User Panel
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:42:54 PM EDT
Gun legislation continues to advance at the Colorado Capitol before lawmakers wrap up for the year. A bill requiring gun owners to insure their guns cleared another hurdle Wednesday.
The bill took a big step by advancing to the Senate floor. Groups opposing the measure say if it becomes law, it will likely face legal challenges. “Colorado has been a leader in a number of policy areas. I think gun safety is one of them,” said state Sen. Chris Hansen. Hansen is hoping Colorado continues to lead on gun policy by passing a new bill he is sponsoring requiring gun owners to get insurance coverage for their firearms. “This has been a long conversation nationally about how we can do a better job of handling liability and some of the costs that come with firearm accidents or misuse. So, we’ve really taken a closer look at what we do with car insurance and home insurance and we think that this is a really great way to help folks cover that liability, but do it in a way that doesn’t become to onerous for gun owners,” Hansen said about the measure. Under the proposal, the insurance policy would cover losses and damages suffered by any person other than the policyholder. Failure to maintain a firearm policy would result in a civil infraction with a minimum fine of $500 for the first offense. Sponsors said they do not believe the cost of insuring a firearm will deter or disenfranchise gun owners. “In most cases, it’s already covered by your homeowners insurance, we’ve just got to make sure that it is covered in people’s policies. If you’ve got a safe storage device, a gun safe, et cetera — that’s lowering your liability, likely takes your insurance change to near zero. We also have pieces in the bill that allow folks to opt out if there is a problem with affordability,” Hansen explained. ‘The technology is literally changing on a weekly basis’: AI industry pushes back on Colorado bill People who can prove they cannot afford to add this coverage to their policy or have been denied coverage by insurers can petition a court to be exempt from the requirement if it becomes law. https://kdvr.com/news/politics/colorado-politics-news/bill-requiring-liability-insurance-for-gun-owners-advances-to-full-senate/ Starting January 1, 2025, HB24-1270 would require gun owners to have liability insurance that covers losses or damages to a person who is injured from the accidental or unintentional discharge of a firearm. Failure to have a firearm liability insurance policy is a civil infraction. https://www.cohousedems.com/news/house-passes-bill-to-promote-responsible-gun-ownership-with-firearm-insurance-coverage |
|
Originally Posted By fadedsun:
Obsessed with Ukraine much, OP? |
Got to love the government.
|
|
“I was always willing to be reasonable until I had to be unreasonable. Sometimes reasonable men must do unreasonable things.”
|
Originally Posted By SnoGoRider: Gun legislation continues to advance at the Colorado Capitol before lawmakers wrap up for the year. A bill requiring gun owners to insure their guns cleared another hurdle Wednesday. The bill took a big step by advancing to the Senate floor. Groups opposing the measure say if it becomes law, it will likely face legal challenges. “Colorado has been a leader in a number of policy areas. I think gun safety is one of them,” said state Sen. Chris Hansen. Hansen is hoping Colorado continues to lead on gun policy by passing a new bill he is sponsoring requiring gun owners to get insurance coverage for their firearms. “This has been a long conversation nationally about how we can do a better job of handling liability and some of the costs that come with firearm accidents or misuse. So, we’ve really taken a closer look at what we do with car insurance and home insurance and we think that this is a really great way to help folks cover that liability, but do it in a way that doesn’t become to onerous for gun owners,” Hansen said about the measure. Under the proposal, the insurance policy would cover losses and damages suffered by any person other than the policyholder. Failure to maintain a firearm policy would result in a civil infraction with a minimum fine of $500 for the first offense. Sponsors said they do not believe the cost of insuring a firearm will deter or disenfranchise gun owners. “In most cases, it’s already covered by your homeowners insurance, we’ve just got to make sure that it is covered in people’s policies. If you’ve got a safe storage device, a gun safe, et cetera — that’s lowering your liability, likely takes your insurance change to near zero. We also have pieces in the bill that allow folks to opt out if there is a problem with affordability,” Hansen explained. ‘The technology is literally changing on a weekly basis’: AI industry pushes back on Colorado bill People who can prove they cannot afford to add this coverage to their policy or have been denied coverage by insurers can petition a court to be exempt from the requirement if it becomes law. https://kdvr.com/news/politics/colorado-politics-news/bill-requiring-liability-insurance-for-gun-owners-advances-to-full-senate/ Starting January 1, 2025, HB24-1270 would require gun owners to have liability insurance that covers losses or damages to a person who is injured from the accidental or unintentional discharge of a firearm. Failure to have a firearm liability insurance policy is a civil infraction. https://www.cohousedems.com/news/house-passes-bill-to-promote-responsible-gun-ownership-with-firearm-insurance-coverage View Quote Ok, TX needs to do the same but for voting. |
|
|
They must have got the same idea from our bill in 2023.
Under SB 8, gun insurance in California would be similar to car insurance. Gun owners would: Be held civilly liable for property damage, injury, or death resulting from the use of their firearms Have to obtain liability insurance that covers losses or damages resulting from negligent or accidental use of their firearm, including property, damage, injury or death Have to obtain proof of gun insurance, keep that proof with their firearm, and produce it when asked by a peace officer during the course of a lawful detainment. https://trackbill.com/bill/california-senate-bill-8-firearms-liability-insurance/2282348/ |
|
|
How about insurance for free speech while we're at it?
|
|
|
It's all so tiresome.
|
|
|
Legislators should be required to maintain liability insurance to cover the unconstitutional bills they put forward.
|
|
|
MOVE TO A FREE STATE!
|
|
"when tyranny becomes law rebellion becomes duty"
|
I hate this libtard infested state more and more every day...
Cannot wait to get out of here. |
|
|
Yet another illegal and unconstitutional law that I'll freely ignore.
My guess is the idiots in Denver get their asses sued in a heart beat over this one. No way it passes the Bruen test. |
|
Abolish the FBI, ATF, and the NSA.
Any citizen accused of a crime is presumed innocent until bankrupted beyond all reasonable doubt. |
For fucks sake.
|
|
Deeper behind enemy lines every day.
|
How are they gonna know you have guns.
Sold them all,sorry |
|
Neotopiaman -"Communism could take over the Sahara and have a shortage of sand."
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM |
It’s not infringing if it’s just the tip.
|
|
|
Another case of...oh you can keep your second amendment but its going to cost you your livelihood.
|
|
|
|
It seems you can get around a lot of these newly proposed dip shit laws with a trust.
It's not my gun, it's the property of trust X. Sorry trust X doesn't own $500 to pay the fine. Colorado is looking to be the state record holder for losing 0-9 SCOTUS decisions. They already got one this year. |
|
|
Lol , insurance for a constitutional right. Get fucked .
|
|
Because I don’t say it , dont mean I ain’t thinkin’ it .
|
Originally Posted By DDDDCheapAF: Lol , insurance for a constitutional right. Get fucked . View Quote Tons of people here driving without any plates or registration on their vehicles. Lots more without car insurance. They're going to get people to self report and buy firearm insurance. Lol. But watch the range owners will be their cuck and require proof to shoot at a club or range. |
|
|
View Quote Originally Posted By The_Fly: Yet another illegal and unconstitutional law that I'll freely ignore. My guess is the idiots in Denver get their asses sued in a heart beat over this one. No way it passes the Bruen test. View Quote Originally Posted By DDDDCheapAF: Lol , insurance for a constitutional right. Get fucked . View Quote Might as well pass a law mandating criminals carry "criminal insurance" to cover themselves when they suffer repercussions from committing crimes |
|
Alea iacta est
|
|
Good! The world would be a better place if only rich people had guns.😉
|
|
|
Just throwing as much shit against the wall as they can to see what sticks. They know the Supreme Court is a joke and will just ignore any ruling on this that might happen 10 years from now. Lawyers in dirty black robes aren’t coming to save us.
|
|
|
I wonder how it will affect non-resident hunting.
|
|
-Things do not happen. Things are made to happen. -JFK
-Beware the fury of a patient man. -Thousands and thousands of laws....All for just ten commandments. -"alot" is not a word. |
Originally Posted By Engineer5: I wonder how it will affect non-resident hunting. View Quote When I was in Colorado last October for something totally not related to hunting, I stopped in a Cabela’s/Bass Pro and asked about elk hunting. IIRC, they said a non-resident elk tag was $700 or $800. Cha ching! At least I did get a map of where I went through SERE (Farish Memorial Park, bounded by Rampart Range Road). They were proud of their maps too. EDIT: I am sure there will be some carve out for out of state hunters. Besides, some of that should be covered by the Federal level “Safe Passage Act” or “Peaceable Journey Act” as part of the 1986 Firearm Owner’s Protection Act: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/926A?_vwo_uuid=DDC3FC471A3EE657989603F6D7EEB4521&tID=65f4975466366 |
|
|
then they want to inspect your home to make sure you have the appropriate storage like Canadians?
more rules & regs to disallow your claims or throw you in jail? certainly more to take your guns meanwhile the illegal aliens from terror nations and narco countries run wild cant have you defending yourselves or your property now can we |
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
There was a similar bill proposed in MD. This crap must be coming from the newly formed Office of Gun Violence Prevention at the Fed level.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By T1NMAN: Another case of...oh you can keep your second amendment but its going to cost you your livelihood. View Quote |
|
|
Could a state's Dept. of Insurance eventually be weaponized against gun owners as a means to achieve a form of gun control? States REGULATE insurance policies sold in their states. They 'approve' the policy forms/language.
- Will states mandate high policy limits as a state minimum required coverage, thus the cost of the policy (premiums) may be cost-prohibitive to some? - Will insurance companies charge higher premiums for policyholders who have a CC license and carry their firearm outside of their home property? - Will the insurance company charge higher premiums to those who have not completed a certain number of hours of training by an 'approved' training facility? - Will states or the insurance company mandate policy language requiring use of firearm locks (or gun safe), holster use that meets certain retention levels? Will all firearms owned need to be listed/described in the policy, including number of magazines/clips, add-on accessories, modifications, etc. (one might argue is an end-around to a form of gun registration)? - Will policy exclusions or underwriting practices limit 'covered' magazine capacity? Covered calibers? Covered weapons? Will 'modified' firearms be excluded? - Will premiums be higher for high capacity magazines, certain calibers, semi-auto vs. single-shot, etc? - Some states mandate vehicle inspections for cars to be legally driven on their highways. Will states eventually try to add a law requiring firearms to be inspected by a state approved gunsmith to ensure firearms are in proper working condition and legal? Yes, the above is absurd and would never happen in Colorado. |
|
|
Where's the liability insurance for being a crappy politician?
|
|
"Freedom isn't free. It costs a hefty fuckin' fee. And if we don't toss in our buck 'o five, who will?"
|
I don't think any state has successfully passed one of these bills.... seems once they figure out that you can't have a liability policy to cover willful criminal acts, it goes away.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By realwar: They must have got the same idea from our bill in 2023. Under SB 8, gun insurance in California would be similar to car insurance. Gun owners would: Be held civilly liable for property damage, injury, or death resulting from the use of their firearms Have to obtain liability insurance that covers losses or damages resulting from negligent or accidental use of their firearm, including property, damage, injury or death Have to obtain proof of gun insurance, keep that proof with their firearm, and produce it when asked by a peace officer during the course of a lawful detainment. https://trackbill.com/bill/california-senate-bill-8-firearms-liability-insurance/2282348/ View Quote |
|
What it boils down to is that they fear an effective resistance to their power: So, Left in power=Guns bad, mmmmkay...?, Right in power=Guns good!-thskirk
|
How much would it cost to get a sympathetic congressman to slip a “All congressmen proposing/supporting gun control bills much either suck on rb889’s balls or resign” clause into one of these 12,000 page omnibus bills? Could call it the eric cartman act.
Why the fuck don’t any of these assholes slip shit like that into shitty bills? At least that would be funny. |
|
|
and NO CRIMINAL WILL EVER BUY THIS INSURANCE.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Alaskanforfreedom: If I misuse my gun and cause property damage Im already liable for it. View Quote Yeahbut, the personal injury attorneys who run Colorado need those increased limits of liability on those policies, in addition to the homeowners policies, cause Jet A and vacation condos aren’t getting any cheaper, and Jr ambulance chaser wants to go to Yale. |
|
|
I assume the underwriters are going to look at education levels, income, prior criminal records, driving records, geographic location, etc. when setting the premiums?
Not a chance. Who am I kidding. This is a shakedown to those who won’t bend the knee. It’s a tax, only the money will go to private insurers who will turn around and fund Democrat campaigns. |
|
|
No one will provide insurance against liability for criminal acts.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Jmo371: I don't think any state has successfully passed one of these bills.... seems once they figure out that you can't have a liability policy to cover willful criminal acts, it goes away. View Quote Colorado has gone full retard....I give this a better than 50% chance of passing now. Before, these kinds of things died in the house and the dems that voted for it got recalled. Now....passed the house, has a senate sponsor and the libs saying they want to "lead" the country in gun laws. Its coming to state near you soon...... |
|
|
While this BS most likely won't pass, it's troubling that there are idiots thinking this is a good enough idea to even introduce it. Colorado needs to seriously do some unfucking NOW. If it isn't way too late already (I suspect it is).
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Jmo371: I don't think any state has successfully passed one of these bills.... seems once they figure out that you can't have a liability policy to cover willful criminal acts, it goes away. View Quote Stopping criminal acts is not the point of these sorts of laws. Neither is obtaining compensation from a third party. They're meant to be a PITA to the law-abiding, and to discourage firearms ownership by same. If violent crime is the problem, incapacitating both the provable repeat violent offender and the violent insane works very well. But that's racist or statist, and won't help achieve the desired state of chaos. |
|
|
Are these people really stupid enough to think they will be obeyed?
|
|
http://piccoloshash.blogspot.com
Vote "YES" on 'NO'! For Captain Erick Foster, Wexford, PA KIA 29 Aug, 07. Rangers lead the way. Inspected by #26 I was checking out this midget porn website.... |
Originally Posted By 99superduty: Colorado has gone full retard....I give this a better than 50% chance of passing now. Before, these kinds of things died in the house and the dems that voted for it got recalled. Now....passed the house, has a senate sponsor and the libs saying they want to "lead" the country in gun laws. Its coming to state near you soon...... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 99superduty: Originally Posted By Jmo371: I don't think any state has successfully passed one of these bills.... seems once they figure out that you can't have a liability policy to cover willful criminal acts, it goes away. Colorado has gone full retard....I give this a better than 50% chance of passing now. Before, these kinds of things died in the house and the dems that voted for it got recalled. Now....passed the house, has a senate sponsor and the libs saying they want to "lead" the country in gun laws. Its coming to state near you soon...... Aren't you glad Colorado decriminalized weed? |
|
|
China delenda est
|
Originally Posted By Missilegeek: Tons of people here driving without any plates or registration on their vehicles. Lots more without car insurance. They're going to get people to self report and buy firearm insurance. Lol. But watch the range owners will be their cuck and require proof to shoot at a club or range. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Missilegeek: Tons of people here driving without any plates or registration on their vehicles. Lots more without car insurance. They're going to get people to self report and buy firearm insurance. Lol. But watch the range owners will be their cuck and require proof to shoot at a club or range. View Quote Then don't patronize them. |
|
|
*** NRA Endowment Life Member***
|
So what is the penalty for non insurance ? Take the guns ? How can they deny your 2A rights due to insurance ?
I don't remembers seeing that in the United States Constitution "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, as long as you have homeowners insurance made payable to the state" |
|
There are only two rules in life set in concrete. 1. Survival of the fittest. 2. There will always be the “haves” and the “have nots”.
|
|
Obviously they don't give a rat's ass about the Constitution but that clearly un-Constitutional on the face of it.
|
|
|
We also have pieces in the bill that allow folks to opt out if there is a problem with affordability View Quote Oooh! Oooh! I can translate that! |
|
We've now proven that we have zero rights, just what privileges we are allowed at any given time.
"Yes, Minister" is required viewing. Seriously, watch it. Along with "Yes, Prime Minister." They are not fiction. |
You have to insure a constitional right? Seems unconstitutional.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.