User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:04:45 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't spew BS and prey on the gullible who are looking for answers. "Super male vitality" and all that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You might reconsider your position if you knew how his trials were rigged. What they did to him was worse than how they rigged Trumps trials. I don't spew BS and prey on the gullible who are looking for answers. "Super male vitality" and all that. You sure do spew a TON of BS on this site from what I’m seeing on this thread. Be a shame if someone sued you for a billion dollars. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:05:32 AM EDT
[#2]
There were unanswered questions and photos of some of the people there that photographed at other events
The powers to be don’t like questions, like 911 there are things people saw and were on video that raised more questions and it is now a forbidden subject |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:06:17 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. And is there any reason why? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:06:58 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That whole lawsuit was bullshit |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:07:04 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How many things AJ has predicted have turned out to be exactly what he was saying all along? He called 9/11 before it happened.  Alex Jones Predicts 9/11 (July 25th 2001) As for the rest, pay me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:07:44 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up it just means there are fact patterns which are consistent with the people having performed acts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:09:20 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He was able to make the controversial speech without government intervention. Great job in pointing out that the first amendment is in place and Alex was allowed to say what he wanted. Initially, then loses his business because some feelings were hurt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:09:31 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: See how right he has been over the last 30 years and how many “conspiracy theories” have been proven right, that’s not the own you think it. When did he support “socialists”. Ukraine is not going to regain the land/ tax base it has lost, so again, they lost, Z man will milk this as long and hard as he can, then he will flee after looting the national treasury. How much more they lose is all that is being determined. Z could save many lives by eating crow, but he has his heart set on retirement on that resort in Cyprus that you bought him with your tax dollars. I wonder who will get him, CIA or FSB… Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right?  See how right he has been over the last 30 years and how many “conspiracy theories” have been proven right, that’s not the own you think it. When did he support “socialists”. Ukraine is not going to regain the land/ tax base it has lost, so again, they lost, Z man will milk this as long and hard as he can, then he will flee after looting the national treasury. How much more they lose is all that is being determined. Z could save many lives by eating crow, but he has his heart set on retirement on that resort in Cyprus that you bought him with your tax dollars. I wonder who will get him, CIA or FSB… |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:09:53 AM EDT
[#9]
I hope they put him in the cell with Trump for life.
That will show how free democracy is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:10:01 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You might reconsider your position if you knew how his trials were rigged. What they did to him was worse than how they rigged Trumps trials. Again, he does not care, as long as people are silenced who speak against his holy crusade he is ok with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:10:02 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy. Still around here? DU to boring? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:12:00 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up. That's some creative mental maneuvering.  That whole post is bullshit... you know it, I know it, and the jury knew that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:12:08 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The verdicts totaled more than gdp of some small countries. If everyone in Grenada volunteered to put every penny they made towards paying off Jones' judgments for a year they couldn't pay it off. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? Prime example of lawfare, but what Alex did was stupid, just not 1.5 billion stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:12:35 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's no point in trying to have a rational discussion with the multiple posters who are engaged in kayfabe in this thread. Their responses are staged and scripted to maintain the 'reality' they are promoting. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Now tell us about damage and deaths caused by MSM lies in regards to George Floyd, Michael Brown, Freddy Grey, Eric Garner, and Trayvon Martin. How much profit did MSM make with each these? Next, tell us about MSM and Russian collusion. Then do MSM and J6. There's no point in trying to have a rational discussion with the multiple posters who are engaged in kayfabe in this thread. Their responses are staged and scripted to maintain the 'reality' they are promoting. There's no point in having a conversation with people who have repeatedly demonstrated they have no clue what the First Amendment does and does not protect, yet here we all are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:13:00 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Initially, then loses his business because some feelings were hurt. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: He was able to make the controversial speech without government intervention. Great job in pointing out that the first amendment is in place and Alex was allowed to say what he wanted. Initially, then loses his business because some feelings were hurt. Everybody laughs at CNN losing tons of money, why don't you advocate for their "first amendment rights". |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:13:38 AM EDT
[#16]
While the award to the plaintiffs is ridiculous, Jones gets zero sympathy from me. The things he said regarding the children who lost their lives at Sandy Hook were not just horrid, they make US look terrible.
We don't want that guy on our side. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:14:29 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's some creative mental maneuvering. That whole post is bullshit... you know it, I know it, and the jury knew that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up. That's some creative mental maneuvering. That whole post is bullshit... you know it, I know it, and the jury knew that. Not sure if you're familiar with talk radio but half of the jig is saying things in an open way so people can interpret it however they like. If some people interpret actor one way and others another, you owe me a billion, makes sense. Juries are supposed to judge the facts of the case, there is no world where it is an absolute fact the parents aren't crisis actors by at least some definition of the words. If the jurors heard 'actor' and were such dumbasses that they immediately assumed it means the parents were liars about everything then that just shows how bigoted and narrowminded the jurors are, not Jones. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:14:32 AM EDT
[#18]
If he is free now welcome redstate judge Axex Jones prosecuting dem politicians everywhere.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:15:45 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He called 9/11 before it happened.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNiIiwwOlsIAs for the rest, pay me. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: How many things AJ has predicted have turned out to be exactly what he was saying all along? He called 9/11 before it happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNiIiwwOlsIAs for the rest, pay me. Wow, he predicted a terrorist who had declared war on us and attacked us multiple times would attack us again. He also said it was going to be a false flag attack that led to martial law. That's the best you got and you want me to pay you?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:16:42 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I dealt with his BS and supporters a lot in 2015. He loved the conspiracy theories that we were invading Texas..MF'er I live here  FAJ... FVP... and FJB The Ukraine flag in your profile explains a lot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:18:02 AM EDT
[#21]
He was right about Dandy Hook.
The fact that they want him broke and gone shows that the Deep State is real. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:21:19 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not sure if you're familiar with talk radio but half of the jig is saying things in an open way so people can interpret it however they like. If some people interpret actor one way and others another, you owe me a billion, makes sense. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up. That's some creative mental maneuvering. That whole post is bullshit... you know it, I know it, and the jury knew that. Not sure if you're familiar with talk radio but half of the jig is saying things in an open way so people can interpret it however they like. If some people interpret actor one way and others another, you owe me a billion, makes sense. That's not what happened. He didn't make the crisis actor statement one time and let listeners interpret for themselves what that meant. I made one search and was able to copy this off the first result. Are these general, open statements? “My gut is, with the timing and everything that happened, this is staged. And you know I’ve been saying the last few months, get ready for big mass shootings, and then magically, it happens.” “Folks, we got to get private investigators up to Sandy Hook right now. Because I’m telling you this — this stinks to highest heaven.” “We’re sorry for everybody’s losses, whatever. We’re investigating this, though.” “It’s as phony as a $3 bill.” “You’ve got parents laughing — ‘hahaha’ — and then they walk over to the camera and go ‘boo hoo hoo,’ and not just one but a bunch of parents doing this and then photos of kids that are still alive they said died? I mean, they think we’re so dumb.” “Why did Hitler blow up the Reichstag — to get control! Why do governments stage these things — to get our guns! Why can’t people get that through their head?” “I watched the footage, and it looks like a drill.” “You know, after you lose your daughter, they put you on some antidepressants or something, but I thought those take a month to kick in. I mean, it’s like a look of absolute satisfaction, like he’s about to accept an Oscar.” |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:21:32 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And is there any reason why? Dude. The guy defamed the parents and profited from it. He deserves punitive punishment. Not to the $$ amount it currently sits at but some punitive punishment. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:21:41 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lol the only 'assault' the parents did was sign on the dotted line after some Esq Asshole fed them a big pile of bullshit. There's a good chance they were bullied into it much the way lottery winners find all sorts of evil and violent people find ways to plunge their winnings into sadness. When there are millions involved lawyers are vicious awful creatures and the parents in this case are just their mark who they will use to draw out their agony, forcing them to testify and relive their worst and most damaging moments. Maybe the parents got more money out of this but they just lose more of their souls the more the lawyers drag them along. If you pay a hitman to kill someone are you not as guilty as the man whom you hired? At the end of they day they agreed, they agreed to sue Remington, they agreed to support all manner of infringements in the 2nd, 4th, 9th, 10th, and now 1st amendment, so fuck them. They want to silence Alex Jones over Muh Sandy Hook? Well I say we silence that lying, freedom subverting, open border pushing, gun grabbering fuck David Pakman over his comments Covenant School The left needs to learn they pull this shit we pull it back twice as hard, fast and costly to them. “Lose their souls”, you serve the devil you get what you deserve and my friend, the devil ALWAYS breaks his tools. It’s like the family who tried to sue the Lucky Gunner for the CO shooting and instead lose their home and still owe 400,000 in restitution to the company because, again, they were actively involved trying to limit the rights of others. You don’t get to go around punching people in the face and cry “I am a victim, why did you attack me!” When someone puts a new hole in you. When you fuck around, you find out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:22:06 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up it just means there are fact patterns which are consistent with the people having performed acts. The amount of mental gymnastics some of you all go through is staggering to witness |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:22:21 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He was right about Dandy Hook. What about Sandy Hook was he right about? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:24:36 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's not what happened. He didn't make the crisis actor statement one time and let listeners interpret for themselves what that meant. I made one search and was able to copy this off the first result. Are these general, open statements? “My gut is, with the timing and everything that happened, this is staged. And you know I’ve been saying the last few months, get ready for big mass shootings, and then magically, it happens.” “Folks, we got to get private investigators up to Sandy Hook right now. Because I’m telling you this — this stinks to highest heaven.” “We’re sorry for everybody’s losses, whatever. We’re investigating this, though.” “It’s as phony as a $3 bill.” “You’ve got parents laughing — ‘hahaha’ — and then they walk over to the camera and go ‘boo hoo hoo,’ and not just one but a bunch of parents doing this and then photos of kids that are still alive they said died? I mean, they think we’re so dumb.” “Why did Hitler blow up the Reichstag — to get control! Why do governments stage these things — to get our guns! Why can’t people get that through their head?” “I watched the footage, and it looks like a drill.” “You know, after you lose your daughter, they put you on some antidepressants or something, but I thought those take a month to kick in. I mean, it’s like a look of absolute satisfaction, like he’s about to accept an Oscar.” @AJE Facts and logic have no place here. These are the same people that claim Trump didn’t say something when it’s exactly what he said. Everything is a conspiracy theory.. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:25:57 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: While the award to the plaintiffs is ridiculous, Jones gets zero sympathy from me. The things he said regarding the children who lost their lives at Sandy Hook were not just horrid, they make US look terrible. We don't want that guy on our side. What Ive seen him say about it was rather benign, and not entirely without merit. Meh, we want people to be able to talk about conspiracy theories, because they arent all false. And thats the true goal of this lawfare. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:27:13 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Everybody laughs at CNN losing tons of money, why don't you advocate for their "first amendment rights". We aren’t talking about CNN. That said, I’m for pretty much unrestricted free speech. When there is a concerted effort to completely shut down speech on any topic it gives me pause. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:28:22 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's not what happened. He didn't make the crisis actor statement one time and let listeners interpret for themselves what that meant. I made one search and was able to copy this off the first result. Are these general, open statements? “My gut is, with the timing and everything that happened, this is staged. And you know I’ve been saying the last few months, get ready for big mass shootings, and then magically, it happens.” “Folks, we got to get private investigators up to Sandy Hook right now. Because I’m telling you this — this stinks to highest heaven.” “We’re sorry for everybody’s losses, whatever. We’re investigating this, though.” “It’s as phony as a $3 bill.” “You’ve got parents laughing — ‘hahaha’ — and then they walk over to the camera and go ‘boo hoo hoo,’ and not just one but a bunch of parents doing this and then photos of kids that are still alive they said died? I mean, they think we’re so dumb.” “Why did Hitler blow up the Reichstag — to get control! Why do governments stage these things — to get our guns! Why can’t people get that through their head?” “I watched the footage, and it looks like a drill.” “You know, after you lose your daughter, they put you on some antidepressants or something, but I thought those take a month to kick in. I mean, it’s like a look of absolute satisfaction, like he’s about to accept an Oscar.” Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. I don't think it's provably false that they're 'crisis actors'. They are acting on a crisis, therefore they are crisis actors. Actors has many meanings, hell the FBI report on the shooting called people in the shooting 'actors' because actors doesn't mean everything they do is made up. That's some creative mental maneuvering. That whole post is bullshit... you know it, I know it, and the jury knew that. Not sure if you're familiar with talk radio but half of the jig is saying things in an open way so people can interpret it however they like. If some people interpret actor one way and others another, you owe me a billion, makes sense. That's not what happened. He didn't make the crisis actor statement one time and let listeners interpret for themselves what that meant. I made one search and was able to copy this off the first result. Are these general, open statements? “My gut is, with the timing and everything that happened, this is staged. And you know I’ve been saying the last few months, get ready for big mass shootings, and then magically, it happens.” “Folks, we got to get private investigators up to Sandy Hook right now. Because I’m telling you this — this stinks to highest heaven.” “We’re sorry for everybody’s losses, whatever. We’re investigating this, though.” “It’s as phony as a $3 bill.” “You’ve got parents laughing — ‘hahaha’ — and then they walk over to the camera and go ‘boo hoo hoo,’ and not just one but a bunch of parents doing this and then photos of kids that are still alive they said died? I mean, they think we’re so dumb.” “Why did Hitler blow up the Reichstag — to get control! Why do governments stage these things — to get our guns! Why can’t people get that through their head?” “I watched the footage, and it looks like a drill.” “You know, after you lose your daughter, they put you on some antidepressants or something, but I thought those take a month to kick in. I mean, it’s like a look of absolute satisfaction, like he’s about to accept an Oscar.” Damn is that really the best you got? I see a massive idiot spouting out a bunch of vomit-worthy opinions, what on earth here has damages? I don't even see anything he's said about a living person that is demonstrably false. It's an absolute fact Jones views the parents as people in satisfaction about accepting an oscar, as distasteful as it sounds that's jones opinion to which he is entitled. He does seem to deny the deaths of the children, but again since they're dead they can't be defamed and thus it is constitutional to lie about the children. It would be defamation if say they had actually been alive and he claimed they were dead. You really want to live in a world where freedom of speech means you can't watch footage of people mourning and express you think the deaths are fake without fear of government reprisal? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:29:01 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Dude. The guy defamed the parents and profited from it. He deserves punitive punishment. Not to the $$ amount it currently sits at but some punitive punishment. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: And is there any reason why? Dude. The guy defamed the parents and profited from it. He deserves punitive punishment. Not to the $$ amount it currently sits at but some punitive punishment. But was there any reason why people would think a conspiracy was taking place? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:29:42 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Alex Jones made money by causing pain and suffering to Sandy Hook parents. Why should he be allowed to profit from that without any repercussion? CNN openly lies and defames/slanders against private companies, citizens and openly affects elections and that’s allowed? Alex Jones did not such thing, if idiots want to harass private citizens for what ever reason that is their choice and provided it’s done within the confines of the law no crime was commit. To a shitlib anyone saying other than what the media says has transgressed against one of their many false gods, ie the media, that is what the case is, a show trial against a “heretic” to appease their false gods. Not sure why you are simping for these people, they will come after you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:29:52 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What about Sandy Hook was he right about? Pointing out the Robbie guy was smiling and laughing seconds before going on camera crying for one. I’ve never lost a child, so I cannot relate, but I can imagine laughing would be something I would not be able to do for quite some time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:30:07 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Damn is that really the best you got? I see a massive idiot spouting out a bunch of vomit-worthy opinions, what on earth here has damages? I don't even see anything he's said about a living person that is demonstrably false. It's an absolute fact Jones views the parents as people in satisfaction about accepting an oscar, as distasteful as it sounds that's jones opinion to which he is entitled. He does seem to deny the deaths of the children, but again since they're dead they can't be defamed and thus it is constitutional to lie about the children. It would be defamation if say they had actually been alive and he claimed they were dead.  He defamed the parents and, newsflash, they’re still alive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:31:36 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: But was there any reason why people would think a conspiracy was taking place? That’s irrelevant to the lawsuit. Also, there are people that will make a conspiracy theory out of any particular thing. Just think, some fool looked up at contrails and claimed they were “chem trails”.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:33:28 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s irrelevant to the lawsuit. Also, there are people that will make a conspiracy theory out of any particular thing. Just think, some fool looked up at contrails and claimed they were “chem trails”. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: But was there any reason why people would think a conspiracy was taking place? That’s irrelevant to the lawsuit. Also, there are people that will make a conspiracy theory out of any particular thing. Just think, some fool looked up at contrails and claimed they were “chem trails”. Did some of the parents own actions not fuel it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:34:18 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He defamed the parents and, newsflash, they’re still alive. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Damn is that really the best you got? I see a massive idiot spouting out a bunch of vomit-worthy opinions, what on earth here has damages? I don't even see anything he's said about a living person that is demonstrably false. It's an absolute fact Jones views the parents as people in satisfaction about accepting an oscar, as distasteful as it sounds that's jones opinion to which he is entitled. He does seem to deny the deaths of the children, but again since they're dead they can't be defamed and thus it is constitutional to lie about the children. It would be defamation if say they had actually been alive and he claimed they were dead. He defamed the parents and, newsflash, they’re still alive. He 'defamed' the parents yet no one can offer a single fact Jones was wrong about involving a living person. The whole fucking thing is about Jones defaming dead children. The dead cannot be defamed. His opinion about how the parents look are not provably false, they are clearly Jones expressing his true but deranged feelings about what he viewed. This is holocaust denial v2. You are not defaming the livig survivors for denying the holocaust. You are defaming the dead. Which is why it's not prosecutable, even though it is loathesome and suggests the survivors are 'actors.' |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:34:35 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Some people (cough Fadedsun cough) are more then fine with that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Eliminating the competition before November. We're not even a Banana Republic anymore. We've jumped into straight communism 101. Not a peep from the MSM. Some people (cough Fadedsun cough) are more then fine with that. People who don't think their Leon Trotsky moment will ever come when they support the current regime's use of lawfare to go after political opponents. Leftists/Communists/Democrats never change their playbook. First they go after the people who oppose them. Next they go after the people who merely stood by. Finally, they go after the people who supported them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:35:43 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right? Be careful, if you upset me enough with your speech I might have to sue you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:36:17 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's BS. Go look up Nick Sandmann. Alex Jones could have settled like the defendants in the Nick Sandman controversy did. AJ even admitted he was 100% wrong. The MAGA kid got millions of dollars because the organizations he was suing settled because they knew they were wrong. AJ knew he was wrong, but went to trial anyways because any publicity is good publicity for him. He knew no matter what his smooth brain supporters would see him as the victim. Being wrong and having an opinion that is factually incorrect doesn’t not mean he has to pay a cent or get sued. Again, CNN can be thrown off the earth and into the Sun and they would deserve it, if your trying to appeal to a sense of equality or fairness you will find a better chance of an Argonian being in Red Mountain then me giving anything but total hostility to that den of lying communist bastards. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:38:15 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It's not what I believe it's the truth . Do you guys really not understand how Alex Jones makes his money? He's a shock jock and people tune into his show because he says controversial things that they like to hear. When and where did he harm the parents? Where did he hurt them? Where in the doll to ole AJ hurt them? What did he say? How did he make money off doing it? I want detailed info. Show us a road map. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:39:29 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The verdicts totaled more than gdp of some small countries. If everyone in Grenada volunteered to put every penny they made towards paying off Jones' judgments for a year they couldn't pay it off. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:43:29 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He didnt come up with it. He just talked about it a little bit. And it wasnt without reason people had suspicions. But going along with a greedful and persecutorial agenda to destroy Alex Jones because of it, didnt help their image thats for sure. Plenty of reason to think less of them now. They are agents of evil now. The “grieving father” laughing as he strolled up to the cameras or the helo camera picking up 26 Christmas trees out back of a nearby Fire House, the claim they found the ID of the brother on the shooter, as well as the demo crews being forced to sign NDAs all prove this not normal, add in the Pakistani incident and you have to be a normie not to question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:45:35 AM EDT
[#44]
I've often been exasperated at the absolute cluelessness of conservatives who go around saying that Alex Jones deserves a $2 billion judgment against him for being a loudmouthed idiot or that Trump should be in prison for accounting irregularities and that we need to respect the results of these judicial processes. It's incredible to me that these people can't see that America is becoming a banana republic. Or rather is a banana republic where political opponents of the regime are persecuted and jailed while its clients are not even charged for the same or worse offenses.
Then I realized that these conservatives really don't want to see what is happening because if you admit that these things happen in America, it means we have to do something about it. And these are people who lack the courage to boycott a beer or turn off a TV for the sake of their "values." They swallow the official story so they can continue to pretend that everything is OK and not have the change anything about how they live. It's an indication of cowardice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:46:37 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: When and where did he harm the parents? Where did he hurt them? Where in the doll to ole AJ hurt them? What did he say? How did he make money off doing it? I want detailed info. Show us a road map. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It's not what I believe it's the truth . Do you guys really not understand how Alex Jones makes his money? He's a shock jock and people tune into his show because he says controversial things that they like to hear. When and where did he harm the parents? Where did he hurt them? Where in the doll to ole AJ hurt them? What did he say? How did he make money off doing it? I want detailed info. Show us a road map. If you want detailed info, why don't you read the court case? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:48:28 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. Because some people (even here) would rather feel good about others being silenced then understand freedom of speech protects unpopular opinions, speech, and ideas. The answer to speech you don’t agree with is always more speech. Between the lie of “Civility” and the truth of freedom of Speech we chose Freedom of speech, those who don’t like it can fuck of to Mexico. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:50:28 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That whole lawsuit was bullshit This. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:50:42 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Did you watch the trial? It wasn’t just a talking point. They had the internal communications and financial records (direct time stamped click through conversion rates) that showed they profited off it and discussed pushing the story more because of the revenue it brought in. People trying to strip all facts out of the situation to push an emotional narrative “it’s heading us to socialism!!!!!” are why we are losing the culture war. LOL. How is that different than all media during COVID? Can we sue them over it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:50:48 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy. It could've happened to NY Times or the Washington Post, they literally responsible for millions of American's dying. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2024 8:51:32 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. Sorry, those people got tricked or willingly turned their kid's death into a political weapon. I have no sympathy for them at all. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
