User Panel
|
I hope she doesn't expect any help from MPD on a call anytime soon.
|
|
Another area that could/should be explored is the talk about "Load and Go" situations. Essentially they are for critical patients who need rapid transport; only essential interventions like CPR, bleeding control, and quick assessment are done on scene. Everything is during the transport period.
I only watch the video once, but appears the Medics but if I recall correctly the Medics put him on the stretcher, loaded it up and dipped out. They only time that would be appropriate is an unsafe scene; otherwise had GF been pulseless and not breathing they should have started CPR within a few moments of arrival |
|
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted: Well, most (All) of my cases are made on duty while wearing a uniform. So I show up in court wearing the exact same uniform. If I was involved in an off duty situation and it ended up in a courtroom I would probably wear a suit and tie. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Interesting. She wasn't on duty(as far as I know) to testify. I would think that most cops are on duty when they testify. Well, most (All) of my cases are made on duty while wearing a uniform. So I show up in court wearing the exact same uniform. If I was involved in an off duty situation and it ended up in a courtroom I would probably wear a suit and tie. I agree with you. I think that she is probably misinterpreting the Uniform Policy. |
|
attorneys chime in
don't criminal attorneys have warm and fuzzy dreams about witnesses like Princess Pissy? |
|
Cant stand watching on HLN anymore...their 'experts' can't fathom why he's not convicted already. Any recommendations for watching live coverage?
|
|
|
Quoted: I agree with you. I think that she is probably misinterpreting the Uniform Policy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Interesting. She wasn't on duty(as far as I know) to testify. I would think that most cops are on duty when they testify. Well, most (All) of my cases are made on duty while wearing a uniform. So I show up in court wearing the exact same uniform. If I was involved in an off duty situation and it ended up in a courtroom I would probably wear a suit and tie. I agree with you. I think that she is probably misinterpreting the Uniform Policy. I don't understand the dispute over the presence of a uniform. Every public agency with people in uniform will have some sort of a policy on this. If I was going to court for any issue rising from official action while on shift, or while driving marked transportation (even if attending court as overtime), I was required to be in uniform according to policy. She's on duty, she is issued and authorized to wear that uniform, and her subpoena rises from an interaction she had in official capacity. |
|
I'm betting she is a supervisor's nightmare. Always talking back, edgy comments, and always gets the last word with that sass.
The exchange with the judge was horrific. If you get an ass-chewing that requires the jury be removed, stfu. She showed her overall lack of professional development in life and that her culture/attitude is tolerated in her workplace by wearing the uniform. |
|
Quoted: I don't understand the dispute over the presence of a uniform. Every public agency with people in uniform will have some sort of a policy on this. If I was going to court for any issue rising from official action while on shift, or while driving marked transportation (even if attending court as overtime), I was required to be in uniform according to policy. She's on duty, she is issued and authorized to wear that uniform, and her subpoena rises from an interaction she had in official capacity. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Interesting. She wasn't on duty(as far as I know) to testify. I would think that most cops are on duty when they testify. Well, most (All) of my cases are made on duty while wearing a uniform. So I show up in court wearing the exact same uniform. If I was involved in an off duty situation and it ended up in a courtroom I would probably wear a suit and tie. I agree with you. I think that she is probably misinterpreting the Uniform Policy. I don't understand the dispute over the presence of a uniform. Every public agency with people in uniform will have some sort of a policy on this. If I was going to court for any issue rising from official action while on shift, or while driving marked transportation (even if attending court as overtime), I was required to be in uniform according to policy. She's on duty, she is issued and authorized to wear that uniform, and her subpoena rises from an interaction she had in official capacity. where did you get this? she's testifying as a bystadner who happend to be walking down that street at teh time during her time off. |
|
I wonder if the state's strategy of using a different attorney to question each witness was a good or a bad idea.
Good would be fresh eyes, and more of them. Bad would be a perceived loss of continuity. |
|
Quoted: Cant stand watching on HLN anymore...their 'experts' can't fathom why he's not convicted already. Any recommendations for watching live coverage? View Quote I stopped watching it on HLN. 1. its delayed and 2. their panel is so left sided its a joke I'm watching on the YT links above |
|
|
Quoted: I'm betting she is a supervisor's nightmare. Always talking back, edgy comments, and always gets the last word with that sass. The exchange with the judge was horrific. If you get an ass-chewing that requires the jury be removed, stfu. She showed her overall lack of professional development in life and that her culture/attitude is tolerated in her workplace by wearing the uniform. View Quote yep and 2 years experience, which means 1 year at the time of the event last year, but she still finds it okay to get into a yelling match with he cops and lecture them from the sidewalk since she knows so much more than they do what are the odds she got the job on merit and not based on affirmative action points? |
|
Quoted: Maybe that's why I'm confused. I can't imagine her fitting into that neighborhood in any other way than as a responder or a victim. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: where did you get this? she's testifying as a bystadner who happend to be walking down that street at teh time during her time off. Maybe that's why I'm confused. I can't imagine her fitting into that neighborhood in any other way than as a responder or a victim. no problem, i thought maybe i missed something |
|
|
Quoted: I don't understand the dispute over the presence of a uniform. Every public agency with people in uniform will have some sort of a policy on this. If I was going to court for any issue rising from official action while on shift, or while driving marked transportation (even if attending court as overtime), I was required to be in uniform according to policy. She's on duty, she is issued and authorized to wear that uniform, and her subpoena rises from an interaction she had in official capacity. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Interesting. She wasn't on duty(as far as I know) to testify. I would think that most cops are on duty when they testify. Well, most (All) of my cases are made on duty while wearing a uniform. So I show up in court wearing the exact same uniform. If I was involved in an off duty situation and it ended up in a courtroom I would probably wear a suit and tie. I agree with you. I think that she is probably misinterpreting the Uniform Policy. I don't understand the dispute over the presence of a uniform. Every public agency with people in uniform will have some sort of a policy on this. If I was going to court for any issue rising from official action while on shift, or while driving marked transportation (even if attending court as overtime), I was required to be in uniform according to policy. She's on duty, she is issued and authorized to wear that uniform, and her subpoena rises from an interaction she had in official capacity. But she was off duty and out of uniform… |
|
|
Quoted: I wonder if the state's strategy of using a different attorney to question each witness was a good or a bad idea. Good would be fresh eyes, and more of them. Bad would be a perceived loss of continuity. View Quote Have we seen them all yet, I thought there’d be a rainbow coalition of them... and at least one in a wheelchair |
|
Quoted: Cant stand watching on HLN anymore...their 'experts' can't fathom why he's not convicted already. Any recommendations for watching live coverage? View Quote |
|
my guess is the defense team woke up this morning with a little bounce in their step knowing they get another go at her
even if she was thoroughly coached last night, she's still one eye roll away from flipping |
|
|
|
Quoted: Chauvin got separated. It was the right call. The other 3 are together unless that changes. View Quote If Chauvin walks, charges will be dropped on the other 3. If Chauvin's actions are ruled to have been lawful, then how could they try the other 3 for failure to stop a lawful act? |
|
Knee on neck restraint demonstration |
|
A few questions by the defense and prosecution and she's already done with her testimony. Next is up.
|
|
Remember when we rehearsed this and I told you to correct your 'uhuh's" to "yes".
|
|
|
Quoted: This kid looks like Michael from "Good Times." https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uWgl_6aKFnE/Wws2xrqTa-I/AAAAAAAAEIc/lclM_MduncA776aO3TxQJiVn6qzecWoBgCLcBGAs/s1600/PDVD_285.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted: This kid looks like Michael from "Good Times." https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uWgl_6aKFnE/Wws2xrqTa-I/AAAAAAAAEIc/lclM_MduncA776aO3TxQJiVn6qzecWoBgCLcBGAs/s1600/PDVD_285.JPG View Quote Worked at Cup foods, Lived above CUP foods. They sell Burner phones, wings and cigs. |
|
|
Quoted: Another area that could/should be explored is the talk about "Load and Go" situations. Essentially they are for critical patients who need rapid transport; only essential interventions like CPR, bleeding control, and quick assessment are done on scene. Everything is during the transport period. I only watch the video once, but appears the Medics but if I recall correctly the Medics put him on the stretcher, loaded it up and dipped out. They only time that would be appropriate is an unsafe scene; otherwise had GF been pulseless and not breathing they should have started CPR within a few moments of arrival View Quote An angry crowd doesnt help. |
|
They are showing video of GF in Cup Foods. Clearly can't walk straight.
|
|
Quoted: Remember during jury selection when the settlement was released and the State said that they could control the witnesses they brought forth, not what the city was doing? https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.movietrailerreviews.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F11%2Fmaury-lie-detector.jpg&f=1&nofb=1 View Quote |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.