User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 6:23:14 AM EST
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 6:35:12 AM EST
[#2]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:06:00 AM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryThey were pissed he was black too. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:10:52 AM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep. You are nuts. It will be more like 12 points.  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
My guess is Moore will win by at least 5 points.................am I nuts? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:14:29 AM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryLol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:18:55 AM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:31:47 AM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 My guess is Allred will be nowhere to be found. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 7:34:33 AM EST
[#8]
These women aren't just lying to smear the judges name and reputation, they are trying to sway the election. Is that an election law violation? Or can you lie all you want in the context of a campaign and only worry about libel suits?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 9:48:17 AM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder who the "Roy" who signed her yearbook really was. Probably another student in her class. Someone should leaf through the whole yearbook to look for "Roy"s. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 10:24:31 AM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
These women aren't just lying to smear the judges name and reputation, they are trying to sway the election. Is that an election law violation? Or can you lie all you want in the context of a campaign and only worry about libel suits? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 10:44:15 AM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm far more interested in getting the names of the people in organizations paying her to lie. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
These women aren't just lying to smear the judges name and reputation, they are trying to sway the election. Is that an election law violation? Or can you lie all you want in the context of a campaign and only worry about libel suits? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 1:04:11 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryA black guy in FL is pro-Moore.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 1:07:19 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 2:29:25 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A black guy in FL is pro-Moore. Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 2:54:29 PM EST
[#15]
Wow so another swamp/MSM attempt to effect another US election has failed and been proven to be absolute BS.
I hope Moore files law suits against those who were coaxed into this latest 'dossier-yearbook' fake forgery. I'm willing to give the women immunity though if they testify as to who approached and coached them so we can expose and prosecute them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 8:00:24 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder who the "Roy" who signed her yearbook really was. Probably another student in her class. Someone should leaf through the whole yearbook to look for "Roy"s. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 8:21:37 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It looked more like "Ray" to me. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bitch still be lyin'. "Moore" is the same color as the rest of the part she admitted adding. https://i.redditmedia.com/J76Hc1KguV-1wTrEBk78wA6zkpuQlBzMYmyl_HDFVko.jpg?w=600&s=2caf7acd3feffe27c3731abc0a8e43e9 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2017 9:01:52 PM EST
[#18]
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/08/exclusive-handwriting-expert-touted-by-washington-post-turns-on-gloria-allred-calls-for-activist-attorney-to-release-yearbook/
LOL, the handwriting expert Allred claimed had examined the yearbook just said she's lying. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 12:04:25 PM EST
[#19]
Would it be constitutional to install cameras with facial recognition capabilities at all polling places to ensure that those voting were not felons or illegals? The cameras would not be recording whom someone voted for, just who voted.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 12:20:12 PM EST
[#20]
Felons can vote in AL. I wish they got their gun rights back at the same time. Libs would lose their fucking minds.
ETA: there has been a big push to register felons over the last few weeks, up until the deadline before the election. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 12:33:38 PM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It looked more like "Ray" to me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 1:15:41 PM EST
[#22]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 5:25:56 PM EST
[#23]
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html
RCP Average: Moore +3.8%. Last 5-polls show Moore in the lead over a range of 3% to 7%. Three of the last five polls are within the margin of error. It will be close. Close enough for the proglodyte dems to cheat their way to another senator. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 6:54:50 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Would it be constitutional to install cameras with facial recognition capabilities at all polling places to ensure that those voting were not felons or illegals? The cameras would not be recording whom someone voted for, just who voted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 7:26:06 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Would it be constitutional to install cameras with facial recognition capabilities at all polling places to ensure that those voting were not felons or illegals? The cameras would not be recording whom someone voted for, just who voted. and one man/one vote is unconstitutional. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 9:06:48 PM EST
[#26]
About 48 hours until the lying libs (not progressives) reignite their melt down when Moore shows a commanding lead in actual vote...not polling lies.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 10:18:51 PM EST
[#27]
I'll be SO glad when this election is over. I can't ever recall being so completely sick of the BS radio ads, television ads, direct mailings and robocalls. It's absolutely ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 10:47:21 PM EST
[#28]
Makes me happy I didn't change my cell number when I moved here years ago.
Looking forward to voting for Moore and winning the cash on Predictit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2017 11:41:14 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Would it be constitutional to install cameras with facial recognition capabilities at all polling places to ensure that those voting were not felons or illegals? The cameras would not be recording whom someone voted for, just who voted. So while it would likely get a State sued and they would likely lose the way things are now, the constitution itself doesn't prohibit what you suggest. However, it should be noted that in many States it is legal for felons to vote. Honestly, based on my experience, they biggest source of fraud is likely to be absentee ballots, not in-person voting. I've seen suspicious ballots of this sort while working elections. When people bring stacks of the things to turn in all in the same handwriting that raises some red flags. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 8:00:42 AM EST
[#30]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 8:09:09 AM EST
[#31]
So if there is a libel suit, how far can discovery go? Far enough to review an accusers bank records?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 10:03:24 AM EST
[#32]
This election will certain tell us about accuracy of certain polls.
Yesterday's FoxNews poll has Jones winning by 10% Yesterday's Emerson poll has Moore winning by 9% Cold link. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html This shows as a hot link in the preview... <a>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html</a><a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html"> </a> |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 12:52:02 PM EST
[#33]
Quoted:
This election will certain tell us about accuracy of certain polls. Yesterday's FoxNews poll has Jones winning by 10% Yesterday's Emerson poll has Moore winning by 9% Cold link. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html This shows as a hot link in the preview... <a>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html</a><a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html"> </a> |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 1:48:59 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If the election goes as many of us expect someone @Fox should be fired. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 3:45:46 PM EST
[#35]
The Senate leadership will forget about these accusations against Moore for two reasons:
1. Moore can't be convicted of a crime, so there will be no criminal charges to investigate. 2. The Senate doesn't want to set a precedent. They don't want hearings every time a Senator is accused of sniffing some poon-tang. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 4:25:32 PM EST
[#36]
I listened to some liberal faggots on a AZ radio show this morning. They were practically crying, saying Moore would win by 8 points and "The people of Alabama will confirm what we always thought about them, and none of it is good."
To the people of Alabama, thankyou for helping slap down fake news again, and thankyou for the large dose of liberal tears I will be ingesting tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 4:31:44 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I listened to some liberal faggots on a AZ radio show this morning. They were practically crying, saying Moore would win by 8 points and "The people of Alabama will confirm what we always thought about them, and none of it is good." To the people of Alabama, thankyou for helping slap down fake news again, and thankyou for the large dose of liberal tears I will be ingesting tomorrow. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 4:33:23 PM EST
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 5:15:32 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This is like the 2016 election in microcosm; these people actually think we care about earning the condescending approval of some effete "intellectual" eunuch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 5:29:54 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This is like the 2016 election in microcosm; these people actually think we care about earning the condescending approval of some effete "intellectual" eunuch. I’ll be voting Moore tomorrow just to spite these types. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 5:48:49 PM EST
[#41]
Like somebody else said, "How come none of this came out during the vetting process for his other Judge positions?"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 6:13:52 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Like somebody else said, "How come none of this came out during the vetting process for his other Judge positions?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 6:21:24 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryWhere does she stand on protection of interns at the White House?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 6:31:14 PM EST
[#44]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 6:31:21 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryThat means she already abused some.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 7:37:56 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where does she stand on protection of interns at the White House? Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 7:41:06 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This election will certain tell us about accuracy of certain polls. Yesterday's FoxNews poll has Jones winning by 10% Yesterday's Emerson poll has Moore winning by 9% Cold link. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html This shows as a hot link in the preview... <a>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html</a><a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html"> </a> |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 7:44:16 PM EST
[#48]
rush was talking about the fox poll it was a roughly equal sample... in a state that went to trump by 28 percent... just stupid
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 7:44:52 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If the election goes as many of us expect someone @Fox should be fired. No doubt Fox news polls are run by Deep State/RINO/Dems. They were not very good during last year's presidential election/primaries and they still suck now. Alabama is a plus R +22 state as Mitchell looked at the Alabama demographics, and Fox's internals have it weighed to R+2. Always look at the poll details when they make them public if they do. However, Emerson at times was dead on and were not off by much in other polls.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2017 7:47:11 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I listened to some liberal faggots on a AZ radio show this morning. They were practically crying, saying Moore would win by 8 points and "The people of Alabama will confirm what we always thought about them, and none of it is good." To the people of Alabama, thankyou for helping slap down fake news again, and thankyou for the large dose of liberal tears I will be ingesting tomorrow. Those lying sacks of sh*t... they would STILL make fun of AL residents as a bunch of poor, ignorant, racist, cousin-humping rednecks, no matter HOW Alabamians voted. And nobody in Alabama is looking for approval from the Left anyway. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File