User Panel
Posted: 2/6/2023 1:25:12 PM EDT
A while back I had bought a mid length freedom upper from PSA. It was a deal of the day and was fairly cheep. I overlooked the fact that it was a mid length. I'm kind of embarrassed to admit, I couldn't tell you what the advantage is of one over the other. So school me GD.
|
|
Quoted: A while back I had bought a mid length freedom upper from PSA. It was a deal of the day and was fairly cheep. I overlooked the fact that it was a mid length. I'm kind of embarrassed to admit, I couldn't tell you what the advantage is of one over the other. So school me GD. View Quote In general terms, midlength uppers are more reliable. There was some pretty significant (a couple ten thousands of rounds) testing I did on a couple midlength uppers vs carbine uppers before pushing for APC to standardize on recommending midlength. Plus you can use it with a bayonet. Poke all the things! |
|
middies tend to be superior for your average 16 inch barrel 556.
it is merely the length of the gastube/distance of gas port from receiver. The slightly longer dwell time on a midlength tends to cause less mechanical stress on the affected parts. In shorter barrels youll want less dwell time |
|
|
Quoted: In general terms, midlength uppers are more reliable. There was some pretty significant (a couple ten thousands of rounds) testing I did on a couple midlength uppers vs carbine uppers before pushing for APC to standardize on recommending midlength. Plus you can use it with a bayonet. Poke all the things! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A while back I had bought a mid length freedom upper from PSA. It was a deal of the day and was fairly cheep. I overlooked the fact that it was a mid length. I'm kind of embarrassed to admit, I couldn't tell you what the advantage is of one over the other. So school me GD. In general terms, midlength uppers are more reliable. There was some pretty significant (a couple ten thousands of rounds) testing I did on a couple midlength uppers vs carbine uppers before pushing for APC to standardize on recommending midlength. Plus you can use it with a bayonet. Poke all the things! You can mount a bayonet on the 14.5s. Just saying. |
|
Mid for 16
Carbine for 14.5 Carbine usually feels more balanced to me but they are both fine in my experience. Edit Properly gassed rifle is more noticeable than gas length as far as recoil |
|
|
|
|
Not overgassed, 4 o' clock ejections are smooth. Less recoil.
Handguard options are fewer if it has the triangle cap. MOE is okay. |
|
|
Quoted: A while back I had bought a mid length freedom upper from PSA. It was a deal of the day and was fairly cheep. I overlooked the fact that it was a mid length. I'm kind of embarrassed to admit, I couldn't tell you what the advantage is of one over the other. So school me GD. View Quote luckily you picked the better one. midlength is likely better all the way down to 13.7" maybe even 12.5" barrel length. |
|
Quoted: This. The longer the gas system (typically) the softer shooting it will be. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
I'm not sure why anyone would want a carbine 16".
Midlength 16" is superior in every way. |
|
|
Quoted: Yeah Have colt Carbine that shoots relatively smooth and a bcm middy that is pretty snappy with a comp. It's gas port in my opinion View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I have both. I can't tell a difference. Yeah Have colt Carbine that shoots relatively smooth and a bcm middy that is pretty snappy with a comp. It's gas port in my opinion My carbine gas is also a Colt. Interesting... |
|
Dwell time. Everything doesn't matter.
Once the bullet passes the gas port in the barrel, it's now a cork keeping pressure building up inside the gas system. A carbine length gas system on a 16" barrel means there will be additional pressure buildup in the gas system, causing the bolt to rotate faster as it unlocks from the chamber. Faster rotation means the extractor can be "flung outwards" as it rotates and lose grip on the fired case. This is why you need rubber o-rings in addition to extractor springs. |
|
If you’re @ semi auto and unsuppressed then the difference is not even measurable.
Either / Or |
|
I have : (4) 20" , (3) 16" mid-length, (1) 16" barreled uppers from PSA.
I like (enjoy) shooting Mid-length a lot more than Carbine. But prefer Rifle (Gov't barrel) to Mid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All my 16" rifles are mid-length. I would have it no other way.
|
|
Quoted: luckily you picked the better one. midlength is likely better all the way down to 13.7" maybe even 12.5" barrel length. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A while back I had bought a mid length freedom upper from PSA. It was a deal of the day and was fairly cheep. I overlooked the fact that it was a mid length. I'm kind of embarrassed to admit, I couldn't tell you what the advantage is of one over the other. So school me GD. luckily you picked the better one. midlength is likely better all the way down to 13.7" maybe even 12.5" barrel length. |
|
16 mid with H buffer and 16 carbine with H2 will feel almost identical imo.
|
|
Mid length gas on a 16” barrel permits bayonet mounting.
Therefore it is the correct configuration. |
|
Generally speaking, the longer the gas tube, the smoother the operation of the rifle as the port pressure is lower.
Using an adjustable gas block can mitigate some of the high pressure on carbine length, but an adjustable gas block on a mid length will do the same thing, only better. |
|
|
It’s a toss up between a classic 20” rifle system and a 14.5” mid length gas system when it comes to what I prefer.
|
|
I don’t see any disadvantages to them.
They are way more common now than back in 2008 when I got into ARs. |
|
|
|
|
I like mid better than carbine. The softer recoil helps me stay on target better.
|
|
|
Quoted: Yet to the experienced, it's quite noticeable. Mid all day on a 16. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If you’re @ semi auto and unsuppressed then the difference is not even measurable. Either / Or Yet to the experienced, it's quite noticeable. Mid all day on a 16. this. Ergos are better, everything is better. At the heart of it: 7" of dwell time is like the Avogadro's number of Stoner's design. The AR15 was designed as a rifle length barrel and rifle length gas system to have 7" of dwell time. Carbine length gas system was designed for the 14" bbl to have... 7" of dwell time! Carbine length gas system on a 16" barrel is bullshit that is the result of dumb fuck laws and nothing to do with design (eta: this combination results in 9" of dwell time). If you're stuck with a 16" bbl, then mid length gas is the correct answer - 7" of dwell time. |
|
I mainly shoot suppressed with short barrels no longer than 12". Currently using carbine length gas and adjustable gas port to fine tune.
Curious what those with 12" barrels and mid length are experiencing suppressed. All my longer (16-20") barrelled AR's are have mid or rifle length gas systems |
|
Quoted: 16 mid with H buffer and 16 carbine with H2 will feel almost identical imo. View Quote I had to switch from an H buffer to a carbine buffer on my first build. After a couple hundred rounds or so it stopped running reliably with the H buffer. Swapped the tungsten weight for a steel one and now it works fine. My other one has had a carbine buffer from the start. |
|
IMO always go with the longest possible gas system. under 14.5" use carbine. 14.5-16 use midlength, 18+ use rifle.
|
|
|
Personally midlength looks better to me and you have softer recoil for better follow up shots.
I think (personally) that the Carbine or pistol length gas system looks good on Shor barrels, nothing 14.5" or longer. You have half the barrel dangling out like your dick in the wind. Then you have also less handguard to position your hand on. Overall looks stupid, less functional, and more recoil. I'm not sure why they're so popular. Because of how I feel about this, I recently bought a Daniel Defense 14.5" barrel that is CHF and is mid-length with the FSB. I want a nice shooting gun for when things get hairy. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.