User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:06:46 PM EDT
[#1]
I am for some restrictions to the Second Amendment, i.e no machines guns, but that is too much. This shouldn't be legal.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:18:39 PM EDT
[#2]
Im not for any restrictions to the second amendment, or any part of the Constitution for that matter. I thought California went too far. This is beyond going too far. Sounds like something I would expect in a left wing Communist country. Register my rifles? Confiscation will be next, read your history books.
Not to mention, whether this passes or not, you can bet the liberals around the country will use this bill as a model for the next Federal ban. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:20:46 PM EDT
[#3]
Are NY Gun Owners gonna just let this happen? What ever happen to majority rules?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:24:15 PM EDT
[#4]
Too many people here in NY on the far left. Apparently they only care about the Constitution when it suits them. As for the "majority" of gun owners here. they dont give a crap unless the guns they own are affected. Same story when the Federal Ban hit. I dont know how many morons I heard say "What do you need an assault rifle for" or "I dont care I dont have any of those kinds of guns". |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:32:04 PM EDT
[#5]
This is almost unimaginable.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:48:56 PM EDT
[#6]
 ( HA HA HA HA HA)I wish the government/politics weren't so corrupt. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:59:45 PM EDT
[#7]
YOU HAVE BEEN OUTED Yes, we read the Anti groups' mailing lists and strategy papers and talking point memos. Yes, we know there are infiltrators here sowing discord. While the ostensible purpose of your comment was to condemn the AW Ban in NY State, your real purpose was to convince other "reasonable" gun owners that "reasonable" restrictions are ok. We don't need your kind here. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:03:25 PM EDT
[#8]
IBTAWBinNY
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:05:11 PM EDT
[#9]
I didn't see Klinton's name on the list of bill sponsors.
Must have been a typo. No machine guns? Why for God's sake? I do think there needs to be a check just to keep full auto weapons away from people who should not have them like the check before buying a handgun. I don't want a full auto weapon but I want it to be my option. If you want one to blow away massive amounts of ammo quickly go for it. Jim |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:05:22 PM EDT
[#10]
IBTAWBinNY
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:08:20 PM EDT
[#11]
WHAT? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:10:58 PM EDT
[#12]
Hillary wouldnt be on it, its a State bill, not Federal. We cant get any full autos in NY anyway, NY doesnt allow Class III full autos. But who gives a crap, with this bill we wont even get any semi-autos with a detachable mag. This wont just get rid of "assault rifles", anything with a detachable mag and one evil feature is banned! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:11:02 PM EDT
[#13]
Sorry. It translates to "In Before The Assault Weapons Ban in New York." |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:12:21 PM EDT
[#14]
We can either hang together or hang seperately, but we are going to hang. Blue_Genes, Thanks for trying to cover your own ass & hang me out to dry.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:12:28 PM EDT
[#15]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:13:13 PM EDT
[#16]
Are any of the sponsors up for reelection?
Jim |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:13:27 PM EDT
[#17]
In Before The Assault Weapons Ban in New York |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:15:32 PM EDT
[#18]
Im a little slow, what is the purpose of that, dont quite get it. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:16:23 PM EDT
[#19]
Dont know. But I will be finding out. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:18:50 PM EDT
[#20]
Exactly!! That's the same thing as saying it ok to say this and not that. Or it is fine to print this but not this. We should have access to all small arms, fully automatic or not. That's an ignorant comment. I don't approve a people blasting the president on tv. But citizens have the right to do it. Yet I a law-abiding citizen don't have the right to legally own a MG.....BullShit! We need to get Alito on the Supreme Court for many reasons like this. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:35:16 PM EDT
[#21]
Unimaginable? Go take a look at the link and read the law. You wouldnt believe that people in this country would actually put together a bill like this (unless you live in California).
Even a lefty liberal anti-gunner should cringe when they read this bill. It has "crapped all over the constitution" written all over it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:35:52 PM EDT
[#22]
How about we restrict your freedom of speech? ETA: Oh, I see you are from Connecticut. Figures..... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:41:48 PM EDT
[#23]
The government was never intended to be majority rule, it was based on the rule of law. Up until the longest time the rule of law ment something (Right to keep and bear arms wasn't infringed), now a majority really don't care about their rights any more and have surrendered those rights to the government.
 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:41:55 PM EDT
[#24]
Well, all you New Yorkers are welcomed to move down to Florida; we'll be more than happy to accomodate you and your guns.
 (I smell an "Escape From New York" scenario here, folks.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:42:49 PM EDT
[#25]
Not off to a very good start here, are we? You are too much.... Fucking troll.... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 6:45:22 PM EDT
[#26]
socialism takes another step forward in NY...giant surprise. Makes books like Unintended Consequences and Enemies: Foreign and Domestic seem more and more like fact instead of fiction.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:20:29 PM EDT
[#27]
 Why Can't I have a fully auto weapon? Saying shit like that in here is or anywhere is wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:20:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Any other amendments to the Bill Of Rights that trouble you?
No doubt because of all the legally owned machineguns that are used in crimes. 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:22:56 PM EDT
[#29]
I really didn't mean to threadjack this, so please forgive me: When a thread gets started, and it is for some reason inappropriate, people will often post "IBTL" which means "in before the lock." It's a way of getting one last word in before the thread gets locked. I jokingly posted to get "in before the AWB in NY takes effect." In all seriousness, I hope it doesn't, and I expect it probably will not. |
||||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:23:10 PM EDT
[#30]
Machineguns are not illegal. They're just overpriced due to a piece of shit add on to GOPA.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:25:56 PM EDT
[#31]
  
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:28:57 PM EDT
[#32]
just so we are clear. And oh, it isn't. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:39:12 PM EDT
[#33]
Exactly, its this mentality that allowed the original Federal ban in the first place. The "I dont care cause I dont have assault rifles", or "I already got one, so I dont care if they ban em". Sure its ok if they restrict some of it, because lets face it they wont restrict it any more right? |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:42:54 PM EDT
[#34]
  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 7:47:22 PM EDT
[#35]
Remember the quote?
"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang seperately." Thomas Sterns Eliot Jim |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:05:27 PM EDT
[#36]
because they have to take the 2nd amendment away before they take away all the other amendments. Nathan |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:09:30 PM EDT
[#37]
Will anyone have the Balls to Say "Molon Labe"?
Nathan |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:11:29 PM EDT
[#38]
All hail the Duke, the Duke of New York!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:12:35 PM EDT
[#39]
We would all appreciate it if you left AR15.com and never returned. We dont need your kind around here.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:13:44 PM EDT
[#40]
cop, soldier, un, anybody who try's to disarm me shall fail.
From my cold dead hands |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:15:11 PM EDT
[#41]
Because we all know people go ape shit and kill people when they get a happy switch.  Go ahead, anything else you don't like in the costitution? Maybe we can scratch out Due Process and just kick your ass now! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:16:22 PM EDT
[#42]
How long will my Countrymen allow the our rights to be nibbled away? I am one man and cannot stand alone against this state sponsored oppression. It may not be in our lifetime, though I hope it is, that somebody will have had enough and make a stand against these infringements. This is how our Country was formed, and unless we collectively do the same, the Country as we know it will be lost. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:16:36 PM EDT
[#43]
Would you care to guess how many registered machine guns have been used in crimes in the US in the past 70 years? Oh wait, you don't care. Nevermind. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:20:26 PM EDT
[#44]
Feel free to send me guns to, uh, store for you, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:24:50 PM EDT
[#45]
Actually, If i still Lived in NH, I would do it. Only problem is if Baby-Blue zombies came I wouldn't know how to get your guns back to you. Nathan |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:27:49 PM EDT
[#46]
Fuck you. You are as much a part of the problem as the gun-grabbing left wing politicians. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:32:35 PM EDT
[#47]
Not to pick gnat shit out of pepper, but a really good friend of mine was one of the few dumbasses to actually use a registered full-auto weapon in a crime. He was a Cop in Dayton Ohio, it was his weapon, and the last time I checked/received mail from him he was still serving his xx-years-to-life prison sentence. I wont use his name here, but the instances of NFA weapons used in crimes, and the one time it happened in Dayton Ohio should narrow it down for you.  That said, hell no, I do not agree with what the troll said earlier. Comments like that, and from a gun owner, piss me off to no end. I'm merely clarifying the issue before some wiseass does. 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:43:10 PM EDT
[#48]
TRAITOR! GO BACK TO THE DU. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:44:29 PM EDT
[#49]
What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED do you not get, tory? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2006 8:44:32 PM EDT
[#50]
Come on down to Alabama, unless you want an sbr. Now you see why we tried to break away.(edit) As long as you don't want to further limit our rights, there would be one hell of a fight, we may loose again, but we aren't afraid to mix it up!
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
