Ammo Oracle

The History and Basic Design of .223 and 5.56 Ammunition
Performance of .223 and 5.56 Ammunition
Terminal Performance of .223 and 5.56 Ammunition
.223 and 5.56 Ammunition Testing
Selection of .223 and 5.56 Ammunition
Ammunition recommendations from the authors of the AR15.COM Ammo Oracle
Purchase and Storage of .223 and 5.56 Ammunition
Legal Questions
Miscellaneous .223, 5.56, and other Ammunition Questions
- You people are a bunch of (Fackler worshippers/idiots/jello fans/armchair theorists/mindless fools). How in the world can you expect me to believe (insert Ammo Oracle answer here)? You have all lost touch with the working man shooter with your lofty theories and ivory tower "science." I know for a fact that my super special homemade round will tear up badguys because it tears up potroast like there is no tomorrow. Why should I believe anything on here?
- None of this answers my question. Now what?

What about using Wolf in defensive roles?

Introduction

Probably not the best idea.

Wolf is generally underpowered for a Mil-Spec 5.56mm round and velocity, so critical to wound profile in FMJ rounds, suffers as a result. Additionally, the gilding-metal jacket used on Wolf bullets is thicker and therefore more resistant to fragmentation.

In our gel tests, fragmentation of 55 grain FMJBT Wolf and wound volume were both lacking, and we wouldn't recommend it for defensive purposes, particularly not where at least M193 is available at a reasonable cost.

55 grain Gel Test

Wolf 55 grain FMJBT from a 1:9 Bushmaster 16" after striking gel @ 2855 fps. Fragmentation and wound volume are minimal

Wolf Gel Test

Unfired Wolf and a Wolf FMBTJ round after a close encounter with ballistic gelatin at 2885 fps. The round was fired from a 16" barrel at a mere 16 feet and still did not exhibit substantial fragmentation

Warning

Confirm Action

Ammo Oracle

What about using Wolf in defensive roles?

Introduction

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us