Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 11/5/2004 2:48:05 PM EDT
Just got these two uppers from MSTN.  17" lightweight Krieger barrels (1:7.7"), stainless, PRI tubes with alloy barrel nuts, QC comps swappable for F/H's.  BUIS will be mounted soon, of course.

Unfortunately, only one of the pair is mine.

 [ link to LARGER image ]
 [ link to LARGER image ]
 [ link to LARGER image ]

 [ link to LARGER image ]
 [ link to LARGER image ]
 [ link to LARGER image ]

 [ link to LARGER image ]
 [ link to LARGER image ]

More here: apollo.demigod.org/~zak/DigiCam/MSTN-LW17/
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 3:24:29 PM EDT
[#2]
Very nice.  Is that KG on the painted one?

ETA:

Do you know how much weight the alloy barrel nut saves compared to the steel one?
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 5:26:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 5:30:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Zak,

Mucho props to you and MSTN.

Tell us more about the uppers.

-Jim
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 5:35:35 PM EDT
[#5]
Great, I just drooled on my keyboard



Awesome rifles, the both of them.
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 7:07:17 PM EDT
[#6]
Are those the "Paul E" brakes?   I like the black one.   I couldn't dream of painting my TA11!
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 7:24:00 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
I couldn't dream of painting my TA11!



Oh, grow a pair!

j/k




BTW, funny website you have in your sigline.
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 7:44:36 PM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:04:12 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:16:54 PM EDT
[#10]
pcurtis,



Corporal_Chaos,


Very nice. Is that KG on the painted one?
Do you know how much weight the alloy barrel nut saves compared to the steel one?


Dark Earth color KG on most of it, Coyote Brown AHII on the TA11, PRI tube, and VFG.  (The stock and lower are actually AHII D.T. but you can't really tell the difference.)

Based on someone else's research in another thread, I believe the aluminum nut saves about 2.8 oz.

new-arguy,

Affirmative.  The painted one is mine.   The Troys front and rear are in-hand, but I'm waiting on some Norrell's Moly Resin.  If I can't get a color match, I'll use more AHII.

Kisara,

Yes, it's the MSTN QC brake.

knightone,


Oh, grow a pair!

Indeed!    Just wait til the MRP gets painted...

-z
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:19:48 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Just wait til the MRP gets painted...

-z



Zak-Smith, you so crazy!

I look forward to seeing it.
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:20:14 PM EDT
[#12]

Tell us more about the uppers.

Let's see..  The Kriegers are 0.700" under the handguard, and 0.740" beyond the gas block.  They are surprsingly light for being 17" and a full gas system.   On mine (tan), you can see the bottom rail was cut to fit and turned around for more useful VFG mounting.   A bipod stud will go at the forward end.  Both uppers have the Young Machine / MSTN relieved chrome bolt carrier.

This barrel type and profile was chosen to be as light as possible but still retain stability and zero for long strings of aimed fired, such as experienced at the ITRC earlier this year.  It ought to be soft-shooting, not lose too much velocity vs. a 18" or 20", and light and handy enough for easy carry.

-z
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:25:38 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Tell us more about the uppers.

Both uppers have the Young Machine / MSTN relieved chrome bolt carrier.


-z



Do you have more information about this?  What type of "relief" does it has, and what purpose does it serve?

ETA:

Your guns look so nice, and your photography is so good, I think it's about time we get a group pic of all your AR type rifles.
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:29:09 PM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Tell us more about the uppers.

Both uppers have the Young Machine / MSTN relieved chrome bolt carrier.


Do you have more information about this?  What type of "relief" does it has, and what purpose does it serve?



 [ link to LARGER image ]

It's basically the Young N.M.  carrier, with mass removed from the rear.  In some cases a lighter carrier is preferrable.

Your guns look so nice, and your photography is so good, I think it's about time we get a group pic of all your AR type rifles.

Maybe, Maybe...  

-z
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:32:00 PM EDT
[#15]


It's basically the Young N.M.  carrier, with mass removed from the rear.  In some cases a lighter carrier is preferrable.

-z



So, it basically achieves the same result as the JP aluminum carrier?  Let us know how it runs compared to the JP unit.  
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:33:24 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:


It's basically the Young N.M.  carrier, with mass removed from the rear.  In some cases a lighter carrier is preferrable.

-z



So, it basically achieves the same result as the JP aluminum carrier?  Let us know how it runs compared to the JP unit.  


It's way heavier than the JP Aluminum carrier.  It's closer in weight to the JP SS b/c.

-z
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 8:58:47 PM EDT
[#17]
Good lord thats nice Zakk!!!!
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 9:21:30 PM EDT
[#18]
Geez Zak, what the snot do you DO for a living? you're always showing off some new toy and making the rest of us envious!

Nick
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 9:43:34 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
Geez Zak, what the snot do you DO for a living?


I'm not married.
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 10:10:01 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Geez Zak, what the snot do you DO for a living?


I'm not married.



That would do it!
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 10:47:48 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 11/5/2004 10:51:51 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:
apollo.demigod.org/~zak/DigiCam/MSTN-LW17/small/144_4413_img.jpg  [ link to LARGER image ]


What kind of gas block is that?  


PRI low profile stainless.  We chose stainless so the thermal expansion rate would match the barrel more closely.
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 6:02:22 AM EDT
[#23]
What makes the barrels "light"?  Have they been fluted?  I don't see any mention of "light" barrels on Krieger's website.

Oh, by the way, these are 2 of the most beautiful rifles I have seen!  I really like what you've done.
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 6:18:13 AM EDT
[#24]


I'm not married.



LMAO, yeah, that'll do it....I'm pleased as can be when I can afford to buy another PIECE for a build. Very nice rifles, by the way.

Nick
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 6:37:26 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:
What makes the barrels "light"?  Have they been fluted?  I don't see any mention of "light" barrels on Krieger's website.


That we had them turned down to 0.700/0.740

-z
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 7:31:40 AM EDT
[#26]
Wow...

Now THAT is what I call gun porn.

If I ever decide to build a race gun, I think I'll be contacting you - too many other expenses right now.
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 12:12:21 PM EDT
[#27]
Very Nice.

I am sure you have a good reason, so I'll ask - why 17"?
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 1:20:25 PM EDT
[#28]
What brand/model is the compensator/FS?
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 2:41:07 PM EDT
[#29]
Hoped I'd never say this to another man but...Nice Pair!
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 9:16:26 PM EDT
[#30]
Adam_White,

If I ever decide to build a race gun, I think I'll be contacting you -

The only thing "gamey" on this gun is the comp. Replace it with a f/h and it's tacticalalicious.  Paul @ MSTN did the work.  

Some friends and I did some flash-hider tests tonight (dark, no moon visible).  The MSTN QC comp was a considerable improvement over no muzzle device, though not quite as good as an A2.

bsbg,

I am sure you have a good reason, so I'll ask - why 17"?

17" is the shortest for reliable operation of a rifle length gas system.

WSAR15,

What brand/model is the compensator/FS?

As stated before, it's the MSTN QC comp.

Link Posted: 11/6/2004 9:45:12 PM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
Adam_White,

If I ever decide to build a race gun, I think I'll be contacting you -

The only thing "gamey" on this gun is the comp. Replace it with a f/h and it's tacticalalicious.  =



It looks to me like the middle ground between a recon rifle and an SPR.  Good for short to medium range precision work, but more than capapble of doing fast, close-up work should the need arise.  Very nice rig indeed.  
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 10:06:06 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
It looks to me like the middle ground between a recon rifle and an SPR.  Good for short to medium range precision work, but more than capapble of doing fast, close-up work should the need arise.  Very nice rig indeed.  


Yeah!  It ought to be lighter than a recce, however.  I think those are 0.8-something under the handguards.

-z
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 10:07:26 PM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:
It ought to be lighter than a recce, however.
-z



That sounds sweet!  I was thinking of a Recce, but I may look at something like this when the time comes.
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 11:24:11 PM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 11/6/2004 11:46:05 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
Adam_White,

If I ever decide to build a race gun, I think I'll be contacting you -

The only thing "gamey" on this gun is the comp. Replace it with a f/h and it's tacticalalicious.  Paul @ MSTN did the work.  

Some friends and I did some flash-hider tests tonight (dark, no moon visible).  The MSTN QC comp was a considerable improvement over no muzzle device, though not quite as good as an A2.
...



What kind if trigger are you using in those?
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 4:38:09 AM EDT
[#36]
Zak,


          Beautiful blaster Bro.....I'm guessing the one that belongs to you is the coyote gun?  Can you give some more detailed info as to the muzzle flash on the MSTN comp during no light conditions?


Thanks,



Take care and stay safe,
Jeff
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 6:11:02 AM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:

What kind if trigger are you using in those?



Yeah....I was going to ask about the guts on these.  On the black one the selector looks unique.   It may just look unique with the brushed aluminum finish it looks like it has.
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 8:36:26 AM EDT
[#38]
Zak,

Did the 17" barrel require any tweaking of the gas port?
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 1:38:14 PM EDT
[#39]
zak, i envy you.

good looking rifles, as always


i have noticed the more im on this site the skinnier my wallet gets.

Link Posted: 11/7/2004 1:45:55 PM EDT
[#40]
Adam_White,

The triggers are JP single-stage.  I guess an argument could be made that these are not "tactical."  I've got a gazillion rounds through a bunch of lowers with JP SS triggers with no FCG related problems.

USMC03,

Yeah, mine's the coyote/tan one.    Funny you should ask about the flash-- last night after our pumpkin shoot, we did some no-light flash-hider tests.   There was no moon and we were out in the boonies with virtually no ambient light-- the Milky Way was clearly visible.

We tested: bare muzzle, A2, Vortex, and MSTN QC with M193 and BH75gr, and also the 308 Vortex on my 6.8SPC shooting my handloads.

As a rule the BH75gr had significantly less flash than the M193 when comparing the same device.    
A bare muzzle created a huge white fireball which blinded the shooter and obscured the target.
The A2 had blue flame shoot out the end, and with small fingers upwards through the slits.  Target was not obscured.
The Vortex had some flame inside the tines, but the most visible component were "sparks" extending 6-12" past the tines.
The MSTN QC comp had maybe 2x the flash of the A2, but it was directed to the sides.  The QC comp is WAY better than a bare muzzle.
In order of most to least effective, when comparing the same ammo: Vortex, A2, MSTN, bare.

The BH75gr through the A2 was only a little bit worse than M193 through the Vortex.

The least flash of all was the 6.8SPC handloads (2575- 2600fps) through the 308 Vortex, even less flash than BH75 through the 223 Vortex.

adh,

The selector is one of those stainless pieces from Oberland Arms or who-ever makes them.  It's just what I had left over in the part box.

Corporal_Chaos,

I'm not sure if the gas hole needs to be tweaked at all.  Best to ask Paul.

-z
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 4:54:11 PM EDT
[#41]
Wow Zak!!!  Seeing that new AR makes me want to take out a loan and call MSTN.  

Remman
Link Posted: 11/7/2004 4:57:41 PM EDT
[#42]
 [ link to LARGER image ]

The charging handle was painted tonight, but no pics yet.
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 4:55:48 AM EDT
[#43]
Zak,


          Thanks for the follow up info.  I have shot the A2, Vortex, Phantom, Bare Barrel, and numerous brakes in no light and low light conditions.  



Semper Fi
Jeff
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 5:54:17 PM EDT
[#44]
Very nice!
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 6:13:08 PM EDT
[#45]
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 7:05:09 PM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:
In some cases a lighter carrier is preferrable.
-z



PLEASE, explain that in more detail.  We have people running m-16 carriers, H2 buffers, H3 buffers, 9mm Buffers, and all the way up to X buffers to get MORE WEIGHT.  And here you are running LESS weight.

Please explain, it would be greatly appreciated.

Also, what is the weight of the total weapon?  I hadn't found it anywhere.

Thank You.

Stainless
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 7:18:51 PM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:

Quoted:
In some cases a lighter carrier is preferrable.

PLEASE, explain that in more detail.  We have people running m-16 carriers, H2 buffers, H3 buffers, 9mm Buffers, and all the way up to X buffers to get MORE WEIGHT.  And here you are running LESS weight.
Please explain, it would be greatly appreciated.


I've explained it several times before on this board.   Complain to management that we have no way to search the full text of the archive.

Anyway, here's one of those old threads: ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=17&t=198104&page=1

Similar to an autopistol's slide velocity (or slide cycle time), the time it takes an AR15's bolt carrier group cycle - extract the fired case, move to the rear, reverse direction, strip and chamber the next round - can be decreased by having less reciprocating mass in the bolt carrier and buffer, reducing the spring constant of the main operation ("recoil") spring, or increasing gas pressure.

In action shooting with a semi-automatic rifle like an AR15 (IPSC or 3Gun), a shooter can re-acquire an acceptible sight picture (ie, enough precision for the shot) faster if the gun moves less and the gun is finished cycling faster. A good muzzle comp helps to keep the barrel from deflecting (usually up and to the strong-side) and also uses the combustion gasses to check recoil. Attacking the problem from the other end of the gun, the reciprocating mass of the bolt carrier group and buffer upset the sight picture by slamming to the rear inside the stock (transferring inertia to the gun), and then the recoil spring must accelerate that mass and then it slams to a stop again going back into battery. Those two events upset the gun. Once the gun is back in battery, the shooter can make final adjustments to the sight picture and pull the trigger again.

By lightening the bolt carrier and/or buffer, and adjusting the system a few other ways (including tuning the recoil spring strength), it is possible to reduce the effect of the two reciprocating mass "stopping" events and to reduce the cycle time of the action. Shooting the two systems side by side, the benefits of the lightened system are obvious.

JP Enterprises has been offering a low-mass operating system for several years based on a aluminum bolt carrier; they are just about to offer a stainless version at the same mass. MSTN has just come out with a lightened bolt carrier also. ( Wes and Paul are more well-known here in the ARFOM universe than John Gangl and crew of JP Enterprises.)

There are drawbacks to a lightened carrier & buffer and a shorter operating time. The action has a smaller operational "window" of conditions where it can work-- there is less margin for dirt, crud, or poor magazines.

There are a whole class of AR15 malfunctions that occur because the magazines could not "keep up" with the
bolt carrier speed (e.g. due to dirty mags or weak mag springs). People run heavier bolt carriers or buffers to help reduce the occurance of these malfs.

The whole reason I added to this thread in the first place was to point out that Rich's followers are working extremely well in a rifle that puts higher requirements on magazine operation.

I'd be happy to demo the lightweight carrier side by side with a normal carrier to anyone who can meet me at the Weld County Range in Northern Colorado.


In this context, both the JP Stainless "Tactical" carrier and the MSTN relieved carrier are similar in weight, but lighter than a standard carrier.  The JP low-mass (aluminum) carrier is much lighter than any of them.


Also, what is the weight of the total weapon?  I hadn't found it anywhere.

I don't have an accurate scale for things of this weight.   Using a cheap bathroom scale yields between 8 - 8.5 lbs, with the VFG and TA11 ACOG mounted, but no magazine.

-z

ETA: Before anyone starts on reliability... I ran the JP SS carrier in my JP rifle at the ITRC this year.  It ran perfectly for three days, 1000 rounds (550 of those in 20 minutes), over miles of hiking through stages, and lot of dust, sand, and dirt.  
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 7:43:30 PM EDT
[#48]

Quoted:
... lot of dust, sand, and dirt.  



Thanks for the info and the quick reply, I rarely make it over to the MAGAZINE FORUM, so I haden't read all that stuff.... GOOD stuff by the way.. thanks.

S
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 8:48:38 PM EDT
[#49]
Very nice! Mr. Zak-Smith, how would you compare your Krieger barreled rifle with the LMT MRP rifle? I'm seriously torn between an MRP with stainless barrel, or doing a build with a Krieger. Any feedback appreciated. Thanks, Mark
Link Posted: 11/8/2004 10:50:18 PM EDT
[#50]
Those are "lightweight"?  Look heavier than something like a Bushmaster Superlight.  Are the pencil thin under the freefloat tube or something?
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top