User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:16:36 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By snoopfighter:
Yeah, I was issued many M4's with Aimpoint Comp M's and once a M4/203 w/ a ACOG TA01NSN (team leader status). Still gives me no idea as to what the ideal height for an accurized M4 w/ a Leupold optic that has a 30mm main tube w/ a 36mm objective lense *is*. Sorry for being so "complicated". Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By snoopfighter:
Originally Posted By GSL:
Originally Posted By snoopfighter:
I have no idea how to answer that. Yeah, I was issued many M4's with Aimpoint Comp M's and once a M4/203 w/ a ACOG TA01NSN (team leader status). Still gives me no idea as to what the ideal height for an accurized M4 w/ a Leupold optic that has a 30mm main tube w/ a 36mm objective lense *is*. Sorry for being so "complicated". This is a scout mount by ADAM. It shoots fine as is, that Vortex is a Viper PST 1-4 30mm tube. 
|
|
|
|
CO, USA
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 4:12:19 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GSL:
ADM Scout Mount. If you're going to fuss this much, get a Magpul PRS and custom the LOP and LOH. This is a scout mount by ADAM. It shoots fine as is, that Vortex is a Viper PST 1-4 30mm tube. <a href="http://s186.photobucket.com/user/heavymetal1182/media/P1010850_zpseafurb4f.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x87/heavymetal1182/P1010850_zpseafurb4f.jpg</a> Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GSL:
Originally Posted By snoopfighter:
Originally Posted By GSL:
Originally Posted By snoopfighter:
I have no idea how to answer that. Yeah, I was issued many M4's with Aimpoint Comp M's and once a M4/203 w/ a ACOG TA01NSN (team leader status). Still gives me no idea as to what the ideal height for an accurized M4 w/ a Leupold optic that has a 30mm main tube w/ a 36mm objective lense *is*. Sorry for being so "complicated". This is a scout mount by ADAM. It shoots fine as is, that Vortex is a Viper PST 1-4 30mm tube. <a href="http://s186.photobucket.com/user/heavymetal1182/media/P1010850_zpseafurb4f.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x87/heavymetal1182/P1010850_zpseafurb4f.jpg</a> So, I have the Leupold optic in hand and it's eye relief is 3-3.5" based on the mag I set it at. Having it almost flush with the charging handle is a no go. It has to sit further forward and I get that. What I want to know is if it's height matters for those who use them. I can squish my cheek down easier than it is to raise it up (jaw weld) for a nice shoulder to POA hold. I mean shit guys, I know I'm being fussy, but I'm also dropping my limited savings on stuff that may make marginal differences. Considering I'm building a "recce"/recon rifle as opposed to a patrol M4 which I could make with an ACOG and non-free float handgaurd, I figured you'd appreciate the scrutiny. If not, understood. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 5:03:44 PM EDT
[#3]
~1.5" ring height is the usual for an AR rifle
A 36mm obj. will have a ton of room to spare... I had a 42mm Obj. and it had more than enough room |
|
|
|
KY, USA
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 7:57:44 AM EDT
[#4]
almost there...YHM bipod mount, bipod on the table waiting to go on, along with a Vtac sling, waiting on qd swivels...
I love this Aero handguard. 
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 11:25:57 AM EDT
[#5]
I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855).
The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. 
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 1:09:22 PM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 1:31:21 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Standard: I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855). The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. http://i.imgur.com/aEAq9OQl.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 4:55:04 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By secretwheelman:
That is what's messin' with you. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Standard:
I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855). The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. http://i.imgur.com/aEAq9OQl.jpg This guy knows ^ Standard, gitcha some 77grn pills and you will see tighter groups. The steel core is never perfectly concentric resulting erratic groups. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2015 5:01:12 PM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 9:26:25 AM EDT
[#10]
Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver!
Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! 
Latest groups with the new Sierra 77 TMK. All 5 shot at 100. 
TMK 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 9:44:14 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Eyekahn:
Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver! Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! -SNIP- Awesome shooting. Am I remembering you have the rifle length one? I really want to give that a try, but I have a 16" Larue heading my way from the blowout they did. Now comes the big question. I snagged a KAC RAS long, I think that would make a sick RECCE build but now I've been wandering into the MK12 thread and there's just something about the Mod1. I'm just kind of meh on the 18" barrels. Has crossed my mind to build a Mod1-Hollandish hybrid. |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 10:08:58 AM EDT
[#12]
What do you guys think for my Recce. Keep the PA 1-6 or a vortex 4-12? The 4-12 is on bull barrel 20inch AR I use for strictly bench shooting
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 10:21:39 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Eyekahn: Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver! Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg Latest groups with the new Sierra 77 TMK. All 5 shot at 100. http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/59E18722-E0E0-4C38-A9B1-67F3FC041EAD_zps18wo2tjt.jpg http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/CFF624DD-069D-47B1-A0EC-A010B4335BFA_zpsu41rlpl5.jpg TMK http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/67B6652A-C901-4A35-B83F-BD6F890258C2_zpskwmdx2e9.jpg That was badass shooting. Let's see what it does in the dead of winter.  |
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 11:07:22 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Standard]
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By blackfly53:
This guy knows ^ Standard, gitcha some 77grn pills and you will see tighter groups. The steel core is never perfectly concentric resulting erratic groups. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By blackfly53:
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Standard:
I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855). The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. http://i.imgur.com/aEAq9OQl.jpg This guy knows ^ Standard, gitcha some 77grn pills and you will see tighter groups. The steel core is never perfectly concentric resulting erratic groups. I'll definitely give some better ammo a shot. It's just been an intermediate range plinker for me up until now. I'm also learning that I shoot better without a Bipod, so that needs some work before I start spitting out $1/round ammo :o |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 11:08:18 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Evile:
What do you guys think for my Recce. Keep the PA 1-6 or a vortex 4-12? The 4-12 is on bull barrel 20inch AR I use for strictly bench shooting 1-6 should be more than enough to get you to 600, and you could go further even if you need. That's really what a Recce is for. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 11:35:56 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Eyekahn:
Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver! Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! <a href="http://s1289.photobucket.com/user/cwm556/media/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg</a> Latest groups with the new Sierra 77 TMK. All 5 shot at 100. <snip> Very nice indeed. Are those the Black Hills loads or are you rolling your own with the Sierra bullets? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 1:01:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JJREA]
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Standard:
I'll definitely give some better ammo a shot. It's just been an intermediate range plinker for me up until now. I'm also learning that I shoot better without a Bipod, so that needs some work before I start spitting out $1/round ammo :o Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Standard:
Originally Posted By blackfly53:
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Standard:
I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855). The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. http://i.imgur.com/aEAq9OQl.jpg This guy knows ^ Standard, gitcha some 77grn pills and you will see tighter groups. The steel core is never perfectly concentric resulting erratic groups. I'll definitely give some better ammo a shot. It's just been an intermediate range plinker for me up until now. I'm also learning that I shoot better without a Bipod, so that needs some work before I start spitting out $1/round ammo :o From what I can gather, sandbags are always a bit more stable and make it a bit easier to shoot well. But you really get bragging rights if you can make little groups like Eyekahn did with just a bipod and nothing else.  I always figure it's just fun for me, so I use bags of some sort. Well, sometimes I just use the bipod. Actually a bipod and a bag on the rear is a pretty good way to go too. But if you just want to go for pure accuracy, bags are the way to go I think.
And dang Eyekahn, that is some good shooting. Consistent too. That's like bolt gun good. Ruger Single shot with a bull barrel good.  In fact, since we're on the subject... are you using just the bipod for that? Or are you using bags too?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 2:45:26 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lancecriminal86:
1-6 should be more than enough to get you to 600, and you could go further even if you need. That's really what a Recce is for. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lancecriminal86:
Originally Posted By Evile:
What do you guys think for my Recce. Keep the PA 1-6 or a vortex 4-12? The 4-12 is on bull barrel 20inch AR I use for strictly bench shooting 1-6 should be more than enough to get you to 600, and you could go further even if you need. That's really what a Recce is for. 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 4:24:00 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By minion42:
Very nice indeed. Are those the Black Hills loads or are you rolling your own with the Sierra bullets? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By minion42:
Originally Posted By Eyekahn:
Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver! Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! <a href="http://s1289.photobucket.com/user/cwm556/media/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg</a> Latest groups with the new Sierra 77 TMK. All 5 shot at 100. <snip> Very nice indeed. Are those the Black Hills loads or are you rolling your own with the Sierra bullets? I hand load.... |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 4:25:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
That was badass shooting. Let's see what it does in the dead of winter.
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By Eyekahn:
Ok, now that I am done with load development I can 100% say this barrel is a tac driver! Anyone looking for an accurate barrel for a recce the Rainier Rock Creek barrel should be at the top of your list! http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/857A3759-13BE-4A7B-A2BA-6BD8502767E4_zps4a0egtny.jpg Latest groups with the new Sierra 77 TMK. All 5 shot at 100. http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/59E18722-E0E0-4C38-A9B1-67F3FC041EAD_zps18wo2tjt.jpg http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/CFF624DD-069D-47B1-A0EC-A010B4335BFA_zpsu41rlpl5.jpg TMK http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b510/cwm556/67B6652A-C901-4A35-B83F-BD6F890258C2_zpskwmdx2e9.jpg That was badass shooting. Let's see what it does in the dead of winter.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 7:13:36 PM EDT
[#21]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2015 11:20:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RTUtah]
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mattyvac: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-xnFcjxz3XrI/VZ2re4w6MrI/AAAAAAAALT0/wYBjWdMCFdg/s800/urxiii_spr_16_btshot.png Fuck you. ETA: And that gay-ass paint job.  |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/9/2015 7:43:55 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JJREA:
From what I can gather, sandbags are always a bit more stable and make it a bit easier to shoot well. But you really get bragging rights if you can make little groups like Eyekahn did with just a bipod and nothing else. I always figure it's just fun for me, so I use bags of some sort. Well, sometimes I just use the bipod. Actually a bipod and a bag on the rear is a pretty good way to go too. But if you just want to go for pure accuracy, bags are the way to go I think.
And dang Eyekahn, that is some good shooting. Consistent too. That's like bolt gun good. Ruger Single shot with a bull barrel good. In fact, since we're on the subject... are you using just the bipod for that? Or are you using bags too?
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JJREA:
Originally Posted By Standard:
Originally Posted By blackfly53:
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Standard:
I've been having great results with this from 50-400 yards. I haven't learned how to judge wind well, so that's still messing with me (using m855). The PA 1-6x works well at all ranges so far. http://i.imgur.com/aEAq9OQl.jpg This guy knows ^ Standard, gitcha some 77grn pills and you will see tighter groups. The steel core is never perfectly concentric resulting erratic groups. I'll definitely give some better ammo a shot. It's just been an intermediate range plinker for me up until now. I'm also learning that I shoot better without a Bipod, so that needs some work before I start spitting out $1/round ammo :o From what I can gather, sandbags are always a bit more stable and make it a bit easier to shoot well. But you really get bragging rights if you can make little groups like Eyekahn did with just a bipod and nothing else. I always figure it's just fun for me, so I use bags of some sort. Well, sometimes I just use the bipod. Actually a bipod and a bag on the rear is a pretty good way to go too. But if you just want to go for pure accuracy, bags are the way to go I think.
And dang Eyekahn, that is some good shooting. Consistent too. That's like bolt gun good. Ruger Single shot with a bull barrel good. In fact, since we're on the subject... are you using just the bipod for that? Or are you using bags too?
Bipod up front bag in the rear. Prone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/9/2015 10:58:09 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Fuck you. ETA: And that gay-ass paint job.
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By Mattyvac:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-xnFcjxz3XrI/VZ2re4w6MrI/AAAAAAAALT0/wYBjWdMCFdg/s800/urxiii_spr_16_btshot.png Fuck you. ETA: And that gay-ass paint job.
You mad that the PRI tube sucks and I made the Mod H mo' betta' ?
|
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 7/9/2015 12:15:25 PM EDT
[#25]
SPRECCE
  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/9/2015 12:45:02 PM EDT
[#26]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/9/2015 2:08:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JJREA]
[#27]
Bipod up front bag in the rear. Prone. NIce. I'm impressed eyekahn. Very nice RustedACe and haveblue and all you all. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2015 6:32:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: secretwheelman]
[#28]
Swapped most of the gear from my blockII recce over to this one.
 |
|
|
|
MD, USA
|
Posted: 7/10/2015 7:57:09 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryThe paint on that rifle looks awesome! How did you do it? I can't decide between this or a pine needle style. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2015 9:07:36 PM EDT
[#30]
I'm not RustedAce, but to me it looks like an FDE basecoat (maybe factory KAC Taupe?) with overlay of some fat darker brown stripes. And use. A lot of use. Can't weather the finish otherwise
 |
|
|
|
AK, USA
|
Posted: 7/11/2015 3:28:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Andrewcdub]
[#31]
My humble contribution.
 " />
|
|
|
AK, USA
|
Posted: 7/11/2015 3:28:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Andrewcdub]
[#32]
glitch
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 7/11/2015 11:46:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Evile]
[#33]
got a new tool box good excuse to take a picture of my AR
what do you guys think about adding a reflex sight onto the scope for faster close range stuff
also got a Aero light weight scope mount coming and a J-comp to replace the Bcm 
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 7/15/2015 8:29:46 AM EDT
[Last Edit: HaveBlue83]
[#34]
I wan a sawman or mod H. Really sucks i need an aem5 or 12th can and a $200 mount system for it. Maybe i can do a mod h first and work for a can down the line :)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 12:26:30 AM EDT
[#35]
This is my contribution.
 " />
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 8:14:24 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nicholasgentges:
This is my contribution. That's as bushnell 1-6.5, right? How do you like it? Mine: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 10:44:48 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TexAg10:
That's as bushnell 1-6.5, right? How do you like it? Mine: http://i785.photobucket.com/albums/yy138/TexAg10/Firearms/IMAG0953_zpsuwgcykkn.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TexAg10:
Originally Posted By nicholasgentges:
This is my contribution. That's as bushnell 1-6.5, right? How do you like it? Mine: http://i785.photobucket.com/albums/yy138/TexAg10/Firearms/IMAG0953_zpsuwgcykkn.jpg Correct, It is the FFP model and I was not sure if I would like it when I got it but I really do. It has the horse shoe reticle so on one power it acts as a red dot. The glass is very clear on these scopes as well not as clear as my Nightforce but I would say just about as clear as my Leopold MK4's. I picked this one up on sale for $499 I don't think it would be the best value at $1000 since the playing field get tough at that price but sub $800 I think it is a very good value. |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 12:10:58 PM EDT
[#38]
Pretty sure this is still a Recce but I put it in the SPR thread too:
Got rid of the Acog, was not enough magnification for what I want the rifle to do. Went to the Sopmod stock, Harris swivel bipod and GGG mount. Got a sweet deal on the ADM Recon X on the EE too. Really enjoying this setup, but I'll enjoy it more when my Larue 16" Stealth barrel finally gets here 
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 12:14:21 PM EDT
[#39]
Close up of the paint job:
Hit everything with a base coat of Krylon Khaki, then a mist in random spots of Earth Brown, final pass over with Forest/OD Green sprayed thru some long grass that I pulled out on the side of the road
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 12:17:16 PM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/17/2015 12:24:48 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ArmedFerret:
nice dude. be sure and throw these in the rattle can paint jobs thread: it's right here Done! |
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 7:55:13 PM EDT
[#42]
About to pull the trigger on a Leupold mr/t 1.5-5 illuminated SPR reticle. They give a nice Mil discount. Any feed back on that glass? Really just using it as intended for the Recce, cqb and being able to reach out. My KAC FF RAS will be here Monday, along with another kac front buis 99051 (3rd time buying this stupid $200 fucking sight) and really just contemplating glass. Thanks in advance
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 8:18:22 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
About to pull the trigger on a Leupold mr/t 1.5-5 illuminated SPR reticle. They give a nice Mil discount. Any feed back on that glass? Really just using it as intended for the Recce, cqb and being able to reach out. My KAC FF RAS will be here Monday, along with another kac front buis 99051 (3rd time buying this stupid $200 fucking sight) and really just contemplating glass. Thanks in advance I've been thinking about the same scope. I'm holding back a bit due to some negative reporting on using that scope close up, but I haven't decided against it yet. I'm waiting to hear more feedback. I'm also considering an SWFA HD 1-6 or a Nightforce 1-4. I just need to sell my Vortex 2.5-10 to afford something! |
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 10:13:23 PM EDT
[#44]
What's everyone's opinion on a 4X? Sufficient enough for groups @100yrds?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 10:18:20 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
What's everyone's opinion on a 4X? Sufficient enough for groups @100yrds? Works fine on my blackout. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 11:24:03 PM EDT
[#46]
what leupold scope reticle is best? the horse shoe or the spr?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2015 11:36:15 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevethePirate:
I've been thinking about the same scope. I'm holding back a bit due to some negative reporting on using that scope close up, but I haven't decided against it yet. I'm waiting to hear more feedback. I'm also considering an SWFA HD 1-6 or a Nightforce 1-4. I just need to sell my Vortex 2.5-10 to afford something! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevethePirate:
Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
About to pull the trigger on a Leupold mr/t 1.5-5 illuminated SPR reticle. They give a nice Mil discount. Any feed back on that glass? Really just using it as intended for the Recce, cqb and being able to reach out. My KAC FF RAS will be here Monday, along with another kac front buis 99051 (3rd time buying this stupid $200 fucking sight) and really just contemplating glass. Thanks in advance I've been thinking about the same scope. I'm holding back a bit due to some negative reporting on using that scope close up, but I haven't decided against it yet. I'm waiting to hear more feedback. I'm also considering an SWFA HD 1-6 or a Nightforce 1-4. I just need to sell my Vortex 2.5-10 to afford something! I just bought one for my KAC MRE Recce. It should be here on Monday and I will report back. |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/19/2015 12:14:54 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
About to pull the trigger on a Leupold mr/t 1.5-5 illuminated SPR reticle. They give a nice Mil discount. Any feed back on that glass? Really just using it as intended for the Recce, cqb and being able to reach out. My KAC FF RAS will be here Monday, along with another kac front buis 99051 (3rd time buying this stupid $200 fucking sight) and really just contemplating glass. Thanks in advance I have the 3-9x40 w/ SPR reticle (pic above) and I love it. The dot is bright, the lines heavy and pronounced and easy to pick up. Highly recommended |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2015 12:15:44 AM EDT
[#49]
L
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Damn! Just a small price difference between those two huh?
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By ArmedFerret:
Originally Posted By ChaSeR84:
Originally Posted By BlackRifleJuju:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
I haven't seen this pic before, but what's up with that weird photoshop of his face!?  Looks like somebody wanted to conceal his identity, but not ruin the photo with a black box over his face. There, now that I've kinda half way contributed to the thread, will you guys school me on what I need to buy to mount a Harris bipod to a picatinny rail, and where I should buy it form? I hear these are nice. this is cheaper and works the same.
i had to get a pair of 1/4" e-clips and use them to shim the stud as it stuck down too far, but it works great on my mk12. Damn! Just a small price difference between those two huh?
Remember you get what you pay for. |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/19/2015 12:16:50 AM EDT
[Last Edit: GuynamedDave]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
What's everyone's opinion on a 4X? Sufficient enough for groups @100yrds? My first 2 optics on my recce were a Vortex Viper 1-4 and then a TA-31 chevron. I hated 4x. Could not shoot a tight group at 200 for shit. 9x now and I love it. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
