Armory Sponsor
Posted: 8/20/2025 3:37:37 PM EDT
Best Guntech, Daddy, King of all the wild things.
Joined:
Feb 2025
Posts:
181
EE: 0% (0)
|
Originally Posted By mike_nds: Contact John Thomas at Retro Arms Works, he does good work Sadly, he isn’t taking on any custom stuff currently. Originally Posted By M1G: Why not just use the 3" brake? I don’t have a short brake. It’s not a factory BM62. JRA ships it like that. With a plain muzzle, no brake. |
|
Originally Posted By Dr_Nimslow: I picked this up the other day. It's one of the new James River BM62 "tankers". The receiver is one of their new billet ones, so hopefully it's good to go. It seems well put together, still haven't had a chance to shoot it however. https://i.imgur.com/LKEhorR.jpg I'm still looking for a gunsmith willing to either attempt to shorten a tricompensator I've got, or just cut it off and thread it 5/8x24 so I can put a flash hider on there. The tanker Garand I had a long time ago threw an impressive fireball out of the muzzle, I'd like to mitigate that with this rifle. So far no one locally wants to tackle the project. Maybe I need to try a machine shop. I'd like to remove the middle part, between the lines. Attaching the original comp/hider to the stub is probably cost prohibitive, but I don't see how just cutting it off, and threading it would be much of a problem https://i.imgur.com/9ukAqaq.jpg The part you want to cut out is the booster chamber, which to my understanding helps to provide the correct pressure for proper cycling. The BM62 muzzle devices were basically just booster chambers. You could cut off the flash suppressor and compensator parts (and may as well do the lug, too, at that point since I don't think it would be functional anymore) and have something shorter and functionally the same as the muzzle device used on the BM62. It would be useful to refer to a cutaway drawing of the tricompensator. It shows the delineations. |
The finest opportunity ever given to the world was thrown away because the passion for equality made vain the hope for freedom.
-Lord Acton
-Lord Acton
|
Originally Posted By Dr_Nimslow: I found a guy locally who was willing to take on the project, it now wears a Surefire Warcomp sport. Also added a primary arms 3x micro in a cogburn arsenal mount. Hope to get a chance to shoot it one of these days. https://i.imgur.com/lGGyCxD.jpg Nice, I have a bm 59 that I traded a cheap 308 ar for. I shot it a few times, but that sucker is heavy and not very fun to shoot. That gun looks nice. |
3-7-77
Proud Member of the Leather Head Mafia
“In my opinion, the M1 Rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised” - George S. Patton
Proud Member of the Leather Head Mafia
“In my opinion, the M1 Rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised” - George S. Patton
|
Originally Posted By bigstick61: The part you want to cut out is the booster chamber, which to my understanding helps to provide the correct pressure for proper cycling. The BM62 muzzle devices were basically just booster chambers. You could cut off the flash suppressor and compensator parts (and may as well do the lug, too, at that point since I don't think it would be functional anymore) and have something shorter and functionally the same as the muzzle device used on the BM62. It would be useful to refer to a cutaway drawing of the tricompensator. It shows the delineations. Both my BM59 builds will run without the Tri comp and just a unthreaded short muzzle from Standard parts. It is indeed a booster, it probably matters more when dirty, etc. but they may run fine without it. I was hoping to thread these short muzzle nubs and fine a suitable short brake but never did. I too prefer the look of the tri-comp but the length on a Para stock version is too much. Not as much liking the short 3" BM59E brake and Finding a real QD para muzzle device is not easy, |
Armory Sponsor


