User Panel
|
Carriers don’t have Aegis. But they do have lots of defensive capabilities. ESSM, RAM, CIDS. And good radars.
|
|
|
Quoted: Carriers have Aegis. It's on the ship right next to it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Carriers don’t have Aegis. But they do have lots of defensive capabilities. ESSM, RAM, CIDS. And good radars. Carriers have Aegis. It's on the ship right next to it SSDS and Aegis will be merged into a common battle management system called Common Source Library |
|
Everyone saying SM-3, hate to break it to you, but it doesn’t work like that. SM-2 or 6 , depending on range/speed, is more likely.
|
|
Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone
|
|
|
Quoted: That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. Directed energy weapons? I was expecting to see a mix of SM-2 and ESSM. I guess they didn’t get that close, which is good. |
|
Quoted: Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone View Quote In a limited situation like this it's a political victory. If we anchor a ship and we continue doing this for weeks/months it will be a huge money pit. I also worry we may need those missiles in the future with China so it's troubling if we run down our stockpile. |
|
Quoted: Directed energy weapons? I was expecting to see a mix of SM-2 and ESSM. I guess they didn’t get that close, which is good. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. Directed energy weapons? I was expecting to see a mix of SM-2 and ESSM. I guess they didn’t get that close, which is good. Yes, Directed Energy ESSM are relatively short-ranged and more for self-defense and the 2s are for area defense. |
|
|
|
Quoted: The sources I read all claim SM-2s. The USS Carney had a busy day. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Everyone saying SM-3, hate to break it to you, but it doesn’t work like that. SM-2 or 6 , depending on range/speed, is more likely. The sources I read all claim SM-2s. The USS Carney had a busy day. 2s are for area IAMD, while 3s are for BMD defense. |
|
Quoted: Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone View Quote If those numbers are true I believe that sets the record for airborne targets destroyed by a single ship in a single engagement in the missile age. Possibly the all time record as South Dakota’s claim of 26 at Santa Cruz was wildly inflated, as was common in that era. |
|
Quoted: It is not about the expense of the missile, but the cost of lives and damage it could inflict that counts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. It is not about the expense of the missile, but the cost of lives and damage it could inflict that counts. Does a tactical victory matter when you bankrupt the Nation? Empires don't fall from enemy action but fall from their economy collapsing. |
|
Quoted: In a limited situation like this it's a political victory. If we anchor a ship and we continue doing this for weeks/months it will be a huge money pit. I also worry we may need those missiles in the future with China so it's troubling if we run down our stockpile. View Quote Nothing to worry about, the production line is revving up already. We have 70 active Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers with over 4200 assorted missiles. That is not even counting the cruisers and Zumwalts. Running out of missiles is the least of our problems at the moment. |
|
|
Quoted: Does a tactical victory matter when you bankrupt the Nation? Empires don't fall from enemy action but fall from their economy collapsing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. It is not about the expense of the missile, but the cost of lives and damage it could inflict that counts. Does a tactical victory matter when you bankrupt the Nation? Empires don't fall from enemy action but fall from their economy collapsing. Doing nothing and doing something will both inevitably lead to change. |
|
Quoted: Does a tactical victory matter when you bankrupt the Nation? Empires don't fall from enemy action but fall from their economy collapsing. View Quote Dude, take a deep breath. Coming to the aid of our closest ally is not about empires. It is about mutual defense. Our people are in this and not by choice. Some desert rat chose to murder, rape, and butcher. You kill rats not make them pets. |
|
The pentagon briefing was weird on this as well.
It doesn't seem like anyone wants to say who fired said cruise missiles. Isn't Yemen also aligned with China? |
|
Quoted: The pentagon briefing was weird on this as well. It doesn't seem like anyone wants to say who fired said cruise missiles. Isn't Yemen also aligned with China? View Quote Iran wanted to establish a base along the Red Sea in Yemen. It appears they did so. I don't believe Iran gave those missiles to Yemen but are the ones launching them. Others may differ but it doesn't matter, the cruise missiles are long range and only Iran has them. |
|
Iran needs to get tenderly loved. They keep testing us to see how much they can get away with.
|
|
Quoted: Nothing to worry about, the production line is revving up already. We have 70 active Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers with over 4200 assorted missiles. That is not even counting the cruisers and Zumwalts. Running out of missiles is the least of our problems at the moment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: In a limited situation like this it's a political victory. If we anchor a ship and we continue doing this for weeks/months it will be a huge money pit. I also worry we may need those missiles in the future with China so it's troubling if we run down our stockpile. Nothing to worry about, the production line is revving up already. We have 70 active Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers with over 4200 assorted missiles. That is not even counting the cruisers and Zumwalts. Running out of missiles is the least of our problems at the moment. Funny I heard that about other munitions just a few months back. The bottom line, people who say that have very little knowleof the depth of the US magazines. |
|
The article seems to suggest that the LACM were brought down with SM2, but the drones were possibly brought down by some other means.
"The missiles fired by the Houthis were engaged by SM2 missiles carried aboard the USS Carney, a U.S. official told ABC News. No information was released about what weapons platform aboard the Carney brought down the 8 drones." Seems wasteful to me to use a standard missile on a drone. If they were really headed to Israel, give them a heads up and let them destroy the drones with their (much cheaper) systems. |
|
Quoted: Yes, Directed Energy ESSM are relatively short-ranged and more for self-defense and the 2s are for area defense. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Latest article says the ship shot down 15 drones and 4 cruise missiles with SM-2s. Seems like a waste to use expensive SM2s for the drones, no? Like using Patriot interceptors for a Lancet drone That is the magazine depth problem DEWs are meant to address. Directed energy weapons? I was expecting to see a mix of SM-2 and ESSM. I guess they didn’t get that close, which is good. Yes, Directed Energy ESSM are relatively short-ranged and more for self-defense and the 2s are for area defense. I thought the latest block 2 ESSM has about 40 km range? Do we know the ranges these missiles and drones were at? |
|
Quoted: The article seems to suggest that the LACM were brought down with SM2, but the drones were possibly brought down by some other means. "The missiles fired by the Houthis were engaged by SM2 missiles carried aboard the USS Carney, a U.S. official told ABC News. No information was released about what weapons platform aboard the Carney brought down the 8 drones." Seems wasteful to me to use a standard missile on a drone. If they were really headed to Israel, give them a heads up and let them destroy the drones with their (much cheaper) systems. View Quote I think it was a demonstration of capabilities to China and Russia. |
|
|
Quoted: So you have personally counted all of them? ROFL. Handwringers are rarely experts either. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Funny I heard that about other munitions just a few months back. The bottom line, people who say that have very little knowleof the depth of the US magazines. So you have personally counted all of them? ROFL. Handwringers are rarely experts either. Well that sort of what my last job involved. But hey how would that compare to a guy who left service decades ago? |
|
|
Just something that popped in my head. But just by their nature interceptors cost way more than missiles that just attack. It'd be cool if Elon got into the IAD game and got his group of engineers together to bring down costs of these things.
|
|
|
Quoted: SSDS and Aegis will be merged into a common battle management system called Common Source Library View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Carriers don’t have Aegis. But they do have lots of defensive capabilities. ESSM, RAM, CIDS. And good radars. Carriers have Aegis. It's on the ship right next to it SSDS and Aegis will be merged into a common battle management system called Common Source Library The rudimentary one line architecture photos make these systems seem similar to industrial DCS systems such as Yokogawa, Honeywell, Kongsberg, Foxboro, etc. Are the platform processor and data acquisition platforms US Military proprietary, or are they off the shelf hardware that could be hacked in similar style to the StuxNet virus set upon Iran years ago? I have worked across various industries on multiple PLC and DCS, SCADA systems and one I am familiar with is Kongsberg...I believe the Germans use that one for weapons platforms as well. In my realm, Kongsberg was station keeping on deep water platforms (dynamic positioning via GPS and ocean bottom transponders), fire and gas shutdown and alarm systems, and process control. We relied upon multi-tiered cyber security protocol including airgap which obviously the USN has, along with system monitoring software. This shit keeps me awake at night. It would be horrifying for a nation state to achieve a backdoor and turn these weapon systems on us during the heat of battle. |
|
Quoted: The rudimentary one line architecture photos make these systems seem similar to industrial DCS systems such as Yokogawa, Honeywell, Kongsberg, Foxboro, etc. Are the platform processor and data acquisition platforms US Military proprietary, or are they off the shelf hardware that could be hacked in similar style to the StuxNet virus set upon Iran years ago? I have worked across various industries on multiple PLC and DCS, SCADA systems and one I am familiar with is Kongsberg...I believe the Germans use that one for weapons platforms as well. In my realm, Kongsberg was station keeping on deep water platforms (dynamic positioning via GPS and ocean bottom transponders), fire and gas shutdown and alarm systems, and process control. We relied upon multi-tiered cyber security protocol including airgap which obviously the USN has, along with system monitoring software. This shit keeps me awake at night. It would be horrifying for a nation state to achieve a backdoor and turn these weapon systems on us during the heat of battle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Carriers don’t have Aegis. But they do have lots of defensive capabilities. ESSM, RAM, CIDS. And good radars. Carriers have Aegis. It's on the ship right next to it SSDS and Aegis will be merged into a common battle management system called Common Source Library The rudimentary one line architecture photos make these systems seem similar to industrial DCS systems such as Yokogawa, Honeywell, Kongsberg, Foxboro, etc. Are the platform processor and data acquisition platforms US Military proprietary, or are they off the shelf hardware that could be hacked in similar style to the StuxNet virus set upon Iran years ago? I have worked across various industries on multiple PLC and DCS, SCADA systems and one I am familiar with is Kongsberg...I believe the Germans use that one for weapons platforms as well. In my realm, Kongsberg was station keeping on deep water platforms (dynamic positioning via GPS and ocean bottom transponders), fire and gas shutdown and alarm systems, and process control. We relied upon multi-tiered cyber security protocol including airgap which obviously the USN has, along with system monitoring software. This shit keeps me awake at night. It would be horrifying for a nation state to achieve a backdoor and turn these weapon systems on us during the heat of battle. It’s proprietary and the USN pays a ton for IA and cybersecurity on it, hopefully that has proofed it from a zero day event. |
|
Quoted: The rudimentary one line architecture photos make these systems seem similar to industrial DCS systems such as Yokogawa, Honeywell, Kongsberg, Foxboro, etc. Are the platform processor and data acquisition platforms US Military proprietary, or are they off the shelf hardware that could be hacked in similar style to the StuxNet virus set upon Iran years ago? I have worked across various industries on multiple PLC and DCS, SCADA systems and one I am familiar with is Kongsberg...I believe the Germans use that one for weapons platforms as well. In my realm, Kongsberg was station keeping on deep water platforms (dynamic positioning via GPS and ocean bottom transponders), fire and gas shutdown and alarm systems, and process control. We relied upon multi-tiered cyber security protocol including airgap which obviously the USN has, along with system monitoring software. This shit keeps me awake at night. It would be horrifying for a nation state to achieve a backdoor and turn these weapon systems on us during the heat of battle. View Quote It would be terrible if we've already demonstrated we can do that to them Oh wait, we have. |
|
|
|
Thoughts on if they made a phalanx in 40mm air burst? Just put out a bunch of flak out, like a cloud and the incoming missile runs into it. ??
Seems odds of success would be better than trying to hit a missile with a bullet. |
|
|
Quoted: Thoughts on if they made a phalanx in 40mm air burst? Just put out a bunch of flak out, like a cloud and the incoming missile runs into it. ?? Seems odds of success would be better than trying to hit a missile with a bullet. View Quote probably would be hell on drones, but 20mm seems to be getting replaced by SeaRam more and more often. |
|
Quoted: The pentagon briefing was weird on this as well. It doesn't seem like anyone wants to say who fired said cruise missiles. Isn't Yemen also aligned with China? View Quote I still think they were aiming at the ship, and "Israel" was the convenient excuse to make it seem like we're not getting into a hot war. |
|
|
Quoted: Thoughts on if they made a phalanx in 40mm air burst? Just put out a bunch of flak out, like a cloud and the incoming missile runs into it. ?? Seems odds of success would be better than trying to hit a missile with a bullet. View Quote They could license it from Sweden and put four of them together and just put a bunch of those mounts all over the place. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: It would be terrible if we've already demonstrated we can do that to them Oh wait, we have. Link? Operation orchard. The end of that particular rabbit hole isn't in the internet but it shouldn't be either. The journey is the destination. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.