User Panel
Quoted: Sounds like Fuddlore to me, my S&W 637 PC Airweight clearly states +P. So idk what hes talking about. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I have never read that. Got a source? Sounds like Fuddlore to me, my S&W 637 PC Airweight clearly states +P. So idk what hes talking about. My 642 Airweight states +P on the barrel, it's about 6 years old. The older vintage Airweights were not rated for +P |
|
Quoted: Gold dot for short barrel 135gr. I don’t know if it’s outdated, but it was tops when it came out View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Gold dot for short barrel 135gr. I don’t know if it’s outdated, but it was tops when it came out Same, My 442 gets this I have a ton of it. I don't shoot the thing much though. I'm sure I'll have enough of this ammo for 10+ years. If it’s an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. Yeah that is just nonsense.... |
|
Quoted: No longer made because it offered terrible performance through barriers. Not worth the HST name View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Federal HST https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/tested-federal-hst-38-special-p/ https://loungecdn.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/HST-pulled-bullet.jpg No longer made because it offered terrible performance through barriers. Not worth the HST name Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: If it's an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. I run standard loads in mine. If Remington brings back the Critical Defense loads for short barrels, I may grab those. I run them in my Shield, and they are low flash, more than accurate. I have never read that. Got a source? Didn't S&W put the flame shields on some revolvers just above the barrel for this reason? I know both of mine say +p on the barrel so it isn't really an issue |
|
|
Quoted: Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Federal HST https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/tested-federal-hst-38-special-p/ https://loungecdn.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/HST-pulled-bullet.jpg No longer made because it offered terrible performance through barriers. Not worth the HST name Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. Car backings are a perfect example of needing barrier performance at close range. Same with any mugging in or around vehicles. Plus auto glass is a good stand in for bone and the .38 hst sucked |
|
|
Quoted: If it’s an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. I run standard loads in mine. If Remington brings back the Critical Defense loads for short barrels, I may grab those. I run them in my Shield, and they are low flash, more than accurate. View Quote My new production S&W 442 J Frame airweight says on the barrel “.38 spl +p” Also OP I use Federal Punch in my J frame |
|
Quoted: Car backings are a perfect example of needing barrier performance at close range. Same with any mugging in or around vehicles. Plus auto glass is a good stand in for bone and the .38 hst sucked View Quote Check out LuckyGunner, they did a study on them and found really poor performance. Took them out of my J frames that day. |
|
I have ten 125 grain Smith and Wesson Nyclads left over from the mid-eighties. Too bad they, and Federal, long since discontinued them. I carry them in my 442.
|
|
Quoted: Didn't S&W put the flame shields on some revolvers just above the barrel for this reason? I know both of mine say +p on the barrel so it isn't really an issue View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: If it's an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. I run standard loads in mine. If Remington brings back the Critical Defense loads for short barrels, I may grab those. I run them in my Shield, and they are low flash, more than accurate. I have never read that. Got a source? Didn't S&W put the flame shields on some revolvers just above the barrel for this reason? I know both of mine say +p on the barrel so it isn't really an issue The Scandium framed guns have them, I can't recall seeing them on the regular Airweights and glancing at S&W's website it doesn't look like they have them. S&W has done so many different things over the years that it's entirely possible some had them. The early, light weight aluminum framed Air Force guns had special light loads made for them, but as far as I know all of the "Lightweight" series were +P rated. My 642 is an early production but I have no idea where the box and manual for it are at the moment or I'd see what it says. I seem to recall them originally saying not to feed it a steady diet of +P but it was fine for normal carry usage. Most companies rounds are on the anemic side compared to original loading data anyways, that HST round being a good example. I realize that the ratings are based on pressure, not velocity, but just over 800fps is in the standard .38 range as opposed to the more boutique stuff like Buffalo Bore, Double Tap, etc. Some of the earlier loading were unofficially listed as +P+ and clocking over 1500fps, definitely above spec (Norma 110gr)*. *https://revolverguy.com/all-about-the-38-special-p-and-38-special-p/ |
|
The warning to not use +p in Airweights depends on what time the Airweight was produced. The early ones aren't as durable as the newer ones. Best not to use +p in those guns. Obviously, if it is marked +p, then it is fine to shoot +ps. Lots of the old guns still out there.
For them, I recommend wad-cutters. Wad-cutters aren't a bad choice in any .38. |
|
Federal Hydra-Shok Deep seems to do well in gel tests, expanding OK and penetrating sufficiently, and it shoots well out of my 37-2, so that's what I carry. And even if expansion fails, the front of hollow point is pretty sharp.
|
|
|
When I shoot a hot 38 special round in a small frame, it can sting a little, so I usually Just hold on loosely, but don't let go
If you cling too tightly. You're gonna lose control. |
|
|
|
My choices would be:
Wadcutters or SWC if you need reloads any will work SWCHP- Either Buffalo Bore or RimRock bullets and roll your own. The newer production big box varieties have a harder alloy and don’t expand well. Gold Dots |
|
I keep the federal micro hst in my cylinder for edc. Backup rounds are golden Sabre to be able to reload faster than hst. I have shot these rounds to get my point of aim established a few times. Now I just practice with reloads and some factory fmj at the range. I don’t have a lot of the carry ammo left in my supply but I may order some more golden sabres soon to have for the range. I don’t usually burn through much carry ammo at the range, just stick to fmj. I based my ammo off of the lucky gunner charts and then tested them through my own 642 for poi
|
|
Quoted: Car backings are a perfect example of needing barrier performance at close range. Same with any mugging in or around vehicles. Plus auto glass is a good stand in for bone and the .38 hst sucked View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Federal HST https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/tested-federal-hst-38-special-p/ https://loungecdn.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/HST-pulled-bullet.jpg No longer made because it offered terrible performance through barriers. Not worth the HST name Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. Car backings are a perfect example of needing barrier performance at close range. Same with any mugging in or around vehicles. Plus auto glass is a good stand in for bone and the .38 hst sucked Auto glass also disrupts wadcutters pretty well. I've posted about it before, but it was pretty demoralizing having three of us fire .38 wadcutters (issued ammo reloaded at the range, not idea the velocity,) at the front window of a Popeye's and having the window defeat the rounds---espcially when the 9mm return fire came right through the window with ease. |
|
|
|
|
In summer time Hydra Shok Low Recoil 110 Grain. In winter something a little stouter.
|
|
This thread is relevant to my interests.
I'm new to J Frames. In January I bought a 640. 35 rounds in and the ratchet/star was coming apart. Off to S&W it went for repair. 2 week turn around and I got it back. 75 rounds of WWB 158gr FMJ later and it seems OK so far. Shoots to point of aim at 15 yards. I was able to put 3/5 or 4/5 on a torso at 40 yards several times. The small size and DAO trigger have been a challenge, but I like it and want to get better. Practice. I recently picked up some Hornady Critical Defense 110gr .38 +P for carry. Should I be looking at something else? |
|
View Quote Can you tell us a little more about those? |
|
Quoted: Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Federal HST https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/tested-federal-hst-38-special-p/ https://loungecdn.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/HST-pulled-bullet.jpg No longer made because it offered terrible performance through barriers. Not worth the HST name Right. But, snub nose for me is really close engagement. Not shooting through walls. Windshields were the main problem iirc |
|
|
Anything that goes bang.
Delivered to the THORACIC CAVITY. Or as old-timers would say, “BETWEEN THE SHIRT POCKETS.” |
|
Quoted: Can you tell us a little more about those? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Can you tell us a little more about those? They were generously gifted to my son. A 3" m13, a 649, and a detective special. All feel like the real guns and fit the right holsters. I might end up using the m13 for back yard training. |
|
What's the advantage of wadcutters versus a standard hollow point? Less recoil?
|
|
|
Quoted: What's the advantage of wadcutters versus a standard hollow point? Less recoil? View Quote A lot of the serious revolver guys gave said that in non +P loads, where expansion is iffy, a waddcutter maximizes giving you the biggest diameter wound channel from non expanding bullets, when compared to FMJ, round nose or JHPs that wont expand. So the wadcutter is making the list for a lot of snubbies for controlability. The thing I have heard is if you go with wadcutters pay attention to the manufacturer as some are loaded very light and can have poor penetration. Also the factory wadcutters can be hard to get and come and go. |
|
Quoted: I scored some golden sabers 125gr +p off budsgunshop for $24/20. it was 1 of 2 rounds that passed luckygunner's "testing" Eta: Nvm. Here they are best deal I could find https://www.budsgunshop.com/product_info.php/products_id/143919/remington+ammunition+27617+golden+saber+defense+.38+spc+p+125+gr+brass+jacket+hollow+point+bjhp+20+bx+25+cs+for+compact+h ".38 Special is often considered a bit underpowered, so it's no surprise that most of the loads that we tested were unable to meet those guidelines for penetration and expansion. We fired five rounds of every load through each of the two test guns. If you throw out all the loads that had any failures to sufficiently expand or penetrate, you're left with just two .38 Special loads that met the standards with both of the test guns: the Winchester 130 gr +P Ranger Bonded and the Remington 125 gr +P Golden Saber." https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/377948/AFD6093C-5E18-4F57-9ABA-29F7FF2C6CAD_jpe-3161152.JPG https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/revolver-ammo-commentary/amp/ View Quote Yep, and even better in .357 Mag, yet mild enough to be usable. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: A lot of the serious revolver guys gave said that in non +P loads, where expansion is iffy, a waddcutter maximizes giving you the biggest diameter wound channel from non expanding bullets, when compared to FMJ, round nose or JHPs that wont expand. So the wadcutter is making the list for a lot of snubbies for controlability. The thing I have heard is if you go with wadcutters pay attention to the manufacturer as some are loaded very light and can have poor penetration. Also the factory wadcutters can be hard to get and come and go. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What's the advantage of wadcutters versus a standard hollow point? Less recoil? A lot of the serious revolver guys gave said that in non +P loads, where expansion is iffy, a waddcutter maximizes giving you the biggest diameter wound channel from non expanding bullets, when compared to FMJ, round nose or JHPs that wont expand. So the wadcutter is making the list for a lot of snubbies for controlability. The thing I have heard is if you go with wadcutters pay attention to the manufacturer as some are loaded very light and can have poor penetration. Also the factory wadcutters can be hard to get and come and go. This. Low Recoil, better wound characteristics then FMJ while penetrating deeper then most HPs that expand at those velocities. |
|
Berrys 125 plated HP with 6.4 grains of Power Pistol(+p) works well in my 642. Attached File
|
|
Quoted: If it's an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. I run standard loads in mine. If Remington brings back the Critical Defense loads for short barrels, I may grab those. I run them in my Shield, and they are low flash, more than accurate. View Quote That's an impressive amount of derp to shoe horn into one post. |
|
Weren't there one or two loads that met the FBI criteria, 12 inches penetration and expansion in balistic gel, bare, denim, etc?
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If it’s an Airweight, DO NOT shoot +P loads in it. They will flame cut the aluminum frame. S&W specifically says no +P in them. I run standard loads in mine. If Remington brings back the Critical Defense loads for short barrels, I may grab those. I run them in my Shield, and they are low flash, more than accurate. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/542867/IMG_6308_jpeg-3161203.JPG My Airlight Titanium does say to use jacketed bullets only. I guess lead projectiles can elongate/jump out of the case due to the recoil. |
|
Quoted: They were generously gifted to my son. A 3" m13, a 649, and a detective special. All feel like the real guns and fit the right holsters. I might end up using the m13 for back yard training. View Quote Co2 powered? I currently carry my j frame with Buffalo Bore either the hard wadcutter or the soft semiwadcutters. |
|
Quoted: Federal HST https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/tested-federal-hst-38-special-p/ https://loungecdn.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/HST-pulled-bullet.jpg View Quote That looks like it wants to scoop a piece of attacker out on the way through |
|
I was using critical defense and bought projectiles to load my own, now I feel I need to research more.
|
|
|
Quoted: Berrys 125 plated HP with 6.4 grains of Power Pistol(+p) works well in my 642.https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/472049/20200829_215851_jpg-3161770.JPG View Quote Does it? What do you base that on? |
|
Quoted: Speer Gold Dot 135g +P is my go to. Designed for snubbies with plenty of penetration and expansion. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/593326/SnubbieAmmo2_jpg-3161201.JPG View Quote I shot an attacking black bear with one back in 2018. 642. The bear turned 180 and ran the other way. Technically, a stop. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.