[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Ban On Possession Of Stun Guns Violated Second Amendment, Mass. High Court Rules (Page 2 of 2)
|
Quoted: It will be interesting to see how they get around Caetano v Mass. USSC was 8-0 that Mass was wrong in their stun gun ban. basically, they said that a stun gun is protected because it's used by the military to control prisoners, making it a weapon useful to the militia. They also ruled technology advancements were covered, no amendment is limited to the technology of the late 1700s. The concurring opinion was written by Alito and is a good read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caetano_v._Massachusetts I am certain the MA gov have already drafted paperwork for a permit. You can't even posses OC Spray in MA without a class B Restricted FID (Firearms Indentification) card 
More fees and another class of weapons permit. 
|
|
Quoted:
LOL until recently you need the license to carry just to buy and possess pepperspray. They changed so you no longer need a license to possess but it still is treated like ammunition so it can only be sold at retailers whom have a ammunition selling license. |
|
Quoted:
Sure you can. Can someone remind me again when opening day for prostitute season is? Quoted:
Quoted:
The way I'm reading this it says the state has more time to write and pass a law to "better" regulate their ownership. So not really a win? It is one of the commie states so I'm sure they'll come up with something. Nobody needs a stun gun. Nobody can hunt with a stun gun.  
|
|
Quoted:
I assume this is Nolo's case? He is getting butt fucked hard with his stun gun case here in NY though. They aren't gonna let him win here. No chance in hell. Good for MA though...even if they are still going to regulate stun guns into a defacto ban status. |
|
Quoted: It would seem that if that is the case, it would open the door for the very same argument with all other arms? I am certain the MA gov have already drafted paperwork for a permit. You can't even posses OC Spray in MA without a class B Restricted FID (Firearms Indentification) card
More fees and another class of weapons permit. |
|
Quoted:
I assume this is Nolo's case? He is getting butt fucked hard with his stun gun case here in NY though. They aren't gonna let him win here. No chance in hell. Good for MA though...even if they are still going to regulate stun guns into a defacto ban status. |
|
Quoted:
The license for pepper spray is gone. We won that a few years ago. Only need to be 18, no license required. Quoted:
Quoted: It would seem that if that is the case, it would open the door for the very same argument with all other arms? I am certain the MA gov have already drafted paperwork for a permit. You can't even posses OC Spray in MA without a class B Restricted FID (Firearms Indentification) card
More fees and another class of weapons permit. Oh wait. We do! 
|
|
Quoted:
Why would a stun gun be protected under the 2nd amendment? I went after ny ona stun gun case but the local DA dropped it. Just as well no way could I have afforded to take that to the Supreme Court |
|
Quoted:
The way I'm reading this it says the state has more time to write and pass a law to "better" regulate their ownership. So not really a win? It is one of the commie states so I'm sure they'll come up with something. Nobody needs a stun gun. Nobody can hunt with a stun gun. |
|
Quoted:
I think the mass case was some woman who was abused by a man I went after ny ona stun gun case but the local DA dropped it. Just as well no way could I have afforded to take that to the Supreme Court Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would a stun gun be protected under the 2nd amendment? I went after ny ona stun gun case but the local DA dropped it. Just as well no way could I have afforded to take that to the Supreme Court |
|
Quoted:
Agreed. Circuit Courts have demonstrated that they are too smart to have to follow SCOTUS rulings they don't like. Remember, no AWB case has actually been ruled on by SCOTUS, so having this as established caselaw is immensely important for the day that they do...and that day is coming. Quoted:
Quoted:
Yet banning most modern semi auto rifles is somehow OK? How do state AWBs pass muster with Caetano vs. Mass on the books? I have no idea. Remember, no AWB case has actually been ruled on by SCOTUS, so having this as established caselaw is immensely important for the day that they do...and that day is coming. |
