User Panel
Quoted: We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs. Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon. So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit. View Quote Seriously? Who the hell gives two fucks about this place? Jesus Christ. Now, can we get back to twitter please? |
|
Quoted:
Ok, but to go back to where we were beforehand: When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick. |
|
The Israeli military says it has carried out a "large scale attack" against Iranian targets in Syria. The military says it planes struck 12 targets Saturday including three aerial defense batteries and four Iranian targets that are part of Iran's military establishment in Syria.
Link |
|
Quoted:
First and foremost, Islam sucks. Does anyone else question why the West is programmed to hate Syria/Iran, yet the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar seem to get a pass? Does anyone else find it odd that the majority of Islamic violence/female suppression/terrorism is exponentially carried out by radical Sunni muslims (Saudi Wahhabism), not Shia? Maybe it has something to do with the petrodollar? Again, not taking sides, as I think they all suck, but I think we need to look at the bigger picture. View Quote I don't love Islam in any of its forms, none. But one form of its is far more hostile to the West than another, and we happen to be most buddy-buddy with that form. |
|
Quoted:
First and foremost, Islam sucks. Does anyone else question why the West is programmed to hate Syria/Iran, yet the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar seem to get a pass? Does anyone else find it odd that the majority of Islamic violence/female suppression/terrorism is exponentially carried out by radical Sunni muslims (Saudi Wahhabism), not Shia? Maybe it has something to do with the petrodollar? Again, not taking sides, as I think they all suck, but I think we need to look at the bigger picture. View Quote Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around. |
|
Quoted:
Israel can retaliate because Syria doesn't have nukes, Israel does. Soviets couldn't do small reprisal against US over U2 incident because they'd start a fuckin global thermonuclear war. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. |
|
Quoted:
Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes. Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
So you blame the US when we overfly countries we don't have agreements with with military drones? I mean we even killed people doing that (Pakistan right?) I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you? I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside. As to how this affects me. Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia. As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification. No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace. I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right? Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria. |
|
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? When the US was overflying the USSR with U2s and SR71s, should the Russians have done the same thing the Israelis just did? Of course not, that would have led really bad places really quick. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. |
|
Quoted: We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs. Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon. So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit. View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Blame the U.S. for what? Flying military hardware over hostile countries that we know could possibly retaliate on us for doing so? We choose to do it, we fully understand the consequences of doing it, and those countries fully understand the consequences of retaliating on us for it. Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you? I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside. As to how this affects me. Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia. As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification. No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace. I mean we overflew the USSR for a couple decades with Military Aircraft right? Just like Syria understood the consequences of flying drones over Israel. Just like Israel understood the consequences of flying over to Syria in retaliation. Just like Syria understands the consequences for firing on Israel's Jets. This will not end well for Syria. However, the concern is what if it goes beyond that. What if Iran jumps in, and SURPRISE (I don't think so but they theoretically could I guess) they got nukes. What if Iran and the Russians jump in? (I mean we did much the same on Saddam kicking around Kuwait right?) What if North Korea decides to be dicks while this is blowing up? What if Israel starts losing? I'm talking about continuing escalation, just like how WWI started. I see 1 positive ending here (nothing more happens), 1 eh-whatever ending (they blow each other up more in peace), and a bunch of bad ones. |
|
Quoted:
Apology not accepted, COC doesn't allow me to properly reply besides stating I'm hoping mods ban you. Guess we'll have to wait till tomorrow to find out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. |
|
Quoted: Iran not part of Petrodollar scheme. Iran attacked our embassy and took hostages, only went downhill from there. Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes. Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around. View Quote Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say? |
|
Quoted:
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs. Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon. So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit. Every one of the above utterly fucked up their jobs and fucked everything up as a result. Things didn't get bad because they weren't there long enough, but because they were there too long, or at all. Cause and effect, the fucked up nature of what happened AFTER is the direct result of what happened BEFORE. IE. Those people you're discussing caused what happened to them, and to their nations, and to their people. |
|
Quoted:
Of course they did. That's what Islam does, but you cannot say Iraq/Libya/Syria were not better off under their dictators than they are currently - it appears to me that Islamic countries have to be ruled with an iron fist to keep shit in check. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: We really need to stop repeating this. Pan Arab unity = Ba'athist Arab nationalistic socialism = about 30 good years in Syria, 10 in Iraq before the majority populations getting fucked over by typical Arab tribal corruption caused nations to fracture. In Iraq, the Ba'athist controlling things were Sunni under Saddam, he fucked the Shia over bad enough that he essentially forever destroyed Iraq doing so much to try to keep them in check after. In Syria, once papa Assad took over the Ba'ath govt it became Alawite, specifically their tribe running it and being typical corrupt as fuck tribal dictator who managed to piss off his majority, who were Sunni Arabs. Both Saddam and Assad courted religion nuts on their own side. When the Sunni revival started in the early 90s, Saddam started his Faith campaign, promoting religious piety, hajibs are back, religious schools catering to Wahhabists/Salafists spring up at Saddam University for Islamic Studies (alma matter of most of ISIS cadre). And Assad courted 12'er Shia nuts, like Hezbollah, Iran, Lebanon. So stop with the secular crap already. Thats as true as suggesting a communist country is actually a worker's paradise. Its propaganda and bullshit. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. What a stand up guy. |
|
Quoted:
That's my understanding. Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace. Israel saw it and shot it down. Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble). Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s. Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station). Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered. ETA: But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example). Israel escalated. At least we know the S400 works. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you? I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside. As to how this affects me. Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia. As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification. No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace. Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace. Israel saw it and shot it down. Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble). Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s. Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station). Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered. ETA: But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example). Israel escalated. At least we know the S400 works. I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol |
|
Quoted:
I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel. Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Iran not part of Petrodollar scheme. Iran attacked our embassy and took hostages, only went downhill from there. Saudi king and govt officially were never our enemy, rogue elements inside kingdom were, to include numerous senior princes and Saudi intelligence, controlled by same rogue princes. Who have all been snatched up, likely dead at this point, from new crown prince who doesn't fuck around. Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say? Just had to keep meddling in the Middle East. |
|
Quoted:
Writes "I do apologize for offending you" after making disparaging remarks on my family. Then claims he stands by what he posted. What a stand up guy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. What a stand up guy. |
|
Quoted:
I know Iran isn't involved in the petrodollar - that's the Saudis and banking cartel. Yes Iran took a lot of Americans hostage, but I would say it started to go down hill a couple of decades prior to that when the CIA overthrew the Iranian govt and installed their puppet wouldn't you say? View Quote You're trying to state one is good, one is bad. Nope. They are both bad, but at least the govt of KSA and Qatar get along with us, while most of their populations don't or won't. The Iranian people hate us far less than their govt does, and that's the problem. |
|
Quoted:
I haven't gotten enough sleep in the last week to type up an eloquent explanation due to my newborn daughter being born and getting transferred to different NICU's and my wife getting sliced open like a thanksgiving turkey. So the best I can explain it right now it is "that's just how it is" You match a threat with superior firepower. Your enemy out of nowhere starts shooting pot shots at your home , do you shoot pot shots back? No. That is how third world countries respond to a threat. You drop a fucking JDAM on his head to eliminate the threat and send a message to his friends you will not be fucked with. I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does it all mean? Another bout of skirmishes or do we here in the U.S. Wake up to an initiated Samson option? Thus a different world later on in the AM.... We live in such interesting times.... All will probably quite before next escalation or maybe not... Why does Israel have a right to unilaterally strike another sovereign nation? Why do they expect not to be shot at when doing that? Why do Americans care when they are? They don't expect not to be shot at. Israeli's are not the least bit stupid. Why do Americans care? Israel is our ally and American patriots have their friends/allies backs. And if that's how you feel, why do you care what we think? Why do you care about any of it if it doesn't affect you? I disagree that Israel is our ally, but I'll set that aside. As to how this affects me. Well, seeing as how most are outraged by the Syrians defending their airspace from attack, and a segment of the populace demanding War with Assad even before this, I have an interest in seeing that their wishes are non fulfilled and war doesn't happen, or at least not a war between the US and Syria, or worse yet, Russia. As I stated in another thread, the setup for this is eerily similar to WWI, with slight modification. No country would tolerate another country invading their airspace and killing their soldiers defending said airspace. Syria slipped a Iranian Drone into Israeli Airspace. Israel saw it and shot it down. Syria shot down a Apache, that shot down the drone (Maybe wrong here, Apache was in Lebanese Airspace)(this whole line is debatble). Israel hit the Drone Launching Station with F-16s. Syria shot down a F16 (presumably during the attack of said Station). Israeli F16 crashed in Israel, all Pilots recovered. ETA: But even with that sequence of events, why launch the attack? This kinda stuff goes on constantly (back to my Cold War example). Israel escalated. At least we know the S400 works. I don't have enough sleep in me to explain it any better right now. But you are correct that Israel escalated, but what do you expect? Israel to send a UAV back? Or to do nothing? That's not how this works. Lol What you want us to shoot down a Bear every time it strayed into US airspace? or them to shoot down one of ours? But the enemy didn't "take pot-shots" at Israel's home, they flew a photo-recon mission, got caught, and then Israel started shooting. So this would be burning down your neighbors home because he flew a drone over your yard. ETA: Actually, depending on where the Drone was, and where the Apache was, this whole thing could have started over Lebanon. Also Congrats. |
|
Quoted:
I'm sorry you were offended, not what I said. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. What a stand up guy. What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise. |
|
Quoted:
Minces words again. What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Exactly. This is why Iran is currently trying to build nukes as rapidly as possible, and I don't blame them at all. It makes sense, don't you agree. That said, I do apologize for offending you, I honestly wish for nothing but peace. I want Israel to have its (current) borders, Syria to have its, and everyone be held to the same standard. What a stand up guy. What a noble man, deserving of respect and praise. |
|
Quoted: If Iran/Libya/Syria were better off under dictators, Enron was better off under Ken Lay, Penn State was better off under JoePa, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was better off under Bernie, and America was better off under Obama. Every one of the above utterly fucked up their jobs and fucked everything up as a result. Things didn't get bad because they weren't there long enough, but because they were there too long, or at all. Cause and effect, the fucked up nature of what happened AFTER is the direct result of what happened BEFORE. IE. Those people you're discussing caused what happened to them, and to their nations, and to their people. View Quote |
|
|
Anyways goodnight ARFCOM. If WWIII pops off in the middle of the night somebody wake my ass up and let me know where we're taking fire from. My body is ready.
|
|
Quoted:
Anyways goodnight ARFCOM. If WWIII pops off in the middle of the night somebody wake my ass up and let me know where we're taking fire from. My body is ready. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Posted for posterity. There you did it again. You brought in my family, again, wishing them harm time this time. Me. Right here. My family, LEAVE THEM THE FUCK OUT OF IT View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thier War Boner is fully erect. Maybe they'll get the war they want, and they and their families can suffer consequences for once. There you did it again. You brought in my family, again, wishing them harm time this time. Me. Right here. My family, LEAVE THEM THE FUCK OUT OF IT |
|
Back on track:
From Jerusalem Post: "In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning. The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria." SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military. ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. |
|
Quoted:
ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Maybe Russian payback for US funded and supplied rebels downing one of their Su-25s. Probably not, but who knows View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. |
|
Quoted:
Back on track: From Jerusalem Post: "In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning. The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria." SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military. http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. View Quote If they are shooting down IDF F-16s (which should be roughly equivalent to our variants) with 1979 era Russian Export Tech... Even moreso than the S-400 rumors, one F-16 with a S-400 is egg on Russia's face IMO, one F-16 with a SA-17 is pretty respectable. ETA: Assuming IAF destroyed the launch system, which I'm sure they did. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Dude, we've had pages of people hijacking the thread already, please don't continue it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The rebels that we fund and supply were not the ones that shot down the Su-25. Another possibility since the IAF supposedly targeted Iranians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersad |
|
Quoted:
Back on track: From Jerusalem Post: "In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning. The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria." SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military. http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. View Quote |
|
Let me get this straight.
Israel flew U.S. provided F-16s OVER arabs, that are trying to kill them, into Syria? And got killed? I'll have a Coke. |
|
View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Couple this with his attack on Levin and Shapiro for being "neocons" (code for JEWS), and a certain bigoted bent seems to be making itself apparent. ~ HiramRanger proud member of the Jew Crew View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Yep, all Israels fault. They made Iran fly aircraft in their airspace. ~ HiramRanger proud member of the Jew Crew |
|
Honestly, this is all good for us. Have to keep pressure on muslims, as it's a death Colt that just wants to jihad the world for themselves and their shit ways.
|
|
Quoted:
Back on track: From Jerusalem Post: "In a major flare up on Israel's northern border, Israel carried out a large-scale attack against Syrian air defenses and Iranian targets in the war-torn country after an Israeli F-16 crashed during operations to strike Iranian targets in Syria early Saturday morning. The operation, which was carried out by eight Israeli jets, struck 12 targets in Syria including three Syrians SA5 and SA17 air defense batteries and four Iranian targets near the town of Kiswah, which is home to Syria's 1st armored division and part of the Islamic Republic's buildup in Syria." SA-5's have been the brunt of missiles used to target IAF jets in the last couple of years. These missiles are not primarily designed to go against fighter aircraft, but rather strategic aircraft like AWACS, tankers, etc. However, it's probably the only thing in the Syrian inventory with legs. Losing three whole systems (assumption) would be a big loss for the Syrian military. http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=60&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fthe-drive-staging%2Fmessage-editor%252F1508185247045-akhdah52.jpg ETA: The SA-17 is a pretty capable system.. when it's not busy shooting down airliners Based on the info in the article, the Buk could likely be the system responsible for bringing down the F-16. I don't think the Russians would take a shot at an IAF aircraft due to political fallout/consequences. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Right, those carefully vetted moderate rebels that have no common cause with AQ. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.