Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
9/21/2026 11:17:09 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote History
Originally Posted By FluxIntegral:


In my experience, this all gets worse with a FFP optic (which is the rage). I learned this after acquiring an ATACR 1-8, Vortex Gen III 1-10, NX8 1-8, and Leupold Mk6 1-6. All FFP. Then to see what all the noise was about, I bought a Vortex Gen II 1-6 (SFP). Wow, what a difference.  The 1x has a very generous eyebox. Almost red dot like. This is what an LPVO is supposed to offer. Red dot like up close, more precision at distance. The FFP set ups compromise on the 1x performance (and at higher mag, they are fixed parallax). The Leup Mk6 1-6 is almost unusable at 1x. Still like all of these LPVOs, but if you're really interested in a 1x that negates the need for a red dot sight, I'd stick with a SPF.

That NF NX6 1-6 SFP has my interest. Seems like a purpose built Vortex Razor killer.
View Quote


every sentence you sounded like you need training more/// which is okay
Yesterday 9:12:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FluxIntegral][Edited] [#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By xxflyingturtlexx:


every sentence you sounded like you need training more/// which is okay
View Quote



Of course, I could use more training. But training isn't going to change my experience. FFP LPVOs suffer suffer from all the things I described, and others here seem to corroborate that that position. Maybe we all need more training.

What is new is that a couple recent optics seem to have cracked the code on the 1x performance issue. I'll have to take a look at that NX6 and  PLX-C RDB.
Yesterday 9:53:06 PM EDT
[#3]
They definitely cracked the code on both.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
Armory Sponsor