User Panel
|
Oil up the jaws of the war machine and feed it with our babies
|
|
|
We adopted our son from Guatemala. Why? We could afford the cost, and go through the hoops. What we could not accept, was the fact that the birth mother still had the right to have contact with the child after adoption.
It was like if we adopted the child, we were getting the birth mother as well.. Hell no!!!!! |
|
|
Pray for the trumpet to sound and things to be made new.
|
|
Those who would give up essential liberty, to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
|
Originally Posted By StevenH: Policy changes that encourage parents to keep their kids. Such as Child tax credits Childcare tax deductions No taxes on formula, diapers, pumping supplies One year of paternity/maternity leave. Newborns covered by mothers health insurance for one year rather than existing 30-days. It’s expensive but if you really want to reduce the number of abortions start there. View Quote How about if the parents stay together? Stop promoting single motherhood and 90% of this Tom Fuckery goes away. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Gelandewagen: How many illegal immigrants came here last year? How many legal immigrants? What did we do with all those babies before 1960? Why don't we finally approve the male birth control pill? (it's existed for 30 years but FDA won't approve it for fear of STD spread as everyone would stop using condoms). What will Planned Parenthood do without a fresh stream of baby flesh to sell to the medical industry.... As already stated. You force the parent to raise the kid or go to jail. Why is it everyone is so focused on killing those who MAY become a burden.... But we can't kill those who actually ARE burdens. View Quote I'll go down the list. 1. I don't know how many illegal immigrants came here last year. I do know none of them should have entered this country. 2. Again I don't t know. I do know that along with the people whom worked hard and did everything correctly are only one part of "legal immigrants", and if they assimilate I applaud them. It's well known that some Republican lawmakers have drafted bills to import immigrants on work visas, so the corruption is bi-partisan. 3. Again, I don't know what we did before the 60's. I was born in 1978 and although I enjoy learning about history, this wasn't a topic I looked at much. 4. Why don't we approve it? It probably should be approved. 5. I don't agree with or support planned parenthood. 6. Fine with me. 7. Because every body thinks their opinion matters. I don't like paying for anybody beyond my family. My job in life as a man is to support my family to the best of my ability same as any other man. I don't want to support the welfare class too. Unfortunately because of the .gov I have no choice. Edit-spelling |
|
|
Originally Posted By 13starsinax: 18? There are subsides in place for their entire lives. Children born into sound households are all taught they can be on their parents insurances until age 26. The abortion debate is political fodder, and neither party should be given anymore credence. View Quote Socialism and socialism lite I guess. Edit spelling. 2nd edit also spelling. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Obo2: You could probably feed them with the federal funds sent to abortion clinics alone. Heck bust in to the federal cheese reserve, cancel funding for egyptian college tuitions... View Quote You're likely right, but our corrupt government isn't about to do anything like this at all. They wouldn't be able to steal as much money. |
|
|
Grant citizenship to illegals if they adopt. Simple, easy, done.
Or just murder them all after they're born. That's what the left wants anyway. You're making at least two stupid assumptions. The first is that behavior will not change reducing the number of kids that would otherwise have been murdered. The second is that, once born, the parents won't change their minds about whether the child is unwanted. |
|
|
Pretty sure women and men would figure out real quick what a condom and birth control is.
They (and I at one time) just want to rawdog everything in sight without consequence. Sex is what it is, we can't change that. Only our behavior. Abortion is murder. Bottom line and no I don't care if someone disagrees. It's a made up term just like gender fluid. Ever wonder why the lefts pet projects all involve less people being born? Destroy the family, abortion, sterilize kids, have babies born and then "have the mother make a decision". Absolutely evil. |
|
|
“We?” Who is this “we?”
Last I checked, your child is your responsibility. Don’t want that responsibility? Don't sleep around. The universe doesn’t owe you sex without consequences |
|
"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."
-C.S. Lewis |
-Get pregnant and don't want it?
-Fine, the state will pay for your medical care, health, and safety for the duration of the pregnancy. -At birth the child becomes a ward of the state, you relinquish all rights to the child. -Do this three times and you are subject to forced sterilization or given the opportunity to birth more children as a state mother, all subsequent births are wards of the state. -These children are raised and educated within a closed, state system. -Children undergo regular assessments to determine natural abilities. -Children receive focused education and support to enter into career fields their assessments determine are appropriate. Promiscuity is deterred, with productive concessions granted for the benefit of the nation, declining birth rates are resolved, military recruitment numbers turned around, and abortion is a distant memory. If this sounds reasonable to you, sign up for my newsletter by jumping off the nearest tall building. |
|
|
Incentivize domestic adoption first. That system is screwed so bad many people import children from elsewhere. And incentivize larger families with working parents around. Humans have done ok for a long time without easily accessible abortion I don't think it will be a problem.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By HKocher: I agree, but that's not going to make up for the surplus of unwanted children, even if there is a decrease in said unwanted children. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HKocher: Originally Posted By Rebel31: A lot more adoptions would absolutely happen if it wasn't such a huge PITA. We personally know of one family that had conception issues. They had one baby of their own and adopted a foreign child as it was way easier than adopting a US born kid. From what they told me adopting a US born child was $50k+ and takes around 2 years IF everything goes smoothly. I agree, but that's not going to make up for the surplus of unwanted children, even if there is a decrease in said unwanted children. I absolutely think it would if legal adoption was not so expensive or such a process to adopt a domestic born child. |
|
I'm not the one REEING, motherfucker! -FCSD2162
|
Originally Posted By HKocher: Since abortion seems to be the topic of the day, let me pose this question. I think most of us can agree that abortion is disgusting and abstinence or contraception is preferable, but this thread is about reality, not your personal morals. Quick googling informs me that there are 500k - 1,500k abortions a year in the US, while there are 50k - 100k adoptions in the US per year. Feel free to correct my numbers. We can also agree that the adoption process in the US needs reform, but we’re still talking about at best, a surplus of 400k unwanted babies. So what do we do with these children? Force them on the parent(s) that didn’t want them? Force them on pro-lifers? Cheap labor? Child super soldiers? Put them in prison or mental institutions where they will inevitable end up? FWIW, I’ve known many families that adopted, and in almost all of those cases, the child was serious messed up for life due to lack of love and affection in the infant stage. View Quote Several, months ago I came to the conclusion to just let it happen we don't need more libs in the country. Libs breeding libs, more social service takers. |
|
|
Originally Posted By SBR300BLK: Incentivize domestic adoption first. That system is screwed so bad many people import children from elsewhere. And incentivize larger families with working parents around. Humans have done ok for a long time without easily accessible abortion I don't think it will be a problem. View Quote How do you think we can incentivize adoption without creating a social security hustle? (I.e. adopting 10 kids for the SS checks, buying yourself steak and a new car while the kids eat government cheese and mud pies) |
|
|
The parents can take care of their kids. Same as anyone else. If they abuse them or don't feed them, its a crime.
If they really don't want them, they can give them away to the state. Bring orphanages back I guess. |
|
|
Originally Posted By wyomingnick: The parents can take care of their kids. Same as anyone else. If they abuse them or don't feed them, its a crime. If they really don't want them, they can give them away to the state. Bring orphanages back I guess. View Quote What to do with the 18 y/o kicked out of the barracks/orphanage on his birthday with nothing but a pair of shoes, $500, and 10 years of violent, impersonal, uncaring, childhood trauma? |
|
|
Abortion is murder. Put the unwanted children up for adoption. Why are there so many baby killers on GD?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By MohaveGreen: This right here. Are the pro-life people going to pay to feed these 500,000 or more babies until they are 18? Republicans need to shut up about abortion. It's not going away no matter how much any of us want it to. View Quote If you engage in behavior any reasonable person knows could result in creating another human life you are responsible for that human life. If you can’t afford a child don’t engage in behavior that could result in a child. If you don’t want a child don’t engage in behavior that could result in a child. If you do engage in that behavior, and end up having a child you damn well better figure out a way to afford the child, and learn to like it. If not I’m perfectly fine with the government spending the money to support the child until they are 18 as long as both parents are imprisoned for life. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HKocher: How do you stop that? I want to raw dog a girl, how do you stop me? And does the govt have a right to do so View Quote The government doesn’t have a right to stop you. The government should hold you accountable if you have a child though. If you can’t, or don’t want to support the child you can go to prison. You made the decision to raw dog a girl, and the both of are responsible for what happened. I know personal responsibility is so passé though. |
|
|
Now fellate me, as I eat this expensive ham.
USA
|
|
Look, yes, I have banged HUNDREDS of broads. INTERNATIONALLY. But know this - I wrap my rascal, TWO TIMES, cuz I like it to be joyless and without sensation. It's a way of punishing supermodels.
|
Originally Posted By GenoGS: If you engage in behavior any reasonable person knows could result in creating another human life you are responsible for that human life. If you can’t afford a child don’t engage in behavior that could result in a child. If you don’t want a child don’t engage in behavior that could result in a child. If you do engage in that behavior, and end up having a child you damn well better figure out a way to afford the child, and learn to like it. If not I’m perfectly fine with the government spending the money to support the child until they are 18 as long as both parents are imprisoned for life. View Quote Paying to raise and educate a child for 18 years, and paying to feed and house its two parents for 30-50 years each, does not strike me as a fiscally conservative position. Would probably be cheaper to leave the kid with mom and cut her a check for formula... And here we are. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are no "unwanted children".
Babies are a blessing from GOD! |
|
|
Originally Posted By PainefulCommonSense: Paying to raise and educate a child for 18 years, and paying to feed and house its two parents for 30-50 years each, does not strike me as a fiscally conservative position. Would probably be cheaper to leave the kid with mom and cut her a check for formula... And here we are. View Quote It’s not about the money it’s about “sending a message”. I think you would find the entire thing becomes moot whenever there are real consequences. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By GenoGS: It’s not about the money it’s about “sending a message”. I think you would find the entire thing becomes moot whenever there are real consequences. View Quote How much money are you willing to spend on the project? I can respect that perhaps you are not a fiscal conservative. Originally Posted By GenoGS: I’m not sure which one is the apple and which is the orange. View Quote What greater criminal punishment do you advocate? Is the death penalty isn't a great enough consequence, what do you propose? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Gspointer: I wish they would spend our tax dollars to find out how pregnancy happens. Once our scientists figure that out, then they can figure out a way to stop them. I don’t know, they can’t even cure cancer. View Quote Well you see @Gspointer when a man and a woman love each other very much…. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Dagoth-Ur: Well you see @Gspointer when a man and a woman love each other very much…. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Dagoth-Ur: Originally Posted By Gspointer: I wish they would spend our tax dollars to find out how pregnancy happens. Once our scientists figure that out, then they can figure out a way to stop them. I don’t know, they can’t even cure cancer. Well you see @Gspointer when a man and a woman love each other very much…. If babies are products of love, how could they ever be 'unwanted'? I think you meant "when a man and woman excite each other, even rather minimally but it's been a while"... |
|
|
Maybe their parents can raise them? Buy the ticket etc this ain't rocket surgery.
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Lou_Daks: The problem with your premise is ignoring any rights of the unborn humans. Do they get any consideration in your world? Do they get a vote? Are they just collateral damage in the name of "freedom"? View Quote Does anyone have a right to be a burden? Or a threat? Oh they get a vote alright, in 18 years and guess how a majority of them will vote? We are in a war, a cultural war, a political war, a demographic war, and the age old war of survival . In war there are casualties, you refuse to accept this for what ever reason but it does not make reality any less real or true. |
|
|
If it was 100% banned ; it would require another ban on free-sh*t payments...
The government (at least the federal level) should get out of free stuff in general.. You want free food to feed your army of trophies... Go to the states with lots of money like CA/ NY since they have more money than WV or MS. Single moms have multiple options like Chicago has single mom housing help, state level public housing, United Way has housing help. School lunch program can continue only if they maintain an GPA of 3.5 or above. That's a B average ; incentive to maintain good grades. Those who can't/won't maintain a B average can eat peanut butter/jelly sammich ; just be comfortable being uncomfortable. When school is out for the summer, kids who parents won't make a lunch can go to summer school and get a lunch. Same rules apply, full lunch for GPA 3.5, PBJ for those who won't. At least they are getting ahead a class or two in the summer. |
|
I am just a Combat Hot-Air Balloon Pilot.. Our craft is 50X quieter than the B-2 Spirit. The enemy can't hear us until we drop bombs on them..
|
Originally Posted By UnequivocalLiberty: Every kid wants to be an astronaut. Start a NASA program that trains kids to do the needful. Then ship them off to space in various directions. Colonize or die. Gives them and us a chance. View Quote The astronaut meme is only made funnier when in regards to this subject. |
|
|
Originally Posted By PainefulCommonSense: What to do with the 18 y/o kicked out of the barracks/orphanage on his birthday with nothing but a pair of shoes, $500, and 10 years of violent, impersonal, uncaring, childhood trauma? View Quote This, never mind the feelings of insecurity, inferiority, or being molested. |
|
|
Originally Posted By TeacherInCA: If it was 100% banned ; it would require another ban on free-sh*t payments... The government (at least the federal level) should get out of free stuff in general.. You want free food to feed your army of trophies... Go to the states with lots of money like CA/ NY since they have more money than WV or MS. Single moms have multiple options like Chicago has single mom housing help, state level public housing, United Way has housing help. School lunch program can continue only if they maintain an GPA of 3.5 or above. That's a B average ; incentive to maintain good grades. Those who can't/won't maintain a B average can eat peanut butter/jelly sammich ; just be comfortable being uncomfortable. When school is out for the summer, kids who parents won't make a lunch can go to summer school and get a lunch. Same rules apply, full lunch for GPA 3.5, PBJ for those who won't. At least they are getting ahead a class or two in the summer. View Quote You advocating moving undereducated single moms out of Appalachia and dropping them in Chicago? So you're advocating funding that move presumably, since how else will she get to NYC, as a single mom? And then that kid gets set up in the chiraq public school system, where he only eats moldy sandwiches cause he's a 'dumb hick', and as a consequence of his undereducated and resentful mother's raising (afterall, she had to move across the country and leave her family cause of this little turd) he spends his time on the street and knocks up some chick. And you think youll be insulated from this problem, for how long? |
|
|
Originally Posted By PainefulCommonSense: How much money are you willing to spend on the project? I can respect that perhaps you are not a fiscal conservative. What greater criminal punishment do you advocate? Is the death penalty isn't a great enough consequence, what do you propose? View Quote They real do love to spend other people’s money, don’t they? So what if we have millions of more dems and we lose elections? As long as they feel good, right? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dagoth-Ur: They real do love to spend other people’s money, don’t they? So what if we have millions of more dems and we lose elections? As long as they feel good, right? View Quote I understand the nationalist arguments around the issue. But the advocates of such need to acknowledge they've abandoned American Conservativism for something else. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HKocher: Would they? Are there really that many families willing to adopt based on charity or lack of fertility? I seriously doubt it. View Quote I think so. Adoption is incredibly expensive (I've heard $90k lately), which really cuts down on the number of families who can make it work. There are plenty of great middle/working-class people who would love to adopt, would do a great job with it, but simply cannot afford the process. |
|
|
Originally Posted By sabocat: I think so. Adoption is incredibly expensive (I've heard $90k lately), which really cuts down on the number of families who can make it work. There are plenty of great middle/working-class people who would love to adopt, would do a great job with it, but simply cannot afford the process. View Quote Tepidly waiting for you to address my "what about the SS hustle" with a response about the liberatory nature of child labor, and how if only we had pre-teen chimney sweeps whose labor is sold by their parents then the children would be wanted, even a commodity to be traded. |
|
|
Originally Posted By MMcfpd: Abortion is not going to be banned in the country as a whole. Thoughts I've had as to how to address the tsunami of fatherless children (Abortion Rights Revisited). View Quote We live in a gynocentric society. Giving fathers the choice to waive their parental rights will never happen. Every time a child support payment is made in this country the state/county where it happens gets a cut of the payment. The government will never end something that generates the amount of revenue that child support payments generate for them. They know that men work more and make more money than women. That's why judges love giving custody of children to the mothers. Even if the mothers are absolute pieces of shit who should have no contact with their children. It has absolutely nothing to do with what's best for the children. The men paying child support will generate more revenue than if custody were awarded the other way around. |
|
|
Originally Posted By PainefulCommonSense: Tepidly waiting for you to address my "what about the SS hustle" with a response about the liberatory nature of child labor, and how if only we had pre-teen chimney sweeps whose labor is sold by their parents then the children would be wanted, even a commodity to be traded. View Quote The children yearn for the mines! There isn't really anything stopping deadbeat parents from doing that with children born to them. If they aren't eligible for benefits, benefits are capped, and/or the number of adoptions per family is capped, scamming the system would seem to be harder. It's also 3 AM and my brain is a bit fried, so this post is worth what you paid for it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HKocher: FWIW, I’ve known many families that adopted, and in almost all of those cases, the child was serious messed up for life due to View Quote Fixed |
|
|
Did I just kill another thread?
We are in the middle of a Communist Revolution in the USA. There is no voting our way out of this. |
Originally Posted By HKocher: Do we force that contraception by govt mandate? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HKocher: Originally Posted By TarzanT: How about concentrating on contraception. Do we force that contraception by govt mandate? Only if you are eating at the government trough. |
|
Did I just kill another thread?
We are in the middle of a Communist Revolution in the USA. There is no voting our way out of this. |
Fatten the children up for the market and feed them to the public.
|
|
Celebrating the remains of the Second Amendment one Fine Firearm at a Time.
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.