User Panel
Let me guess that Trump promised Mohamed Bin Salman support and the IC is upset because they’re still sucking that Wahabist assbag, dopey Prince Al-Waleed’s dick....
|
|
Quoted:
@Bullet_Sponge So, the House PSCI is violating the law (Title 32 CFR 806.26) by publishing FOUO material to the public? I say this, because the if it were cleared for public release, you would see “ That is, unless I’m completely misremembering the annual training that I just completed last month, but what do I know? If I published FOUO without approval, I’m pretty sure that I’d be out of a job, and potentially subject to criminal penalties. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
He went incognito till Trump got elected. Kind of odd. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Just the latest nonsense for the lemmings to seize upon, flail around like screaming toddlers, and spread around like so much manure for a week or so, until it fizzles out into yet another burger of nothingness.
Bullet_Sponge, Rachel Maddow, Adam Schiff, and their fellow travelers must have the most severe case of bolas azules ever known to political science. |
|
|
Quoted:
Just the latest nonsense for the lemmings to seize upon, flail around like screaming toddlers, and spread around like so much manure for a week or so, until it fizzles out into yet another burger of nothingness. Bullet_Sponge, Rachel Maddow, Adam Schiff, and their fellow travelers must have the most severe case of bolas azules ever known to political science. View Quote It truly is Charlie Brown trying to kick the football |
|
|
Quoted:
Scroll to about 7:45 and listen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3p2zKPQSgI Should we be skeered? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
..."former officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity"? There is this... Jason Klitenic, the DNI general counsel, noted in a letter sent to congressional leaders on Tuesday that the activity at the root of the complaint “involves confidential and potentially privileged communications.” Nice that we have a swamp IC actively surveilling the president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3p2zKPQSgI Should we be skeered? |
|
So $1 cash money says it's an illegal leak of a wiretap (digital intercept).
They played their hand early. I would expect this short of story to break next year at this time. |
|
|
How sad is it that the _ trolls are able to troll with impunity but good members get banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Pres Trump, certainly must love his country deeply. If I was in his position, copping all this bullshit every five minutes, I would jump on my jet with my supermodel wife, family and a suitcase full of cash be all "adios muthafuckers"
|
|
|
Trump should declass it all and play it for the world to laugh at.
He should then out the leaker publicly. Then they should lock up everyone who spied on the President...forever. |
|
Does everyone remember what happened last time Bullet_Sponge was here with non stop MSM links to some IC BS about Trump and a foreign state? Let me remind you, the director and deputy director of the FBI were fired, and both referred for criminal prosecution by the IG. Various members of the Stasi FBI and DOJ lost their jobs.
Who will it be going down this time Bullet_sponge? |
|
Quoted:
So $1 cash money says it's an illegal leak of a wiretap (digital intercept). They played their hand early. I would expect this short of story to break next year at this time. View Quote Add this to the two other intel leaks in recent weeks, and it shows they're trying to set a narrative. |
|
Quoted:
So $1 cash money says it's an illegal leak of a wiretap (digital intercept). They played their hand early. I would expect this short of story to break next year at this time. View Quote Stuff like this is, IMHO, them trying to provoke him into doing it too soon. ETA: And I think that's been the case for a while. They wanted to scare the DC GOPe away from anything with Trumps finger prints. They were halfway there (McCain and Co) Remember how many times they had a "special election on Trump" but he kept winning them Jon Ossoff was his name? They wanted to milk that to the midterms, with a calendar of russia, stormy daniels, special elections,and "muh polls". Then win the midterms, declare it all over, impeachment. Then absorb the negative press blows, "oh thats the past, he's impeached anyway", they me too thomas off the court, Kennedy's seat goes Ginsburg, and thanks in some part to Some_People who carried water for the DNC after their fuckin feelings got hurt. Sure they were wrong about just about everything from 2015 on? But hey, often in error yet never in doubt - they_persisted. Now here we are. |
|
Quoted: IMHO they are trying to goad Donald into using stuff he has, now, while they can still recover before the election. Stuff like this is, IMHO, them trying to provoke him into doing it too soon. View Quote By the time it's over they won't be able to walk down the street... |
|
Quoted:
Yep. DECLAS brings down the house; he has the power and they know it, and they're scared of what he can do. By the time it's over they won't be able to walk down the street... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: IMHO they are trying to goad Donald into using stuff he has, now, while they can still recover before the election. Stuff like this is, IMHO, them trying to provoke him into doing it too soon. By the time it's over they won't be able to walk down the street... The Swamp critters likely won't see any time. "Too big to jail" in some cases, IF what's been whispered about on the web is true. But. While I don't think we'll get total satsifaction in that way, we can still vote. Power is what they want, and we can take it away. The guy wasn't my first or second choice in the primary - nor were the last 2 guys. But the media deserves to be wrecked on twitter by a troll president, and I want to see them in tears again trying to tell themselves that their narratives and polling matter most. |
|
|
So.... no one agrees with my earlier post about "shades of Comey..." ?
|
|
I noticed someone stopped posting in his own thread.
Must be off work. |
|
He'll drop out any day now!
The IC as a whole has not yet redeemed itself. Their word isn't worth shit to the public until they do. |
|
Is it really that hard to imagine Trump speaking without thinking first? He does it almost every day.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Another actually_believes thread. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/298946/31467E44-2D10-41D2-ABDF-B9C162626B51_png-1095461.JPG View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
Fake News a big nothing.
Someone got butthurt and wants the Orange Mussolini to pay. So perhaps someone needs to be indicted for leaking sensitive/confidential information. Probably some cuck never Trumper. |
|
Quoted:
A whistleblower isn't a "leaker". It's an entirely lawful process and an important part of Congressional oversight. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Another out the leaker project... When you use it to go after someone you couldn't prove committed the acts you invented, it's still bullshit. |
|
Quoted:
The retard can give the nuclear launch codes to the Russians, and people here will still defend him. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A timeline of events from the WaPo that could be helpful: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/19/what-is-trump-whistleblower-complaint-about-heres-helpful-timeline/ |
|
Shouldn't have signed the 702 reauth, should have gutted the whole thing. Nothing but an arm of the activist Democrat dirty tricks team.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I'm sure that he has done a lot to change your opinion since then. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I didn't know who he was as I wasn't involved in the threads. I believe I was responding to a report button and looked at all of the CoC violations in there. My attempts at putting a lid on things failed miserably. I still don't really know who he is or what he's going on about. I see he is locked so someone took care of it. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Who ended up getting locked out of all that mess? View Quote edit alluded to here https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/-ARCHIVED-THREAD-Here-there-be-never-trumps-part-4-/5-2203741/?page=18#i77977494 |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.