Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 7
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:00:25 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


From someone that just wrote a motorcycle jab, comparing a Miata to a motorcycle is silly man.  Are you talking about a moped that has the back-up foot pedals?  



That's because you HAVE to push a Miata or BRZ a lot harder in every day driving just to merge into a school zone.  

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/69574/FB_IMG_1584666691473_jpg-1589002.JPG
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Using a Miata as a daily driver is about as close as it gets to using a motorcycle as a daily driver while still having a "roof" available.


From someone that just wrote a motorcycle jab, comparing a Miata to a motorcycle is silly man.  Are you talking about a moped that has the back-up foot pedals?  

Quoted:
You can't go 10/10ths in a BRZ most of the time, but you can still use more of the car and push it a lot harder than most sports/performance cars without getting into trouble.


That's because you HAVE to push a Miata or BRZ a lot harder in every day driving just to merge into a school zone.  

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/69574/FB_IMG_1584666691473_jpg-1589002.JPG

I'd I wasn't 6'5" I'd buy a cheap used one and drop an LS1 in it.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:03:07 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'd I wasn't 6'5" I'd buy a cheap used one and drop an LS1 in it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Using a Miata as a daily driver is about as close as it gets to using a motorcycle as a daily driver while still having a "roof" available.


From someone that just wrote a motorcycle jab, comparing a Miata to a motorcycle is silly man.  Are you talking about a moped that has the back-up foot pedals?  

Quoted:
You can't go 10/10ths in a BRZ most of the time, but you can still use more of the car and push it a lot harder than most sports/performance cars without getting into trouble.


That's because you HAVE to push a Miata or BRZ a lot harder in every day driving just to merge into a school zone.  

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/69574/FB_IMG_1584666691473_jpg-1589002.JPG

I'd I wasn't 6'5" I'd buy a cheap used one and drop an LS1 in it.


Miata or BRZ?
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:08:18 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
1980's IROC camaros with the 305 engine.

View Quote

1975 Camaros with a 190hp 350. It would still get you in trouble though.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:17:08 PM EDT
[#4]
According to Top Gear.
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:49:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'd I wasn't 6'5" I'd buy a cheap used one and drop an LS1 in it.
View Quote


I guess.  But for less money invested and a no comparison better overall car, just get an LS1 C5 Vette for under $10K.  If I liked Vettes, white New Balance, and gold chains, I'd plop down $5k more for a C6 just not to have pop-up headlights.  

Actually I've noticed the C5 demographic is overwhelmingly black these days.  It's like the Dodge Charger for those that don't roll with a crew.  The New Balance dudes are rocking C7s.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:50:48 PM EDT
[#6]
Classic muscles cars.

V6 Accords will fuck them up.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 7:58:17 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Classic muscles cars.

V6 Accords will fuck them up.
View Quote


I had a V6 Accord

It had 205 hp
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 8:22:11 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Fixed it for you.

I drive a 1997, the first year of the C5 and the LS-1.

It's pretty quick, even nowadays, although I wouldn't race a Mustang GT or a V8 Challenger.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Basically all Corvettes prior to 19987.


Fixed it for you.

I drive a 1997, the first year of the C5 and the LS-1.

It's pretty quick, even nowadays, although I wouldn't race a Mustang GT or a V8 Challenger.


Bahhhh you're right, it was Camaro in 98, Corvette in 97.

Link Posted: 9/12/2020 8:37:38 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I had a V6 Accord

It had 205 hp
View Quote


This year's v6 accords make ~280hp.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 8:51:23 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Coming from a motorcycle guy, ALL cars are slow until you start talking supercharged big blocks and quarter million dollar supercars. The supercharged big blocks run close to a bike when set up for drags and the super cars can sort of hang up to about 180 and then a few will pull a few mph on you if you have miles of clear road.... which isn’t often.

Cars to a fast motorcycle guy are like the fat kid that gets a slow go kart. And they lean the wrong way into corners.
View Quote


Maybe stock cars. I've seen a bolts on/tune WRX kick a 600s ass on the highway. Watched a big single Supra on a stock bottom end annihilate a liter bike.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 8:51:38 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


This year's v6 accords make ~280hp.
View Quote


Mine was an 01.

Chrysler Voyagers have 287 hp these days
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 8:59:54 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
1980's IROC camaros with the 305 engine.

View Quote


Ditto this.

In the early 90's I had an 86 Iroc with the TPI 305/ 700R4 / 3.23 rear.
Bone stock it ran a 15.85 @ 89mph at Maple Grove.

I knew it was a turd... but just needed to see how big of a turd.

When the LT1 went into the 94 Camaro, it was amazing to drive. The Camaros topped out at 152 and the TA's would go 158 IIRC.

My old Iroc was good to about 140 and took forever to get there.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:00:12 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://wallpapercave.com/wp/z773u1q.jpg

Nissan 240SX.

GTR body with a Nissan V6 truck engine.
View Quote


Literally everything besides Nissan 240sx you just typed is false.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:00:15 PM EDT
[#14]
Fiat X1/9

Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:01:17 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I had a V6 Accord

It had 205 hp
View Quote


Must be 20 years old.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:02:22 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Ditto this.

In the early 90's I had an 86 Iroc with the TPI 305/ 700R4 / 3.23 rear.
Bone stock it ran a 15.85 @ 89mph at Maple Grove.

I knew it was a turd... but just needed to see how big of a turd.
View Quote


That's not too terrible. My bone stock 93 civic Si hatchback ran the same time though.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:05:42 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
My 86 Iroc hit 145 once.  Not super fast, but faster than what I own know.  Then again, what do expect from a Ford F250...


But really, while my Golf is the smoothest car at speed I have ever owned.  120 is pretty much all it has.  I have not tried to see if the F250 is faster.
View Quote


My 02 F250 is governed at 92
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:08:46 PM EDT
[#18]
Had a 1980 Z28. Heavy bastard with 250hp.  Nice cruising car. But no real go.



It looked just like this one.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:09:39 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Had a 1980 Z28. Heavy bastard with 250hp.  Nice cruising car. But no real go.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/89/1980_chevrolet_camaro-pic-17969-1600x120-1528895.jpg

It looked just like this one.
View Quote


Yeah, but it looked cool.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:13:04 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


My wife's Honda minivan will hurt one's feelings.
View Quote

So will my '17 Accord EX-L coupe with the J35Y v6 6 speed
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:16:53 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

IROC's only came with the 350.
View Quote


Incorrect.  

The options were the 350, 305, or the anemic L69.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:20:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Incorrect.  

The options were the 350, 305, or the anemic L69.
View Quote


I think the L69 was the HO305 with quadrajet and dual snorkel air cleaner. (I had one)
Pretty sure the base 305 was the LG4.


Edit to add:
Yep...

https://oldcarmemories.com/1983-1988-chevrolet-l69-5-0-liter-305-cid-h-o-v8-a-genuine-1980s-legend/
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:20:26 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote

Thought about getting either a Subaru WRX or STI but the thought of pulling the motor to do head gaskets(bound to happen just when). Decided to go another route..
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:20:38 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How this hasn't been mentioned yet, is beyond me. Anything short of a ripsnortin' V8 and a manual is heresy, so of course Plymouth chose a 240hp V6 and a craptastic "AutoStick" tranny.

https://bringatrailer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/1999_plymouth_prowler_155595956723891c3e7bebIMG_5313.jpeg?fit=940%2C632

And the Saturn Sky/Pontiac Solstice. These two were also yearning for V8s, or a turbo V6, maybe turbo 4 but noooo, they had to be castrated with NA 4-bangers.

https://i.postimg.cc/Pf6F4rB6/374-main-l.jpg
View Quote


The Sky was available with two different turbocharged 4s...
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:24:26 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


For reference, how old are you?

Because that's literally all there was back in the 80's. GM was NOTORIOUS for this.

Put some lipstick on the pig, sell it as a performance version, but without the performance.

Let me give you some examples:

Chevrolet Celebrity...140hp V6:

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.K5EFsRvUr1Vah6AmHm7VZgHaEQ%26pid%3DApi&f=1

Chevrolet Celebrity Eurosport VR...140hp V6:

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.cb4MEk2nspfDx3L64oxbNQHaDQ%26pid%3DApi&f=1

Pontiac Bonneville...165 HP V6:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/1987_Pontiac_Bonneville_SE%2C_rear_left.jpg/1280px-1987_Pontiac_Bonneville_SE%2C_rear_left.jpg

Pontiac Bonneville SSEi...165 HP V6:

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcarphotos.cardomain.com%2Fride_images%2F1%2F1825%2F4721%2F4562360001_large.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Heck, the first Fiero was a fast looking turdbucket that couldn't get out of it's own way. By that time, the "phone-it-in" attitude was very much in effect at GM. They put the Iron Duke in EVERYTHING, and proceeded to stick racing stripes all over the outside.

A buddy of mine's dad had a Pontiac 6000, which was supposed to be Pontiac's competitor to the European sedans. It had the Iron Duke in it. Funniest part is, when you lifted the hood, there was an emblem on the engine that said, "Tech 4". Because fuel injection. Car and Driver called it "Low Tech 4".  

88 horsepower in a car weighing 2800 lbs is hilarious, if you're not the one driving it. It was so bad that when my buddy's Chevette broke down, he was glad when it was finally fixed so he no longer had to drive the 6000....lol.
View Quote


Yeah, had Celebrity and Corsica in driver ed. About 1987-88(sophmore year)
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:27:28 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


This year's v6 accords make ~280hp.
View Quote


I thought Honda deep 6'd all V6 engines in cars and went turbo 4 on everything.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:29:48 PM EDT
[#27]
I preferred my hot rods looked slow and went fast.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:39:58 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


@dragoontwo
My wife’s expedition runs neck and neck with that car in the 1/4 mile

I am so disappointed in that car’s power numbers.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:41:04 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I thought Honda deep 6'd all V6 engines in cars and went turbo 4 on everything.
View Quote


Correct.

Options are a 1.5 4 banger and a 2.0 turbo.  

Hybrid is another option, I think.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:41:42 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


@dragoontwo
My wife’s expedition runs neck and neck with that car in the 1/4 mile

I am so disappointed in that car’s power numbers.
View Quote


Now send em both to a road course.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:42:55 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
DeLorean

ETA - Beat by less than a minute due to slows internets
View Quote


Actually he saw your post and went back in time to beat you on that one.


Any way mustangs are cars that look people think is a fast car but it really is not.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:45:48 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I thought Honda deep 6'd all V6 engines in cars and went turbo 4 on everything.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


This year's v6 accords make ~280hp.


I thought Honda deep 6'd all V6 engines in cars and went turbo 4 on everything.


Nope, Ody, Passport, Pilot, Ridgeline all rocking the V6
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:49:53 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

IROC's only came with the 350.
View Quote


IROCs with automatics only came with a 350. Manual trans IROCs only came with a 305.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 9:54:06 PM EDT
[#34]
I managed to get to 117mph in my '89 MR2. It's supposed to do 125, but that must be down hill with a tail wind.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:00:24 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The new Camry TRD. Looks fast but only 300hp. Runs the same speed as my 2.7 ecoboost F150
View Quote

I have one. It’s a Camry! I feel good it’s got 300 hp. Pretty fun car for 27k...
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:16:43 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Mine was an 01.

Chrysler Voyagers have 287 hp these days
View Quote


My 2017 tacoma makes 275ish, it's nuts how far we have come with HP.  I would not have guessed this 20 years ago, seriously, mom vans are making more power than old "muscle cars" did not that long ago.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:20:09 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
There just wasn't enough time to go faster.

Nick
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:25:33 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
doesn't even do Earth escape velocity

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/271151/sx_jpg-1588521.JPG

View Quote
Uhh, yes it does. It's currently in a highly elliptical SOLAR orbit and likely will be for millions of years.

Nick
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:25:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Miata or BRZ?
View Quote

Miata.

They make a fairly cheap swap kit and a junkyard 5.3 can be had for $500. I tried to drive one once. I couldn't work the clutch pedal without sticking my leg at a very awkward angle which resulted in me dumping the clutch and killing it a lot.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:28:02 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
My prius in economy mode.

Sport mode?  Totally different story.
View Quote



A Prius in sport mode.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:32:22 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

IROC's only came with the 350.
View Quote
Came with 305's also.



Can vouch for a Delorean being slow. 0-60 in 10 seconds. Running gag I had with a friends dad who owned that Delorean is that 88mph was chosen for time travel speed because thats as fast as the car went. Fucking V6 PRV motor pushing 130hp at the crank.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:33:09 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

IROC's only came with the 350.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
1980's IROC camaros with the 305 engine.


IROC's only came with the 350.


Troof
.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:34:09 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Eagle Talon DL version. It had the 1.8l with 92 hp.
View Quote


Gotta go with the AWD Turbo !!!
.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:38:07 PM EDT
[#44]
Chevy 454SS truck
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:45:07 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


IROCs with automatics only came with a 350. Manual trans IROCs only came with a 305.
View Quote
Nope. Lot's of 305/auto Irocs out there.
Parents had an '86 for a while.

Nick
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 10:49:10 PM EDT
[#46]
All three of my fiance's recent cars.

She started out (since we were dating) with a 2013 v6 mustang. It was a pretty good vehicle considering all of the shit she hit or ran over.

The next was a 2015 Mercedes SLK. It was not fun to drive, was not fast, and was tiny. Maintenance nighmare and ended up with transmission issues and intermittent AC failure.

The current one is a new Lexus IS. It's loud, rough, and not quick at all. My truck is faster.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 11:08:02 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Nope, Ody, Passport, Pilot, Ridgeline all rocking the V6
View Quote


Those are not cars.  Attention to detail.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 11:08:43 PM EDT
[#48]
Mitsubishi Starion
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 11:12:09 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I disagree with almost all of this. The engine, and how it behaves, is one of the biggest things that you can notice when daily driving. Most people aren't running through a tight and twisty side road to get their groceries or do their commute. I think we would all love that as a commute, but most of us need to be realistic with our driving habits. You might get a few corners, a few stop lights, and maybe an onramp or two if you are really lucky. Places that the BRZ doesn't really shine. You know what really does well in those situations? Cars with a bit of torque with the help of a turbo. Like the WRX, or the GTI, or the Focus ST. All cars that aren't exactly fast either, but universally rate higher as being better daily drivers.

The BRZ/FRS really shines and shows it's self when driving it on the track, autocross, or some other situation where you can honestly push it to the max of your own abilities. This is where the engine differences that you were dismissing really seem to disappear. I've been lucky enough to drive BRZs in this situation, even once on a frozen lake, and I've always said that they are fun in those situations. But that's at a level way above what I'd want to risk driving on public roads, let alone in the city.

What you are left with is a car that's great when pushed, but not so great when not. I don't mean that as "It's a terrible car" when not pushing it, but more like I just didn't really find it enjoyable. And I just don't see a situation where I could push a BRZ enough on legal roads to make it more fun than the little turbo guys sitting next to them on the lot. The HP differences between them aren't all that much in the grand scheme of things, but the torque curves tell a completely different story.

I know you have issues with FWD cars, and I honestly don't know your own personal experience with driving any of them. I know we've had these discussions plenty of times before. I went in wanting to buy a BRZ in 2013 when they came out and left with a Focus ST. While I don't have the ST any more either, I still think I came out of that purchase with a car that was more enjoyable for the majority of situations that I put it through.

And before someone calls me out and gives the stereotypical response of "You are just a hater and you can't tell me I'm not having fun with my BRZ" let me respond to that with "You also can't tell me that you are having more fun with your BRZ than I did with my Focus ST". Cars are a personal choice, and I think it's great we have choices. I've said the same thing in manual transmission threads. Some people might hate autos, DCTS, or manuals, but I think it's great that there are choices for everyone. I just personally think the BRZ would have been better with a turbo. Much like almost everyone else who drove one and didn't buy one, or bought one and sold it. And much like Toyota and Subaru are thinking, given the rumors going on for the next generation. Heck even most owners will say that at one point or two, even if they won't admit it on the internet arguing against other people saying it.

Enough of the soap box, my contribution to the thread is the Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart. The body of an Evo with all the speed of the econobox sedan it was based off of. I rarely see any actual Evo X's any more, most have been relegated to garaged weekend cars so when I see a ralliart it's always a small slap of reality to the face.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


With all of the differences between the Miata and the WRX, engine output is probably the least important distinction when it comes to daily driving.

A WRX is a car that normal people can use as a four seasons daily driver. Using a Miata as a daily driver is about as close as it gets to using a motorcycle as a daily driver while still having a "roof" available.

You can't go 10/10ths in a BRZ most of the time, but you can still use more of the car and push it a lot harder than most sports/performance cars without getting into trouble.

I disagree with almost all of this. The engine, and how it behaves, is one of the biggest things that you can notice when daily driving. Most people aren't running through a tight and twisty side road to get their groceries or do their commute. I think we would all love that as a commute, but most of us need to be realistic with our driving habits. You might get a few corners, a few stop lights, and maybe an onramp or two if you are really lucky. Places that the BRZ doesn't really shine. You know what really does well in those situations? Cars with a bit of torque with the help of a turbo. Like the WRX, or the GTI, or the Focus ST. All cars that aren't exactly fast either, but universally rate higher as being better daily drivers.

The BRZ/FRS really shines and shows it's self when driving it on the track, autocross, or some other situation where you can honestly push it to the max of your own abilities. This is where the engine differences that you were dismissing really seem to disappear. I've been lucky enough to drive BRZs in this situation, even once on a frozen lake, and I've always said that they are fun in those situations. But that's at a level way above what I'd want to risk driving on public roads, let alone in the city.

What you are left with is a car that's great when pushed, but not so great when not. I don't mean that as "It's a terrible car" when not pushing it, but more like I just didn't really find it enjoyable. And I just don't see a situation where I could push a BRZ enough on legal roads to make it more fun than the little turbo guys sitting next to them on the lot. The HP differences between them aren't all that much in the grand scheme of things, but the torque curves tell a completely different story.

I know you have issues with FWD cars, and I honestly don't know your own personal experience with driving any of them. I know we've had these discussions plenty of times before. I went in wanting to buy a BRZ in 2013 when they came out and left with a Focus ST. While I don't have the ST any more either, I still think I came out of that purchase with a car that was more enjoyable for the majority of situations that I put it through.

And before someone calls me out and gives the stereotypical response of "You are just a hater and you can't tell me I'm not having fun with my BRZ" let me respond to that with "You also can't tell me that you are having more fun with your BRZ than I did with my Focus ST". Cars are a personal choice, and I think it's great we have choices. I've said the same thing in manual transmission threads. Some people might hate autos, DCTS, or manuals, but I think it's great that there are choices for everyone. I just personally think the BRZ would have been better with a turbo. Much like almost everyone else who drove one and didn't buy one, or bought one and sold it. And much like Toyota and Subaru are thinking, given the rumors going on for the next generation. Heck even most owners will say that at one point or two, even if they won't admit it on the internet arguing against other people saying it.

Enough of the soap box, my contribution to the thread is the Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart. The body of an Evo with all the speed of the econobox sedan it was based off of. I rarely see any actual Evo X's any more, most have been relegated to garaged weekend cars so when I see a ralliart it's always a small slap of reality to the face.


You're overlooking the obvious.

When you're not driving it hard, the WRX is probably a pretty normal car. On the other hand, the Miata will always be a cramped, drafty, bucket of NVH that assaults the senses whether or not you're in the mood for that. I've heard NCs and NDs are a little more spacious, but driving the NA with the top up is awful as a 6' tall dude. It can be hard to see traffic lights. The engine is spinning 4k RPMs at interstate cruising speeds. Leaks aren't unusual. Things might be different is you're in a beach-side community where it's warm all the time, but using a Miata as a four seasons commuter car in the Midwest would require some serious dedication. The WRX? Not so much.

There are plenty of corners, curves, ramps, and roundabouts in a daily drive to make use of a nice handling car. That doesn't necessarily require insane cornering speeds, either. You just have to be a little... assertive/lively going around the corner. A light, well balanced car is much more gratifying than something larger or less even in the same situation.

I've personally owned 3 FWD cars. Those include an 8th gen Civic, a 3rd gen Mazda3, and... an 8th gen LeSabre. The Civic and the Mazda3 were both reasonably good handling vehicles. The Civic was the vehicle that opened my eyes to the importance of things like weight and center of mass. The flip side is, I don't like feeling throttle inputs in the steering wheel, and FWD cars can get derpy when you try to do something like pulling out around a corner into traffic. The tires don't want to accelerate and turn at the same time. The only real reason I would buy another FWD car is price. I wouldn't mind an affordable commuter car with tight handling that's fun to toss around. But once you get into the price points of something like a VW GTI or a Civic Type R, I'm going RWD or AWD.

My only experience in a Subiyota was a short Ride & Drive circuit at an auto show. The whole thing was on downtown city streets. My perception is that most of the complaints are from the "torque dip" in the middle of the RPM band. Or people who don't understand what the car is.
Link Posted: 9/12/2020 11:35:22 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://wallpapercave.com/wp/z773u1q.jpg

Nissan 240SX.

GTR body with a Nissan V6 truck engine.
View Quote



The 240sx came equipped with Nissan's KA24DE 2.4 litre 4CYL... hence the designation "240sx". In typical Nissan fashion the numerical portion of the name indicates the liter displacement of the engine.   The KA24DE was a very popular 4cyl Nissan engine. The car competed with the Toyota Celica.
Page / 7
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top