User Panel
Quoted: South Korea but not on scale and minimum 10 years here more likely 20 View Quote I think it depends on just how much of the IP and institutional knowledge that we can extract from the place. If we were able to get plans and the people with the knowledge then I do believe we could have something up and running sooner. It might well be a few generations back, but it wouldn’t be stone aged. The company I’m at has some backend software we need to deploy soon and I was relieved when the powers that be wanted to avoid cloud. On-prem will still be gtg after the party starts, but I have my doubts about cloud. I’ve been trying to get my hands on inexpensive spares for hardware when the opportunity arises. |
|
Quoted: I think it depends on just how much of the IP and institutional knowledge that we can extract from the place. If we were able to get plans and the people with the knowledge then I do believe we could have something up and running sooner. It might well be a few generations back, but it wouldn’t be stone aged. The company I’m at has some backend software we need to deploy soon and I was relieved when the powers that be wanted to avoid cloud. On-prem will still be gtg after the party starts, but I have my doubts about cloud. I’ve been trying to get my hands on inexpensive spares for hardware when the opportunity arises. View Quote We could do far better if we didn’t have all the problems we’re having - many of which are self imposed but I’m looking at how things are rather than I wished them to be |
|
Quoted: Xi Jinping is no spring chicken and China knows sometime in the 2030s they start losing military aged population so the clock is ticking for the military option View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Even a Chinese blockade of the island would ruin our economy; no invasion necessary. It would ruin the Chinese economy too, which I why I remain skeptical that China will do anything more than rattle sabers. Then again, the Chinese might look at Joe Biden and decide they'll never get a better opportunity to strike. Xi Jinping is no spring chicken and China knows sometime in the 2030s they start losing military aged population so the clock is ticking for the military option Actually he is a spring chicken at 70. I think his parents lived until their 90s. Mother still alive.. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I figure China already has spies working inside who can thwart any move to disable or destroy the equipment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
DouglasQuaid: We could hurt China pretty bad too. In a shooting war, we could blockade much of their trade. China still imports lots of oil from the middle east that transits through a few choke points, notably near Singapore. Plus China still imports lots of agricultural products from the USA. It would be a bad situation from all parties since we all have critical imports coming from each other. All the more reason for China to not invade Taiwan. View Quote |
|
They need to park thermite grenades on the hard drives and critical components in those plants. “Pull in case of an emergency”
|
|
China definitely wishes it could get there
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/27/tech/china-semiconductor-investment-fund-intl-hnk Attached File |
|
Quoted: The B2 can disable chip machines too. Yes, it's an Asian thing, PRC believes Taiwan is the rouge child that needs to come back into the fold... It's also a good rallying point for Xi. Other than the chip manufacturing, nobody really gives a shit about Taiwan, and nobody really wants to piss off China. Looking at how the US has (or hasn't) supplied them over the decades. View Quote Look at a map of Asia, and notice that China has various other nations on all the islands that surround their coast. Taiwan is key because if China possessed it, it would give them a buffer of access, it is right in the center of sea access bounded by Japan to the north, and the Philippines to the south. China is a nation dependent on sea trade, both in and out of the country. Similarly, Russia is even more heavily constrained. Though it is the largest country on earth, it has surprisingly few seaports in the west. And these very few ports are within waters with multiple potentially contested seas between them and the open ocean. It is a potential choke point to their economy that the US cannot relate to. We have thousands of miles of uncontested coastline. When the Key Bridge was destroyed, we considered it a national imperative to restore it, but realistically, the nation has literally dozens of other port cities. Russia has a mere handful of port cities, so they are going to react very differently to even a perceived loss of access. I'm not saying that both Russia and China could not still be secure by simply being peaceful and more cooperative with their neighbors, or that I agree with their actions. Both are also authoritarian states, and most authoritarian states do not want to rely on trust and cooperation, they have to have control. |
|
Quoted: OK I'm quoting mtself because I see you answered the Japan/S Korea in a separate response. I think you give China way too much credit for ability to exert power outside fuel range of their aircraft. But heck if they did half what you think they would we would be in WWIII and I think between Japan, Korea, USA, India and others who would join in China would be without an airforce or navy in a few months. Whatever. The bottom line IMO is that China has as much to lose as we do if they invade Taiwan and in fact are on shakier ground. View Quote https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/29/asia/chinese-ships-japan-senkaku-islands-intl-hnk-ml Attached File Attached File |
|
Current Pacific theater commander - PACOM
Japanese newspaper https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/Interview/China-s-drills-appear-to-be-rehearsal-for-Taiwan-invasion-U.S.-admiral Attached File Attached File |
|
EUV’s are extremely sensitive. You don’t need fancy software to brick them, and you don’t need to blow them up. They require a clean room to operate in. Very little damage to them or their buildings would make them inoperable.
|
|
Read a article a few years back that all the machine operators would have to do is,walk away and disappear.
Supposedly they are pretty complex and running them preety much takes a expert trained in each proprietary machine. So just evact the operators state side and the machines would lay dormant or ruined if not run correctly. Was something they were gaming out about a invasion. If the operators were held at gunpoint everything could run as normal but removing the operators was the equivelant of grenading each machine. Seems these chip making machines only exist there well most of them from what the article said. |
|
You don't need grenades or to sabotage the tools. You don't need a single thing. Those tools require maintenance all the time. Precision parts that China will immediately be sanctioned from being able to get. Two weeks, maybe a month, and those tools start dropping like flies. An EUV scanner is an entirely different beast than everything else before it.
|
|
Quoted: EUV’s are extremely sensitive. You don’t need fancy software to brick them, and you don’t need to blow them up. They require a clean room to operate in. Very little damage to them or their buildings would make them inoperable. View Quote I’m still ok with us expending the munitions so as to guarantee there is zero chance of reverse engineering anything from the equipment. |
|
It would have been better to leave Taiwan with Japan after the World War.
|
|
Quoted: OK I'm quoting mtself because I see you answered the Japan/S Korea in a separate response. I think you give China way too much credit for ability to exert power outside fuel range of their aircraft. But heck if they did half what you think they would we would be in WWIII and I think between Japan, Korea, USA, India and others who would join in China would be without an airforce or navy in a few months. Whatever. The bottom line IMO is that China has as much to lose as we do if they invade Taiwan and in fact are on shakier ground. View Quote @jimmybcool https://www.foxnews.com/politics/how-chinese-attack-taiwan-could-lead-direct-war-us-beijing.amp Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Remote shutdown only works if the tools are plugged into the network.
Guaranteed the CCP already has individuals working in those companies and fabs, so the moment the CCP decides to invade, all of those network cables will be unplugged or cut. US companies have been hiring Chinese nationals straight out of our universities here for some time, so take some time to think about that |
|
It's embarrassing that we're in this position. US and it's western allies has had (and continues to have) the worst leadership in the history of human civilization. This problem didn't sneak up on us.
|
|
Quoted: https://i.ibb.co/MRx7ZMS/troll.png the "gun enthusiast" joins the forum and decides that talking about China and Taiwan is super important, right off the bat. lmao. View Quote Correct, and since the mods don’t jump on this obvious baiting, I just added a new one to my ignore list labeled as “agitator”. My only question is, is this guy getting paid or has AI gotten good enough to mimic these sorts of argument and we’re all arguing, blocking, and sometimes banning artificial entities? |
|
Huge if China does invade. The first step will be cyber attack and I bet they already have a plan to block the kill codes as the very first step...if not a hour or so before they start the war.
China has entire divisions in their Army that is their only mission to to hack and cyber attack. In fact there is a 10 year old report talking about the Chinese site that house them in Shanghai. The funny thing is I walked right past it while in Shanghai and did not know it was that site at that time. I did point out to my co-worker the very thick electric fences that could kill a elephant....I talking easy 1/2 inch thick electric wire. There needs to be a local kill switch both software and mechanical. |
|
Quoted: Correct, and since the mods don’t jump on this obvious baiting, I just added a new one to my ignore list labeled as “agitator”. My only question is, is this guy getting paid or has AI gotten good enough to mimic these sorts of argument and we’re all arguing, blocking, and sometimes banning artificial entities? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: https://i.ibb.co/MRx7ZMS/troll.png the "gun enthusiast" joins the forum and decides that talking about China and Taiwan is super important, right off the bat. lmao. Correct, and since the mods don’t jump on this obvious baiting, I just added a new one to my ignore list labeled as “agitator”. My only question is, is this guy getting paid or has AI gotten good enough to mimic these sorts of argument and we’re all arguing, blocking, and sometimes banning artificial entities? Honestly, and this is just from reading Twitter these days, I think some of it might be bots amplifying a given set of talking points. Whether hooked to a LLM or something much simpler. Too many posts on that platform from ostensibly completely different people (pinky-swear), yet have pretty much the same syntax and vocabulary. No reason to think other social media would be immune. As noted, it's gonna get a whole lot worse should hostilities really start getting threatened. The Ukraine invasion has been eye-opening for me with respect to a lot of posters here who I read more uncritically before the invasion. Anyway, on the topic; yes, machinery to lay down the layers of materials that make up a modern integrated circuit, and metrology tools to determine if those layers are the right size and where you want them, are indeed very complicated pieces of machinery. (Had a family member in that line of work a bunch of years ago. Determining process windows and maintaining them was challenging, but lucrative.) Chinese attempts to reverse engineer and domestically service those tools might be successful, but I think their attempts to build adequate domestic SOTA turbofans is probably a better comp for their likelihood of success. I.e., not good. |
|
Quoted: It takes almost a decade to setup fab up and running for the latest chips. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are their any other facilities that can produce those chips? How long would it take to set up a replacement facility? It takes almost a decade to setup fab up and running for the latest chips. That’s about right, when you consider the building of the actual fab, tool installations, quals, ‘recipe’ matching, pre-production ramp up…. There is a LOT to it. It ain’t like making pizza. |
|
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna159203
Taiwan government warning against travel to China after Beijing recently announced death penalty for any Taiwanese not supporting reunification and China’s Taiwan talking points such as no contact with USA, no AR15s from USA for civilians not accepting Taiwan’s President as legitimate etc |
|
|
|
|
I was under the impression that it was an open secret that the US would bomb those fabs before they could fall into Chinese hands.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.