Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 13
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:49:55 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs.

Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon.

So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit.
View Quote
Who gives a f**k?

Seriously? Who the hell gives two fucks about this place? Jesus Christ.

Now, can we get back to twitter please?
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:50:58 AM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Ok, but to go back to where we were beforehand:

When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
You still forget to mention the military drone over Israel is what started it. If Syria don't want to get fucked up then keep their hardware out of Israel's space. Its a simple concept and dummy can understand.
Ok, but to go back to where we were beforehand:

When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick.
Israel can retaliate because Syria doesn't have nukes, Israel does. Soviets couldn't do small reprisal against US over U2 incident because they'd start a fuckin global thermonuclear war.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:51:23 AM EST
[#3]
The Israeli military says it has carried out a "large scale attack" against Iranian targets in Syria.  The military says it planes struck 12 targets Saturday including three aerial defense batteries and four Iranian targets that are part of Iran's military establishment in Syria.

Link
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:52:38 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
First and foremost, Islam sucks. Does anyone else question why the West is programmed to hate Syria/Iran, yet the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar seem to get a pass? Does anyone else find it odd that the majority of Islamic violence/female suppression/terrorism is exponentially carried out by radical Sunni muslims (Saudi Wahhabism), not Shia? Maybe it has something to do with the petrodollar? Again, not taking sides, as I think they all suck, but I think we need to look at the bigger picture.
View Quote
This is another one of my Issues.

I don't love Islam in any of its forms, none.

But one form of its is far more hostile to the West than another, and we happen to be most buddy-buddy with that form.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:54:24 AM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
First and foremost, Islam sucks. Does anyone else question why the West is programmed to hate Syria/Iran, yet the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar seem to get a pass? Does anyone else find it odd that the majority of Islamic violence/female suppression/terrorism is exponentially carried out by radical Sunni muslims (Saudi Wahhabism), not Shia? Maybe it has something to do with the petrodollar? Again, not taking sides, as I think they all suck, but I think we need to look at the bigger picture.
View Quote
Iran not part of Petrodollar scheme. Iran attacked our embassy and took hostages, only went downhill from there. Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes.

Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:55:25 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Israel can retaliate because Syria doesn't have nukes, Israel does. Soviets couldn't do small reprisal against US over U2 incident because they'd start a fuckin global thermonuclear war.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
You still forget to mention the military drone over Israel is what started it. If Syria don't want to get fucked up then keep their hardware out of Israel's space. Its a simple concept and dummy can understand.
Ok, but to go back to where we were beforehand:

When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick.
Israel can retaliate because Syria doesn't have nukes, Israel does. Soviets couldn't do small reprisal against US over U2 incident because they'd start a fuckin global thermonuclear war.
Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:56:27 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes.

Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around.
View Quote
lol
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 3:57:52 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So you blame the US when we overfly countries we don't have agreements with with military drones? I mean we even killed people doing that (Pakistan right?)

I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
Rights don't come into play here. There is no world-wide Bill of Rights of country on country strikes. What gave Japan the right to attack us?

They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you?
I can understand your argument that in terms of force in international relations there are no "rights", however, isn't it well established that the Japanese acted "wrongly" in doing so? I mean even aside from "Victors Justice"? Whats the difference here?

I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside.

As to how this affects me.

Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia.

As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification.

No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace.
No country would tolerate a military drone in their airspace either. Syria is to blame for this one. I hope they pay.
So you blame the US when we overfly countries we don't have agreements with with military drones? I mean we even killed people doing that (Pakistan right?)

I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right?
Blame the U.S. for what? Flying military hardware over hostile countries that we know could possibly retaliate on us for doing so? We choose to do it, we fully understand the consequences of doing it, and those countries fully understand the consequences of retaliating on us for it.

Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:00:25 AM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
View Quote
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:01:18 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
You still forget to mention the military drone over Israel is what started it. If Syria don't want to get fucked up then keep their hardware out of Israel's space. Its a simple concept and dummy can understand.
Ok, but to go back to where we were beforehand:

When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick.
Israel can retaliate because Syria doesn't have nukes, Israel does. Soviets couldn't do small reprisal against US over U2 incident because they'd start a fuckin global thermonuclear war.
Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Islam has no borders, as we have seen first hand. If they escalate anything they will lose.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:02:49 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs.

Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon.

So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit.
View Quote
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:04:40 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Thanks, I had the picture in my mind, but damned if I could remember the name!

Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:05:06 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Blame the U.S. for what? Flying military hardware over hostile countries that we know could possibly retaliate on us for doing so? We choose to do it, we fully understand the consequences of doing it, and those countries fully understand the consequences of retaliating on us for it.

Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
Rights don't come into play here. There is no world-wide Bill of Rights of country on country strikes. What gave Japan the right to attack us?

They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you?
I can understand your argument that in terms of force in international relations there are no "rights", however, isn't it well established that the Japanese acted "wrongly" in doing so? I mean even aside from "Victors Justice"? Whats the difference here?

I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside.

As to how this affects me.

Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia.

As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification.

No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace.
No country would tolerate a military drone in their airspace either. Syria is to blame for this one. I hope they pay.
So you blame the US when we overfly countries we don't have agreements with with military drones? I mean we even killed people doing that (Pakistan right?)

I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right?
Blame the U.S. for what? Flying military hardware over hostile countries that we know could possibly retaliate on us for doing so? We choose to do it, we fully understand the consequences of doing it, and those countries fully understand the consequences of retaliating on us for it.

Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria.
Thats fine and all, if Israel blows the shit out of Syria it don't hurt my feelings.

However, the concern is what if it goes beyond that.

What if Iran jumps in, and SURPRISE (I don't think so but they theoretically could I guess) they got nukes.

What if Iran and the Russians jump in? (I mean we did much the same on Saddam kicking around Kuwait right?)

What if North Korea decides to be dicks while this is blowing up?

What if Israel starts losing?

I'm talking about continuing escalation, just like how WWI started.

I see 1 positive ending here (nothing more happens), 1 eh-whatever ending (they blow each other up more in peace), and a bunch of bad ones.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:05:55 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:09:07 AM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Iran not part of Petrodollar scheme. Iran attacked our embassy and took hostages, only went downhill from there. Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes.

Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around.
View Quote
I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel.

Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say?
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:11:25 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs.

Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon.

So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit.
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check.
If Iran/Libya/Syria were better off under dictators, Enron was better off under Ken Lay, Penn State was better off under JoePa, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was better off under Bernie, and America was better off under Obama.

Every one of the above utterly fucked up their jobs and fucked everything up as a result. Things didn't get bad because they weren't there long enough, but because they were there too long, or at all.

Cause and effect, the fucked up nature of what happened AFTER is the direct result of what happened BEFORE.

IE. Those people you're discussing caused what happened to them, and to their nations, and to their people.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:13:20 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs.

Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon.

So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit.
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check.
Europe and America certainly was.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:13:39 AM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted.

What a stand up guy.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:14:00 AM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That's my understanding.

Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace.

Israel saw it and shot it down.

Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble).

Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s.

Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station).

Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered.

ETA:

But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example).

Israel escalated.

At least we know the S400 works.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
Rights don't come into play here. There is no world-wide Bill of Rights of country on country strikes. What gave Japan the right to attack us?

They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you?
I can understand your argument that in terms of force in international relations there are no "rights", however, isn't it well established that the Japanese acted "wrongly" in doing so? I mean even aside from "Victors Justice"? Whats the difference here?

I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside.

As to how this affects me.

Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia.

As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification.

No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace.
I suppose it's possible the series of events is out of order but I was under the impression this spat started from Iran/Syria sending their UAV into Israeli airspace, no?
That's my understanding.

Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace.

Israel saw it and shot it down.

Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble).

Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s.

Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station).

Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered.

ETA:

But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example).

Israel escalated.

At least we know the S400 works.
I haven't gotten enough sleep in the last week to type up an eloquent explanation due to my newborn daughter being born and getting transferred to different NICU's and my wife getting sliced open like a thanksgiving turkey. So the best I can explain it right now it is "that's just how it is" You match a threat with superior firepower. Your enemy out of nowhere starts shooting pot shots at your home , do you shoot pot shots back? No. That is how third world countries respond to a threat. You drop a fucking JDAM on his head to eliminate the threat and send a message to his friends you will not be fucked with.

I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:14:25 AM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel.

Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Iran not part of Petrodollar scheme. Iran attacked our embassy and took hostages, only went downhill from there. Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes.

Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around.
I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel.

Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say?
Absolutely, the Iranians have a legit reason to hate/fear us.

Just had to keep meddling in the Middle East.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:14:53 AM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted.

What a stand up guy.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted.

What a stand up guy.
I'm sorry you were offended, not what I said.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:17:59 AM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel.

Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say?
View Quote
Maybe. But shah didn't seem to have a problem. And those Shia "students", their beef wasn't geopolitics, it was religious ferver. You see we are khafirs to them. Great Satan not because corrupt, because unGodly.

You're trying to state one is good, one is bad. Nope. They are both bad, but at least the govt of KSA and Qatar get along with us, while most of their populations don't or won't. The Iranian people hate us far less than their govt does, and that's the problem.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:18:00 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I haven't gotten enough sleep in the last week to type up an eloquent explanation due to my newborn daughter being born and getting transferred to different NICU's and my wife getting sliced open like a thanksgiving turkey. So the best I can explain it right now it is "that's just how it is" You match a threat with superior firepower. Your enemy out of nowhere starts shooting pot shots at your home , do you shoot pot shots back? No. That is how third world countries respond to a threat. You drop a fucking JDAM on his head to eliminate the threat and send a message to his friends you will not be fucked with.

I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM....  We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not...
I'm not expecting WWIII by the A.M. but Israel is pissed, as they should be and will retaliate with even more aggression, as they should. Things could escalate with time, or things could end up with outside talking head influences de-escalating the situation with what-if's, this is why's, and here's why you can'ts. Just too early to say
This is my problem and questions that led to a certain someone losing his mind.

Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation?

Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that?

Why do Americans care when they are?
Rights don't come into play here. There is no world-wide Bill of Rights of country on country strikes. What gave Japan the right to attack us?

They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you?
I can understand your argument that in terms of force in international relations there are no "rights", however, isn't it well established that the Japanese acted "wrongly" in doing so? I mean even aside from "Victors Justice"? Whats the difference here?

I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside.

As to how this affects me.

Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia.

As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification.

No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace.
I suppose it's possible the series of events is out of order but I was under the impression this spat started from Iran/Syria sending their UAV into Israeli airspace, no?
That's my understanding.

Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace.

Israel saw it and shot it down.

Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble).

Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s.

Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station).

Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered.

ETA:

But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example).

Israel escalated.

At least we know the S400 works.
I haven't gotten enough sleep in the last week to type up an eloquent explanation due to my newborn daughter being born and getting transferred to different NICU's and my wife getting sliced open like a thanksgiving turkey. So the best I can explain it right now it is "that's just how it is" You match a threat with superior firepower. Your enemy out of nowhere starts shooting pot shots at your home , do you shoot pot shots back? No. That is how third world countries respond to a threat. You drop a fucking JDAM on his head to eliminate the threat and send a message to his friends you will not be fucked with.

I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol
Thats exactly how it worked between us and Russia.

What you want us to shoot down a Bear every time it strayed into US airspace? or them to shoot down one of ours?

But the enemy didn't "take pot-shots" at Israel's home, they flew a photo-recon mission, got caught, and then Israel started shooting.

So this would be burning down your neighbors home because he flew a drone over your yard.

ETA:

Actually, depending on where the Drone was, and where the Apache was, this whole thing could have started over Lebanon.

Also Congrats.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:19:52 AM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm sorry you were offended, not what I said.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted.

What a stand up guy.
I'm sorry you were offended, not what I said.
Minces words again.

What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:21:15 AM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Minces words again.

What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Exactly.

This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree.

That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace.

I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard.
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out.
Whatever, I stand by what I posted.
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted.

What a stand up guy.
I'm sorry you were offended, not what I said.
Minces words again.

What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise.
You are just looking for a reason to be offended, just click that ignore button instead of being a snowflake, or keep hitting report, I don't care.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:21:44 AM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If Iran/Libya/Syria were better off under dictators, Enron was better off under Ken Lay, Penn State was better off under JoePa, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was better off under Bernie, and America was better off under Obama.

Every one of the above utterly fucked up their jobs and fucked everything up as a result. Things didn't get bad because they weren't there long enough, but because they were there too long, or at all.

Cause and effect, the fucked up nature of what happened AFTER is the direct result of what happened BEFORE.

IE. Those people you're discussing caused what happened to them, and to their nations, and to their people.
View Quote
You're not looking at the situation through the right prism. Sunnis and shias have been fighting and killing each other since Mohammed died, and they will continue to do so until the end of time. They hate each other more than any other group of people, as such, whichever sect the ruling party belongs to, they have to keep the other side in check. The world as a whole was a lot better off before the we went about dicking around in the Middle East - this is a fact.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:23:27 AM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Minces words again.

What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise.
View Quote
I think you greatly overreacted, his “family” comment was rhetorical and you know this.

Now kindly drop it or take it to the pit so we can focus on the happenings in this thread.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:29:57 AM EST
[#28]
Anyways goodnight ARFCOM. If WWIII pops off in the middle of the night somebody wake my ass up and let me know where we're taking fire from. My body is ready.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:42:03 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Anyways goodnight ARFCOM. If WWIII pops off in the middle of the night somebody wake my ass up and let me know where we're taking fire from. My body is ready.
View Quote
You won't know from here since people keep derailing it to prove meaningless personal points. Where are the mods at?
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:49:12 AM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Posted for posterity.

There you did it again. You brought in my family, again, wishing them harm time this time.

Me. Right here. My family,  LEAVE THEM THE FUCK OUT OF IT
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Thier War Boner is fully erect.

Maybe they'll get the war they want, and they and their families can suffer consequences for once.
Posted for posterity.

There you did it again. You brought in my family, again, wishing them harm time this time.

Me. Right here. My family,  LEAVE THEM THE FUCK OUT OF IT
lol the first one was a common rhetorical tool.  You're not that sensitive (or maybe you are), you just want the guy banned.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 4:49:16 AM EST
[#31]
Back on track:

From Jerusalem Post:

"In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning.
The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria."

SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military.



ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:04:44 AM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
View Quote
Maybe Russian payback for US funded and supplied rebels downing one of their Su-25s.  Probably not, but who knows
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:05:19 AM EST
[#33]
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:06:48 AM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maybe Russian payback for US funded and supplied rebels downing one of their Su-25s.  Probably not, but who knows
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
Maybe Russian payback for US funded and supplied rebels downing one of their Su-25s.  Probably not, but who knows
SA-17s have been in Syrian inventory for years.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:07:22 AM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Back on track:

From Jerusalem Post:

"In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning.
The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria."

SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military.

http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg

ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
View Quote
Now that should be concerning.

If they are shooting down IDF F-16s (which should be roughly equivalent to our variants) with 1979 era Russian Export Tech...

Even moreso than the S-400 rumors, one F-16 with a S-400 is egg on Russia's face IMO, one F-16 with a SA-17 is pretty respectable.

ETA:

Assuming IAF destroyed the launch system, which I'm sure they did.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:10:18 AM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Maybe Russian payback for US funded and supplied rebels downing one of their Su-25s.  Probably not, but who knows
View Quote
The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:17:17 AM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25.
View Quote
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:22:06 AM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25.
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
Dude, we've had pages of people hijacking the thread already, please don't continue it.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:26:13 AM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yep, all Israels fault.  They made Iran fly aircraft in their airspace.
View Quote
Couple this with his attack on Levin and Shapiro for being "neocons" (code for JEWS), and a certain bigoted bent seems to be making itself apparent.

~ HiramRanger proud member of the Jew Crew
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:26:38 AM EST
[#40]


I hope a MF'er did.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:29:15 AM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Dude, we've had pages of people hijacking the thread already, please don't continue it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25.
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
Dude, we've had pages of people hijacking the thread already, please don't continue it.
The argument is a dead horse anyway. I'm not going to pursue it further.

Another possibility since the IAF supposedly targeted Iranians:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersad
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:34:56 AM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Back on track:

From Jerusalem Post:

"In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning.
The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria."

SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military.

http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg

ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
View Quote
Is he practicing for karaoke night?
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:41:27 AM EST
[#43]
Let me get this straight.

Israel flew U.S. provided  F-16s OVER arabs, that are trying to kill them, into Syria? And got killed?

I'll have a Coke.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:41:31 AM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
It's more than clear that he is an anti-Semite.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:43:18 AM EST
[#45]
Looks like vid of crash site

Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:47:50 AM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Couple this with his attack on Levin and Shapiro for being "neocons" (code for JEWS), and a certain bigoted bent seems to be making itself apparent.

~ HiramRanger proud member of the Jew Crew
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yep, all Israels fault.  They made Iran fly aircraft in their airspace.
Couple this with his attack on Levin and Shapiro for being "neocons" (code for JEWS), and a certain bigoted bent seems to be making itself apparent.

~ HiramRanger proud member of the Jew Crew
Shapiro is complete shit, and probably controlled opposition. When NYT is writing a piece about someone in a good light, you know they're shit. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/ben-shapiro-conservative.html
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:52:33 AM EST
[#47]
Honestly, this is all good for us. Have to keep pressure on muslims, as it's a death Colt that just wants to jihad the world for themselves and their shit ways.
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:58:00 AM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Back on track:

From Jerusalem Post:

"In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning.
The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria."

SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military.

http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg

ETA:

The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences.
View Quote
Supposedly another wave of strikes is happening but it’s being reported by a think tank writer not confirmed by a news source ce
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 5:58:11 AM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Hey come on man, what do you have against nuking Boston?
View Quote
My cancer doctors are there, leave them alone... nuke Jersey
Link Posted: 2/10/2018 6:04:09 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25.
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ.
You're not seriously suggesting that SDF are ideologically aligned with AQ or that we are backing the rebels that shot down the Russian, are you?
Page / 13
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top