User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:28:23 AM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 11:07:45 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryThese two are much better than the others, we need more like them! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 11:39:13 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ummm... how does that help the 2nd Amendment? You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 12:03:40 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'll bet you're the life of the party........  Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: <a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 12:09:03 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: <a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 12:39:01 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Dones't"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 12:42:22 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not mine champ, but good detective work.. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V-brW9p1Ojc/Tb4cKuMB-1I/AAAAAAAAAOk/M91VR0dgByc/s1600/AreYouFuckingKiddingMe_1200px_by_CrusierPL.png https://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/258troll_spray.jpg He's not the troll. Using arguments based in obvious falsehoods make gun owners look silly. Stop posting stupid bullshit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 2:07:38 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Using arguments based in obvious falsehoods make gun owners look silly. Stop posting stupid bullshit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 3:57:18 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Using arguments based in obvious falsehoods make gun owners look silly. Stop posting stupid bullshit. Agree, also we need more quality fake Anti gun propaganda like the first two examples on page 3. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 8:09:34 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
<a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification Just a quick remark here. Who cares how the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? Yes, we constantly make fools out of them, yet, here we are. Politicians seem to also love that bs and do not care less about data fabrication or manipulation. So, who are we really trying to reach with this? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 8:14:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just a quick remark here. Who cares who the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? they control the media, it changes the game |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:03:28 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: its fine just shows lots of gun violence in the area where I live and it's not true that's all.  Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: So not accurate  But get the point across I guess.Which one did you quote, I'll get rid of it.. its fine just shows lots of gun violence in the area where I live and it's not true that's all. Vermont is shown on that map as high crime, which is the exact opposite. Vermont is consistently considered one of, if not the safest state in the country. Our state may be dominated with Democratic politics as a whole, but we have very minimal gun restrictions and very low crime. I don't think that map is correct at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:04:36 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
they control the media, it changes the game Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just a quick remark here. Who cares who the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? they control the media, it changes the game And this one. The media and its "statistics" and made-up stuff certainly weights into their cause. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:25:55 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just a quick remark here. Who cares how the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? Yes, we constantly make fools out of them, yet, here we are. Politicians seem to also love that bs and do not care less about data fabrication or manipulation. So, who are we really trying to reach with this? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: <a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification Just a quick remark here. Who cares how the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? Yes, we constantly make fools out of them, yet, here we are. Politicians seem to also love that bs and do not care less about data fabrication or manipulation. So, who are we really trying to reach with this? There is merit to both sides' thinking: - Throwing easily refuted material out there, hoping the the low-information crowd doesn't fact-check us, because the ends justify the means , isn't a path we should be on. - The opposition is already and happily willing to use ad hominem attacks to discredit our positions. We don't need to give them the hammer used to bash us about the head. Make them work for it! For example,  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:41:44 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We gain nothing by spreading untruths. Why would you want to spread untruths? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: <a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ The use of factual inaccuracies in an argument and molding them to fit an agenda is typically a tell-tale sign of a weak argument and will usually be discredited, along with any substantial points. If you are looking to piss off liberals and get a few giggles in watching them get all worked up, then post away with what ever makes them mad. If you are truly looking to further the cause of defending our 2nd Amendment Rights, then I would suggest that we should stick to solid arguments with solid facts. Its really not hard to do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:48:38 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "Dones't"? Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 9:53:48 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Dones't"? Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Dones't"? I don't see waht the problem is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:08:52 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't see waht the problem is. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"Dones't"? I don't see waht the problem is. I don't think you're being honets. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:30:24 PM EDT
[#19]
never knew so many idiots had no idea what a meme is. congrats to the 6 that have been posted so far.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:30:36 PM EDT
[#20]
When is she gonna die??
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:36:43 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
never knew so many idiots had no idea what a meme is. congrats to the 6 that have been posted so far. wat? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:38:55 PM EDT
[#22]
OST
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 10:40:22 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just a quick remark here. Who cares how the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? Yes, we constantly make fools out of them, yet, here we are. Politicians seem to also love that bs and do not care less about data fabrication or manipulation. So, who are we really trying to reach with this? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: <a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ he's right, the left already looks at conservatives as simpletons - we need to be extra vigilant against factual error to deny them justification Just a quick remark here. Who cares how the progressive-liberals look at normal people? Do they care that normal people see them as retarded lemmings and mold their stuff based on that perception? Or do they keep targeting their "audience" with the usual nonsense and lies and despite caught one time after another do they change anything? Yes, we constantly make fools out of them, yet, here we are. Politicians seem to also love that bs and do not care less about data fabrication or manipulation. So, who are we really trying to reach with this? If you don't know history, google the quote before you post it and see if it was said by the person quoted. If you can't fucking spell a simple word like "doesn't," google the correct spelling, and make sure everything on your meme is spelled correctly before you post it. If all that is too much work, just don't post any memes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/26/2015 11:08:28 PM EDT
[#24]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/27/2015 7:47:37 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Vermont is shown on that map as high crime, which is the exact opposite. Vermont is consistently considered one of, if not the safest state in the country. Our state may be dominated with Democratic politics as a whole, but we have very minimal gun restrictions and very low crime. I don't think that map is correct at all. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So not accurate But get the point across I guess.Which one did you quote, I'll get rid of it.. its fine just shows lots of gun violence in the area where I live and it's not true that's all. Vermont is shown on that map as high crime, which is the exact opposite. Vermont is consistently considered one of, if not the safest state in the country. Our state may be dominated with Democratic politics as a whole, but we have very minimal gun restrictions and very low crime. I don't think that map is correct at all.  That might have something to do with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/27/2015 11:41:17 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
never knew so many idiots had no idea what a meme is. congrats to the 6 that have been posted so far. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/29/2015 9:13:54 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One day I'll decide I want to roll this grenade onto my Facebook page <a href="http://s38.photobucket.com/user/nathan210/media/gloria%20steinem_zpsilkaw5he.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/nathan210/gloria%20steinem_zpsilkaw5he.jpg</a> There is a difference, ya know... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/9/2015 3:59:54 AM EDT
[#28]
bump.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/10/2015 1:21:31 PM EDT
[#29]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/10/2015 8:19:35 PM EDT
[#30]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/10/2015 9:09:26 PM EDT
[#31]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/11/2015 10:42:17 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are these real? Quote HistoryAs in "are these real pictures, on the real internet, in this real world?", then yes, they are very real. But if youre asking if theyre real brady campaign ads, no, they are not. theyre obviously photoshopped. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 7:46:09 AM EDT
[#33]
Bump because I'll probably need a few of these on Facebook.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 9:45:27 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... To ignore facts is just flat out willful ignorance. Call it what you want, but facts are incapable of "racism".....and the ENORMOUS disproportion of violence and crime here is absolutely worth putting a fine point on. And no, this certainly doesn't mean all blacks are criminals. Please, lets not knee-jerk in to some PC horse shit....we understand this. What it does mean is that, for whatever reason, blacks in respect to violent crime are ALARMINGLY over represented. And again, to ignore facts that point to, by far, the most violent among us is dangerous and nothing short of willful ignorance.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 10:28:46 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To ignore facts is just flat out willful ignorance. Call it what you want, but facts are incapable of "racism".....and the ENORMOUS disproportion of violence and crime here is absolutely worth putting a fine point on. And no, this certainly doesn't mean all blacks are criminals. Please, lets not knee-jerk in to some PC horse shit....we understand this. What it does mean is that, for whatever reason, blacks in respect to violent crime are ALARMINGLY over represented. And again, to ignore facts that point to, by far, the most violent among us is dangerous and nothing short of willful ignorance. http://i4.minus.com/ibuGDlQQb7Sbr9.png Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... To ignore facts is just flat out willful ignorance. Call it what you want, but facts are incapable of "racism".....and the ENORMOUS disproportion of violence and crime here is absolutely worth putting a fine point on. And no, this certainly doesn't mean all blacks are criminals. Please, lets not knee-jerk in to some PC horse shit....we understand this. What it does mean is that, for whatever reason, blacks in respect to violent crime are ALARMINGLY over represented. And again, to ignore facts that point to, by far, the most violent among us is dangerous and nothing short of willful ignorance. http://i4.minus.com/ibuGDlQQb7Sbr9.png And those numbers are misleading as well. If you're going to compare blacks and whites, you should compare them for all crimes against all colors. Blacks may commit more crimes against whites, but that's because there are more whites (as pointed out by your image). Also... I thought this image came from an 88er group? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 10:37:46 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't see waht the problem is. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"Dones't"? I don't see waht the problem is. Howdy Pod'ner! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 10:52:26 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And those numbers are misleading as well. If you're going to compare blacks and whites, you should compare them for all crimes against all colors. Blacks may commit more crimes against whites, but that's because there are more whites (as pointed out by your image). Also... I thought this image came from an 88er group? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ummm... how does that help the 2nd Amendment? You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... To ignore facts is just flat out willful ignorance. Call it what you want, but facts are incapable of "racism".....and the ENORMOUS disproportion of violence and crime here is absolutely worth putting a fine point on. And no, this certainly doesn't mean all blacks are criminals. Please, lets not knee-jerk in to some PC horse shit....we understand this. What it does mean is that, for whatever reason, blacks in respect to violent crime are ALARMINGLY over represented. And again, to ignore facts that point to, by far, the most violent among us is dangerous and nothing short of willful ignorance. http://i4.minus.com/ibuGDlQQb7Sbr9.png And those numbers are misleading as well. If you're going to compare blacks and whites, you should compare them for all crimes against all colors. Blacks may commit more crimes against whites, but that's because there are more whites (as pointed out by your image). Also... I thought this image came from an 88er group? The numbers are not remotely misleading and the racial breakdown they represent matters because its whites who are continually villainized as being the racist boogyman and the source of problems for the black community. Not Asians, not eskimos.....whites are the ones being fingered as the problem. Almost exclusively. I didn't draw these racial lines...we know who has though. Comparing black/white crime disparities illustrates a very different and valid view of the facts...and facts matter....a lot. When 13% of the population is 200x more likely to commit assaults against whites, what exactly in "misleading" about that? It's fucking alarming is what it is. Blacks don't commit more crimes against whites because there are more whites. They commit crimes in a HORRENDOUS disproportion to their 13% population representation....against whites, blacks and everyone else. Per capita, blacks are BY FAR more representative of violent crime. Watch this video starting at the 2:55min mark. Then tell me how "misleading" those crime stats are.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 10:55:14 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Had to throw this in.. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9dOavQc1woY/URwBP6oSHzI/AAAAAAAACv4/xnIUzkOVekk/s1600/600498_10100539171667712_757294380_n.jpg Obama did not order flags lowered for Whitney Houston. Please dont repeat untruths like the liberals do. It makes us look as stupid as them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 10:57:20 AM EDT
[#39]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 11:00:54 AM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 11:07:42 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:They were slaughtered, but it's historically inaccurate to say they were disarmed a decade or more before they actually were. If you can't see this . . . and why it matters . . . well, I would ask you to please just stop posting memes. "The internet is full of stupid and wrong quotes" - Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 11:09:35 AM EDT
[#42]
Tag
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 11:37:22 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The use of factual inaccuracies in an argument and molding them to fit an agenda is typically a tell-tale sign of a weak argument and will usually be discredited, along with any substantial points. If you are looking to piss off liberals and get a few giggles in watching them get all worked up, then post away with what ever makes them mad. If you are truly looking to further the cause of defending our 2nd Amendment Rights, then I would suggest that we should stick to solid arguments with solid facts. Its really not hard to do. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
<a href="http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg" target="_blank">http://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpghttp://i.stack.imgur.com/fb4X8.jpg</a> Washington was an educated man and also would never have used the contraction "it's" when he meant "its." I know, just splitting hairs again, but if gun advocates would start approaching these historically-based memes with a skeptical eye, we wouldn't embarrass our cause with the frequency we do. I'll bet you're the life of the party........ The use of factual inaccuracies in an argument and molding them to fit an agenda is typically a tell-tale sign of a weak argument and will usually be discredited, along with any substantial points. If you are looking to piss off liberals and get a few giggles in watching them get all worked up, then post away with what ever makes them mad. If you are truly looking to further the cause of defending our 2nd Amendment Rights, then I would suggest that we should stick to solid arguments with solid facts. Its really not hard to do. Except of course when it is liberal media doing it to sway the ignorant masses. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 11:59:53 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The numbers are not remotely misleading and the racial breakdown they represent matters because its whites who are continually villainized as being the racist boogyman and the source of problems for the black community. Not Asians, not eskimos.....whites are the ones being fingered as the problem. Almost exclusively. I didn't draw these racial lines...we know who has though. Comparing black/white crime disparities illustrates a very different and valid view of the facts...and facts matter....a lot. When 13% of the population is 200x more likely to commit assaults against whites, what exactly in "misleading" about that? It's fucking alarming is what it is. Blacks don't commit more crimes against whites because there are more whites. They commit crimes in a HORRENDOUS disproportion to their 13% population representation....against whites, blacks and everyone else. Per capita, blacks are BY FAR more representative of violent crime. Watch this video starting at the 2:55min mark. Then tell me how "misleading" those crime stats are.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGTUcS-yQtQ
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ummm... how does that help the 2nd Amendment? You know not all Black Americans are criminals right? Yup....but I do not get that all blacks are criminals from that...I get that proportionally they weigh heavily on the crime in this country... and I do not see it as a "Race" problem but a cultural problem and not just for blacks but for any broken home without fathers... the numbers still tell a part of the story though... To ignore facts is just flat out willful ignorance. Call it what you want, but facts are incapable of "racism".....and the ENORMOUS disproportion of violence and crime here is absolutely worth putting a fine point on. And no, this certainly doesn't mean all blacks are criminals. Please, lets not knee-jerk in to some PC horse shit....we understand this. What it does mean is that, for whatever reason, blacks in respect to violent crime are ALARMINGLY over represented. And again, to ignore facts that point to, by far, the most violent among us is dangerous and nothing short of willful ignorance. http://i4.minus.com/ibuGDlQQb7Sbr9.png And those numbers are misleading as well. If you're going to compare blacks and whites, you should compare them for all crimes against all colors. Blacks may commit more crimes against whites, but that's because there are more whites (as pointed out by your image). Also... I thought this image came from an 88er group? The numbers are not remotely misleading and the racial breakdown they represent matters because its whites who are continually villainized as being the racist boogyman and the source of problems for the black community. Not Asians, not eskimos.....whites are the ones being fingered as the problem. Almost exclusively. I didn't draw these racial lines...we know who has though. Comparing black/white crime disparities illustrates a very different and valid view of the facts...and facts matter....a lot. When 13% of the population is 200x more likely to commit assaults against whites, what exactly in "misleading" about that? It's fucking alarming is what it is. Blacks don't commit more crimes against whites because there are more whites. They commit crimes in a HORRENDOUS disproportion to their 13% population representation....against whites, blacks and everyone else. Per capita, blacks are BY FAR more representative of violent crime. Watch this video starting at the 2:55min mark. Then tell me how "misleading" those crime stats are. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGTUcS-yQtQ
I think I have seen that video before, and I understand what you're saying, but how does the black violence against whites stack up to white violence against whites? That's the numbers in looking to compare. I'll review the video when I get home. ETA because for all I know that's what you linked for me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2015 12:03:22 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"The internet is full of stupid and wrong quotes" - Thomas Jefferson 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
