User Panel
Watch the video link. "Cops and Klan go hand in hand" |
|
|
Quoted:
They go after the Founding Fathers. The destruction of history is being purposefully done. If the future generations don't study and know their past, then the State can create new National Mythos to make society into what it wants. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So when they run out of statues and nothing magically changes, what then? Fucking idiots. The destruction of history is being purposefully done. If the future generations don't study and know their past, then the State can create new National Mythos to make society into what it wants. The true architects behind the Antifa/BLM/HugAMuslim/etc. movement don't give a shit about history, or tolerance, or slavery, or anything that isn't directly related to keeping themselves comfortably wrapped in money and the power to rule over others. They are simply useful tools which can be used to manipulate the sympathies and emotions of a voting public that has been deliberately conditioned over generations to depend on others to do their thinking for them. Those terms are the hypnotist's keywords; when uttered by the masters, the puppet's eyes glaze over and they react predictably, refreshing the cloud of chaos used to obscure the public's view of the social engineering and corruption the master's empires are built upon. None of this is about honor or respect or human rights. It's about control. |
|
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri all owned slaves and were Union States. Even with the formation of West Virginia, Senator John S. Carlile objected that Congress had no right to impose emancipation on West Virginia. North didn't fight the war over Slavery. It simply used it as a reason after the war started. The south left, and fought, over slavery (connected to states rights, but the right in question was slavery). The north fought over the south leaving. Nor did many in the North care about slavery at all. Much like many in the south didn't either. Everybody likes to think of every side being a monolithic block, years after the war, but they weren't. There's a reason both the South and North had to resort to a draft. Hell, a lot of southern states didn't like or trust the Confederate government because they felt it was trying to gain too much power over the states (which it was, ironically). Shit, I knew people who didn't know the New York Draft Riot was a thing until Gangs of New York came out. We do this with WW2 now as well, forgetting about all the isolationists before the war (mostly socialists and lefties who though Hitler was fine because Stalin signed a treaty with him), people that opposed the war, or people who just didn't much care. Or people that saw it as a way to make a buck. It makes for an easier story. |
|
Quoted:
No, he's right. The south left, and fought, over slavery (connected to states rights, but the right in question was slavery). The north fought over the south leaving. Nor did many in the North care about slavery at all. Much like many in the south didn't either. Everybody likes to think of every side being a monolithic block, years after the war, but they weren't. There's a reason both the South and North had to resort to a draft. Hell, a lot of southern states didn't like or trust the Confederate government because they felt it was trying to gain too much power over the states (which it was, ironically). Shit, I knew people who didn't know the New York Draft Riot was a thing until Gangs of New York came out. We do this with WW2 now as well, forgetting about all the isolationists before the war (mostly socialists and lefties who though Hitler was fine because Stalin signed a treaty with him), people that opposed the war, or people who just didn't much care. Or people that saw it as a way to make a buck. It makes for an easier story. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri all owned slaves and were Union States. Even with the formation of West Virginia, Senator John S. Carlile objected that Congress had no right to impose emancipation on West Virginia. North didn't fight the war over Slavery. It simply used it as a reason after the war started. The south left, and fought, over slavery (connected to states rights, but the right in question was slavery). The north fought over the south leaving. Nor did many in the North care about slavery at all. Much like many in the south didn't either. Everybody likes to think of every side being a monolithic block, years after the war, but they weren't. There's a reason both the South and North had to resort to a draft. Hell, a lot of southern states didn't like or trust the Confederate government because they felt it was trying to gain too much power over the states (which it was, ironically). Shit, I knew people who didn't know the New York Draft Riot was a thing until Gangs of New York came out. We do this with WW2 now as well, forgetting about all the isolationists before the war (mostly socialists and lefties who though Hitler was fine because Stalin signed a treaty with him), people that opposed the war, or people who just didn't much care. Or people that saw it as a way to make a buck. It makes for an easier story. |
|
This was predictable, Washington is the next to go
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2017/08/16/jackson-washington-park-protest-presidents-slave-owners/ |
|
Quoted:
No, he's right. The south left, and fought, over slavery (connected to states rights, but (one of) the right in question was slavery). The north fought over the south leaving. Nor did many in the North care about slavery at all. Much like many in the south didn't either. Everybody likes to think of every side being a monolithic block, years after the war, but they weren't. There's a reason both the South and North had to resort to a draft. Hell, a lot of southern states didn't like or trust the Confederate government because they felt it was trying to gain too much power over the states (which it was, ironically). Shit, I knew people who didn't know the New York Draft Riot was a thing until Gangs of New York came out. We do this with WW2 now as well, forgetting about all the isolationists before the war (mostly socialists and lefties who though Hitler was fine because Stalin signed a treaty with him), people that opposed the war, or people who just didn't much care. Or people that saw it as a way to make a buck. It makes for an easier story. View Quote |
|
Quoted:That's why we NEED to pass down the stories through families of what REALLY happened. View Quote What matters are the personal accounts and source records of the time. Those are as well preserved and documented as is possible, and they're easily available. Statues don't tell anyone much of anything about what happened, or why it did. They're symbols that reflect the thoughts and wishes of the people who erected them, and not a historical accounting. |
|
Baltimore's four Confederate monuments are removed under cover of darkness as the city council swiftly honors its promise
to take down the divisive statues after violent clashes in Charlottesville
More Pics |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
|
None of this would be happening if the "Solid South" was still voting 100 percent Democrat like it did for 100 years.
When do they start attacking Woodrow Wilson's statues? He's the president who re-segregated the government in 1913, and caused many black federal employees to either lose their jobs or lose most of their salaries. |
|
It's not just statues Democrats want gone today
|
|
Quoted:
people who keep making this comparison/argument just show their lack of knowledge of history. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hitler was against having statues of his likeness erected because he saw it being synonymous with the likes of Stalin and Lenin who loved a good statue. There were however a small number busts made of Hitler's likeness and some of them have been preserved in Germany. |
|
Coorection, 4 have been arrested now.
http://abc11.com/politics/4th-person-charged-in-destruction-of-durham-confederate-statue/2313763/ |
|
Quoted:
Coorection, 4 have been arrested now. http://abc11.com/politics/4th-person-charged-in-destruction-of-durham-confederate-statue/2313763/ View Quote Guess the Cops don't like being compared to the Klan either. Who knew? |
|
Quoted:
I think you're giving them too much credit. The true architects behind the Antifa/BLM/HugAMuslim/etc. movement don't give a shit about history, or tolerance, or slavery, or anything that isn't directly related to keeping themselves comfortably wrapped in money and the power to rule over others. They are simply useful tools which can be used to manipulate the sympathies and emotions of a voting public that has been deliberately conditioned over generations to depend on others to do their thinking for them. Those terms are the hypnotist's keywords; when uttered by the masters, the puppet's eyes glaze over and they react predictably, refreshing the cloud of chaos used to obscure the public's view of the social engineering and corruption the master's empires are built upon. None of this is about honor or respect or human rights. It's about control. View Quote More explicitly--- IT'S ABOUT STEALING AND TAKING -CONTROL- OF THE USA!!!!! |
|
Quoted:
Baltimore's four Confederate monuments are removed under cover of darkness as the city council swiftly honors its promise to take down the divisive statues after violent clashes in Charlottesville
More Pics http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/14/434BE56800000578-4795740-A_monument_dedicated_to_the_Confederate_Women_of_Maryland_lies_o-a-25_1502888775587.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/14/434C0CE800000578-4795740-A_monument_to_Robert_E_Lee_commander_of_the_pro_slavery_Confeder-a-37_1502889710024.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/14/434C09AA00000578-4795740-Only_the_base_of_the_Robert_E_Lee_and_Thomas_Stonewall_Jackson_r-a-29_1502888775799.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
"None of this is about honor or respect or human rights. It's about control." More explicitly--- IT'S ABOUT STEALING AND TAKING -CONTROL- OF THE USA!!!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I think you're giving them too much credit. The true architects behind the Antifa/BLM/HugAMuslim/etc. movement don't give a shit about history, or tolerance, or slavery, or anything that isn't directly related to keeping themselves comfortably wrapped in money and the power to rule over others. They are simply useful tools which can be used to manipulate the sympathies and emotions of a voting public that has been deliberately conditioned over generations to depend on others to do their thinking for them. Those terms are the hypnotist's keywords; when uttered by the masters, the puppet's eyes glaze over and they react predictably, refreshing the cloud of chaos used to obscure the public's view of the social engineering and corruption the master's empires are built upon. None of this is about honor or respect or human rights. It's about control. More explicitly--- IT'S ABOUT STEALING AND TAKING -CONTROL- OF THE USA!!!!! |
|
Quoted:
They've been in control for a long time now. At this point it's about keeping it... and they're scared to death because they can see it slipping through their fingers. Turn on the news right now - any channel - if you want to see how truly desperate they are. View Quote I had the unpleasant experience of sitting near a TV in a restaurant last night watching ABC News in closed caps. Their expressions were sickening. ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING!!! Mid Term elections may be ---interesting... |
|
Quoted:
They've been in control for a long time now. At this point it's about keeping it... and they're scared to death because they can see it slipping through their fingers. Turn on the news right now - any channel - if you want to see how truly desperate they are. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
And they would promptly be arrested. Only leftist agitators are allowed to break the laws these days it seems. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
More arrests http://abc11.com/more-protesters-arrested-for-taking-down-confederate-statue/2316998/?sf107114046=1 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Guess you missed the video of the cop giving the armed dude protecting a monument in Virginia an escort from the protesters at the end of the day all while being harassed by ANTIFA. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And they would promptly be arrested. Only leftist agitators are allowed to break the laws these days it seems. |
|
Quoted:
None of this would be happening if the "Solid South" was still voting 100 percent Democrat like it did for 100 years. When do they start attacking Woodrow Wilson's statues? He's the president who re-segregated the government in 1913, and caused many black federal employees to either lose their jobs or lose most of their salaries. View Quote but FDR is their socialist hero so they never mention that |
|
http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2017/08/17/madison-mayor-paul-soglin-orders-removal-two-confederate-memorials-cemetery/576266001/
Two Confederate memorials will be removed from a Madison cemetery, Mayor Paul Soglin said Thursday. Soglin ordered the removal of a "Confederate's rest commemorative memorial" from the city-owned Forest Hill Cemetery, located on the city's west side. "There is a larger monument, which has not garnered as much attention, which will also be removed," Soglin said in a statement posted on his Facebook account. That marker was installed about 100 years ago and will require heavy machinery to remove, Soglin said in an interview. The memorials honor 140 Confederate soldiers who died in 1862 while in captivity at nearby Camp Randall. They were buried in a mass grave at Forest Hill. The display of Confederate flags at the cemetery and the memorials have stirred considerable debate in Madison, including a 2016 city attorney's opinion that said the city's policies on flag displays were outdated. "The removal of city-owned monuments to confederate soldiers in Forest Hill Cemetery has minimal or no disruption to the cemetery itself," Soglin said. "There is no disrespect to the dead with the removal of the plaque and stone." Soglin said both monuments include inscriptions that "speak in glowing terms about the historic efforts of the Confederacy." The older monument lists the names of the Confederate soldiers buried at Forest Hill. "It will eventually be replaced with a plaque or some sort of monument with the names of the deceased," the mayor said. "There's not going to be any additional language included." --------------- FO time, people? |
|
Quoted:
No, he's right. The south left, and fought, over slavery (connected to states rights, but the right in question was slavery). The north fought over the south leaving. Nor did many in the North care about slavery at all. Much like many in the south didn't either. It makes for an easier story. View Quote 1) White populations in southern states benefited from the fact that they got more Congressional seats than their rated from their voting eligible population. 3/5 of the black population counted toward electoral votes and the number of extra Congressional seats. This was a gimme prize awarded in the Constitutional Conventions. 2) Northern industry that paid for its labor couldn't compete with southern industry that used free slave labor. Could many of the southern crops have grown in free states? Absolutely, but it wasn't profitable when your competition didn't have to pay a nickle to its workers. If you don't think this is a real reason, this is the same reason why iPads are made in China and not North Dakota. The Civil War was about slavery. |
|
DSA / antifa / refuse facism are pushing hard, this is 1 of many tweets
|
|
Quoted:
http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2017/08/17/madison-mayor-paul-soglin-orders-removal-two-confederate-memorials-cemetery/576266001/ Two Confederate memorials will be removed from a Madison cemetery, Mayor Paul Soglin said Thursday. Soglin ordered the removal of a "Confederate's rest commemorative memorial" from the city-owned Forest Hill Cemetery, located on the city's west side. "There is a larger monument, which has not garnered as much attention, which will also be removed," Soglin said in a statement posted on his Facebook account. That marker was installed about 100 years ago and will require heavy machinery to remove, Soglin said in an interview. The memorials honor 140 Confederate soldiers who died in 1862 while in captivity at nearby Camp Randall. They were buried in a mass grave at Forest Hill. The display of Confederate flags at the cemetery and the memorials have stirred considerable debate in Madison, including a 2016 city attorney's opinion that said the city's policies on flag displays were outdated. "The removal of city-owned monuments to confederate soldiers in Forest Hill Cemetery has minimal or no disruption to the cemetery itself," Soglin said. "There is no disrespect to the dead with the removal of the plaque and stone." Soglin said both monuments include inscriptions that "speak in glowing terms about the historic efforts of the Confederacy." The older monument lists the names of the Confederate soldiers buried at Forest Hill. "It will eventually be replaced with a plaque or some sort of monument with the names of the deceased," the mayor said. "There's not going to be any additional language included." --------------- FO time, people? View Quote |
|
|
|
It's amazing how quickly this is happening in so many cities just to appease the goddamn unappeasable leftist fuckwits.
|
|
|
|
|
New York City antifa raise money for Yvette Felarca
|
|
Quoted:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHeVdcIXoAA25WQ?format=jpg View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Actually, Northerners cared greatly about slavery for two HUGE reasons: 1) White populations in southern states benefited from the fact that they got more Congressional seats than their rated from their voting eligible population. 3/5 of the black population counted toward electoral votes and the number of extra Congressional seats. This was a gimme prize awarded in the Constitutional Conventions. 2) Northern industry that paid for its labor couldn't compete with southern industry that used free slave labor. Could many of the southern crops have grown in free states? Absolutely, but it wasn't profitable when your competition didn't have to pay a nickle to its workers. If you don't think this is a real reason, this is the same reason why iPads are made in China and not North Dakota. The Civil War was about slavery. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.