User Panel
Posted: 4/9/2008 12:43:02 PM EDT
I posited the question as to whether or not Modern Abortion and contraception methods were in fact intended as a Eugenics program in order to reduce the number of minorities and poor in this country. As evidence to support this position, I provided various links to Margaret Sanger's writings and in fact the early stated positions of the organization that is now Planned Parenthood. These writings suggest a specific social engineering program designed primarily to engage in a reverse Eugenics program by intentionally decreasing the number of births among minorities and the poor, while not targeting the majority or those from successful families.
All of these things are in fact true and are well documented in Sanger's own writings. Now, given that the very idea of reducing the minority population by preventing or decreasing minority births by design of social elites, is wholly repugnant to the modern liberal mantra, they are going nuts over it as they cannot disprove it. It has been roundly denounced as a conspiracy theory with much stammering after I point out, it can't be a conspiracy if the founders openly stated their specific intent and purpose in writing. This is rich. BTW: I am staunchly pro choice, believe life begins when the child could survive independant of the mother and do not care at all what your personal beliefs are on the issue. Your opinion is no better than mine on the subject so keep it to yourself. The fun part here is watching liberals implode when they realize that their liberal agenda is founded upon racist and stealth genocide. |
|
I am saving the Coups degras.
I know a woman who became pregnant in college. This is about mid 1980s. She is Jewish, her boyfriend was WASPish. Also a college student. She went to get an abortion and planned parenthood talked her out of it because!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is always a good adoptive home for a caucasian baby from college educated parents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is specifically what she was told by PP. |
|
I will not cross link it. The primary reason is, I don't want trolls from there coming here. The second is, it is a newspaper website forum with software so hard to follow that it's infuriating to someone not used to it. That and they delete at will with even the slightest CoC violation. At this point I've managed to avoid that. |
|
|
Margret Sanger made up for her racism by being a socialist. They will give her a pass on it.
|
|
Yes, please, you must share a link. I just have to watch this burn down in person. ETA: I swear I won't post a thing, and I'll cold link from my browser. I just want to watch. IM me at the very least. I'm openly begging here. |
|
|
You gotta be shitting us. (By the way I'm pro-life, no arguing just wondering why libtards are Pro-abortion but anti-death sentence?) I know you are not a libtard and, I'm not Trying to take shots at your position. |
|
|
No, I am pro choice because I am a father of teenage daughters. That and I believe life begins when a baby could survive independant of the mother. This is my personal belief. The whole Eugenics issue was very new to me. |
|
|
No, this was very true. I was not the father of her child, but knew her in college after she put the baby up for adoption. I think she told me about this while trying to convince me that she had no intention of getting re pregnant to trap someone. |
||
|
I think it is important to point out to liberals that what they often view as progressive policy really has it's roots in the most evil forms of racism much as gun control. |
|
|
I'm wondering what the actual abortion statistics are by race and economic level are. You've made some mighty tall accusations here about Planned Parenthood but I see no reference to verifiable source data to support your basic premise. I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect in your assertions, I'm saying that verifiable support for the validity of your claims is lacking.
|
|
Sooooooo did ya hit it |
|||
|
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger some direct info here. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,348649,00.html |
|
|
Blow job, but that's another story at a later time. |
|
|
What gets me is "we are losing children everyday in Iraq"...
OTOH, libs are very pro abortion. (I am pro choice) |
|
|
||
|
I was listening to Laura Ingraham today play clips from people asking planned parenthood if they could donate money for abortions and earmark it for black women only and they said that it could be done no problem.
|
|
Several reasons why I'm pro-choice are in the original post.
Bible be damned, we've got too many knuckleheads in this country. Get the shop-vac. - BG |
|
I doubt they have a black only earmark, they probably just said it to the bigot so they could still get his money. I see no issue with lying to bigots. |
|
|
Abortion is for the poor. If blacks have more abortions its probably because their culture encourages sex at a younger age.
Ironically, Stephen Levitt attributes abortion to the dramatic decline of crime in the 1990s. Crime was out of control. They poured money into the police and crime went down - so they assumed that worked. BUT - not so fast. Levitt makes a compelling case that Roe v Wade is what did it. Simply put, there were less babies of poor people to grow up to be thieves, murderers, and drug dealers. |
|
They are still debating it. This is fun, I have not posted to it there in three hours.
|
|
Well played! I admire your taunting of the Obamunists and agree with your philosophy re: abortion.
|
|
The moderator killed the thread. Apparently a clintonista and an obamunist started hurling racial slurs at each other.
|
|
OK, at least copy/paste the text so we can all laugh along. |
|
|
Divide and conquer, I like it ! |
|
|
I seem to recall reading that something like 90% of abortions are performed on black babies. -K |
|
|
From the numbers that I read, a higher raw number of abortions are done by white college age women. However, as a percentage of the ethnic population, a much higher percentage is done by black women. The link I used earlier showed that something like 50% fewer potential babies born over the period of time in question to black mothers. |
||
|
You could post a new thread asking why Obama only voted 'present' on a partial-birth abortion bill while in the Illinois legislature.
Linky (ETA: Doing so without hinting whether you are pro or anti should add to the chaos, as ensuing posters won't know whether to agree with you or villify you) |
|
I started a new thread with this post:
Is this good public policy? We know that Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood organization started with the specific intent of providing low cost birth control and abortion services in low income and minority communities with the specific intent of keeping the population of undesireables down. Even though their intent was racist from its inception, could it now in the modern era, be good public policy to ensure that no cost of very low cost, birth control and abortion services are available to the poor and lower social classes?? Should we as Democrats be supportive of this population control and should we urge our politicians to fund it? The guy who is the abortion drum beater is calling me a tinfoil conpiracy theorist. I just asked him if he actually read any of Sanger's writings? |
|
From one of their far left liberals
Maybe Sanger was a racist and who believed in eugenics. Big deal. Henry Ford was an anti-semite who was a friend of Adolf Hitler. Planned Parenthood is no more a front for a eugenics agenda than the Ford Motor Company is a front for the Nazis. My response: I used the trump card: I can agree That Ford Motor company is no longer a front for the Nazis, I'm not quite sure I can buy into the former. The net results are the same. I tend to not relay too many personal things but I did know ( not in the biblical sense ) a girl in college that was convinced by PP not to abort when they found out the father was also white. She was told there are good homes for White babies and she should put it up for adoption. This was said by a PP center in NE Ohio in about 1985. Now, you infer what you like or not, but I know this woman and still do. This is specifically what she was told. Combine that with the recent unpleasentness in the news and your assertions sound less and less plausible |
|
I love it |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.