of de-colonization precisely because it basically threw away a great deal of progress in the name of justice. A clear case of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. However, if you're going to go all Rhodesian, you have to understand, in large swathes of the world, colonialism was unmitigated genocide, and the better material conditions of the eventual survivors is not a really compelling argument for the morality of colonialism. For example, look at the Belgian Congo, and try to explain how that was good for the natives. Or German SW Africa (hey, the 10% we didn't straight up murder have running water! They should be thankful!). View Quote |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.