Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
5/29/2025 7:56:16 PM EDT

I'm planning a a couple cans. one for .30cal including .308 and down, the other deidicated 5.56.  I'm going with a welded/tubless design for both.  Both sets of baffles will be 60* cones.  All parts will be 17-4ss H900.

My question is what thickness should the skirts be?
5/29/2025 9:02:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: User55645][Edited] [#1]
I'd go ~.100 in the blast area
~.080 2 cones after
.065 for a couple
Taper off to .045 nearer end cap

Alter depending on how robust you'd like it

I'd plan to reharden post-weld
5/29/2025 11:25:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Is this for the skirt or conical section?
5/30/2025 3:52:24 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Originally Posted By sclearman:
Is this for the skirt or conical section?
View Quote

Would be applicable for both.
7/4/2025 9:09:21 AM EDT
[Last Edit: MoNkEyTurbo][Edited] [#4]
I designed some conically shaped baffles from 17-4 designed to be autogenously welded (fusion weld, no filler, back purged,on a turn table) into a baffle stack at around .040". This is a bolt action 300 blackout subsonic only. I would say .060" thickness would be sufficient for super sonic.

https://tinypic.host/image/image.Dwe4w
7/6/2025 11:13:14 AM EDT
[#5]
@MoNkEyTurbo
Link doesn't seem to work
7/8/2025 10:14:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: MoNkEyTurbo][Edited] [#6]
Sorry, the free hosting autodeleted.


7/8/2025 11:49:12 PM EDT
[#7]
Love the design, but have some questions about how you would weld that up
7/9/2025 1:46:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: MoNkEyTurbo][Edited] [#8]
https://ibb.co/r2zJWXgj

They will nest together. Then using a rod to hold them tight and provide back purging they would be autogenous GTAW welded on a rotary table using a pulsed process.
7/16/2025 12:04:44 PM EDT
[#9]
The blast chambers on our Accipiter and Valkyrie models are .06" thick, the baffle walls get progressively thinner toward the distal end from .055" down to as thin as .035" on the longer ones.

Of note, however, is that they are machined with a reinforcing ring in the blast chamber, blast baffles are threaded and welded into the blast chamber, and the baffle skirts are undercut to those thicknesses with all abutment faces .080".

As mentioned, you would want to heat treat again post-weldment to retemper the material in the HAZ.
Suppress all the things!
8/1/2025 12:19:33 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ECCO_Machine:
The blast chambers on our Accipiter and Valkyrie models are .06" thick, the baffle walls get progressively thinner toward the distal end from .055" down to as thin as .035" on the longer ones.

Of note, however, is that they are machined with a reinforcing ring in the blast chamber, blast baffles are threaded and welded into the blast chamber, and the baffle skirts are undercut to those thicknesses with all abutment faces .080".

As mentioned, you would want to heat treat again post-weldment to retemper the material in the HAZ.
View Quote


Are you saying heat treat the baffles such as to H900, then weld, and then re-treat to h900 to bring the weld HAZ up to strength?  Or do I have that wrong?

8/2/2025 4:47:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: User55645][Edited] [#11]
They're already heat treated (per the OP) so doing it post-weld would be "again".
I'd suggest passivation, but I'm willing to bet Ecco doesn't and it's never been an issue.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Armory Sponsor