User Panel
Posted: 4/18/2019 2:14:40 PM EDT
Developmental and Test + LRIP
2011 - 9 2012 - 29 2013 - 35 2014 - 36 (109 built by end of 2014) 2015 - 45 2016 - 46 2017 - 66 (266 built by end of 2017) High Rate Production kicks in 2018 - 91 (357 built by end of 2018) 2019 - 130 (487 by end of this year) 2020 - 145 2021 - 150 2022 - 150 2023 - 160+ (1092+ by end of 2023) 500th fuselage section already built and delivered by Northrop-Grumman February 25th, 2019 |
|
|
Raymond Scott - Powerhouse [mp3] |
|
|
Maybe a dumb question, but why would we allow pictures of the inside of factories like this to be released?
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe compared to a tiny Harrier, sure. http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=13981&t=1 https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2016/post-6237-0-55496200-1482604836.jpg http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3_NpXe5bSG8/UhYOPUwsAJI/AAAAAAAAMag/32yfXggr_E8/s1600/AV-8B.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn that's a fat plane. http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=13981&t=1 https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2016/post-6237-0-55496200-1482604836.jpg http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3_NpXe5bSG8/UhYOPUwsAJI/AAAAAAAAMag/32yfXggr_E8/s1600/AV-8B.jpg |
|
|
Quoted:
Look at the fat fucks building the damned thing. The radar absorbent coating is probably just congealed nacho cheese at this point. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: Maybe compared to a tiny Harrier, sure. But it's far more aerodynamic than all of the aircraft it's replacing when you combat-configure them. http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=13981&t=1 https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2016/post-6237-0-55496200-1482604836.jpg http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3_NpXe5bSG8/UhYOPUwsAJI/AAAAAAAAMag/32yfXggr_E8/s1600/AV-8B.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Maybe it's the lines or something, but it looks bloated. View Quote But, it's more aerodynamic than hanging things off wings. Which it also does. Still there's no getting around the fact that it just doesn't quite have the lines of an F22. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Maybe a dumb question, but why would we allow pictures of the inside of factories like this to be released? View Quote The F-35 line uses a new type of production method based on decades of lessons-learned from the F-16 production line though, so the production operations have been planned and executed with a focus on efficiency of operations without as much bottle-necking. Seems to be working out as planned now that they ironed out the kinks with the early birds and LRIP. |
|
|
Quoted:
Nothing sensitive is revealed, plus the Clinton's sold high speed aircraft manufacturing technology to the Chinese in the 1990s. The F-35 line uses a new type of production method based on decades of lessons-learned from the F-16 production line though, so the production operations have been planned and executed with a focus on efficiency of operations without as much bottle-necking. Seems to be working out as planned now that they ironed out the kinks with the early birds and LRIP. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe a dumb question, but why would we allow pictures of the inside of factories like this to be released? The F-35 line uses a new type of production method based on decades of lessons-learned from the F-16 production line though, so the production operations have been planned and executed with a focus on efficiency of operations without as much bottle-necking. Seems to be working out as planned now that they ironed out the kinks with the early birds and LRIP. |
|
Let's not forget all of the ones we built before we worked all of the bugs out, that we won't upgrade to standard, that won't ever see service in an operational squadron. Hundreds of F-35's wasted
|
|
Quoted:
There's a cool video of how they build them, let me see if I can find it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe a dumb question, but why would we allow pictures of the inside of factories like this to be released? The F-35 line uses a new type of production method based on decades of lessons-learned from the F-16 production line though, so the production operations have been planned and executed with a focus on efficiency of operations without as much bottle-necking. Seems to be working out as planned now that they ironed out the kinks with the early birds and LRIP. The F-35 Factory |
|
The size comparison to a Mig 21 is particularly interesting to me.
If Poland buys F35s one of the types they will be replacing is the SU22. A literal flying antique. But! Cheap to operate, apparently. |
|
|
Quoted:
Let's not forget all of the ones we built before we worked all of the bugs out, that we won't upgrade to standard, that won't ever see service in an operational squadron. Hundreds of F-35's wasted View Quote Compare that to the few hundred early model F16s that got sent to the boneyard with low hours. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, but do you remember that Boeing thing that was competing against it? That thing was Buffett Slayer fat. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Let's not forget all of the ones we built before we worked all of the bugs out, that we won't upgrade to standard, that won't ever see service in an operational squadron. Hundreds of F-35's wasted View Quote * Fighter conversion training squadrons for the USAF, USMC, USN, Danes, Norwegian AF, Royal Navy, Royal Air Force, Royal Australian Air Force, ROK Air Force, Japanese Air Force, etc. * Test squadrons at Edwards, Pax River, and Eglin * Fighter Weapons School at Nellis AFB Instead of needing all sorts of structural changes to these aircraft, the vast majority of changes have been software, which is upgradable as part of the F-35's avionics architecture approach to adaptability. We did the same thing with F-4Cs, F-15As, F-16As, and are doing it with F-22As. There are 20 early production lot/block 10 F-22As dedicated to conversion training, with 160 combat-coded Raptors. I don't hear anyone complaining that their fighter conversion Raptors don't have the Helmet-Mounted Sight, AIM-9X capability, radar ground-mapping modes, Small Diameter Bomb delivery capability, or the April 2016 Raptor upgrades, because it doesn't matter. So F-35 pilots who train on early LRIP birds at Luke AFB, MCAS Beaufort, or NAS Lemoore will have all the systems features they can handle during their first times in the jet, getting used to starting, taxiing, take-offs, patterns, formation flying, and landings. When they get to their squadrons, they will do intensive combat systems management training on ground sim stations to learn all the mission profiles their squadrons cover down on as part of their service and regional taskings at that time, and then employ those profiles in operational training sorties, to include live weapons delivery as scheduled. So if a dude trains on a Block 1 production bird that was brought up to 3i software, it isn't a big deal when he gets to his squadron with 3F, as they're preparing for transition to 4 anyway. Block 4.3 F-35s will have some minor structural changes to the weapons bay to be able to carry 6 x AIM-120s. Some of the structural changes that were initiated because of F-35B weights benefitted the As and Bs as well, so those were added to the mass production line. This has no real bearing on the early production birds, and I've seen plans to retrofit some of the LRIPs structurally as well in the cases where it helps with airframe life span. |
|
Also, just like we did with previous aircraft, birds get moved around all the time.
If a Squadron has some of the early LRIP birds, as the airframe hours rack up on them or new birds roll off the line several years down the road, they'll pull the old birds and replace them with new shiny ones, and send the old birds through depot-level checks and inspections with some changes and upgrades if needed, then send them to the training, test, or weapons test units. Go track the history of any particular F-16 for example and see how many times they've been assigned here, moved there, then moved over here, then sent there. |
|
And because someone is going to bitch.
Attached File The proposed F32. Still chonky. But got kind of an updated F86 vibe. |
|
... sometimes I miss working in that environment - American aircraft factories that design, develop and manufacture military hardware are great to work at. At least in my experience
|
|
Don't forget about the F-35's that Italy and Japan are building.
|
|
@KA3B
I've been wondering for awhile. What is 601 supposed to mean? Unreconizable error? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe it's the lines or something, but it looks bloated. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn that's a fat plane. http://www.f-16.net/forum/download/file.php?id=13981&t=1 https://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2016/post-6237-0-55496200-1482604836.jpg http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3_NpXe5bSG8/UhYOPUwsAJI/AAAAAAAAMag/32yfXggr_E8/s1600/AV-8B.jpg Do you know why the F-35 is tapered at both ends? So LM's ass won't slam shut when it craps them out. |
|
|
|
Do they build all three variants on the same line, or different lines in the same building for the different variants?
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.