User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:25:16 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mueller is "done with collusion"? Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...  
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:26:19 PM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I mean..if Roger Stone is not your guy that conspired with wikileaks and Russians then who is it? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:34:36 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:35:42 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump did it all and managed to keep every trace of evidence secret after his campaign had spies all over it and FISA warrants on members of his campaign. Don't ya know? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:36:09 PM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The evidence is clear that the FBI and DOJ made up Russian-Trump collusion to divert attention from Clinton's use of a private server in her bathroom and bribery from foreign governments including mainly the Russians. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:50:03 PM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
lol Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 12:51:32 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The evidence is clear that the FBI and DOJ made up Russian-Trump collusion to divert attention from Clinton's use of a private server in her bathroom and bribery from foreign governments including mainly the Russians. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:11:39 PM EST
[#8]
So who was colluding with who then?
Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:15:52 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:21:40 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The article is hanging a lot on a Republican's interpretation of "direct evidence". No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:22:24 PM EST
[#11]
But if you can't prove it, is it really that bad?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:23:00 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well to be fair there was a signed contract for Trump Tower Moscow that recently came out. I wouldn't rule out the possibility of something that stupid appearing eventually. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: The article is hanging a lot on a Republican's interpretation of "direct evidence". No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... The "If it's what you say it is, I love it." email is pretty fucking blatant, as well. lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:33:57 PM EST
[#13]
Womp womp.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:35:17 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The article is hanging a lot on a Republican's interpretation of "direct evidence". No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:41:10 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No direct evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians means there was collusion between Trump and the Russians? Is that your conclusion? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:43:46 PM EST
[#16]
El Paso Fire Department denies Trump's crowd claim at rally
The El Paso Fire Department late Monday denied President Donald Trump's claim that officials gave him special permission to pack more people in to his rally than the facility allowed. Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuun! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 1:45:27 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
El Paso Fire Department denies Trump's crowd claim at rally The Deep State has now infiltrated THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS! Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuun! https://i.imgur.com/Vzeukqe.gif Quote HistoryQuoted:
El Paso Fire Department denies Trump's crowd claim at rally The El Paso Fire Department late Monday denied President Donald Trump's claim that officials gave him special permission to pack more people in to his rally than the facility allowed. Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuun! https://i.imgur.com/Vzeukqe.gif 
[Holy shit there are TONS of Sean Spicer gifs]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 2:03:18 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with.
Is that your way of saying "there is evidence but no one else agrees with it"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 2:32:27 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well to be fair there was a signed contract for Trump Tower Moscow that recently came out. I wouldn't rule out the possibility of something that stupid appearing eventually. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 2:38:45 PM EST
[#20]
They're off downloading the latest firmware update in light of today's news glitch.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 3:50:52 PM EST
[#21]
 
It would have been beautiful to have ben able to bear witness in my thread y'all managed to get locked. So what's your next big failure of a prediction NT'ers? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 3:53:00 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://i.imgflip.com/2tigxl.jpg https://media.giphy.com/media/z48aJruaX0Jsk/giphy.gif https://i.imgflip.com/2tifhl.jpg It would have been beautiful to have ben able to bear witness in my thread y'all managed to get locked. So what's your next big failure of a prediction NT'ers? I think I'll file this under posts that won't age well at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 3:55:28 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 3:56:22 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://i.imgflip.com/2tigxl.jpg https://media.giphy.com/media/z48aJruaX0Jsk/giphy.gif https://i.imgflip.com/2tifhl.jpg It would have been beautiful to have ben able to bear witness in my thread y'all managed to get locked. So what's your next big failure of a prediction NT'ers?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 3:58:17 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So if the Senate Intelligence Committee says there is no direct evidence and Mueller finds nothing then what? Isn't it pretty damning that the committee didn't find any evidence? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:00:00 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then more than likely nothing happened. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:03:10 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Would you be disappointed though? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. I'm just curious what the investigation turns up. That won't stop the low-information types from posting memes about "NeverTrumper" tears and whatnot. Those morons love them some strawmen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:07:49 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope. I'm just curious what the investigation turns up. That won't stop the low-information types from posting memes about "NeverTrumper" tears and whatnot. Those morons love them some strawmen. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. I'm just curious what the investigation turns up. That won't stop the low-information types from posting memes about "NeverTrumper" tears and whatnot. Those morons love them some strawmen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:22:33 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://i.imgflip.com/2tigxl.jpg https://media.giphy.com/media/z48aJruaX0Jsk/giphy.gif https://i.imgflip.com/2tifhl.jpg It would have been beautiful to have ben able to bear witness in my thread y'all managed to get locked. So what's your next big failure of a prediction NT'ers? Too bad JBow and company couldn’t keep off the COCk. C‘est la vie |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:24:59 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then more than likely nothing happened. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:46:40 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Still trying to keep that whole "Hillary colluded with the Russians to hack her own campaign and setup Trump" theory going? In order to cover up the truth, try to steal the election and now we are in the continuation of it to cover up all their crimes. Including the ones prior to the election in which they enriched themselves. All the evidence points to this. None points to their narrative. None of it. Yet you will continue to spread the lies and falsehoods. It's your job after all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 4:56:22 PM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The article is hanging a lot on a Republican's interpretation of "direct evidence". No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 5:24:25 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://media.giphy.com/media/26gs9MAbSIh04J0Na/giphy.gif [Holy shit there are TONS of Sean Spicer gifs] Not sure why the Pres'nit feels the need to spin an easily disproved lie about crowd size though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 7:35:22 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So if the Senate Intelligence Committee says there is no direct evidence and Mueller finds nothing then what? Isn't it pretty damning that the committee didn't find any evidence? The administration investigating itself. BooHoo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 7:40:36 PM EST
[#35]
Trump knocked the ball out of the field in his rally last night!
Dozens more to come! MAGA! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 7:43:23 PM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump knocked the ball out of the field in his rally last night! Dozens more to come! MAGA! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 7:45:51 PM EST
[#37]
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on.
So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 7:51:32 PM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 8:17:55 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. They probably hate that Trump would support Jews. This is a good meme if you like irony. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 8:47:13 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just another Republican whitewash. The administration investigating itself. BooHoo. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So if the Senate Intelligence Committee says there is no direct evidence and Mueller finds nothing then what? Isn't it pretty damning that the committee didn't find any evidence? The administration investigating itself. BooHoo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 8:53:47 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 8:55:31 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well Flynn was charged for asking the Russians not vote to charge Israel with war crimes or start a nuclear war, and the never Trumpers loved that. Creemed for days. They probably hate that Trump would support Jews. This is a good meme if you like irony. https://i.redd.it/jx13ju7t98g21.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. They probably hate that Trump would support Jews. This is a good meme if you like irony. https://i.redd.it/jx13ju7t98g21.jpg I don't remember that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 8:57:52 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Flynn was charged with that? Or fake news story? I don't remember that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. They probably hate that Trump would support Jews. This is a good meme if you like irony. https://i.redd.it/jx13ju7t98g21.jpg I don't remember that. He just reposts whatever shiny things he sees over at The_Donald - he has no actual understanding of any of this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:07:04 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No exactly sure the guy who "both sides" the Charlottesville protests has the moral high ground when it comes to attacking antisemitism.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:22:46 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What about the guy that formally recognized the capitol of Israel instead of just being a pussy about it like all the former Presidents? I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:28:48 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not exactly sure how switching out the sign in front of our consulate in Jerusalem does anything to combat antisemitism here in the United States...but whatever. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:29:52 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No exactly sure the guy who "both sides" the Charlottesville protests has the moral high ground when it comes to attacking antisemitism.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:32:08 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Actually both sides did have shit stirrers in Charlottesville that day. You don't believe that? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:32:12 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Given your insider knowledge though you should be able to come up with ways to combat the left and it's hatred of all things semite, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:37:31 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: lol I think I'll file this under posts that won't age well at all. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
