User Panel
Post from CeramicGod -
So, the gay bath houses in San Francisco were NOT closed due to public health concerns because the gay activists relied upon the well-litigated and nicely defined 'penumbra' of the Ninth or Tenth Amendment? Nope. That's not what happened at all, is it? How did the gay lobby miss such an obvious and open avenue of Constitutional attack on those public health decrees?
First, ceramicgod, put a cork in your driveling piehole! Nowhere in this or any other thread have I urged that 'sex clubs' be closed due to MY personal religious beliefs! Second, and you really, really have to believe me on this one - I have no freaking need to know where you, or others like you, park your penises, one way or the other! I don't care, I'm not interested, and I couldn't give the least flipping fig about such matters! Understand? I have no desire to control anyone's life! BUT if you say that you have the right to park your penis someplace other than the palm of your own hand, please don't say that this right is 'you know, just like my right to hold a gun'! It isn't! No way. No how. At no time! Comprende, amigo? So, climb down off your ceramic-misguided hobby horse and join us on the ground!
I don't and I won't. So what?
Ah, the Prince of Non-sequiturs shows his ceramicass this morning! I have made no statements about sex clubs other than to say that the right to attend them is not anything like the RKBA! Either address that stament or go play with your ceramicpod. Eric The(CeramicMyAss!)Hun |
||||
|
Eric, I'm tired of your personal attacks. I hope we never meet in person.
Let me spell it out for you, and this is the first time I've ever done this on the board: This is the last time you attack me personally and I just turn the other cheek. If this were in person, this would be fighting words. Mark 'em. I won't forget. Funny, how the moderators on this site can call people names, personal attack galor and they don't get banned. Mention a flashlight and you do. What bullshit. Far as I'm concerned, if they don't BAN Eric the Hun, every moderator on this board is a hypocrit. |
|
ooof.... throttle back soldier...... The way I read it, ETH is engaged in some healthy debate amid an open forum as are you. You, have your panties all in a bunch. So dig out the wedgie, go get some sunlight, pop a valium, and sit back down at the screen. You'll feel better. |
|
|
It is the morphine -------- it causes a loss of inhibitions. Lighten up. |
|
|
As you can tell, I've edited the message to something more reasonable for the COC - I wrote that at the moment, and didn't edit it fast enough before you guys quoted it. HOWEVER: Eric has been attacking me personally for months. Its old. Nothing comes of it. I'm sick of it, and that "MODERATOR" under his name is a outrage. |
||
|
Why? Everyone I know oves the heck out of me! Why would you be any different?
Ah, a spelling contest! Cool!
Still fixated on your ceramicass this morning, I see! Tsk, tsk, tsk! You should see more lofty subjects of discourse!
Which words are those? 'Ceramicass'? 'Ceramicpod'? What?
Well, some of us are good at remembering dates. Some are good at remembering old grudges. To each his own!
What names have I called you, son? I can't seem to recall one that would merit such a response as this one! Let's see what words got your dainties in a patchwork!
Try to keep this between the two of us, if you please!
Maybe, but you still don't have an answer for my 'bullshiite' either! Now, take a deep breath, and listen! I never once mentioned my personal religious beliefs in this thread! But, you, thinking you know me, oh-so-well, simply thought, in knee-jerk fashion, that if I post on a 'sex club' thread, I simply MUST be here to do the Lord's work! Well, buddy-boy, guess again! You are all washed up and full of yourself this morning. Eric The(SucksToBeYou)Hun |
||||||||
|
Post from CeramicGod -
I bear you no malice, son! Whatever you may say about me is nothing compared to what I've been through, so take no thought of whatever you wish to call me.
First, I seldom if ever attack anyone personally. If I have attacked you personally in the past, please accept my apologies for doing so! It is quite unlike me, I can assure you. As can others! Second, let the 'Moderator' under my name count for little in any of our disputes! I speak for myself, and I 'moderate' only the Gunstock Forum. Nothing elsewhere. Nothing in General Discussion. Have a nice day. Eric The(Gracious,AsAlways)Hun |
||
|
I don't know why but that is the funniest thing I've seen all morning. Not trying to take sides, we now rejoin the pissing contest already in progress. |
|
|
He's right you know. I've called Eric lots worse. Once I even called him a lawyer. |
|
|
A 'Lawyer' … …now thats a harsh thing to call a man! ANdy |
||
|
<gack> I never knew that! I am appalled! I don't think that I shall ever speak to you again....for the next few seconds, at least! Eric The(Reeling)Hun |
||
|
Pipe down Barrister. |
|||
|
You CAN'T do that to me this early in the morning. Now I have images of them goofy fuckers in ties in a sex club with 52,000 bicycles parked out front. |
|
|
|
||
|
Don't mock me, Boy! I'm feeling rather cantankerous this AM! The meds aren't working properly and I'm sitting here in a darkened bedroom with a glistening sheen slowly forming upon my porcelain-like body! (Ugh, that mental picture is revolting even to me!) Eric The(DullWitted)Hun |
|
|
I'm blind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||
|
I think Eric is pretty much correct. I don't think Federal regualtion would be constitutional due to the 10th Amendment, but clearly the states can regulate this as they choose. Of course, the people who attend these places are pretty much the same group who don't know about the 10th or simply don't care (although they think there is some amendment that mentions "right to privacy"). |
||
|
$130 will buy the wife and I a dinner at Ruth Chris Steak house
|
|
I can save you $130 bucks. The secret of Ruth Chris. 1. Grill a steak. 2. Put a plate in an oven and heat the plate. 3. Put a pad of butter on the heated plate. 4. Quickly add the steak to now sizzling plate and serve. You have just made a $130 Ruth Chris "sizzling steak." Now you can take the wife to the swing club. |
|
|
Or you can just pimp her out for the $$$ instead, I mean why should I pay for a business to pimp her when I can and make all those greenbacks? |
||
|
Well, yeah, sure; but will Ruth Chris's allow you to bang a 50 year old ,185lb truck driver's wife while your wife is simultaneously blowing the truck driver? |
|
|
Ah-hah! Just as I'd planned! I smoked out the member who has the most rich and imaginative fantasy life! Uh-oh! Did I just use the terms 'smoked' and 'member' in the very same sentence??!! I'll be leaving now. Eric The(Now,Don'tComeAfterMe)Hun |
|||
|
I must agree. Lighten up, Frances. BTW, Eric is right. While the .gov may have no right to tell a two consenting adults where to park their privates, the fact remains that such a "right" is not anywhere near as important as the RKBA or any of the others enshrined in the Constitution. The BOR is there for a purpose, and sex isn't one of them. This is like people saying that publishing Hustler or screaming out the details of the SIOP on a street corner is protected by the First Amendment, but political ads 30 days before an election aren't. |
||
|
Man that didn't help. |
||
|
I have been to a few overseas.
I didn't get any poon but it was still an experience I'll never forget. Most of the clubs were dance clubs where the pros, semi pros and amateur girls went to make some $$$. Most anything was acceptable from having sex on stage to laying some pipe at your table or booth. My first experience in a club in Rio De Janeiro was kinda funny. At the time, I spoke enough Portuguese to grab a cab for me and my compadres and convey to the cabbie we wanted to see some womenz, the more nekkid, the better. He dropped us off in the North end of the city and pointed down a dark alley. We walked up to the club, went in through the first door and stopped to pay the cover and get frisked. There was a curtain dividing the foyer from the club and you could hear all sorts of things coming from behind the curtain. I was the first to walk through and was greeted in the first booth by a fellow sailor who was obviously rounding third and heading for home with a local girl right in the booth. As my eyes adjusted to the light I could see people all over the club in various forms of copulation and there was a live show up on the stage. There were 4 of us that went. I grabbed a seat on a large round couch while two of my buds went in search of whatever. The line to the bathroom was very long as it doubled for a privacy area for those too timid to have sex in public. While sitting on the couch a rather large sailor sat down beside me, he called a girl over and quickly negotiated a price for some knob polishing. I wasn't paying attention to what he was doing or rather getting done to him but as he got further along he started to lean over and make contact with me. Just as I was about to get up and grab another seat, he grabbed my leg and grunted. I looked over at Grant who was a brother from Georgia, who had sat down with me on the round couch and said "The novelty has worn off this place, we should be going." He couldn't stop laughing at the fact that the dude grabbed my leg. We had a buddy in line for the bathroom so we were stuck there for some time. We stayed for a few hours, I did see a few womenz that I would have loved to sample but the disease factor and the numbers of riders that most women had put a damper on the lust. |
|
To quote Frank Dreben (Leslie Nielsen) in The Naked Gun 33 1/3, "I like my sex like I like my basketball......one on one and with as little dribbling as possible".
So I think I'll pass on the club thing. Gimme my own bedroom with nothing there but me, a woman, some candles, some soft jazz and a bottle of champagne on ice. The woman with any (or none) of these accomodations is all I need. Hehe. -CH |
|
You never mentioned the context of this discussion with the "lady friend". She may have been checking to see if you were game.
BUTT what do I know? |
|
Damn, now that image will be stuck in my head all day. |
||
|
There are more good one-liners in this thread then in all of the other threads combined. |
||
|
Last I checked... Mormons drive cars, it's the Amish that don't. ETA - I should also note that I've never seen an Amish person riding a bike even though I live in Amish country, a couple towns over from the 2nd largest Amish community in the country. They're either walking, or in a buggy. I've heard they throw the crazyiest parties ever. My friend went to one at a barn that was specifically built for parties, they had an amish DJ spinning techno and tons of kegs. When the cops showed and used the loudspeaker to tell all underage people to leave, my friend said all the Amish kids flipped them the bird and kept partying. |
||
|
Right, if you're talking about Amish sex clubs, you need to cut that number in half and swap the bicycles and cars for horse buggies. "Oh Samuel...." |
|||
|
Wow, so sex can be regulated because it isn't specifically protected by the constitution? So where in the constitution is the right to breathe protected? For that matter, where does it SPECIFICALLY say that military pattern semi-automatic firearms are protected? Some things should be so self freaking explanatory. Thanks for the reminder of why lawyers are so despised.
As far as I am concerned, the City of San Fransico gov't shutting down bath houses for public health concerns is no different than the State of California banning assault weapons and .50 caliber firearms for public health concerns. Some of you guys had better think long and hard about that. You've got no right to bitch about the gov't infringing on your freedoms when you condone it infringing on someone else's. |
|
Thankfully, Boomer, your views have NOT been accepted in any Court of Law that I know of!
Did the Founding Fathers intend to protect gay sex, private or otherwise? Did the Founding Fathers intend to protect an individual's right to keep and bear arms? IF you say that the Founding Fathers' original intent doesn't matter any longer, then just drop all pretense at being pro-RKBA and simply call the ACLU for a membership application! And to try and link sex and gun rights as coextensive or coequal rights is a sin! Sorry. There may be plenty of reasons to NOT interfere with anyone's private sexual activities, but the US Constitution and the particular Amendments thereto referred to as the Bill of Rights are NOT sources of any such reasons. Eric The(Historical)Hun |
|
My limited experience with this was a 'strip club' in Rio. I wasn't there long. I bailed on my buddies at the first available opportunity (another guy 'wasn't feeling well', so I left to 'make sure he was OK'). One of my other buddies 'hit it' at the club, and again at a hotel that night. He was my roomate on that trip, I didn't see him until right before dawn a few times. Me, I ended up spending the night talking to a cute girl from Maryland on the beach that night. (No, I didn't hit it, and in retrospect, am glad I didn't) Personally, I don't like them. I just want me and my GF. I don't need others or an audience. |
|||
|
I think the founding fathers might have constitutionally protected sex had they foreseen idiots trying to parse the constitution like this. I wonder what they would have said about some twice divorced old geezer shagging girls young enough to be his daughters or even granddaughters. Like I said, no wonder why lawyers are despised. Thanks for yet a another perfect example. Sex, straight or gay, between consenting adults being regulated just because it isn't mentioned in the constitution = . Sex is such a basic function of life that it shouldn't require constitutional protection. Geez, get over yourself already. |
|
|
I always see them on bikes, or is that Jehova's Witnesses? |
|||
|
Post from Boomer -
Have any source or facts that might back up your views on this? Those guys were pretty strait-laced, you know!
Are you mumbling something under your breath about moi ??!! I doubt that the Founding Fathers would have given a rat's rear what I did in my private life! But I damn sure know that whatever dalliances I may engage in would not somehow qualify as a 'fundamental right' that should be secured by any Constitutional provision or by any Bill of Rights!
Who gives a flying fig what profession is 'despised'??!!
No, thank you for another perfect example of why attorneys are wealthy and much sought after by one and all!
Whatever! Your saying that it is so, does not make it so!
That is the point of this whole argument! Whatever the status of 'sexual freedom' might be, it is NOT in the pantheon of 'Fundamental Rights' when the issue at hand is a commercial 'sex club.' Otherwise we are discussing whether the government can make some provisions respecting commercial sexual businesses. And we all know that it does, and no one is in a snit over it.
Eric The(Sassier'nHades)Hun |
|||||||
|
Oh, you SO OWE ME A NEW KEYBOARD! |
||
|
I guess I see you point. Commercial sex businesses can be regulated just as commercial firearms businesses can. So the $64,000 answer is to just have free sex parties for those so inclined, right?
|
|
Excellent! You have correctly identified the issues involved! I applaud your perseverence in going back and reading this thread thoroughly! Forgive me for my excesses in that last post of mine! I can be a bit niggling at times! Eric The(Attorney,AfterAll)Hun |
|
|
Never really heard of and likewise never been to one.......sounds kinda illegal.
Does a bottom shelf tiddy bar in Tiajuana count? |
|
I hate it when a great sex thread degenerates into a constitutional debate.
|
|
Sex is sonething that is private and should be experienced only withinthe intimate relatship of a few couples...LOLOL
HEy ETH...you should see the Female Asian..Body builder model...nah never mind |
|
+1 Now the mormon sex club that's funny. |
|
|
Black leather clad dominatrix with a strap on dildo resembling a black knurled tree stump, and a wimpy Wall Street executive stripped down.. bent over a sawhorse. Poor boy must have went home in a wheel chair. |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.