User Panel
|
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. |
|
Quoted:
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. |
|
Quoted:
Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. L10-11 |
|
Quoted:
USS Utah, before the Pearl Harbor attack... https://padresteve.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/utah-in-1935.jpg ...and now... http://www.intoceansys.co.uk/uploads/img4e609ec1ae006.jpg View Quote The before photo is earlier than her final configuration when she sank. They had 5"/25 mounts forward on turrets 1 and 2 and 5"/38 enclosed mounts aft on turrets 4 and 5. They also had I think one 1.1" mount, some 20mm mounts and 8 .50 caliber machine guns. |
|
I just started the Dirk Pitt series by Clive Cussler so this appeals to me.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. L10-11 Judging by the lat and longitude, that's a Tupolev 154. Former private plane of the communist ruler of Bulgaria. Now an artificial reef in the Black Sea. |
|
|
Quoted: Down and side imaging technology is awesome. It has really advanced in the past 10 years. Some of the new fishing graphs can produce amazing images, when properly set up. Most can be had for around 1k. https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8849/28802854821_8e0eaf233b_b.jpg View Quote I get distracted when looking for fish and find myself spending time checking out old bridges, cars, silos etc... On the bottom of the lake. Lots of images from "consumers" posted here |
|
I remember seeing images of something that looked like the Millenium Falcon years ago that had everyone freaked out. Pretty sure it was in the Baltic.
|
|
Here's some of my images that I've shot at work:
http://www.bosargediving.com/our-services/sonar-services/ |
|
Quoted:
Here's some of my images that I've shot at work: http://www.bosargediving.com/our-services/sonar-services/ View Quote Cool!!! |
|
|
Very cool. When I was a kid, I used to imagine how neat it would be if they could drain the ocean and you could just walk around and explore what was down there. This is almost as good.
Good post. |
|
|
Possum. |
|
Quoted:
I got to look at tons of sidescan when I was diving. It was.... Super boring because most of it looked like this. http://www.offshore-technology.com/contractor_images/11190/images/146831/large/rock-2.jpg View Quote That's what makes these images so interesting. Imagine, after seeing miles and miles of... ...you suddenly see this... |
|
Quoted: Here's some of my images that I've shot at work: http://www.bosargediving.com/our-services/sonar-services/ View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. Coordinates on the photo put it in the Black Sea off the coast of Bulgaria. ETA: Already noted above. |
|
Awesome pics and thread.
Surprised we still can't find the nuke we lost off of Georgia. |
|
Quoted:
First pic: Ford Trimotor, or possibly a JU-52? Trimotor: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQCC9y6FV_Z7Qs5Lr78__7q95n1O4n6n75DiDhCd5scbbCUAnHZ Ju-52: http://g02.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1luxCIVXXXXbUXVXXq6xXFXXXf/MD-010-WWII-German-JU-52-transport-aircraft-bombing.jpg View Quote Looks like the top view of a Do 24 to me...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_24 |
|
|
Any more info on the bodies? That's surprisingly creepy especially the way the shadows are cast
|
|
I need to borrow that to find my lost guns.
Damn boating accident. |
|
|
Quoted:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=13384&d=1285895680 "Is that a U Boat"? [chico]"Thats a notta my boat" [/chico] View Quote Not likely. U-boat would have a single surface mounted gun. Unless it somehow came off while sinking. |
|
|
Quoted:
Without having to say it, a good number of people here will be able to identify THIS one... http://waittfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MSN018A_BOW-SIDE4-R99m.jpg View Quote Ah yes. The SS Minnow. Finally! |
|
Quoted: It's not 3d but it appears that way. Think of the sounds waves as a laser, it will bounce off the object back towards the transmitter. The sound will never reach where the "shadow" is so it registers as no response or "nothing there". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why/how does it show shadows? It's not really a shadow, more of a blank area that is shown because the sonar waves can't penetrate the object. So is it a 3D recreation of the image? If the sonar source was casting the shadows, why don't the photos, or whatever they are, show the perspective that is casting the shadow? I'm not sure I'm writing this correctly, but it appears that the picture is from a different perspective than the sonar is pointed. It's not 3d but it appears that way. Think of the sounds waves as a laser, it will bounce off the object back towards the transmitter. The sound will never reach where the "shadow" is so it registers as no response or "nothing there". His point is it appears the image collector (or whatever it is called) is in a different location from the sonar source. (e.g. towed sonar, but image collector on bottom ship). If both were in the same position, it too shouldn't see the "shadow". |
|
Quoted: First pic: Ford Trimotor, or possibly a JU-52? Trimotor: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQCC9y6FV_Z7Qs5Lr78__7q95n1O4n6n75DiDhCd5scbbCUAnHZ Ju-52: http://g02.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1luxCIVXXXXbUXVXXq6xXFXXXf/MD-010-WWII-German-JU-52-transport-aircraft-bombing.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hudson River water landing? That's awfully shallow. Doubtful. That looks like a 727: three-engined, T-tailed jet, or one similar to it. |
|
Quoted: His point is it appears the image collector (or whatever it is called) is in a different location from the sonar source. (e.g. towed sonar, but image collector on bottom ship). If both were in the same position, it too shouldn't see the "shadow". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why/how does it show shadows? It's not really a shadow, more of a blank area that is shown because the sonar waves can't penetrate the object. So is it a 3D recreation of the image? If the sonar source was casting the shadows, why don't the photos, or whatever they are, show the perspective that is casting the shadow? I'm not sure I'm writing this correctly, but it appears that the picture is from a different perspective than the sonar is pointed. It's not 3d but it appears that way. Think of the sounds waves as a laser, it will bounce off the object back towards the transmitter. The sound will never reach where the "shadow" is so it registers as no response or "nothing there". His point is it appears the image collector (or whatever it is called) is in a different location from the sonar source. (e.g. towed sonar, but image collector on bottom ship). If both were in the same position, it too shouldn't see the "shadow". Side scan sonar works on distance to target with a highly directional component to the bounce back. So... a line near the water surface is the path of the unit attached to the boat. From that line, it's angle from horizontal and distance along each position on the line. When you get bounce back at 10 degrees down you might have 120 foot bounce back. At 10.001 degrees down you might have 123 foot bounce back. This is noted in the data. Then, when the image is created, those angles and distances are calculated out, and you get a "view from the top" picture of the bounce back intensity. It's this angle translation math that generates the shadow. The sending and receiving unit are pretty close together. It's that the resolution of the sonar is used to calculate an image from a different point of view. |
|
Cool pictures. I've always thought it would be cool to be able to temporarily drain a body of water so you could walk the bottom and check everything out.
|
|
|
I've spent the past few nights looking at different images now
I had a unit mounted on my Jon boat that I would fish and hunt out of all up and down pool 14,15 and 16 on the Mississippi and have found some cool things on the bottom of the river. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.