Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 6/8/2017 1:05:56 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Pyramid scheme.


Depending on what you get your masters in and what state your looking at $15-$45k.

Pay to keep your job basically.


The state of Kentucky has limited where you can get your Masters and Rank I too, saying low cost options from out of state do not meet their standards.......go figure.

Then let's add on the Rank I, another $20-$50k.......


You get a pay increase with each step up but they increase is about $5k........enough to cover 1-2 classes.
View Quote
My Masters in Admin will only cost about $10k and it's from one of the top universities in the nation as far as Ed. Admin programs.
Link Posted: 6/8/2017 1:10:52 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
There is no point.  Just like there's no point for anything.  It's arbitrary.  Completely.  
The pay raise isn't there.  The costs associated with getting your Master's isn't in any way reimbursed and the pay difference in salary for
your average teacher in no way makes up for it.  Total bullshit.

I could see if if was an administrative job like a Principal or something.  But for a teacher?  Fuck that.
View Quote
My wife has her masters.  The difference in her pay from a bachelors to a masters is $4493 per year.  The district would offer classes every semester at a couple of the nearby colleges.  When she finally declared her major, which is gifted and talented education, she had to pay because the district didn't offer some of those classes for free.  Because the college was private it ended up costing us around $8800 out of pocket.  We recouped our money after two years.
Link Posted: 6/8/2017 1:48:09 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I can understand why teachers do it.  I'm trying to understand why society/school boards/administrators allow it.

Is it that they actually think they're better teachers for it? Yes. Shows dedication to the job. Some advanced &/or dual credit HS subjects require a masters to teach it.

Is it a cynical move to keep teachers in your system, sort of like non-compete agreements, stock options or whatever in private industry?  [red] No. Absolutely not. Generally speaking, in the subjects where a masters seems make the most actual difference in teacher quality are VERY competitive fields of education - such as the sciences, advanced math & foreign language. The folks that own masters in those subjects can pretty much go anywhere they'd like to work & get hired, once they've otherwise proven themselves.

A masters does not, in & of itself, 'make' a teacher & there are many near perfect teachers that do not possess masters. There are also plenty of masters carrying people who have no business in a classroom. A new teacher has no use getting one because, since they're not proven, it does make their hiring a more expensive experiment. A 'good' or better teacher has nothing to lose by getting a masters.
View Quote
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top