User Panel
He should move to a free country, like El Salvador, and broadcast from there.
|
|
Quoted: The verdicts totaled more than gdp of some small countries. If everyone in Grenada volunteered to put every penny they made towards paying off Jones' judgments for a year they couldn't pay it off. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? View Quote Get the hell outta here with that dadburn lawyer logic. What we gots here a failure to com-you-ni-cate. (Little finger held to mouth) Billions!!!! |
|
|
Quoted: Again, that suit would not go anywhere, because we don’t have power in this system, and that is by design. Hell a leftist murder kids in a school and live stream it and he would be released without bail. He has a right to speak his mind, and when those parents started to use their victimhood to assault the rights of other people, they made themselves legitimate targets of and for criticism View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If your kids were murdered in a school shooting, and some left-wing loudmouth was accusing you of being a crisis actor, would that not bother you? Would you take legal action against them? Not that the final judgment isn't disproportionate, but Alex Jones no doubt made it worse with his actions during the trial. He could have settled and paid way less, but instead he chose to turn it into a circus by acting like a clown. Again, that suit would not go anywhere, because we don’t have power in this system, and that is by design. Hell a leftist murder kids in a school and live stream it and he would be released without bail. He has a right to speak his mind, and when those parents started to use their victimhood to assault the rights of other people, they made themselves legitimate targets of and for criticism Lol the only 'assault' the parents did was sign on the dotted line after some Esq Asshole fed them a big pile of bullshit. There's a good chance they were bullied into it much the way lottery winners find all sorts of evil and violent people find ways to plunge their winnings into sadness. When there are millions involved lawyers are vicious awful creatures and the parents in this case are just their mark who they will use to draw out their agony, forcing them to testify and relive their worst and most damaging moments. Maybe the parents got more money out of this but they just lose more of their souls the more the lawyers drag them along. |
|
Quoted: What monetized damages? The parenst of Sandy Hook did not have their careers or income affected by Alex Jones. The only thing they are doing is defending the honor of their dead children. While I understand and don't blame the parents for what they're doing, the judicial system is not the place to settle opinions on honor, and they are being victimized by parasitic lawyers. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: How many things AJ has predicted have turned out to be exactly what he was saying all along? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: See how right he has been over the last 30 years and how many "conspiracy theories" have been proven right, that's not the own you think it. When did he support "socialists". Ukraine is not going to regain the land/ tax base it has lost, so again, they lost, Z man will milk this as long and hard as he can, then he will flee after looting the national treasury. How much more they lose is all that is being determined. Z could save many lives by eating crow, but he has his heart set on retirement on that resort in Cyprus that you bought him with your tax dollars. I wonder who will get him, CIA or FSB Excactly NOTHING. But facts? Who need them? FAJ and FJB |
|
Quoted: If your kids were murdered in a school shooting, and some left-wing loudmouth was accusing you of being a crisis actor, would that not bother you? Would you take legal action against them? Not that the final judgment isn't disproportionate, but Alex Jones no doubt made it worse with his actions during the trial. He could have settled and paid way less, but instead he chose to turn it into a circus by acting like a clown. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You don't understand. He hurt people's feelings. Do you not value people's feelings?! Not that the final judgment isn't disproportionate, but Alex Jones no doubt made it worse with his actions during the trial. He could have settled and paid way less, but instead he chose to turn it into a circus by acting like a clown. You need to get out more. |
|
Quoted: Again, that suit would not go anywhere, because we don't have power in this system, and that is by design. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Again, that suit would not go anywhere, because we don't have power in this system, and that is by design. That's BS. Go look up Nick Sandmann. Alex Jones could have settled like the defendants in the Nick Sandman controversy did. AJ even admitted he was 100% wrong. Quoted: The MAGA kid got billions of dollars in money judgments too? I did not know that. |
|
|
Quoted: Alex Jones made money by causing pain and suffering to Sandy Hook parents. Why should he be allowed to profit from that without any repercussion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What monetized damages? The parenst of Sandy Hook did not have their careers or income affected by Alex Jones. The only thing they are doing is defending the honor of their dead children. While I understand and don't blame the parents for what they're doing, the judicial system is not the place to settle opinions on honor, and they are being victimized by parasitic lawyers. The lawyers of the parents made lots of money off their pain and suffering. What Alex Jones made money from was coming up with an idiotic theory that turned out to be wrong. Looks like they sued the wrong person. |
|
Quoted: Do you really believe that, or is that just a talking point? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: The lawyers of the parents made lots of money off their pain and suffering. What Alex Jones made money from was coming up with an idiotic theory that turned out to be wrong. Looks like they sued the wrong person. View Quote He didnt come up with it. He just talked about it a little bit. And it wasnt without reason people had suspicions. But going along with a greedful and persecutorial agenda to destroy Alex Jones because of it, didnt help their image thats for sure. Plenty of reason to think less of them now. |
|
Quoted: The verdicts totaled more than gdp of some small countries. If everyone in Grenada volunteered to put every penny they made towards paying off Jones' judgments for a year they couldn't pay it off. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? View Quote No. It was vengeful and spiteful. Our justice system is eroding itself. |
|
|
Quoted: I don't spew BS and prey on the gullible who are looking for answers. "Super male vitality" and all that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You might reconsider your position if you knew how his trials were rigged. What they did to him was worse than how they rigged Trumps trials. I don't spew BS and prey on the gullible who are looking for answers. "Super male vitality" and all that. I wouldnt go that far. |
|
|
So after liquidation, can he start a new site? Or do they own it too? Is the actual intent to make him homeless?
|
|
|
Quoted: The verdicts totaled more than gdp of some small countries. If everyone in Grenada volunteered to put every penny they made towards paying off Jones' judgments for a year they couldn't pay it off. Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? View Quote He didn't cause damages to anybody. Anybody claiming that this was anything other than a politically motivated attack to silence a man seen as an enemy by the regime is arguing in the same vein as those claiming the prosecutions of Trump and pro life "FACE Act violators" are legitimate. It is intended to silence opposition and have a chilling effect on anybody who questions or provides alternatives to pseudo-corporate state sponsored media narratives. |
|
Quoted: So after liquidation, can he start a new site? Or do they own it too? Is the actual intent to make him homeless? View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. |
|
Quoted: This, You may not like him, but they screwed him just like they would screw you an me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That whole lawsuit was bullshit This, You may not like him, but they screwed him just like they would screw you an me. That precisely Then when on top there are very real reasons to question at least the narrative it’s even worse. |
|
|
Alex Jones can be in a burlap sack on the street with nothing but an X account, and could crowd fund 200k in the next hour with a Tweet that he's back under a new label.
He would be back to where he left off within a year. |
|
|
Attached File
Quoted: AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And this is why I’m glad Ukraine Lost. AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right? Attached File |
|
Quoted: Even Alex Jones admitted that Sandy Hook 100% happened. The First Amendment was designed to protect people from the government, not people from each. You can't slander and cause damage that can be monetized and think you're protected by the First Amendment. Old Timey days like when the MAGA kid was suing CNN and other media outlets for slander. Where were all you First Amendment advocates then? View Quote CNN is an agent of evil, anything they say is either a lie, or a truth told in service of a greater and nefarious agenda. |
|
|
|
Quoted: In the old timey days I feel like this would have been settled by one of the parents just punching Jones in the face and hopefully him getting the message and moving on, rather than a bunch of lawyers preying on understandably clinically unwell people on both sides. View Quote The judge is openly hostile to the idea of free speech as was the venue as was the opposition. |
|
Quoted: Do you really believe that, or is that just a talking point? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Alex Jones made money by causing pain and suffering to Sandy Hook parents. Why should he be allowed to profit from that without any repercussion? Do you really believe that, or is that just a talking point? Daily briefings and whiteboards? |
|
Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. View Quote Totally the same thing The victim families didn't have to listen to Alex's show, but they did have to listen to his moron followers accuse them of being crisis actors. Alex has and had free speech, and he used it in a very irresponsible manner. He deserves to be penniless. |
|
I hope that Elon buys it and operations continue as normal. Fuck anyone that doesn't believe in free speech.
|
|
Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. View Quote You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? |
|
Quoted: Alex Jones made money by causing pain and suffering to Sandy Hook parents. Why should he be allowed to profit from that without any repercussion? View Quote Now tell us about damage and deaths caused by MSM lies in regards to George Floyd, Michael Brown, Freddy Grey, Eric Garner, and Trayvon Martin. How much profit did MSM make with each these? Next, tell us about MSM and Russian collusion. Then do MSM and J6. |
|
|
Quoted: It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. Doesn’t matter. Free speech shouldn’t be restricted. What people seek to not comprehend is that the first amendment was put there to protect controversial speech. If one takes offense of the words of others, then don’t listen. |
|
Quoted: You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. |
|
|
|
Quoted: AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And this is why I’m glad Ukraine Lost. AJ was a liar who peddled BS conspiracy theories and supported Socialists when it was convenient. As a reminder, if Ukraine has lost that means the war is done, right? I remember when Epstein Island , Bohemian Grove, and poisoning our food and water supplies were those crazy “conspiracy theories” that he was one of the first to speak on for years. Oh wait they were ALL true…. Nevermind |
|
Quoted: Totally the same thing The victim families didn't have to listen to Alex's show, but they did have to listen to his moron followers accuse them of being crisis actors. Alex has and had free speech, and he used it in a very irresponsible manner. He deserves to be penniless. View Quote Lets assume everything hes accused of was true. Why would that deserve destitution? |
|
Quoted: Do you really believe that, or is that just a talking point? View Quote Did you watch the trial? It wasn’t just a talking point. They had the internal communications and financial records (direct time stamped click through conversion rates) that showed they profited off it and discussed pushing the story more because of the revenue it brought in. People trying to strip all facts out of the situation to push an emotional narrative “it’s heading us to socialism!!!!!” are why we are losing the culture war. |
|
Quoted: Doesn’t matter. Free speech shouldn’t be restricted. What people seek to not comprehend is that the first amendment was put there to protect controversial speech. If one takes offense of the words of others, then don’t listen. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Jones is an a hole but did he really cause damages to people in the billions? It's hard to imagine losing your kid, and watching this guy rake in money convincing people the incident was faked. Doesn’t matter. Free speech shouldn’t be restricted. What people seek to not comprehend is that the first amendment was put there to protect controversial speech. If one takes offense of the words of others, then don’t listen. He was able to make the controversial speech without government intervention. Great job in pointing out that the first amendment is in place and Alex was allowed to say what he wanted. |
|
When InfoWars falls the truly terrible actions of the tyrants will start.
Ill probably wear my Team Humanity shirt this weekend. |
|
Quoted: Now tell us about damage and deaths caused by MSM lies in regards to George Floyd, Michael Brown, Freddy Grey, Eric Garner, and Trayvon Martin. How much profit did MSM make with each these? Next, tell us about MSM and Russian collusion. Then do MSM and J6. View Quote There's no point in trying to have a rational discussion with the multiple posters who are engaged in kayfabe in this thread. Their responses are staged and scripted to maintain the 'reality' they are promoting. |
|
Quoted: I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Holocaust survivors were forced to watch literal Nazis marching in Skokie which probably felt like a far more existential threat, and then get represented pro bono by the ACLU and then watch the nazis win. Sometime between 1978 we wen from you can literally be a nazi scaring the shit out of Jews (who had their entire families gassed to death) in person right in your town square, to owing billions for being some guy with a radio show you don't even have to listen to coming up with what is closer to the analogue of holocaust denial than being a nazi marching in the square. It's blatantly obvious free speech has been eroded significantly since the 70s, as well as damn near every other freedoms we have. Although the downfall didn't start there. You guys keep using the words free speech, but it's clear you don't understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect. No one has the right to go on their radio show and tell lies about random people. The First Amendment does not protect your right to do that. Imagine if you were a small business owner and a larger competitor took out ads all over town claiming you were a child molester. Does that larger business have a constitutionally protected right to free speech in this case? I can call a dead guy a child molester no problem. Under common law you cannot defame a dead person, so yeah I could theoretically call the dead kids (the subjects of the so called defamation) child molesters and it would be constitutional. Of course when you live in land where judges make shit up, as has been seen with the erosion of the constitution, you get stuff like I'd probably owe a billion dollars. He called the parents crisis actors. The parents are alive. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.