User Panel
Quoted:
Yes it's very humorous for a mod to call you a troll. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
At this point I cannot see why anyone is continuing to push the narrative that the Trump campaign had any collusion with the Russian govt as claimed. It seems that if you are pushing that narrative then you are doing so to troll or cause problems on purpose for this site, seeing how the actual report and lead investigator said it wasn't so. That would be a violation of CoC #7...[cenk] look it up. [cenk] With that said I would suggest that some of you sort out your priorities and your reasoning to be here. If your intent is to continue to push a false narrative and burden the site and its membership your time here will be shorter than you think. The Mueller Investigation wasn't the Alpha and the Omega of the NeverTrump movement but I'm fine with Mueller's conclusions unless some additional evidence comes to light. Quoted:
I refuse to believe you’re dumb enough to think what you wrote - only dyed in the wool fanatics with TDS believe that, and you’re sharper than that. |
|
Quoted:
I never cared about the whole Russian thing. I don't remember posting about it very much, might have made few little quips. Trying to impeach or remove a sitting POTUS is a very stupid move. Don't believe I supported any bureaucrats, I might be wrong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
10-4, you can't help that and I won't make light of it. It does not however excuse your support of an attempted coup by unelected leftist bureaucrats. |
|
Quoted:
Would congress have opposed Hillary banning bump stocks and making half a million gun owners felons? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I guess we'll never know since Trump fired him because of the Russia thing. Why is it you still support a guy who made half a million gun owners felons again? |
|
|
Quoted:
Lol, rofl. Trump intended to mean he wanted long-term amnesty for illegals when he said, "deportation force." It was a lack of understanding on my part. Trump intended to mean that he wanted increased restrictions to gun rights, and a criminalization of gun parts *possession* when he said he wanted to defend gun rights... It was a lack of understanding on my part... Lol, rofl. Trump intended to give Hillary immunity when he said, "LOCK HER UP!" It was a lack of understanding on my part... Lol, rofl. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: You don't understand either. Trump intended to mean he wanted long-term amnesty for illegals when he said, "deportation force." It was a lack of understanding on my part. Trump intended to mean that he wanted increased restrictions to gun rights, and a criminalization of gun parts *possession* when he said he wanted to defend gun rights... It was a lack of understanding on my part... Lol, rofl. Trump intended to give Hillary immunity when he said, "LOCK HER UP!" It was a lack of understanding on my part... Lol, rofl. |
|
|
Quoted:
Well Romney is View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
The Sponge admitted he was wrong to an extent and has accepted Mueller's report along with his investigative team of all rabid democrats as an indication that there was no Russian collusion. None of the other ones have even admitted to this obvious fact. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Do you ever get the feeling that the vast majority of people on this site don't like your bullshit and also that the moderators are tired of your shit? Seriously, you guys have been wrong as fuck and yet have no shame in continuing on whatever straw you can grasp. Not a single one of you admits you were wrong about Russia and Trump. None of you add anything to the community, you just haunt Trump threads, piss people off, and get threads locked. What's the point of being here when literally everyone hates you except for your small core of what, ten Never Trumpers? You have no credibility, no integrity, and no shame. Can't you just get a life and find a liberal gun forum? Fuck it, be a man and go out in style or be more of a man and admit how wrong you were. We. Don't. Like. You. You. Are. Ostracized. From. This. Community. None of the other ones have even admitted to this obvious fact. |
|
Quoted:
I thought he just admitted that he accepts the report’s findings. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Do you ever get the feeling that the vast majority of people on this site don't like your bullshit and also that the moderators are tired of your shit? Seriously, you guys have been wrong as fuck and yet have no shame in continuing on whatever straw you can grasp. Not a single one of you admits you were wrong about Russia and Trump. None of you add anything to the community, you just haunt Trump threads, piss people off, and get threads locked. What's the point of being here when literally everyone hates you except for your small core of what, ten Never Trumpers? You have no credibility, no integrity, and no shame. Can't you just get a life and find a liberal gun forum? Fuck it, be a man and go out in style or be more of a man and admit how wrong you were. We. Don't. Like. You. You. Are. Ostracized. From. This. Community. None of the other ones have even admitted to this obvious fact. |
|
Quoted:
But you stayed in this thread, reading it, and you stayed silent while your nevertrumper buddies went wild with speculation and unsubstantiated allegations. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
At this point I cannot see why anyone is continuing to push the narrative that the Trump campaign had any collusion with the Russian govt as claimed. It seems that if you are pushing that narrative then you are doing so to troll or cause problems on purpose for this site, seeing how the actual report and lead investigator said it wasn't so. That would be a violation of CoC #7...[cenk] look it up. [cenk] With that said I would suggest that some of you sort out your priorities and your reasoning to be here. If your intent is to continue to push a false narrative and burden the site and its membership your time here will be shorter than you think. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Wake me when there's a special prosecutor looking into the gun running at Benghazi that poor suffering Hillary was behind. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or are you okay with Trump refusing to prosecute Hillary for all the crimes she's committed? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Trump's interview with Maria Bartiromo? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Sen Graham's press conference today? 3D chess is a thing. Meanwhile, back in the real world, both Trump and Graham asked for a Special Council to investigate Hillary and the Dem/Russia collusion. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You can’t joke either! God is there anything you are good at? Besides accepting paychecks from share_blue, of course. Quoted:
If you had half a brain you would notice he is not a mod here.... troll! With that said I am off to go help put criminals where they belong. Have a great day everyone. |
|
|
Probably the same way T_S KNEW what was in the mueller report.
|
|
Quoted:
The Courts have spoken and they are NOT on our side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JAIME CAETANO v. MASSACHUSETTS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 14–10078. Decided March 21, 2016 PER CURIAM. The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 750 (2010). |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Latest SCOTUS ruling on 2nd A was Ceatano View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The Courts have spoken and they are NOT on our side. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JAIME CAETANO v. MASSACHUSETTS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 14–10078. Decided March 21, 2016 PER CURIAM. The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 750 (2010). |
|
Quoted:
Most of us said he didn't care about the second amendment, and that has proved true. That should be kind of a big one on a gun forum. Maybe not. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
His statement about Mueller is disgusting...you have to agree, right? View Quote Right now, it is Democrats attacking Muellers credibility in --essentially-- exonerating Trump from the worst of the accusations. It is in Trumps best interest to support Muellers integrity on that... Believe it or not. Romneys statement is pure political garblygook. But it benefits Trump from every perspective... |
|
Quoted:
And this above is what a post looks like when you've got nothing of substance to respond with but want to try to have the last word so it looks like you "won". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Most of the shit you whine about can only be authorized by congress, so complaining about how other people apply logic to your nonsense is pretty funny. Unless you like the guy that actively defended the FBI snipers that murdered Vicki and Sammy Weaver in cold blood holding the same seat of power as Eric Holder, or unless you're okay with more Federal land grabs despite the Federal Government already owning 47% of the land in the US West, or unless you're okay with government mandated/funded paid family leave. You want to claim it's Congress's fault so I'll ask you the same questions I've asked several other Trump defenders and have yet to be given an answer on. 1) Why has Trump signed every bill Congress has sent him, only using his veto power once? 2) Which swamp creatures has Trump worked to primary in our recent midterm election and working to primary in the upcoming 2020 election? Surely there are primary opponents to all these incumbent swamp creatures. Trump's ability to veto Congress and use his position as head of the party to support primary candidates he'd like to see elected are his two biggest powers and from all appearances, he's used neither to push his agenda he campaigned on. Quoted:
Did you miss that when Trump shut the Government down air traffic controllers stopped going to work, or that when he signed a national emergency on the border 12 senate republicans were all to happy to stab us all in the back? Quoted:
When you post nonsense, you shouldn't be shocked by nonsensical replies. People will think you are trolling. You will be trolled. This is a troll thread afterall. Trump making campaign stop after campaign stop, leading chants of, "Lock her up! Lock her up!" And then as soon as he secures the Presidency, coming out and saying, "I don't want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPK7uStv6zA That is nonsense. Or are you okay with Trump refusing to prosecute Hillary for all the crimes she's committed? Quoted:
Just so responding to your trolling isn't a complete waste. https://i.redd.it/f484n4ut96o21.png https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI5HivVS3V8 I've said multiple times in this thread and past, I've never put any stock in it and believe it was nothing more than bullshit drummed up by Democrats (including John McCain). You can search the site until you're blue in the face and you'll never find me supporting it and almost never even discussing it. In fact, I think in one of the few instances I actually discussed it a while back, I believe I posted that Trump should have nipped it in the bud early while he could. He should have fired everyone involved, cleaned house at Justice, taken his lumps in the press, all so he can move on and focus on actual policy instead of a made up distraction. Of course, this was back before we lost control of the House... |
|
Quoted:
A Special Prosecutor is not a thing, anymore, and statues of limitation are still a thing so you can keep napping. Meanwhile, back in the real world, both Trump and Graham asked for a Special Council to investigate Hillary and the Dem/Russia collusion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or are you okay with Trump refusing to prosecute Hillary for all the crimes she's committed? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Trump's interview with Maria Bartiromo? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Sen Graham's press conference today? 3D chess is a thing. Meanwhile, back in the real world, both Trump and Graham asked for a Special Council to investigate Hillary and the Dem/Russia collusion. |
|
Quoted:
So shooting down Trump’s illegal gun ban should be a no brainer for any Judge, correct? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Courts have spoken and they are NOT on our side. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JAIME CAETANO v. MASSACHUSETTS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 14–10078. Decided March 21, 2016 PER CURIAM. The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 750 (2010). |
|
Quoted:
I'm not responsible for what other people say or think. America is not communist yet, and you don't have to denounce my friends and neighbors. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
But you stayed in this thread, reading it, and you stayed silent while your nevertrumper buddies went wild with speculation and unsubstantiated allegations. You don't believe the government/deep state is telling the truth, do you? How will your neighbor ever learn and become educated if you are complicitly silent while those in the government are spreading falsehoods? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Courts have spoken and they are NOT on our side. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JAIME CAETANO v. MASSACHUSETTS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS No. 14–10078. Decided March 21, 2016 PER CURIAM. The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 750 (2010). |
|
Quoted:
What's the statute of limitations on illegal international arms trafficking resulting in deaths and, was it up 11/13/2016 when Trump said he didn't want to hurt suffering Hillary further? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or are you okay with Trump refusing to prosecute Hillary for all the crimes she's committed? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Trump's interview with Maria Bartiromo? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Sen Graham's press conference today? 3D chess is a thing. Meanwhile, back in the real world, both Trump and Graham asked for a Special Council to investigate Hillary and the Dem/Russia collusion. He wanted to move on for the good of the country but he Leftest would not. Now that Trump is totally cleared from the Collusion charge things are going to happen. |
|
Quoted:
It is a political statement that benefits Trump right now. Right now, it is Democrats attacking Muellers credibility in --essentially-- exonerating Trump from the worst of the accusations. It is in Trumps best interest to support Muellers integrity on that... Believe it or not. Romneys statement is pure political garblygook. But it benefits Trump from every perspective... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
His statement about Mueller is disgusting...you have to agree, right? Right now, it is Democrats attacking Muellers credibility in --essentially-- exonerating Trump from the worst of the accusations. It is in Trumps best interest to support Muellers integrity on that... Believe it or not. Romneys statement is pure political garblygook. But it benefits Trump from every perspective... I see..4d chess. No. It doesn't benefit Trump at all to build up the character of the man Trump has been trying to tear down. Leave it to Romney to protect his swamp buddies. |
|
Quoted:
If that was actually important to you then you would also oppose Top_Secret and his campaign to make anti-gun James Comey the POTUS in 2020. View Quote James Comey can't ban anything, so not really worried about him, more so about the Repblicans and DJT. |
|
Quoted:
We are all very much responsible for what our neighbors say or think. Sounds very much like what people said in the USSR You don't believe the government/deep state is telling the truth, do you? I have no idea, but I doubt it How will your neighbor ever learn and become educated if you are complicitly silent while those in the government are spreading falsehoods? View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I feel bad for him. Just another attention seeking liberal stooge that got run over by the DNC when no longer useful. One can relate eh, bullet_sponge. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
At least we can all laugh at Avenatti. lol One can relate eh, bullet_sponge. lol |
|
Next round of Trump’s glorious Citizen Protection begins tomorrow:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/03/chuck-baldwin/my-open-letter-to-senators-lindsey-graham-marco-rubio-et-al/ Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has announced that the Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin conducting hearings next Tuesday, March 26, on Senate Bill 7, the Extreme Risk Protection Order and Violence Prevention Act of 2019—otherwise known as a national “red flag” gun confiscation bill. |
|
|
Quoted:
There are pics in the BOTD archives if you're that needy. Here's a pic from COTA for the F1 race. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/174335/A7B79BB5_JPG-277378.jpg View Quote |
|
At least some members of Congress are consistent...
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Committee on Oversight about getting documents from the Justice Department: “How can you ignore the facts when you don’t get the facts? That’s what this is all about…I just want to get the information…I think we’re right on target with this. We just want the information so we have the facts.” At that same proceeding, former Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., then a member of the House Oversight Committee “the notion that you can withhold information and documents from Congress no matter whether you are the party in power or not in power is wrong. Respect for the rule of law must mean something, irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles." View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Ever take the time to ask yourself why the anti-gun justices agreed that stun guns are "arms" within the meaning of the Second Amendment? Here's a hint: They know exactly where the game is headed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Latest SCOTUS ruling on 2nd A was Ceatano Here's a hint: They know exactly where the game is headed. I would be interested in your opinion if you want to simply lay it out. |
|
|
Quoted:
You seriously need to watch the Maria B interview as Trump answers the Hillary question. He wanted to move on for the good of the country but he Leftest would not. Now that Trump is totally cleared from the Collusion charge things are going to happen. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or are you okay with Trump refusing to prosecute Hillary for all the crimes she's committed? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Trump's interview with Maria Bartiromo? Do you know how I know you failed to watch Sen Graham's press conference today? 3D chess is a thing. Meanwhile, back in the real world, both Trump and Graham asked for a Special Council to investigate Hillary and the Dem/Russia collusion. He wanted to move on for the good of the country but he Leftest would not. Now that Trump is totally cleared from the Collusion charge things are going to happen. I'm sure the families and loved ones of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods will all take great comfort in the fact that the party responsible for their deaths won't be brought to justice for "the greater good". Oh, but wait... Now that the Dem witch hunt is over and done with, now things are going to be different! Attached File Well, at least until the 2020 election rolls around and we're told how Trump can't take action on that now because he needs to focus on attracting middle of the road voters and prosecuting Hillary would look divisive but he'll get right on it in his second term! And then we're told we can't do it in the first part of the second term because of how important the midterms are! And so on, and so on, ad nauseam... |
|
Quoted:
At least some members of Congress are consistent... Just kidding. These quotes are during the last administration. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
At least some members of Congress are consistent... Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking Republican on the Committee on Oversight about getting documents from the Justice Department: “How can you ignore the facts when you don’t get the facts? That’s what this is all about…I just want to get the information…I think we’re right on target with this. We just want the information so we have the facts.” At that same proceeding, former Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., then a member of the House Oversight Committee “the notion that you can withhold information and documents from Congress no matter whether you are the party in power or not in power is wrong. Respect for the rule of law must mean something, irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles." The President did NOT commit a crime. He is exonerated fully. Congress has no standing for documents and testimony from the Mueller investigation involving the President since no crime was committed and the rule of law after two years of onslaught was ultimately upheld. No obstruction and no collusion. This is a quintessential example of due process and separation of powers. If they found evidence of collusion or obstruction then congress would have a reason for obtaining that information. They didn't find it and it doesn't exist. |
|
Quoted:
I'm sure the families and loved ones of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods will all take great comfort in the fact that the party responsible for their deaths won't be brought to justice for "the greater good". Oh, but wait... Now that the Dem witch hunt is over and done with, now things are going to be different! View Quote Back in the real world her activities with the CGF, distruction of the emails, and the dossier will now be investigated. There was no way anything could go forward until Trump was cleared on the Russia Collusion. DOJ IG report is coming. Huber is coming. Sorry it does not fit your timeline like a 1 hour made for TV drama. |
|
|
Quoted:
Poor girl is blind as a bat..nicceee catch DJ, you out punted your coverage... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There are pics in the BOTD archives if you're that needy. Here's a pic from COTA for the F1 race. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/174335/A7B79BB5_JPG-277378.jpg |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.