User Panel
Quoted: This is a fact. But even worse is the fact that even if the MSM ran another story refuting the original, it won’t make a difference. Once a libtard has heard something on the MSM it’s forever imprinted as being true on the brain cell that still functions. No matter what happens after, they can only cling to the first thing they heard. View Quote Yep. As it has been throughout the ages, they are great tools of tyranny. Many/most would be all-too-happy to be storm troopers and evict, imprison, torture, and murder for their evil masters. Look how many of them said that those who chose not to be experimental lab rats over the past few years should be put in camps, and many even said "I hope you die from covid". And despite their puppet masters admitting more and more that covid was overblown and created by our government, they still stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the fact that they were rubes. They are the very same as those who murdered for Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, etc. What is old is new again. They are the enemies of freedom, life, and self-determination and individuality. |
|
Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. View Quote |
|
Quoted: You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? View Quote Better response than mine. But note he's discrediting himself. |
|
Quoted: This is a fact. But even worse is the fact that even if the MSM ran another story refuting the original, it won’t make a difference. Once a libtard has heard something on the MSM it’s forever imprinted as being true on the brain cell that still functions. No matter what happens after, they can only cling to the first thing they heard. View Quote The same thing happens all the time when it comes to officer involved shootings and uses of force. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: The FBI, CIA and NSA worked with the Uni party globalist to ensure Donald Trump was not re-elected and will again. The first time was a fluck and they could not manufacturer enough fraudulent votes to offset Trumps pead. They learned there lesson and took advantage of covid with massive mail in voting fraud. Are you having a stroke?? Just on my phone typing fast. You have tons of time. I will send my posts to you for proof reading before hand. |
|
Quoted: You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged — but for a "legitimate purpose." "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude … when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: Attached File But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! |
|
Quoted: Decimate the FBI 100% of the agents go The agency is a clear and present danger to the citizens of the United States freedom. View Quote Fixed |
|
Quoted: Half of GD as well. Which half are you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Once a libtard has heard something on the MSM it’s forever imprinted as being true on the brain cell that still functions. No matter what happens after, they can only cling to the first thing they heard. Yup, it's only the "libtards" who have this flaw in their character. Half of GD as well. Which half are you? It would seem that pointing out that both sides suffer this flaw would mean I am self aware enough to attempt to avoid it. What about you? @Curdmugeon45 |
|
|
|
Quoted: Better response than mine. But note he's discrediting himself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? Better response than mine. But note he's discrediting himself. Attached File |
|
Quoted: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! View Quote Did you actually read what you posted. Your credibility is about as good as the FBI at this point. |
|
|
|
Quoted: You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! View Quote We only found out because the judge released the unredacted documents. They redacted it to hide it from us. Also the picture was used for months without this context being released. Although some of us suspected that this or similar was the case. It was an information op played out by the government against the American people, like so many others. That's why when pictures like that come out they don't convince us of anything. We realize the government is lying to take down Trump. That's baked into our assumptions now. Early 2017 with the Russia nonsense I was left wondering, but now at this point I just assume FIB and JustUs are lying. |
|
Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. View Quote Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrpppp |
|
We need to keep in mind the government isn't one monolithic thing. In this case the judge seems to be doing the right thing. It's different than the DC, Georgia and NY cases in that matter. Prosecutions were mostly launched in corrupt locations, which is why these cases are such clusterfucks. We would have never received these unredacted documents in the other cases controlled by corrupt judges.
Also, if you pay attention, it isn't just black and white but shades of gray. Mueller didn't just go all in and create fake evidence. He was clearly part of the plan to get Trump (hence why he ignored the dossier and why he went after those Russian entities), but there were limits to how far he went. Likewise Barr played both sides of the fence. Durham also: he released some good info, but in a way provided cover. There are those involved who are not happy with the corruption but who are not willing to pull off the scab. |
|
Quoted: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged but for a "legitimate purpose." "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! |
|
|
Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged but for a "legitimate purpose."
There is no legitimate purpose for staging photos of evidence at the scene of the crime. Unacceptable by any legal standard. "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." The search warrant specified several isolated rooms, not the entire resort. Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. The image was presented as if the folders were found that way. Fake evidence is unacceptable in any court of law. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. That makes no sense whatsoever. And it doesn't sound like SOP for a search warrant. It would be more believable if the agents had seized the boxes and taken them, in original form, back to the lab for proper cataloging. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. One photo? One? Could that be because other photos didn't further the agenda? We know lots of other photos were taken. Where are they and why were they not included in the DOJ filing? It is ludicrous that only one photo was included. |
|
Quoted: Decimate the FBI every year for the next five years. 10% of the agents go each year and I don't care how you pick them. After five years re-evaluate and see if they have any will to be political hatchet men and repeat if needed. The agency is a clear and present danger to the citizens of the United States freedom. View Quote Why not just start with 50% and not need a new HQ? |
|
Quoted: We only found out because the judge released the unredacted documents. They redacted it to hide it from us. Also the picture was used for months without this context being released. Although some of us suspected that this or similar was the case. It was an information op played out by the government against the American people, like so many others. That's why when pictures like that come out they don't convince us of anything. We realize the government is lying to take down Trump. That's baked into our assumptions now. Early 2017 with the Russia nonsense I was left wondering, but now at this point I just assume FIB and JustUs are lying. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! We only found out because the judge released the unredacted documents. They redacted it to hide it from us. Also the picture was used for months without this context being released. Although some of us suspected that this or similar was the case. It was an information op played out by the government against the American people, like so many others. That's why when pictures like that come out they don't convince us of anything. We realize the government is lying to take down Trump. That's baked into our assumptions now. Early 2017 with the Russia nonsense I was left wondering, but now at this point I just assume FIB and JustUs are lying. No, no, no.... The government told us in a recent court filing. The benevolent, honest and forthright government. How can you doubt them? Mr. Miller has explained this to you. |
|
Quoted: I’m moderately shocked that trump is still alive for one , and that he hasn’t just been arrested by the feds and put in prison for treason with no bail, no hearings . View Quote You wanna start a Catalina Wine Mixer, that's how you start a Catalina Wine Mixer. I'm surprised someone hasn't |
|
Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. View Quote Trolling = boring You aren't even amusing anymore. |
|
Quoted: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. You CAN'T be that fucking retarded so you must be a shill. Taking photos to document evidence? No, taking photos of random piles of paper that they put the "top secret" cover sheets that they brought with them on to create outrage and a propaganda coup for the left. You do realize that it's been proven that the FBI printed those cover sheets out themselves and brought them with them to Mar-a-Lago and attached them to random papers they say were in the boxes they confiscated, right? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/fbi-evidence-photo-standard-practice-trump-mar-a-lago-search-2022-9%3famp Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged — but for a "legitimate purpose." "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude … when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. You know how we know the FBI put those cover sheets in there? Because the government told us in a recent court filing: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/585454/1000008374_jpg-3209593.JPG But yeah, there's some really sneaky nefarious stuff happening in that picture! Filter teams. You mean plant teams. I wonder how much kiddie porn they'll find on his computer? |
|
Quoted: Yet the damage has already been done. The liberal idiots still believe President Trump had Top Secret documents and they will never hear the truth because the treasonist MSM where they get their "facts" will never show this to them. Those responsible for this should be swinging from lampposts. View Quote And a bunch of never trumpers hear convinced he committed treason. |
|
I was just shocked that someone would have so many incorrect cover sheets.
|
|
|
The two most annoying groups of persons in my world:
China Flu vaxxers People who defer to a corrupt administration's indictments against our last president What a shit-show |
|
Quoted: I think they are afraid that might kick off some sort of reaction that they might not be able to control. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As always, not shit is going to happen. Our government is corrupt as it gets and does whatever the hell they want to do. They will continue to do so until they are reeled in by the people, which isn’t going to happen, so we all should just get used to these Stasi type tactics. I’m moderately shocked that trump is still alive for one , and that he hasn’t just been arrested by the feds and put in prison for treason with no bail, no hearings . I think they are afraid that might kick off some sort of reaction that they might not be able to control. I really think J6 spooked them, that’s why they are going after those people so hard. Try and make an example to make people be afraid and less likely to protest thus being easier to control. |
|
Quoted: Politics = garbage Trolling = boring You aren't even amusing anymore. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's rather amusing to see people who are claiming the government botched chain of custody and evidence documentation so badly that the case should be dismissed also getting upset about FBI agents taking photos to document evidence before removing it from Mar-a-Lago. I'm curious how anybody can claim they are "random documents" when they are redacted. Trolling = boring You aren't even amusing anymore. It's not surprising that government agents like this have this mentality. One only needs to look at the multitude of video evidence out there of LEO & unelected bureaucrats to see the disdain of the .gov to some asshole with a camera on the streets. It's rotten from the bottom to the top. Trump or you or I are not immune to persecution. I still support those LEO that work within the confines of the Constitution. |
|
Quoted: I really think J6 spooked them, that’s why they are going after those people so hard. Try and make an example to make people be afraid and less likely to protest thus being easier to control. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As always, not shit is going to happen. Our government is corrupt as it gets and does whatever the hell they want to do. They will continue to do so until they are reeled in by the people, which isn’t going to happen, so we all should just get used to these Stasi type tactics. I’m moderately shocked that trump is still alive for one , and that he hasn’t just been arrested by the feds and put in prison for treason with no bail, no hearings . I think they are afraid that might kick off some sort of reaction that they might not be able to control. I really think J6 spooked them, that’s why they are going after those people so hard. Try and make an example to make people be afraid and less likely to protest thus being easier to control. I think the message most people got from J6 is show up armed next time and go all the way |
|
Quoted: Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged but for a "legitimate purpose." There is no legitimate purpose for staging photos of evidence at the scene of the crime. Unacceptable by any legal standard. "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." The search warrant specified several isolated rooms, not the entire resort. Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. The image was presented as if the folders were found that way. Fake evidence is unacceptable in any court of law. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. That makes no sense whatsoever. And it doesn't sound like SOP for a search warrant. It would be more believable if the agents had seized the boxes and taken them, in original form, back to the lab for proper cataloging. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. One photo? One? Could that be because other photos didn't further the agenda? We know lots of other photos were taken. Where are they and why were they not included in the DOJ filing? It is ludicrous that only one photo was included. View Quote I will care what you have to say when you at least claim (I wouldn't dare demand verification) that you worked for the DOJ/FBI, or even anywhere in law enforcement/the justice system. Quoted: I used to work for the FBI and I no longer trust them. . View Quote @ExFed1811 I'd love to hear your thoughts about the post above yours here. ETA: not on the question of trust, just procedure. |
|
Quoted: I will care what you have to say when you at least claim (I wouldn't dare demand verification) that you worked for the DOJ/FBI, or even anywhere in law enforcement/the justice system. @ExFed1811 I'd love to hear your thoughts about the post above yours here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Bobby Chacon, a retired FBI agent, told Insider that the photo was indeed staged but for a "legitimate purpose." There is no legitimate purpose for staging photos of evidence at the scene of the crime. Unacceptable by any legal standard. "It's just a trail to be as thorough as you can in documenting where every item came from within a search," Chacon told Insider. "And a search of this geographic magnitude when you're searching a resort area that's this large, you want to make sure you're very thorough and you document where everything was." The search warrant specified several isolated rooms, not the entire resort. Two federal law enforcement officials told The New York Times that the folders weren't discovered on the floor, but arranged like that by agents after they were removed from Trump's office. The image was presented as if the folders were found that way. Fake evidence is unacceptable in any court of law. Most agents will take a photo of the finding in its original form, and then spread out, so individual findings can be traced back to their original location, according to Chacon. That makes no sense whatsoever. And it doesn't sound like SOP for a search warrant. It would be more believable if the agents had seized the boxes and taken them, in original form, back to the lab for proper cataloging. Chacon said agents typically take photos at the start of the search, when they recover any evidence during the search, and at the end of the search. The Department of Justice court filing notably only included one photos, but others of other parts of the search process may exist. One photo? One? Could that be because other photos didn't further the agenda? We know lots of other photos were taken. Where are they and why were they not included in the DOJ filing? It is ludicrous that only one photo was included. I will care what you have to say when you at least claim (I wouldn't dare demand verification) that you worked for the DOJ/FBI, or even anywhere in law enforcement/the justice system. Quoted: I used to work for the FBI and I no longer trust them. . @ExFed1811 I'd love to hear your thoughts about the post above yours here. |
|
This stuff cant stand and America be taken seriously in the world.
Leader of the free world plating like a 3rd world tin pot banana republic. Chinese are laughing their asses off . |
|
Didn't pay detailed attention the first time around, but the paperclips are super sketchy.
Any doc I handled (very very few!) with SECRET or TOP SECRET coversheets had them STAPLED, not paper-clipped to the docs. |
|
|
Quoted: It’s actually worse than just that pic. The White House colluded with FBI and NARA on the raid and set him up. They had NARA call Trump up and said: “we’ve got these boxes of your documents from your term here, you gotta get them out of here” and then they sent them to Mar A Lago. These papers in the photo were from that batch of documents. It was a total setup. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I will care what you have to say when you at least claim (I wouldn't dare demand verification) that you worked for the DOJ/FBI, or even anywhere in law enforcement/the justice system. View Quote You are defending the alteration of evidence. I expect this is situation dependent, and in other situations you would find it outrageous. |
|
|
Quoted: You are defending the alteration of evidence. I expect this is situation dependent, and in other situations you would find it outrageous. View Quote Like if they did it to Biden when he wanted to return all the STOLEN docs he had ? That most likely was to get out in front of the plot to frame Trump . |
|
Quoted: They interviewed actual FBI agents in that movie IN REAL LIFE , which you obviously haven't watched . What was this reply meant to accomplish ?, hell I was agreeing with you . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This is not a move! It's real life and if you can't handle it get out. They interviewed actual FBI agents in that movie IN REAL LIFE , which you obviously haven't watched . What was this reply meant to accomplish ?, hell I was agreeing with you . I was not referring to you but to the FBI and after going back and reading it, it looks clear as mud. sorry for that. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Apparently, the office of professional responsibility, in the FBI no longer exists. The assholes involved in this rage should be terminated. In Minecraft? |
|
|
Yet ya'll keep voting and seving the military hoping for change.....lol.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.