User Panel
Quoted:
adds up to 155 none of it adds up Unticketed infant is the extra one. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
adds up to 155 none of it adds up Unticketed infant is the extra one. And the seven crew members brings it to 162 souls on board. |
|
Quoted:
The ones in the raft almost certainly wouldn't be impact activated. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While the plane itself may have a minimum of 2 ELT, they were also rated for oceanic flight and must have emergency rafts.....I was under the impression these days they have ELT too. Isn't the lack of communications and evidence way odd? The ones in the raft almost certainly wouldn't be impact activated. Would they be EPIRBs? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
adds up to 155 none of it adds up View Quote Unticketed infant is the extra one. View Quote So the infant is the terrorist that snuck on board? ETA: My webernets Fu failed me |
|
Quoted:
And the seven crew members brings it to 162 souls on board. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
adds up to 155 none of it adds up Unticketed infant is the extra one. And the seven crew members brings it to 162 souls on board. Okay, thanks; makes since with 4 infants manifested, 181=177 and then 155=154 thanks again prayers out again |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
While the plane itself may have a minimum of 2 ELT, they were also rated for oceanic flight and must have emergency rafts.....I was under the impression these days they have ELT too. Isn't the lack of communications and evidence way odd? The ones in the raft almost certainly wouldn't be impact activated. Would they be EPIRBs? They are all tracking transmitters with perhaps differences in how they are used/features. Might some individuals also have PLBs? Regardless, it get's weird when there is absolutely no communication reported. Ballista's report that this airline is also one of the very few in an 11,000 airline fleet not to have the free INMARSAT tracking is also quite interesting. |
|
Quoted:
Its ok guys, unlike $80 million airliners, my cell phone has a GPS tracker on it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Im gonna bust out FSX tonight to fly this same course. I will update if a Dragon/aliens/godzilla devours the aircraft for me. I would suggest attaching some sort of electronic device to track you with, so we can find you later. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Tie a rope to yourself so we can find you later. Its ok guys, unlike $80 million airliners, my cell phone has a GPS tracker on it I can tell you where my wife and kids phones are 24/7 but airlines cant tell where their planes are. |
|
Quoted:
I can tell you where my wife and kids phones are 24/7 but airlines cant tell where their planes are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Im gonna bust out FSX tonight to fly this same course. I will update if a Dragon/aliens/godzilla devours the aircraft for me. I would suggest attaching some sort of electronic device to track you with, so we can find you later. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Tie a rope to yourself so we can find you later. Its ok guys, unlike $80 million airliners, my cell phone has a GPS tracker on it I can tell you where my wife and kids phones are 24/7 but airlines cant tell where their planes are. Most of this was my bitch about the last one when most of the people here assured my how impossible and expensive it would be to do. Wonder how much per day a military ship costs to blindly search the ocean? |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Im gonna bust out FSX tonight to fly this same course. I will update if a Dragon/aliens/godzilla devours the aircraft for me. I would suggest attaching some sort of electronic device to track you with, so we can find you later. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Tie a rope to yourself so we can find you later. Its ok guys, unlike $80 million airliners, my cell phone has a GPS tracker on it Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? ETA: my cheap 23' sportfishing boat has an EPIRB on it that activates when the button is pushed or when it is submerged in water. They cost a few hundred dollars. How the hell can two $100MM aircraft full of people vanish with no trace. It tells me that the world aviation community has some catching up to do..... |
|
Okay, gotta ask.
Isn't there another airliner that went down in that same general area and they still haven't found anything? I might recollect incorrectly but that's what I remember. |
|
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? View Quote Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. |
|
Quoted:
Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. |
|
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Having to read stuff like that is my penance for posting in cop threads. |
|
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. View Quote Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. |
|
Quoted:
Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). |
|
|
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? ETA: my cheap 23' sportfishing boat has an EPIRB on it that activates when the button is pushed or when it is submerged in water. They cost a few hundred dollars. How the hell can two $100MM aircraft full of people vanish with no trace. It tells me that the world aviation community has some catching up to do..... View Quote Aircraft have ELTs that are activated manually or by an inertia switch. |
|
Quoted:
From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). Their ability to get to satellites from underwater is a bit of a problem. |
|
Quoted:
From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). EPIRBs, PLBs or ELTs transmit a signal. Polar orbiting and geosynchronous satellites can pick up that signal. A cell phone with GPS will receive GPS signals but don't expect to track it some distance from shore. |
|
Quoted:
From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). I have not seen any with round the world coverage. |
|
Quoted:
Their ability to get to satellites from underwater is a bit of a problem. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). Their ability to get to satellites from underwater is a bit of a problem. An intact plane that doesn't spew debris takes a long time to sink. It takes less then a minute for satellite communication. Something is very wrong here. |
|
|
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. yep if you pre-load all the maps it sure will for you - not for anyone else |
|
Quoted:
EPIRBs, PLBs or ELTs transmit a signal. Polar orbiting and geosynchronous satellites can pick up that signal. A cell phone with GPS will receive GPS signals but don't expect to track it some distance from shore. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. Yes it will work but what about 50 miles from land? Give the searchers time to find the wreckage if the plane did impact water in that area. I would have a black box detecting system on the way to listen for the black boxes before those batteries die. From my understanding an EPIRB will work anywhere on the globe, it transmits a signal with your location to a satellite (or network of satellites). EPIRBs, PLBs or ELTs transmit a signal. Polar orbiting and geosynchronous satellites can pick up that signal. A cell phone with GPS will receive GPS signals but don't expect to track it some distance from shore. it will (your phone will give a GPS coordinate without service) again, for you - not for anyone else |
|
Quoted:
yep if you pre-load all the maps it sure will for you - not for anyone else View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. yep if you pre-load all the maps it sure will for you - not for anyone else I think it'll give me GPS coordinates, even without data transfer. |
|
Quoted:
GPS is global. Polar orbiting satellites would cover gaps where geosynchronous satellite coverage is inadequate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have not seen any [EPIRB} with round the world coverage. GPS is global. Polar orbiting satellites would cover gaps where geosynchronous satellite coverage is inadequate. Yes, gps is. The issue is the transmitting of the location of the unit. There is still a coverage gap. The one I looked at still said there were still dead zones for the 406mhz. |
|
|
Quoted:
Most of this was my bitch about the last one when most of the people here assured my how impossible and expensive it would be to do. Wonder how much per day a military ship costs to blindly search the ocean? View Quote at some point it stops being about the equipment on the aircraft and starts being on the infrastructure to support communications lots of bitching about ADS-B installation prices - they still only work within range of receiving stations - the cost to piggyback on existing sat constellations or put up new ones would be pretty steep |
|
Quoted:
I think it'll give me GPS coordinates, even without data transfer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. Bet my phone with GPS and google maps could work on a plane. yep if you pre-load all the maps it sure will for you - not for anyone else I think it'll give me GPS coordinates, even without data transfer. Well it's a good thing your phone will let YOU know where you are when you crash. Now you just need to wait until your phone washes up near a cell tower so it can send that info to everyone else. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
They have now officially asked the US to assist in the search. From their track record, they really suck at hide and seek. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Still nothin? They have now officially asked the US to assist in the search. From their track record, they really suck at hide and seek. Did you see one of their search vessels posted on the previous page(s)? It was a dinghy... |
|
I searched and couldn't find it... but has a passenger list been published?
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? Shit's expensive, and airlines aren't going to do it unless mandated to do so. The world is a really, really big place. It's honestly not that expensive. If almost anyone can afford to send text messages from anywhere on the globe via satellite, then a plane with GPS navigation can send periodic status updates. |
|
Quoted:
Inmarsat to provide free global airline tracking service
In advance of the conference on aircraft tracking being hosted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Montreal on Monday, 12 May, Inmarsat has confirmed it has proposed to ICAO a free global airline tracking service over the Inmarsat network, as part of the anticipated adoption of further aviation safety service measures by the world’s airlines following the loss of flight MH370. <snip> I believe this is a CYA statement, just released from AirAsia: AirAsia's fleet of short-haul jets have been receiving tracking upgrades, but plane lost en route to Singapore had not yet been modified |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well it's a good thing your phone will let YOU know where you are when you crash. Now you just need to wait until your phone washes up near a cell tower so it can send that info to everyone else. So, it comes down to cost. more physics ... the world is a big place rf does not tend to lend itself to submarine environments electronics tend not to survive impact forces / fires |
|
Quoted:
more physics ... the world is a big place rf does not tend to lend itself to submarine environments electronics tend not to survive impact forces / fires View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well it's a good thing your phone will let YOU know where you are when you crash. Now you just need to wait until your phone washes up near a cell tower so it can send that info to everyone else. So, it comes down to cost. more physics ... the world is a big place rf does not tend to lend itself to submarine environments electronics tend not to survive impact forces / fires It just needs to survive and send information a second prior. |
|
Quoted:
Seriously though. Isn't a bit pathetic that in today's day and age with all of the satellite and location technology that is available, two airliners full of passengers have simply disappeared into the twilight zone in less than one year? ETA: my cheap 23' sportfishing boat has an EPIRB on it that activates when the button is pushed or when it is submerged in water. They cost a few hundred dollars. How the hell can two $100MM aircraft full of people vanish with no trace. It tells me that the world aviation community has some catching up to do..... View Quote I 100% agree. I know it is more complicated than the cell phone locator or the LoJack in cars but when airlines are losing aircraft like this, the added cost can be pretty easily justified. |
|
Quoted:
Yes, gps is. The issue is the transmitting of the location of the unit. There is still a coverage gap. The one I looked at still said there were still dead zones for the 406mhz. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have not seen any [EPIRB} with round the world coverage. GPS is global. Polar orbiting satellites would cover gaps where geosynchronous satellite coverage is inadequate. Yes, gps is. The issue is the transmitting of the location of the unit. There is still a coverage gap. The one I looked at still said there were still dead zones for the 406mhz. Do you have a website showing the coverage gap? I would be surprised if the 406 MHz systems on geosynchronous satellites is not effectively global (excluding polar regions). I will have to do some research. Update: Looking at Figures 6 and 7 of the following document it appears that the only unserved area is the south polar region. http://www.cospas-sarsat.int/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=206&Itemid=132 |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well it's a good thing your phone will let YOU know where you are when you crash. Now you just need to wait until your phone washes up near a cell tower so it can send that info to everyone else. So, it comes down to cost. Like most things in life yes. Would you pay an extra three dollars a ticket to fly on a jet that had a tracking system on it or would you do like most everyone and just hit the lowest price that the Gnome finds you? |
|
Quoted:
Do you have a website showing the coverage gap? I would be surprised if the 406 MHz systems on geosynchronous satellites is not effectively global (excluding polar regions). I will have to do some research. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have not seen any [EPIRB} with round the world coverage. GPS is global. Polar orbiting satellites would cover gaps where geosynchronous satellite coverage is inadequate. Yes, gps is. The issue is the transmitting of the location of the unit. There is still a coverage gap. The one I looked at still said there were still dead zones for the 406mhz. Do you have a website showing the coverage gap? I would be surprised if the 406 MHz systems on geosynchronous satellites is not effectively global (excluding polar regions). I will have to do some research. Low polar orbit (528 miles), each of 5 POES/SARSAT satellites completes an orbit every 100 minutes, angle of orbit is 99 degrees off equator. These use doppler effects to get fixed location of beacon. Geosynchronous Orbit, 10 GEOSAR Satellites Spaced out roughly every 30 degrees of longitude, with some wide variance, these can't use doppler, so rely on multiple satellites to receive to triangulate. Both types of SAR Satellites are additional payloads on other satellites, such as GOES-E for geosync, and METOP-A for one of the polar orbits. NOAA info on Cospas-Sarsat Cospas-Sarsat usage statistics, seem to cover the entire globe From the last link, here are the rescues aided by SARSAT: |
|
Quoted:
Low polar orbit (528 miles), each of 5 POES/SARSAT satellites completes an orbit every 100 minutes, angle of orbit is 99 degrees off equator. These use doppler effects to get fixed location of beacon. Geosynchronous Orbit, 10 GEOSAR Satellites Spaced out roughly every 30 degrees of longitude, with some wide variance, these can't use doppler, so rely on multiple satellites to receive to triangulate. Both types of SAR Satellites are additional payloads on other satellites, such as GOES-E for geosync, and METOP-A for one of the polar orbits. NOAA info on Cospas-Sarsat Cospas-Sarsat usage statistics, seem to cover the entire globe From the last link, here are the rescues aided by SARSAT: View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have not seen any [EPIRB} with round the world coverage. GPS is global. Polar orbiting satellites would cover gaps where geosynchronous satellite coverage is inadequate. Yes, gps is. The issue is the transmitting of the location of the unit. There is still a coverage gap. The one I looked at still said there were still dead zones for the 406mhz. Do you have a website showing the coverage gap? I would be surprised if the 406 MHz systems on geosynchronous satellites is not effectively global (excluding polar regions). I will have to do some research. Low polar orbit (528 miles), each of 5 POES/SARSAT satellites completes an orbit every 100 minutes, angle of orbit is 99 degrees off equator. These use doppler effects to get fixed location of beacon. Geosynchronous Orbit, 10 GEOSAR Satellites Spaced out roughly every 30 degrees of longitude, with some wide variance, these can't use doppler, so rely on multiple satellites to receive to triangulate. Both types of SAR Satellites are additional payloads on other satellites, such as GOES-E for geosync, and METOP-A for one of the polar orbits. NOAA info on Cospas-Sarsat Cospas-Sarsat usage statistics, seem to cover the entire globe From the last link, here are the rescues aided by SARSAT: So, based on your picture, if you're over water and the plane your flying in connects with SARSAT, you better hope you're near land becasue water rescues are still not (likely) gonna happen. |
|
Quoted:
The sad part is that INMARSAT offers free satellite tracking but this Airbus POS did not have it installed. It's free and they still did not have it. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6Dco5dCQAAjSvg.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Most of this was my bitch about the last one when most of the people here assured my how impossible and expensive it would be to do. Wonder how much per day a military ship costs to blindly search the ocean? The sad part is that INMARSAT offers free satellite tracking but this Airbus POS did not have it installed. It's free and they still did not have it. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6Dco5dCQAAjSvg.jpg Free or "Free" (with the purchase of a $35,000 piece of equipment that must have new firmware updates installed every 180 days at a low introductory rate of 3 easy payments of $4,999.99 per update). That company is in business for profit... So where is the charge... |
|
Pentagon: Details of Indonesia's request for US assistance in AirAsia search still being coordinated; could include some air, surface, sub-surface 'detection capabilities' - statement View Quote How long was it before the US was in on the MH370 search, dropping sonobuoys all over? I'm also curious as to how many of the search "ships" have the equipment to detect the 38kHz beacon from the CVR/CDR boxes. The picture of the inflatable boat as a search craft did not instill confidence. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.