![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
I haven’t followed the thread, but I think it’s a big deal.
Not because climate change, or anything like that. But simply because the SW is in a bad position with water, that I hate to see it in. It is in many ways the best part of the country. |
|
Quoted: The tip of the tail is about 75 feet from the surface, from the latest report about two weeks ago. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How deep is that B-29 now? The tip of the tail is about 75 feet from the surface, from the latest report about two weeks ago. Won’t be long… |
|
Oh noes salt brine.
Pump it into some corner of the vast wastland desert. Hell, it used to be salt water ocean at some point in history. Theres plenty of space to shuffle off the undesirable salt waste where absolutely nobody is going to live. Ever drive phoenix to california? Throw a dart somewhere. |
|
Hey let’s move 80 million people into a desert and wonder why they’re running out of water
|
|
Nuclear power and desalination plants make too much sense, so we don't do that. That's bad stuff.
|
|
|
Quoted: If thats what it takes to live in a desert sustainably then thats what it takes. View Quote It's not. When I worked in real estate in Los Angeles I would go into apartments that had things like broken faucets that ran tub fillers at full volume 24/7/365 for the last ten years. The proper order is conservation, efficiency, recycling... and only then desalination. ETA: And the guy above me is right, most of the water goes to farmers to grow alfalfa and almonds in the desert. |
|
Quoted: Why don’t you read the thread dope, then maybe you’d understand where the water is actually going. Hint, it isn’t peoples’ faucets and toilets. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hey let’s move 80 million people into a desert and wonder why they’re running out of water Why don’t you read the thread dope, then maybe you’d understand where the water is actually going. Hint, it isn’t peoples’ faucets and toilets. No, it's the food being grown, to feed the large increase in number of people. Speaking of which, all conservation measurements seem to always start focusing on the faucets and toilets, btw. |
|
Quoted: No, it's the food being grown, to feed the large increase in number of people. Speaking of which, all conservation measurements seem to always start focusing on the faucets and toilets, btw. View Quote Farmers are converting to more efficient systems as well but you just don't hear much about it. |
|
4 years ago I visited the Hoover Damn and this is a shame. Do we tear down the damn when it does go dry. I mean its like its not needed anymore when the water is gone. Hopefully they recover some bones proving the place was wet once before.
|
|
Quoted: Desal plants are only "relatively cheap to run" when contrasting costs to bringing in water by tanker or by aircraft, otherwise it doesn't get more expensive than desal. Lake Mead water is treated and delivered for $1.40 per 1000 gallons in Las Vegas Desal based on local energy costs $3 to $4 per 1,000 gallons was cited for Texas. The Huntington Beach plant that was proposed was going to cost $9 to $10 per 1000 gallons. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Aruba is a desert island with literally no fresh water. The entire island runs off one of the largest and best desalination plants. I can't believe that there aren't more desalination plants. They are relatively cheap to run, don't harm the environment and make some if the tastiest drinking water I have had. Heck my brother's sailboat mainly runs off solar, batteries and has a water maker.... ![]() Desal plants are only "relatively cheap to run" when contrasting costs to bringing in water by tanker or by aircraft, otherwise it doesn't get more expensive than desal. Lake Mead water is treated and delivered for $1.40 per 1000 gallons in Las Vegas California urban ratepayers rarely pay more than $1 to $3 per thousand gallons for their water. Desal based on local energy costs $3 to $4 per 1,000 gallons was cited for Texas. The Huntington Beach plant that was proposed was going to cost $9 to $10 per 1000 gallons. Still better than no water, though. |
|
|
Quoted: This +1000. Stop supplying water to california so that it will be forced to build desalinization plants. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Stop building giant cities, suburbs, and golf courses in the desert? Stop supplying water to california so that it will be forced to build desalinization plants. Yep, then the byproduct can kill off all the coastal marine life. TANSTAAFL. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Aruba is a desert island with literally no fresh water. The entire island runs off one of the largest and best desalination plants. I can't believe that there aren't more desalination plants. They are relatively cheap to run, don't harm the environment and make some if the tastiest drinking water I have had. Heck my brother's sailboat mainly runs off solar, batteries and has a water maker.... ![]() Desal plants are only "relatively cheap to run" when contrasting costs to bringing in water by tanker or by aircraft, otherwise it doesn't get more expensive than desal. Lake Mead water is treated and delivered for $1.40 per 1000 gallons in Las Vegas California urban ratepayers rarely pay more than $1 to $3 per thousand gallons for their water. Desal based on local energy costs $3 to $4 per 1,000 gallons was cited for Texas. The Huntington Beach plant that was proposed was going to cost $9 to $10 per 1000 gallons. Still better than no water, though. Most water billing is based on the cost of treating and transmitting the "free" water, that is just there. What happens is The Tragedy Of The Commons', where the item value itself (water in this case) is not taken into account until it's gone. As to desal plants, the water commeth from the sea, the water returnith to the sea. And the water that was drawn, eventually returns to the sea via sewer or rainfall in the end anyway. Overfixation on localized salinity increases can be easily managed by extending the reject (concentrate) return lines back to sea further out. |
|
|
Quoted: As to desal plants, the water commeth from the sea, the water returnith to the sea. And the water that was drawn, eventually returns to the sea via sewer or rainfall in the end anyway. Overfixation on localized salinity increases can be easily managed by extending the reject (concentrate) return lines back to sea further out. View Quote You do know that sewerage isn't pumped into the ocean, right? They clean the water and then pump it into aquifers where they can withdraw it again. I'm not sure where evaporation ends up. |
|
Quoted: No, it's the food being grown, to feed the large increase in number of people. Speaking of which, all conservation measurements seem to always start focusing on the faucets and toilets, btw. View Quote Probably because folks don't riot over toilets nearly as much as they do about food shortages. |
|
Quoted: You do know that sewerage isn't pumped into the ocean, right? They clean the water and then pump it into aquifers where they can withdraw it again. I'm not sure where evaporation ends up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As to desal plants, the water commeth from the sea, the water returnith to the sea. And the water that was drawn, eventually returns to the sea via sewer or rainfall in the end anyway. Overfixation on localized salinity increases can be easily managed by extending the reject (concentrate) return lines back to sea further out. You do know that sewerage isn't pumped into the ocean, right? They clean the water and then pump it into aquifers where they can withdraw it again. I'm not sure where evaporation ends up. Not everywhere. Most wwtp effluent goes into a creek or river and ends up in the ocean. |
|
Quoted: It's not. When I worked in real estate in Los Angeles I would go into apartments that had things like broken faucets that ran tub fillers at full volume 24/7/365 for the last ten years. The proper order is conservation, efficiency, recycling... and only then desalination. ETA: And the guy above me is right, most of the water goes to farmers to grow alfalfa and almonds in the desert. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If thats what it takes to live in a desert sustainably then thats what it takes. It's not. When I worked in real estate in Los Angeles I would go into apartments that had things like broken faucets that ran tub fillers at full volume 24/7/365 for the last ten years. The proper order is conservation, efficiency, recycling... and only then desalination. ETA: And the guy above me is right, most of the water goes to farmers to grow alfalfa and almonds in the desert. I agree with you on all of that. I'm just saying if we've reached the end of that line, which I know we have not. |
|
Quoted: Except that isn't what it takes. That's what people that don't live in California think California should do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If thats what it takes to live in a desert sustainably then thats what it takes. Except that isn't what it takes. That's what people that don't live in California think California should do. Why did you respond to my post twice? ![]() But if you read my other posts in this thread, you'll know that I don't think it's the next step. |
|
Quoted: Hmm... why could that be.... https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2022/03/Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE.png Got to love leftists. Worry about the environment in one hand. Slam as many humans as possible into the USA from lower impact 3rd world venues. Want to solve environmental and resource issues - it's all about population size. Windfarms and electric cars doesn't mean jack shit. View Quote i am not sure why we are looking at a world population graph going back 12k years when we are discussing a regional drought over a couple of decades? lake mead was essentially full in 2000. the population of the us has increased by 47 million in that time. It doesn't really compare to the scale of world population growth. CA is responsible for 6m az 2m nv 1m ut 1m co 2m wyo 100k nm 300k |
|
Quoted: But golf courses, and lawn are green, fuck growing food though. View Quote Respectfully, they already do what you suggested, and it's part of the problem. Roughly 80% of the water used by businesses and households in CA is used for agriculture. Or looked at differently (in terms of where all the water goes), 40% of all water in California ends up being used for agriculture. In CA, water is heavily subsidized for farmers, which empowers them to grow produce that otherwise wouldn't grow in California's climate. So while it may be the case that golf courses are wasteful, the agriculture you're wishing they'd use the water for actually IS where a large portion of the water already goes. As you can imagine, that might make a dent in reservoirs. |
|
|
|
Quoted: i am not sure why we are looking at a world population graph going back 12k years when we are discussing a regional drought over a couple of decades? lake mead was essentially full in 2000. the population of the us has increased by 47 million in that time. It doesn't really compare to the scale of world population growth. CA is responsible for 6m az 2m nv 1m ut 1m co 2m wyo 100k nm 300k View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hmm... why could that be.... https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2022/03/Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE.png Got to love leftists. Worry about the environment in one hand. Slam as many humans as possible into the USA from lower impact 3rd world venues. Want to solve environmental and resource issues - it's all about population size. Windfarms and electric cars doesn't mean jack shit. i am not sure why we are looking at a world population graph going back 12k years when we are discussing a regional drought over a couple of decades? lake mead was essentially full in 2000. the population of the us has increased by 47 million in that time. It doesn't really compare to the scale of world population growth. CA is responsible for 6m az 2m nv 1m ut 1m co 2m wyo 100k nm 300k Humans and food product is more fungible than one might think. It's an indicator of the rapid rate of demand growth, and while obviously an exagreation on the time scale, the reality is the population of the planet has doubled in my lifetime. And in the USA, close to that. That's a huge uptick in food supply demand as well. All of which adds up to drain water resources from areas that have limited water resources. Humans = food consumption = water consumption. And CA grown food travels far and wide. |
|
Maybe the will be able to recover that B-29 that sank in the lake...
|
|
|
Quoted: We are talking about CA, AZ and NV here, I don't really care about PA. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not everywhere. Most wwtp effluent goes into a creek or river and ends up in the ocean. We are talking about CA, AZ and NV here, I don't really care about PA. It isn’t everywhere in those places either. ETA. 15 years in the industry. What’s your background? |
|
|
![]() #632 The Emerging Secrets of Lake Mead: Is It Really As Bad As They Say? |
|
Quoted: Yep, then the byproduct can kill off all the coastal marine life. TANSTAAFL. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Stop building giant cities, suburbs, and golf courses in the desert? Stop supplying water to california so that it will be forced to build desalinization plants. Yep, then the byproduct can kill off all the coastal marine life. TANSTAAFL. I'm not sure why you think this is a problem that can't be overcome. You don't have to just have one giant pipe/outlet dumping briney water directly into the ocean directly on the coastline. |
|
Just make a big circular train track and dump the salt in the deserts of NV. I just read a story that our landfill has enough capacity to run until 2175. I'm sure we can find another to hold salt.
|
|
Quoted: I'm not sure why you think this is a problem that can't be overcome. You don't have to just have one giant pipe/outlet dumping briney water directly into the ocean directly on the coastline. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Stop building giant cities, suburbs, and golf courses in the desert? Stop supplying water to california so that it will be forced to build desalinization plants. Yep, then the byproduct can kill off all the coastal marine life. TANSTAAFL. I'm not sure why you think this is a problem that can't be overcome. You don't have to just have one giant pipe/outlet dumping briney water directly into the ocean directly on the coastline. Exactly. The salinity issue is a canard. |
|
|
Waste water is either (after treatment) used to service golf courses and such or dumped back into Mead via the Las Vegas wash.
|
|
Wonder if any of this massive rain and flooding in MT will make it down there? Looks like no...it ends up in the MS river.
|
|
Well, I guess they just SOL. And the rest of us are just gonna have to accept the fact that we're not gonna be able to eat stuff that's outta season.
|
|
![]() Is Lake Mead Still Drying Up? Weeds Growing - 30 Day Update |
|
View Quote I am surprised she did a video without taking off her clothes. She really pushes her modeling and nudity adventures. |
|
Quoted: Hmm... why could that be.... https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2022/03/Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE.png Got to love leftists. Worry about the environment in one hand. Slam as many humans as possible into the USA from lower impact 3rd world venues. Want to solve environmental and resource issues - it's all about population size. Windfarms and electric cars doesn't mean jack shit. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Not water. But I have lived in places where water is used to charge aquifers, run thermal plants and for potable reuse for most of my life. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It isn’t everywhere in those places either. ETA. 15 years in the industry. What’s your background? Not water. But I have lived in places where water is used to charge aquifers, run thermal plants and for potable reuse for most of my life. It is very controversial and isn’t nearly universally accepted. It is often a technique of last resort. |
|
Eh. SW is a desert. It was abnormally wet for most of the 20th century. They'll cut a big chunk of the farmers' and ranchers' water off, kill off all the lawns in the SW, and ban pools. Shower heads will approximate a stream of piss, a toilet flush will throw a quart of water in the bowl.
By then, everyone reading this will be dead and it won't be a problem for us anymore. Ag land out there is in for price correction if you don't water. Oh, all our grocery bills are going up even more. |
|
Quoted: Who's going to be the first to float a conspiracy: "The government is CAUSING Lake Mead to dry up! This is the only way they can recover the top-secret reconnaissance equipment they installed on it!" View Quote Well, the water level of every man-made lake on the Colorado is, MAN MADE! It's as if we control the dams and release rates somehow. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.