AR Sponsor
M4A1 SOPMOD Block II clone picture thread (Page 922 of 925)
Member
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
484
EE: 100% (3)
Collector, historian, and enthusiast of A.R.M.S. rails, mounts, and accessories.
Member
Joined:
Aug 2024
Posts:
1550
EE: 100% (2)
|
Originally Posted By StormSG553: I'm not sure which optic to put on this thing? If I can find one of the dark brown Elcanshttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/384429/IMG_0308_jpeg-3628728.JPG, I think that would look awesome
|
Member
Joined:
Aug 2024
Posts:
1551
EE: 100% (2)
|
Originally Posted By Cestratton85: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/598826/20241108_083805-3628880.jpg I was thinking one of those as well! |
|
Done. Irons, CCO and ACOG zeroed. I like how KAS rails fit the bottom. Attached File |
“You either know and understand history or you trust the government. You can’t do both”
|
Greyfoxg posted a picture on Instagram the other day of a Ranger with a 14.5" Block II with a M4-2000. I assume that it came from their SCARs. Pretty cool to see as I'd never seen that combo before. Any other pictures of Block IIs or URG-Is with M4-2000s out there? |
|
So I have yet to see a single pic of an actual M4-2000 in use. The pic you are referring to is, like you touched on, a SCAR-SD. The M4-2000 does have an NSN, and while that doesn't mean much, I do believe that there was some unit purchases made. I've heard / seen multiple people mentioned they used that can while in service. Units like Army sniper sections. However, I haven't come across any pictures in my searches and we know that services members aren't always a reliable source. |
|
Originally Posted By thatARMSguy: Block II prototype all dialed in for Clone Rifles! https://i.imgur.com/1PBmFPk.jpeg |
|
Originally Posted By 7dirtydan7: Since we are on the topic of irons what are your preferences? I good friend of mine prefers the matech over KAC but personally it looks like the kac might be a bit nicer to use. I have yet to grab a set. It seems to me the bais from kac were more prevalent. Thoughts? Originally Posted By 7dirtydan7: Since we are on the topic of irons what are your preferences? I good friend of mine prefers the matech over KAC but personally it looks like the kac might be a bit nicer to use. I have yet to grab a set. It seems to me the bais from kac were more prevalent. Thoughts? Matech are simultaneously cheaper feeling but nicer to use. They default to the up position which is preferred and the elevation/windage feels really close to a carry handle. The peep itself is just a bit chintzy. KAC sights are truly just for last ditch. Originally Posted By StormSG553: I'm not sure which optic to put on this thing? If I can find one of the dark brown Elcanshttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/384429/IMG_0308_jpeg-3628728.JPG, I think that would look awesome Razor 1-6 or PST 1-6. |
Member
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
494
EE: 100% (3)
Collector, historian, and enthusiast of A.R.M.S. rails, mounts, and accessories.
|
Zero at 400m today. Great shooting combo 9rd 77gr Defender ammo. 2 fliers. Attached File Attached File Attached File |
“You either know and understand history or you trust the government. You can’t do both”
|
Question on torque wrench oritnetatio when torque RIS II barrel nut: are the given ft/lbs values based on the torque wrench being in line, or or parallel to the wrench tool? If parallel, what is the proper orientation? In the same direction torque is applied, or the opposite direction? |
|
Originally Posted By ChemTrailZ: Question on torque wrench oritnetatio when torque RIS II barrel nut: are the given ft/lbs values based on the torque wrench being in line, or or parallel to the wrench tool? If parallel, what is the proper orientation? In the same direction torque is applied, or the opposite direction? Attached File Attached File 55 ft-lbs cut off |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
|
Attached File |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
|
Attached File |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
|
Originally Posted By Eyekahn: Anyone have a Marsoc photo dump? Looking for some inspiration. Especially with an LVPO. Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
@combat_diver do you, or anyone else know which is the correct tangodown VFG for the block ii package? I know the BGV mk46(Surefire tape switch compatible) was selected earlier as part of the SCAR equipment package; but with so many of the phased replacement equipment coming from ITI(optics, lights and lasers) that was used during the slow rollout of the block 2 suite, was the Mk46 carried over to the block 2 suite, or was the BGV-ITI grip selected? Both have NSNs |
|
Originally Posted By ChemTrailZ: @combat_diver do you, or anyone else know which is the correct tangodown VFG for the block ii package? I know the BGV mk46(Surefire tape switch compatible) was selected earlier as part of the SCAR equipment package; but with so many of the phased replacement equipment coming from ITI(optics, lights and lasers) that was used during the slow rollout of the block 2 suite, was the Mk46 carried over to the block 2 suite, or was the BGV-ITI grip selected? Both have NSNs Attached File |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
|
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/SOPMODII_jpg-3661210.JPG I can’t figure out how to locate that MCN, and the NSN is for the DD grip; but visually it looks like the ITI which is what I suspected Much appreciated; still unsure if I want to spring for 2 of the DDs so I can get 5 tangodowns for what 2 DDs are currently selling for |
Member
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
506
EE: 100% (3)
|
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/SOPMODII_jpg-3661210.JPG Side note, any idea how feasible tracking down the weapon shot counter would be? Would probably be completely useless but I want to eventually put together a 100% complete deployment kit (in 15-20 years or so at this rate) and it'd be neat to have at least for show |
Collector, historian, and enthusiast of A.R.M.S. rails, mounts, and accessories.
|
Still working on my RC1 approval, and need to save up for an su230 for the 14.5, but here are my twins Scored a NOS 14.5, C MP stamped SOCOM profile barrel for the 14.5, and a nos crane 10.3 GI barrel for the cqbr. non nsn 4 prong on the 14.5, when I find another I’ll swap the nsn marked one on the cqbr Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By Henchovinland: I know this belongs somewhere else but you rabbid s.o.b's will know best and fastest. What sights were on J Gurwitch's 1911? Block ii forever! He's an active member here. I can't remember his username, give it a minute and someone will tag him. Stuka something or other @Stukas87 |
Why is the sky blue?
What makes the green grass grow?
What makes the green grass grow?
|
Originally Posted By Henchovinland: I know this belongs somewhere else but you rabbid s.o.b's will know best and fastest. What sights were on J Gurwitch's 1911? Block ii forever! IIRC they were MMC's, same as the old chuck taylor combat master and long discontinued Luckily, someone makes a copy: https://www.galatiinternational.com/front-rear-sight-set-3-dot-1911-45-auto-replacement-part-john-masen.htm MGWs (https://www.brownells.com/gun-parts/handgun-parts/handgun-sights-parts/1911-fixed-narrow-tenon-sight-sets/ ) were also seen on some sf guns, as were standard trijicons |
Member
Joined:
Oct 2025
Posts:
8
EE: 100% (2)
Member
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
510
EE: 100% (3)
|
Originally Posted By Tamarit_167: Amidoinitrite? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/610845/1000019215_jpg-3664636.JPG |
Collector, historian, and enthusiast of A.R.M.S. rails, mounts, and accessories.
Member
Joined:
Oct 2025
Posts:
10
EE: 100% (2)
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
5669
EE: 100% (7)
Member
Joined:
Jul 2025
Posts:
22
EE: 100% (10)
|
recently picked up this light used from a local store, made me scratch my head on what would be a more correct mount for this light that would be out in the wild. What are your thoughts? Attached File |
Member
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
514
EE: 100% (3)
|
Originally Posted By 7dirtydan7: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/609189/surefire_pic_jpeg-3667373.JPG recently picked up this light used from a local store, made me scratch my head on what would be a more correct mount for this light that would be out in the wild. What are your thoughts? |
Collector, historian, and enthusiast of A.R.M.S. rails, mounts, and accessories.
Member
Joined:
Jul 2025
Posts:
23
EE: 100% (10)
|
Originally Posted By BlueDevilBrew: I've tried a lot of different Block II setups, this NSW setup w/ the NXS 2.5-10x24 is my favorite. Short and fairly light for a rifle that can cover 1-750 yards. Highly recommend if you get the chance. https://i.postimg.cc/WbXCP2D0/DSC-3342.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/cHP1hRW8/06FBEAE7-2C12-4BEC-AA80-FDFB26A7E67B-jpe-2134090.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/HLhTWwVt/tlt-Ozms.jpg Have details on the correct NSW specs for the scope? |
|
Range tonight, last mag used the happy switch. Attached File |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
|
Originally Posted By Cavguy: Never seen that Black Hills MK255 Mod 1 RRLP ammo before (seems like a USSOCOM issue only round?), looks like that is a frangible round designed for training and real world use where over-penetration is an issue. Yes, NSW, SOCOM and FBI Reduced Range Limited Penetration |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Member
Joined:
Oct 2025
Posts:
15
EE: 100% (2)
|
Attached File |
De Oppresso Liber
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Iraq: 91,03,04,05,06,08,09,15,16,22,23,24&25'
Afghanistan: 09,10,11,14,17,18,19,20&21'
Member
Joined:
Jul 2025
Posts:
24
EE: 100% (10)
|
Originally Posted By 11boomboom: I think Colt, FN and KAK were suppliers. Originally Posted By 11boomboom: Originally Posted By 7dirtydan7: If these rifles had to be re-barreled what other manufacturers (if any) were used for barrels? I think Colt, FN and KAK were suppliers. Rosco and MMC as well. |
"All welchers should be removed from the EE".-Aimless
|
Originally Posted By thatARMSguy: I've seen this graphic before, but has anyone ever seen a FSP GL/SSC rail? I've only ever seen the flat top version. Side note, any idea how feasible tracking down the weapon shot counter would be? Would probably be completely useless but I want to eventually put together a 100% complete deployment kit (in 15-20 years or so at this rate) and it'd be neat to have at least for show Originally Posted By thatARMSguy: Originally Posted By Combat_Diver: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/SOPMODII_jpg-3661210.JPG Side note, any idea how feasible tracking down the weapon shot counter would be? Would probably be completely useless but I want to eventually put together a 100% complete deployment kit (in 15-20 years or so at this rate) and it'd be neat to have at least for show |
If I had to be stranded in an island for a long time with a male arfcommer it'd be eesmith. I'm not gay, but I do get lonely. - Kalahnikid
tnsparky
Medikeighted
EdwardAvila
Rest In Peace, Brothers.
tnsparky
Medikeighted
EdwardAvila
Rest In Peace, Brothers.
M4A1 SOPMOD Block II clone picture thread (Page 922 of 925)
AR Sponsor








