User Panel
It is a simulation and God is the programmer. Plato figured this out thousands of years ago.
|
|
Do some research on the "Double Slit Experiment with Delayed Data Erasure"
Quantum Mechanics may yet prove we live in some grand simulator. Not saying we do, just open minded enough to entertain the idea until we can resolve what we don't understand. |
|
Do all of you hate this theory because of your religion or because you don't think it's possible?
|
|
|
I'm willing to entertain a lot of delusions and conspiracy theories, but I guess I'm too much of a luddite to buy this one. I'd rank this right up there with flat Earth and we didn't land on the moon stuff.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: So, if we are in the matrix, why can we not do some matrix type shit? People have since forever thought of magic and similar, it seems to be near instinctual for humans to long for more than what is. Magic and otherworldly powers have been themes of every culture for a long long time. More primitive ones yes, but think about this, the belief in magic has become more taboo as our technology increased, and increased exponentionally. Perhaps the ones controlling the matrix tweaked it to work out that way? Mebbe they wanted a 'stronger bread and circues' to keep the Neo down. Perhaps this matrix is hardcoded to prevent those abilities latent within us. Maybe this world is a jail for us. Perhaps we were once a mighty galaxy conquoring species using our powers and this matrix is humanities prison to keep the rest of the universe safe. ........ok time to take my meds again. View Quote Maybe the old stories about magic are true, except these were exploits and hacks and the program has been patched. |
|
On an alien planet called Kerbal we are simply a save state in a computer game called "Human Space Program".
|
|
|
Meh, I've often pondered it as a possibility, maybe not literally but figuratively of our existence. However, if the universe is truly infinite, probability says he's right.
The human problem is our sense of scale is fucked. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yo, I heard you like simulations. We put simulations in your simulator, so you can simulate while you simulate.
|
|
Iven smart people prove that they say or believe stupid things.
|
|
All I know is when I pay my taxes it's not simulated. I have about 50 projects around the house that need to be done that can attest to that.
|
|
|
His argument doesn't consider random action.
Can a simulation ever successfully model a truly random event? I mean to the point where the simulation itself has no control over or preknowledge of the outcome. Do truly random events occur in nature? |
|
It's not a new theory and Musk didn't come up with it. There are a lot of really smart people who have talked about it. The article is pure click bait, relying on the predictable Musk-envy to bring readers in. |
|
Elon Musk has said that there is only a “one in billions” chance that we’re not living in a computer simulation. View Quote If that is the case then progressive liberalism must be a malware virus. |
|
Ok, so lets say this theory is true.
If we develop the exact same thing wont we just be a simulation living in another simulation? Also, if we are just being powered by computers what if something happens to those computers do we just go bye bye? Seems retarded. |
|
Fall of '93 I start college. Live on campus, but really not very far from home.
I recognize faces. Lots of faces. It got to the point where I thought "the program" was was overloaded and had to start recycling graphics. The whole experience was like deja vu times 2356. Then I realized there actually where a handful of kids from the past two years attending the same school and I actually was seeing people that I kinda recognized. |
|
Whoever/whatever has made this simulation so "realistic" that right now, some dorito eating mother fucker is running the "sitting on the couch, watching Daniel Tiger with my 3 year old" mini-quest with me.
|
|
Hey I want a bunch of government tax dollars to make me rich too.
|
|
40 years ago video games were awesome, one could play for hours and still be entertained, brain activity was increased and kids could imagine.
Now, 40 years later, we have ultrarealistic pieces of shit and kids/adults alike are turned into mindless zombies. |
|
Quoted:
We live in a giant physics sandbox.....If it's "real" or a "simulation".....What's the difference? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Do all of you hate this theory because of your religion or because you don't think it's possible? We live in a giant physics sandbox.....If it's "real" or a "simulation".....What's the difference? This. Though Musk's argument for being in a simulation is weird: "technology has improved greatly over the last 100 years, this must all be fake!!!1!!!eleven!!" I'm not getting the path from A to B. "Since that would lead to games that would be indistinguishable from reality that could be played anywhere, 'it would seem to follow that the odds that we’re in "base reality" is one in billions', Mr Musk said.". The idea of becoming engrossed in and obsessed with some VR experience has been around in fiction for decades (if not longer), I don't grasp how Pong is relevant to Oculus or how this "proves" we're in a simulation. |
|
If my dog puked on the carpet, did it really even happen?
Is the dog simulated? The puke? The carpet? I'm gonna need to know in a hurry. |
|
Will someone please stop putting psilocybin mushrooms in the spaghetti that Elon has for dinner each week?
|
|
If I am living in a simulation, how does the programer know how long ATF wait times should be???
May be they were meant to be instantaneous. Or maybe none at all |
|
|
Ah, the anti-intellectual crowd is out in force. Regardless of Musk being a moron or not a moron the simulation idea is neither new nor inherently crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I'm willing to entertain a lot of delusions and conspiracy theories, but I guess I'm too much of a luddite to buy this one. I'd rank this right up there with flat Earth and we didn't land on the moon stuff. View Quote Well, if we are in a simulation, we didn't land on the moon and the earth may very well be a very large flat chip. So, you'd be consistent. |
|
Quoted:
Do all of you hate this theory because of your religion or because you don't think it's possible? View Quote Or perhaps because (1) it's old rehashed stuff that's been around forever. (2) it's non-testable and non-falsifiable, so it's not a "theory" at all. It's just an amusing story and thought experiment. Neat for philosophical discussion or for taking about when stoned, but nothing really beyond that. |
|
Quoted:
This. Though Musk's argument for being in a simulation is weird: "technology has improved greatly over the last 100 years, this must all be fake!!!1!!!eleven!!" I'm not getting the path from A to B. "Since that would lead to games that would be indistinguishable from reality that could be played anywhere, 'it would seem to follow that the odds that we’re in "base reality" is one in billions', Mr Musk said.". The idea of becoming engrossed in and obsessed with some VR experience has been around in fiction for decades (if not longer), I don't grasp how Pong is relevant to Oculus or how this "proves" we're in a simulation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Do all of you hate this theory because of your religion or because you don't think it's possible? We live in a giant physics sandbox.....If it's "real" or a "simulation".....What's the difference? This. Though Musk's argument for being in a simulation is weird: "technology has improved greatly over the last 100 years, this must all be fake!!!1!!!eleven!!" I'm not getting the path from A to B. "Since that would lead to games that would be indistinguishable from reality that could be played anywhere, 'it would seem to follow that the odds that we’re in "base reality" is one in billions', Mr Musk said.". The idea of becoming engrossed in and obsessed with some VR experience has been around in fiction for decades (if not longer), I don't grasp how Pong is relevant to Oculus or how this "proves" we're in a simulation. Simulation hypothesis In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom proposed a trilemma that he called "the simulation argument". Despite the name, Bostrom's "simulation argument" does not directly argue that we live in a simulation; instead, Bostrom's trilemma argues that one of three unlikely-seeming propositions must be true. The trilemma points out that a technologically mature "posthuman" civilization would have enormous computing power; if even a tiny percentage of them were to run "ancestor simulations" (that is, "high-fidelity" simulations of ancestral life that would be indistinguishable from reality to the simulated ancestor), the total number of simulated ancestors, or "Sims", in the universe (or multiverse, if it exists) would greatly exceed the total number of actual ancestors. Therefore, at least one of the following three propositions is almost certainly true: "The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage (that is, one capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations) is very close to zero", or "The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero", or "The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one" The argument is sort of similar to arguments you hear about intelligent extraterrestrial life. Sure, we may live in "base reality" and are the only real beings and we're the first to discover how to simulate reality, but if simulated reality is possible and beings capable of creating simulated reality would create it, then there are vastly more virtual beings than real and chances are we're one of the virtual beings. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.