Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - MASADA (Page 3 of 51)

Previous Page
/ 51
Next Page
1/17/2007 3:36:40 AM EDT
[#1]
Rich,

By the prototype, it looks as if there will not be a MIAD Style grip, having interchangeable backstraps. I think people in general will want that. It looks awesome as it is and personally I don't care about different backstraps. I'm sure your team has already thought of it, but I wanted to throw it out there anyways.

Regards,
Nathan
1/17/2007 4:11:37 AM EDT
[#2]
I am really thinking hard about buying one.


As long as it functions good, I'll get one.
1/17/2007 4:41:10 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Video of the inital test firing of the Masada on Jan 5th, 2007.

Inital Masada test fire (Windows Media- 4 meg)

This test was just to show the rifle could function.

The rifle was just loose strapped in the rest. When hand firing the shooters reported that it was similar to an M4 (AR15).

On the incosistant ejection it could be the ammo as we were firing our cheap Guatemalan training ammo which along with Radway Green seems to have the most issues.

On this prototype the bolt carrier was not hardened and was catching on a burr on the hammer.

We understand the issues on Military manufacturing and we are under no illusions about it.

We actually refered to it internally  (as way of a mission statement) as the "free peoples rifle", opposed to the AK which is the "peoples rifle"


Rich,

Does the Masada design have any form of initial extraction (the lack of which is one of the primary drawbacks of the AR-15 platform)?

Justin
1/17/2007 4:48:07 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
No, the US Mil hasn't adopted a new rifle because the candidates have failed to surpass the M16 in actual utility...

The SCAR is not going to live past the initial contract for 600-some rifles...

The HK XM-8 never got out of testing...

The problem is that as long as a gas-operated semiauto rifle remains the standard issue weapon, you won't get a better one than the M16 for less than the cost of upgrading the M16... This being the case, we are now up to trying to use M16-wives-tales about piston-operation and carbon-fouling (on the part of HK, as the most recent offender) to sell the military a gun they don't need, that offers nothing over the '16... Most of the 'problems' people cite with the M16 don't actually exist, or are largely limited to heavily modified civillian AR-15 models....

Now, does this mean that Magpul is wrong for making a new rifle? NO... The more choices the better...

But will it offer anything 'better' than the M16 to a military customer, to a point that it will justify replacement? No...

Put it this way: Carbine-wise we are up to at least XM-9 right now... XMs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 have failed to beat the M-4... Hmm...

Gas piston operation is not superior, folding stocks really don't improve anything, and we've already tried the plastic-gun route (interestingly, the MASADA looks VERY MUCH like an XM-8) with no success - of course Magpul has a very good track record with plastic - maybe they can solve HK's melting problems....


If I were a mod, I would ban you for spreading false information, and insinuating an industry partner's product failure based on a completely different weapon system that uses different materials.  

The parts in red are outright wrong, and the highlight in blue is just to bring your obvious disreguard for product knowledge reguarding the MASADA to light.

(Magpul and Rainier Arms) I'm sorry I posted about this in your topic, but if you allow this man to continue posting like so, your topic will end up being a flame war filled with completely incorrect information that will spread like a virus.


1) The parts in red are absolutely correct... You may have missed hearing them, or you may have access to info I don't on the SCAR, but the present 'word' is that SCAR is done for after the initial procurement of 600-odd rifles (due to issues with it not living up to it's promised capabilities wrt modularity, and some other 'issues'), and we all know the XM-8 didn't make it for a multitude of reasons (from melting to Beta mags instead of belts)...

There have been several 'can we find a better rifle than the M16' trials (ACR trials come to mind here), all have failed to produce a superior weapon....

2) The part in blue is not an 'assumption about a partner's product' it's a statement - HK has melting problems... Magpul is good with plastic products... It would be nice to see them produce a melt-proof plastic gun - especially if that production moved back into the AR realm (Another polymer AR rec would be nice - a/o just Bushy and Hesse for 'conventional' or CavArms for integrated)..

And a guy with 4000 posts asking for me to be banned because I pissed in your cheerios? Grow up...

I've got some strong opinions, and I am in no way against or trying to slam MagPul for making a new rifle... The more products on the market, the better - especially at such a legally-favorable time...

However, I still personally feel the M16 is the 'best option' for the military, and it's definitely the weapon I'd pick for combat given the choice (of course, I'm not given the choice - but I get an M16 or M4 anyways, so all's well there).......

Simply stating that I don't think this will be better than the M16 doesn't mean there's something wrong with it - the G-36, AUG, and Tavor will never be better than the M16, but it would still be great to have all of them on the market... Fuck, if there was 'something wrong' with a gun just because it's not a M16, I wouldn't own an AK...

That's all...


I believe from all of the available info that the upper receiver of the Masada is aluminum not plastic, therefore not comparable in regards of the melting issues experienced by the HK G36.
1/17/2007 5:41:00 AM EDT
[#5]
I'm with you BushmasterGuy77,

I think the rifle looks awesome 'as is', and I really like the grip/lower receiver being one-piece (like the HK navy style lowers). Some people will want a backstrap option similar to the MIAD, and opinions will vary - but I tend to use the 'medium' backstrap on my MIADs anyway, which looks similar to the Masada Grip.

1/17/2007 9:30:23 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
I believe from all of the available info that the upper receiver of the Masada is aluminum not plastic, therefore not comparable in regards of the melting issues experienced by the HK G36.

Thank you for pointing out what I thought was obvious.

Dave_A, I'm not going to address you any further in this thread. If you feel the need to continue, start another topic if you wish.

Magpul, thanks for bringing us the MASADA. I'm looking forward to when I can pick one up myself.
1/17/2007 9:50:54 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
1) The parts in red are absolutely correct... You may have missed hearing them, or you may have access to info I don't on the SCAR, but the present 'word' is that SCAR is done for after the initial procurement of 600-odd rifles (due to issues with it not living up to it's promised capabilities wrt modularity, and some other 'issues')



Why don't you post a cite for this information?

If you can't, then shut up and stop posting BS.
1/17/2007 9:51:18 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
No, the US Mil hasn't adopted a new rifle because the candidates have failed to surpass the M16 in actual utility...

The SCAR is not going to live past the initial contract for 600-some rifles...

The HK XM-8 never got out of testing...

The problem is that as long as a gas-operated semiauto rifle remains the standard issue weapon, you won't get a better one than the M16 for less than the cost of upgrading the M16... This being the case, we are now up to trying to use M16-wives-tales about piston-operation and carbon-fouling (on the part of HK, as the most recent offender) to sell the military a gun they don't need, that offers nothing over the '16... Most of the 'problems' people cite with the M16 don't actually exist, or are largely limited to heavily modified civillian AR-15 models....

Now, does this mean that Magpul is wrong for making a new rifle? NO... The more choices the better...

But will it offer anything 'better' than the M16 to a military customer, to a point that it will justify replacement? No...

Put it this way: Carbine-wise we are up to at least XM-9 right now... XMs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 have failed to beat the M-4... Hmm...

Gas piston operation is not superior, folding stocks really don't improve anything, and we've already tried the plastic-gun route (interestingly, the MASADA looks VERY MUCH like an XM-8) with no success - of course Magpul has a very good track record with plastic - maybe they can solve HK's melting problems....


If I were a mod, I would ban you for spreading false information, and insinuating an industry partner's product failure based on a completely different weapon system that uses different materials.  

The parts in red are outright wrong, and the highlight in blue is just to bring your obvious disreguard for product knowledge reguarding the MASADA to light.

(Magpul and Rainier Arms) I'm sorry I posted about this in your topic, but if you allow this man to continue posting like so, your topic will end up being a flame war filled with completely incorrect information that will spread like a virus.


1) The parts in red are absolutely correct... You may have missed hearing them, or you may have access to info I don't on the SCAR, but the present 'word' is that SCAR is done for after the initial procurement of 600-odd rifles (due to issues with it not living up to it's promised capabilities wrt modularity, and some other 'issues'), and we all know the XM-8 didn't make it for a multitude of reasons (from melting to Beta mags instead of belts)...

There have been several 'can we find a better rifle than the M16' trials (ACR trials come to mind here), all have failed to produce a superior weapon....

2) The part in blue is not an 'assumption about a partner's product' it's a statement - HK has melting problems... Magpul is good with plastic products... It would be nice to see them produce a melt-proof plastic gun - especially if that production moved back into the AR realm (Another polymer AR rec would be nice - a/o just Bushy and Hesse for 'conventional' or CavArms for integrated)..

And a guy with 4000 posts asking for me to be banned because I pissed in your cheerios? Grow up...

I've got some strong opinions, and I am in no way against or trying to slam MagPul for making a new rifle... The more products on the market, the better - especially at such a legally-favorable time...

However, I still personally feel the M16 is the 'best option' for the military, and it's definitely the weapon I'd pick for combat given the choice (of course, I'm not given the choice - but I get an M16 or M4 anyways, so all's well there).......

Simply stating that I don't think this will be better than the M16 doesn't mean there's something wrong with it - the G-36, AUG, and Tavor will never be better than the M16, but it would still be great to have all of them on the market... Fuck, if there was 'something wrong' with a gun just because it's not a M16, I wouldn't own an AK...

That's all...


I believe from all of the available info that the upper receiver of the Masada is aluminum not plastic, therefore not comparable in regards of the melting issues experienced by the HK G36.


Yep, it's definitely aluminum. IIRC Rich said it was a 7000 series aluminum when I heard him talking about it at SHOT. The handguard is plastic though, at least the bottom portion of it is. Not sure how that will hold up to heat, but I'm sure that Magpul will do some testing.
1/17/2007 11:23:12 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
1) The parts in red are absolutely correct... You may have missed hearing them, or you may have access to info I don't on the SCAR, but the present 'word' is that SCAR is done for after the initial procurement of 600-odd rifles (due to issues with it not living up to it's promised capabilities wrt modularity, and some other 'issues')



Why don't you post a cite for this information?

If you can't, then shut up and stop posting BS.


Your attempts at logic and reason are futile.  I confronted the esteemed poster about it twice already and have yet to see a response.

1/17/2007 12:18:39 PM EDT
[#10]
I don't purport to be as knowledgable as many of the more established posters on this forum, but I don't understand why the Masada will be superior(term used loosely) to the M16.
Lighter? Great. Piston-operated? Wonderful. Caliber interchangability? Whoopdeedoo.

Once again, my experience is limited. I don't run my carbines half as hard as some folks here. That said; I've never had a major issue with the DI system, I've never felt the need for a folding stock, and while the ability to swap mags and barrels to fire a different caliber is a cool idea I don't think it's all that practical.

Kudos to Magpul for getting their entry out there, but this won't be the next M16.
1/17/2007 3:14:10 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
I don't purport to be as knowledgable as many of the more established posters on this forum, but I don't understand why the Masada will be superior(term used loosely) to the M16.
Lighter? Great. Piston-operated? Wonderful. Caliber interchangability? Whoopdeedoo.

Once again, my experience is limited. I don't run my carbines half as hard as some folks here. That said; I've never had a major issue with the DI system, I've never felt the need for a folding stock, and while the ability to swap mags and barrels to fire a different caliber is a cool idea I don't think it's all that practical.

Kudos to Magpul for getting their entry out there, but this won't be the next M16.


I would say the biggest thing is the hardened steel carrier rides on hardened steel rails with a lot more bearing surface than an AR15 carrier. This with the piston system should prove to be a robust operating group as the AR180 showed. Adding a piston drive to an AR15 only fixes half the problem.

The other thing would be AMBI everything and only needing two hands to lock the bolt back.
1/17/2007 4:14:43 PM EDT
[#12]
Please let me know when we can put our order in. Everyone I know who saw it thought it was one of the very best things we saw at Shot Show. I certainly thought so. I want one pretty bad (SBR in tan please).
1/17/2007 5:48:28 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I don't purport to be as knowledgable as many of the more established posters on this forum, but I don't understand why the Masada will be superior(term used loosely) to the M16.
Lighter? Great. Piston-operated? Wonderful. Caliber interchangability? Whoopdeedoo.

Once again, my experience is limited. I don't run my carbines half as hard as some folks here. That said; I've never had a major issue with the DI system, I've never felt the need for a folding stock, and while the ability to swap mags and barrels to fire a different caliber is a cool idea I don't think it's all that practical.

Kudos to Magpul for getting their entry out there, but this won't be the next M16.


I would say the biggest thing is the hardened steel carrier rides on hardened steel rails with a lot more bearing surface than an AR15 carrier. This with the piston system should prove to be a robust operating group as the AR180 showed. Adding a piston drive to an AR15 only fixes half the problem.

The other thing would be AMBI everything and only needing two hands to lock the bolt back.


Yes but it doesn't address the other half of the problem: initial extraction.
1/17/2007 5:51:55 PM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
Please let me know when we can put our order in. Everyone I know who saw it thought it was one of the very best things we saw at Shot Show. I certainly thought so. I want one pretty bad (SBR in tan please).
U with class III ? About time U join the club.  I want one too just like New-arguy's tan and short.. Tuna
1/17/2007 6:07:45 PM EDT
[#15]
Will a DIAS work in it ?
1/17/2007 6:12:47 PM EDT
[#16]
When can dealers start ordering? Info please. These are very cool rifles.
1/17/2007 6:27:47 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Will a DIAS work in it ?


No, because we trip the auto sear different than an M16.
1/17/2007 6:28:30 PM EDT
[#18]
On the inital extraction. I will ask about that.
1/17/2007 6:29:33 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
Please let me know when we can put our order in. Everyone I know who saw it thought it was one of the very best things we saw at Shot Show. I certainly thought so. I want one pretty bad (SBR in tan please).


May as well put my order in the same time as yours.  I'll even help you print out your trust.  I want it.  I know I have to be patient, but I'm not very good at that.  My only hope is that a large part of the Eastern Seaboard falls into the Atlantic so that I will be busy for the next 12 months or so until it is out.
1/17/2007 6:50:50 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
Please let me know when we can put our order in. Everyone I know who saw it thought it was one of the very best things we saw at Shot Show. I certainly thought so. I want one pretty bad (SBR in tan please).




And since we cant have SBR's in WA, I guess some sucking up to get some shipped as Pistols, with some end cap on them would be the answer for a lot of us.

11.5" Masada Pistol.





And then convert it over to a rifle!




Now Rich, please log off the Internet, call your employees all to work, weld the door shut from the inside and dont come out until you guys are done.



A lot of people are waiting to order this!

1/17/2007 7:13:17 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
1) The parts in red are absolutely correct... You may have missed hearing them, or you may have access to info I don't on the SCAR, but the present 'word' is that SCAR is done for after the initial procurement of 600-odd rifles (due to issues with it not living up to it's promised capabilities wrt modularity, and some other 'issues')



Why don't you post a cite for this information?

If you can't, then shut up and stop posting BS.


Your attempts at logic and reason are futile.  I confronted the esteemed poster about it twice already and have yet to see a response.



+1

The pattern is remarkably consistent.  Post swill, fervently label it as fact, & ignore true, fact-based responses posted by those actually involved in the particular programs/projects &/or who work in the companies who make said products in question.  Wash, rinse, repeat.

Some originality of thought or insight would be a nice change of pace, just once there, David.
1/17/2007 8:28:42 PM EDT
[#22]
Magpul-  Can you give us some more details in terms of projected availability, price, other options not on the pdf, pistol option (for those of us in WA and other states who cant have SBR's), MAID grip backstraps (on the Masada), vertical grip sneek peeks and anything else you have in store for us?  

Maybe you could put a "projects in process" section on your site with updates (lowers, vertical grip, Masada, UBR, CTR cheek/ battery compartment) when benchmarks are met.

Is there anything we can do to speed up the release of the MASADA?

Like the rest of your loyal customers, I have cash in hand waiting for the release of the MASADA, lowers, UBR, ect.  The quicker you get these products out, the quicker you'll have my money in you'r pocket!

Congratulations on another well designed product!
1/17/2007 8:42:15 PM EDT
[#23]
Can the Masada handle any AR barrel profile (Govt/Pencil, Midweight, HBAR, Varmint)?

Any 100-rd Beta-C mag tests done?

Future Requests:
1  6.8 SPC.
2  45ACP, 10mm, 40 S&W
3  20GA shotgun
4  Fixed hollow buttstock with door for cleaning kit, etc.
5  Ambi Thumb-hole stock.


Thanks,
Chris
1/18/2007 10:26:46 AM EDT
[#24]
Okay, this is something that we planned on doing.  Now that we have a Magpul forum back up I'll be working on this.  By the end of next week plan on seeing some new tacked threads on our latest stuff to keep everyone updated.  As far as what the ARFcom population can do to speed up the production of the Masada.......sit tight.  Magpul has a very good reputation of keeping the people in the know and I intend to keep it this way.  Please do not call the us to get updated info, try and use the tacked threads to get the info you desire.  Give me a week to gather myself from SHOT and you'll see the tacked threads.  

Drake  


Quoted:
Magpul-  Can you give us some more details in terms of projected availability, price, other options not on the pdf, pistol option (for those of us in WA and other states who cant have SBR's), MAID grip backstraps (on the Masada), vertical grip sneek peeks and anything else you have in store for us?  

Maybe you could put a "projects in process" section on your site with updates (lowers, vertical grip, Masada, UBR, CTR cheek/ battery compartment) when benchmarks are met.

Is there anything we can do to speed up the release of the MASADA?

Like the rest of your loyal customers, I have cash in hand waiting for the release of the MASADA, lowers, UBR, ect.  The quicker you get these products out, the quicker you'll have my money in you'r pocket!

Congratulations on another well designed product!
1/18/2007 11:51:21 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:
Okay, this is something that we planned on doing.  Now that we have a Magpul forum back up I'll be working on this.  By the end of next week plan on seeing some new tacked threads on our latest stuff to keep everyone updated.  As far as what the ARFcom population can do to speed up the production of the Masada.......sit tight.  Magpul has a very good reputation of keeping the people in the know and I intend to keep it this way.  Please do not call the us to get updated info, try and use the tacked threads to get the info you desire.  Give me a week to gather myself from SHOT and you'll see the tacked threads.  

Drake  



Assume this forum is located on Magpuls website. Didn't find anything under Industry section here.

1/18/2007 12:59:38 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Okay, this is something that we planned on doing.  Now that we have a Magpul forum back up I'll be working on this.  By the end of next week plan on seeing some new tacked threads on our latest stuff to keep everyone updated.  As far as what the ARFcom population can do to speed up the production of the Masada.......sit tight.  Magpul has a very good reputation of keeping the people in the know and I intend to keep it this way.  Please do not call the us to get updated info, try and use the tacked threads to get the info you desire.  Give me a week to gather myself from SHOT and you'll see the tacked threads.  

Drake  



Assume this forum is located on Magpuls website. Didn't find anything under Industry section here.





www.ar15.com/forums/forum.html?b=2&f=124
1/18/2007 1:45:36 PM EDT
[#27]
I got to see the Masada today, thanks Magpul.  

The AR15 is a great rifle, but the Masada brings many improvements together in a well-thought-out package.    I am a big AR15 fan, but the Masada is flat out going to rock.

+1 Tan SBR.  
1/18/2007 2:25:49 PM EDT
[#28]
Good to see you again Zak, feel free to post the pics you took.


Quoted:
I got to see the Masada today, thanks Magpul.  

The AR15 is a great rifle, but the Masada brings many improvements together in a well-thought-out package.    I am a big AR15 fan, but the Masada is flat out going to rock.

+1 Tan SBR.  
1/18/2007 2:57:00 PM EDT
[#29]
When does the Masada hit the markit, and how much?
1/18/2007 3:12:08 PM EDT
[#30]
One year, $1500 range....give or take.


Quoted:
When does the Masada hit the markit, and how much?
1/18/2007 9:37:46 PM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Okay, this is something that we planned on doing.  Now that we have a Magpul forum back up I'll be working on this.  By the end of next week plan on seeing some new tacked threads on our latest stuff to keep everyone updated.  As far as what the ARFcom population can do to speed up the production of the Masada.......sit tight.  Magpul has a very good reputation of keeping the people in the know and I intend to keep it this way.  Please do not call the us to get updated info, try and use the tacked threads to get the info you desire.  Give me a week to gather myself from SHOT and you'll see the tacked threads.  

Drake  



Assume this forum is located on Magpuls website. Didn't find anything under Industry section here.





www.ar15.com/forums/forum.html?b=2&f=124


Ok ok..I'm blind...sue me.
1/18/2007 10:33:03 PM EDT
[#32]
I'll give you 20 bucks if you get it to me tomorrow.

Seriously, this rifle and it's announcement really made my day when it was announced at SHOT show.  My appreciation for Magpul and it's wares increased ten fold.

As soon as I can get on a waiting list ANYWHERE, I will be in for one in black with a 16in barrel.
1/19/2007 7:24:12 AM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Okay, this is something that we planned on doing.  Now that we have a Magpul forum back up I'll be working on this.  By the end of next week plan on seeing some new tacked threads on our latest stuff to keep everyone updated.  As far as what the ARFcom population can do to speed up the production of the Masada.......sit tight.  Magpul has a very good reputation of keeping the people in the know and I intend to keep it this way.  Please do not call the us to get updated info, try and use the tacked threads to get the info you desire.  Give me a week to gather myself from SHOT and you'll see the tacked threads.  

Drake  



Assume this forum is located on Magpuls website. Didn't find anything under Industry section here.





www.ar15.com/forums/forum.html?b=2&f=124


Ok ok..I'm blind...sue me.


Are you well off financially????  (just want to make sure its worth my time)

1/19/2007 8:06:56 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
On the inital extraction. I will ask about that.


Looking forward to the answer.
1/19/2007 4:30:21 PM EDT
[#36]
Thanks a lot for the HUGE pics!
1/19/2007 4:32:10 PM EDT
[#37]
Absolutely beautiful rifle there, this thing is going to be an awesome package once it's tested out.
1/19/2007 5:10:47 PM EDT
[#38]
that thing is so kick ass! i can not wait.
1/19/2007 5:39:52 PM EDT
[#39]
Damn... and we need to wait a year? I have Way plenty of time to save... for a acouple.
1/19/2007 6:56:04 PM EDT
[#40]
I cant sleep at night! I close my eyes and I see MASADA'S everywhere..............and I cant touch them!
1/19/2007 8:29:06 PM EDT
[#41]
Drake,

Are there plans for a railed forend that covers the 1/2" or so of exposed gas block?


Photo credit: Zak Smith.


Justin
1/19/2007 8:48:59 PM EDT
[#42]
Why tease us and make us wait a whole year to 18 months?  We want this exciting weapon now!  (I feel like my 5 1/2 year old son who sees a new toy on a commercial and cant wait to get his hands on it).  Seriously, why does it take so long to bring a product like this to market?  I am just trying to get an idea of the timelines.  The car companies frustrate the consumers enough with all their cool concept cars that never, ever hit the showroom floors, and the ones that do take 3-4 years to reach production.  I would think that if a product like this showed such demand in the initial stages, you would want to get it out as fast as possible before the buzz died down (or the Dems kill any chance of it reaching the market).  I think they have an incredible (from at least a looks and functionality standpoint) product and wouldnt change a thing (unlike the Sig 556 which I saw at '06 SHOT.  Initially I got excited about it but then the more I looked at it and compared it to the original 55X series, I couldnt see spending that kind of coin on a rifle Sig had every opportunity to change to meet the demands and suggestions of those who had initial interest in the rifle.)

Anyway, here's hoping that the fine gents at Magpul follow through with this project sooner rather than later.  

BTW - where's that PRS for the G3 that I wanted to T&E?
1/19/2007 9:38:24 PM EDT
[#43]
commanderjb,

I think we'll see that Magpul can deliver a superior product faster than the large weapons manufacturers we are used to dealing with.  Do not despair.  

They quoted, what, about a year?  

How long since we saw the first pictures of the SCAR?

-z
1/19/2007 10:06:42 PM EDT
[#44]
Count me in for one!
1/19/2007 11:06:44 PM EDT
[#45]
I'm a civi. So magpul, could I get a masada with folding stock. I would be willing to get rid of my Colt HBAR for a masada. Man I really love the masada. I'm just hoping magpul can get them out before the dems ban AR's so I can get one with a folding stock.
1/20/2007 5:45:29 AM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:
commanderjb,

I think we'll see that Magpul can deliver a superior product faster than the large weapons manufacturers we are used to dealing with.  Do not despair.  

They quoted, what, about a year?  

How long since we saw the first pictures of the SCAR?

-z


Ditto what Zak said. I feel safe in saying that Magpul will get this out just as soon as is physically possible. However, I know they arent going to do that until its right. Have to also take into consideration the time it takes for all the neccessary ATF approvals, procuring the materials, machinery, molds, etc. That doesnt all come overnight. I'd rather wait a few months and know that a quality product is on the way, than to rush it out too early and have problems.
1/20/2007 5:51:25 AM EDT
[#47]
ill take 3
1/20/2007 8:22:13 AM EDT
[#48]
Dear Magpul,



Please make a belt fed lower as well, ill take 3 if so.  
1/20/2007 8:28:08 AM EDT
[#49]
Is the 'Dark Earth' colored Masada a paint job on an entire black rifle, or is the polymer actually molded in the color and the metal parts of the upper painted ?

I'll be buying at least two.
1/20/2007 8:31:09 AM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:
Is the 'Dark Earth' colored Masada a paint job on an entire black rifle, or is the polymer actually molded in the color and the metal parts of the upper painted ?

I'll be buying at least two.


Polymer is almost always molded in its color. It doesnt take well long term wise to painting. As such, the Masada is molded in its colors with the aluminum upper being coated to match.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 51
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - MASADA (Page 3 of 51)

AR Sponsor