User Panel
Posted: 5/27/2022 3:18:32 PM EDT
I’ve seen about half of these before, but some are new to me. Not sure the story behind any other than the aTrepang.
LEAKED: Best Ever Alien Evidence Released? |
|
Here's more on the Trepang. IIRC there was a layout of about half of these in Life Magazine back when it occurred in 1971, right at or just after the blackout of UFO stories in "Official News" outlets.
All photos in high res They are the originals, not from the magazine scan that was posted here a couple years ago Scrolling a ways down, that also has an article about the Admiral of that sub commenting on it in 2015. Stated sub was in area but he didn't personally see anything or take any photos. Wouldn't expand on a couple other questions. The video just seems to be a slideshow of the images in that link, I can't find the Life Magazine article on it, I remember that big one had the seam/staple right down the middle as it was placed to take up the full width The more famous one with it bursting out of water. |
|
It might be possible to find a copy on eBay or even a library on microfilm
|
|
What if they aren’t extraterrestrials? What if they’re from here? They just live beneath the surface.
|
|
The Black Vault has a real interesting rundown on this case.
https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/arctic-ufo-photographs-uss-trepang-ssn-674-march-1971/ |
|
|
Quoted: What if they aren’t extraterrestrials? What if they’re from here? They just live beneath the surface. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: What if they aren’t extraterrestrials? What if they’re from here? They just live beneath the surface. There have been a LOT of comments in that direction. Mentioning Area of the Earth which is Not explored, with ocean being 95% unknown, most of Antarctica for example (not much for public info but odd meetings there). Several are tagged "UUO"s for Unknown Underwater Objects and there's an acronym for craft that have been seen underwater, in atmosphere and in near Earth space as well. Note: The stuff below is conglomerated from several other threads in this forum which go into a lot of detail for each bit. Lue has really emphasized the "what we don't even know on Earth" aspect in addition to a Spiritual/ "phase space" / paranormal aspect where not all craft match one classification and some match parts of a couple classifications. Some people will associate disclosure with starting to go to church, and some going to church will stop attending once the disclosure happens. Lue says the population of Earth would be "Somber" for a few weeks, implying something striking to the heart of what we know as reality. Everything now has been waiting on the rest of the world to give the "OK" to go public since it's private sector controlled (Rumored under 150 people on the "OK list" of the private dozen or so "gatekeepers" outside .gov control or even influence. Some say as few as 50 people now have full access after deaths of people that were "in" from 50s-90s and not replaced, plus some possibly removed for suspected leaks, just keeping "in pool" down in manageable numbers. There are craploads of private $$$ invested worldwide they don't want to cut off that gravy train or lose control of the tech and we're left with only the few tidbits that are shared. The next two paragraphs will make better sense if the 15 page Wilson Memo is read and you've watched all of the Lue Elizondo interviews and statements made. The latest confirmation of discussions about UAP/UFO seem to have put all of that information into a private commercial company and the typical .gov person is not cleared to learn much about it. Not even the president can look at it since it isn't classified in the traditional way, it's put under a SAP (Special Access Program) which includes some .gov but mostly private company leaders deciding who gets in and who is out. Leaning toward Lockheed Martin and SkunkWorks as my guess. Lue stated that the technology was acquired by the .gov but then given only to one aerospace company and not the others when contracts were put out for bids, one company had a huge boost in tech unknown to others. Take that bit of info, the confirmation of that info in the Wilson memos and Lockheed acquired Boeing who acquired McDdonnell Douglas. The F117, F22, and F35 have all been LockMart's babies when the acquisitions are all added together, there's only one Aerospace company around yet, Boeing has the traditional aircraft design and LockMart does the military or something like that. Add in the timeline of this SAP program starting in the 80s where they put the private sector security access on it and the sudden changes in aircraft company profits and acquisitions and to me it screams "LockMart". Things are going slow, but comparing the last 5 years with the 40 years prior to that things are going along at a pretty good clip, though it seems geological time while waiting day to day/week to week for the next paper published, meeting announced, or interview given. --ETA: Adding this which is another article talking about "The Gatekeepers" being like Skull and Bones secret club sort of group which has managed to be transferred out of a US .gov controlled SAP to prevent congress/president and anybody else they don't trust from seeing more than very basic/simple info which had portions previously leaked anyway. There's a "Secret Society" in the Pentagon Hiding UFO Secrets, Officials Say In interviews with Politico, government officials — who, unsurprisingly, spoke on condition of anonymity — said that there are those within the Pentagon who are "protecting very interesting information" from being released to the public, even as others within and outside the Defense Department are trying to bring daylight to this subject of increasing interest. "They fetishize their secret society," one intelligence official told Politico in interviews ahead of tomorrow's House Intelligence Committee hearings on unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAPs, which is the military's rebranding of what were previously known as UFOs), the first of its kind since 1966. "It’s kind of a Skull and Bones-type vibe. They take it seriously but they have no accountability. Zero. There is a whole group of us that know in great detail this subject, a lot of which has not been reported to Congress because of security issues." It's going to take some sort of "forcing mechanism," another Defense Department official said, to get these gatekeepers to reveal even part of their closely-guarded secrets to Congress and, in turn, the public. While it all sounds very "X-Files"-ish, there's another, much more mundane concern among some officials who spoke to Politico. They're more worried about the actually-unexplained sightings being grouped together with the thousands of alleged UAP sightings that turn out to be bupkis. Remember the interview where Lue said it will take several congressional and senate hearings to get anywhere, or at least get a large portion of it kicked open to scholars and engineers to review while maintaining secrecy, they refuse to let go of their total control of the topic and manipulate the media, the .gov/.mil, and all the proles in the world to have them just ignored or "knowing" misinformation. |
|
Quoted: There have been a LOT of comments in that direction. Mentioning Area of the Earth which is Not explored, with ocean being 95% unknown, most of Antarctica for example (not much for public info but odd meetings there). Several are tagged "UUO"s for Unknown Underwater Objects and there's an acronym for craft that have been seen underwater, in atmosphere and in near Earth space as well. Note: The stuff below is conglomerated from several other threads in this forum which go into a lot of detail for each bit. Lue has really emphasized the "what we don't even know on Earth" aspect in addition to a Spiritual/ "phase space" / paranormal aspect where not all craft match one classification and some match parts of a couple classifications. Some people will associate disclosure with starting to go to church, and some going to church will stop attending once the disclosure happens. Lue says the population of Earth would be "Somber" for a few weeks, implying something striking to the heart of what we know as reality. Everything now has been waiting on the rest of the world to give the "OK" to go public since it's private sector controlled (Rumored under 150 people on the "OK list" of the private dozen or so "gatekeepers" outside .gov control or even influence. Some say as few as 50 people now have full access after deaths of people that were "in" from 50s-90s and not replaced, plus some possibly removed for suspected leaks, just keeping "in pool" down in manageable numbers. There are craploads of private $$$ invested worldwide they don't want to cut off that gravy train or lose control of the tech and we're left with only the few tidbits that are shared. The next two paragraphs will make better sense if the 15 page Wilson Memo is read and you've watched all of the Lue Elizondo interviews and statements made. The latest confirmation of discussions about UAP/UFO seem to have put all of that information into a private commercial company and the typical .gov person is not cleared to learn much about it. Not even the president can look at it since it isn't classified in the traditional way, it's put under a SAP (Special Access Program) which includes some .gov but mostly private company leaders deciding who gets in and who is out. Leaning toward Lockheed Martin and SkunkWorks as my guess. Lue stated that the technology was acquired by the .gov but then given only to one aerospace company and not the others when contracts were put out for bids, one company had a huge boost in tech unknown to others. Take that bit of info, the confirmation of that info in the Wilson memos and Lockheed acquired Boeing who acquired McDdonnell Douglas. The F117, F22, and F35 have all been LockMart's babies when the acquisitions are all added together, there's only one Aerospace company around yet, Boeing has the traditional aircraft design and LockMart does the military or something like that. Add in the timeline of this SAP program starting in the 80s where they put the private sector security access on it and the sudden changes in aircraft company profits and acquisitions and to me it screams "LockMart". Things are going slow, but comparing the last 5 years with the 40 years prior to that things are going along at a pretty good clip, though it seems geological time while waiting day to day/week to week for the next paper published, meeting announced, or interview given. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/41058/Horizontal-Line-PNG-Image-1036306.png --ETA: Adding this which is another article talking about "The Gatekeepers" being like Skull and Bones secret club sort of group which has managed to be transferred out of a US .gov controlled SAP to prevent congress/president and anybody else they don't trust from seeing more than very basic/simple info which had portions previously leaked anyway. There's a "Secret Society" in the Pentagon Hiding UFO Secrets, Officials Say Remember the interview where Lue said it will take several congressional and senate hearings to get anywhere, or at least get a large portion of it kicked open to scholars and engineers to review while maintaining secrecy, they refuse to let go of their total control of the topic and manipulate the media, the .gov/.mil, and all the proles in the world to have them just ignored or "knowing" misinformation. View Quote You have written up the best summary of the most current working theory on what’s going on I’ve seen. Having watched most all of Lue’s interviews, Read the Wilson report, and other related items, I agree with your summary 100%. The big question is now, “what are they?” From clues and reading between the lines, it sounds like they are either partially, or somewhat, in control of humanity on a macro level. The religious comments seem to point to “them” either being the source of much of our religions, OR, something so dire that we will need to turn to God to for help. |
|
So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this-
This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! |
|
Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! View Quote The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. |
|
Quoted: The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. View Quote Good observation. Do you know if this is a common theme of underwater objects/ UUO i think as a poster called it? |
|
Quoted: The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. |
|
Quoted: Good observation. Do you know if this is a common theme of underwater objects/ UUO i think as a poster called it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. Good observation. Do you know if this is a common theme of underwater objects/ UUO i think as a poster called it? I don’t know much about USO to be honest. Mostly it’s reports of “something” with lights underwater and flying out and into space, or the opposite. The cigar shape is pretty great for underwater movement, like our subs and torpedos. |
|
Quoted: They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. |
|
Quoted: Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. |
|
Quoted: We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. |
|
Quoted: I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. Sure. I haven't really kept track of such things since I got laid off way too long ago, so anything is possible. It's pretty much gotta be Lockheed, or it's someone none of us have heard of. I mean, who else is there? |
|
Quoted: Sure. I haven't really kept track of such things since I got laid off way too long ago, so anything is possible. It's pretty much gotta be Lockheed, or it's someone none of us have heard of. I mean, who else is there? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. Sure. I haven't really kept track of such things since I got laid off way too long ago, so anything is possible. It's pretty much gotta be Lockheed, or it's someone none of us have heard of. I mean, who else is there? That's kind of where I'm at. Everybody else has been bought out and kept as subsidiaries or merged. Unless there is something more advanced than skunkworks which is extremely well hidden and the whole Area 51 is just a distraction from where the invisible super company is doing its thing. Back in WWII/Korea/Vietnam there were several aircraft companies, then they all merged bit by bit. I'm guessing Raytheon has more than a finger in that pool as well as they're nearly exclusive providers of electronic/satellite/avionic systems and aircraft and ship accessories like missiles. It could just take one thing to step far ahead where looking at it says "oh, that's obvious how it works" but prior to knowing it could be done and doing it the first time seemed impossible. Similar to how hard drive densities have gone 100x higher capacity and IC density than thought possible in the 80s due to feature size and using tunneling and optical principles to get "over the hump" of each false peak. As far as secrets, this is covered in "Behold, A Pale Horse" (thread in this forum on that) stated that the F117 was designed and created in the late 60s / early 70s and there were NO leaks regarding it until it was disclosed after one was shot down in the Balkans/Kosovo war/"police action" in the late 80s. That completely kills the age old argument of "no way something hundreds of people are in on could be kept perfectly secret - somebody would talk" (mostly used when saying there's now way the whole crew of a ship could keep any secrets). It does, however, explain some of the UFO sightings, so Project Blue Book was made to 'prove' it's all illusions or swamp gas just to keep the public from guessing it - call them kooks instead. The biggest thing in engineering something new is simply Knowing something is possible. Companies won't waste time and money on something they think is impossible or a pipe dream dead end. Once they do know something can be done, then billions are dumped into it and the tech explodes, smart phones, for example regarding circuit density and low power CPUs/and very high capacity yet small long lasting batteries. |
|
|
Quoted: Some claim the B-2 uses alien technolgy https://discover.hubpages.com/politics/How-The-B2-Bomber-Is-Actually-Powered-By-Electrogravitics#:~:text=The%20B2%20Stealth%20Bomber%20uses%20it's%20jet%20engines,charged%20with%20negative%20electrons%20to%20create%20gravitational%20repulsion View Quote I forgot about them. The US DoD blocked the Lockheed/Northrop Merger in the 90s. I thought it had gone through. |
|
Quoted: I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. They could breathe a much denser liquid gas, and the pressure at the bottom of our oceans is much more comfortable to them. Very well could be. Or maybe they are native to our ocean floor. Perhaps they live near thermal vents and fissures. It’s theorized that toolmaking requires fire, which you cant get underwater… but you do find heat sources that could be used to smelt metals. There are more resources under the sea than on land too. Plus, the deep oceans could see little impact from mass extinction events, so life has probably been going uninterrupted for 500+ million years. Who knows what’s really down there. We sure don't. LOL. Know what's down there, I mean. The ocean floor is as unexplored as space at this point. Still, I've read the conjecture that no matter how smart a dolphin or octopus seems, they or any other aquatic species would never get advanced enough to do these things. It's a fairly compelling argument. It's much easier to accept that whatever it is uses the oceans as a near-perfect hiding spot, since we rarely bother looking there in any seriousness. If I believed. Don't get me wrong, I know there has to be life out there somewhere, I just think it's the height of human hubris to think we're important enough to visit. I hope I'm dead wrong. Unless this is all just a simulation, empty universe is empty because they haven't programmed in aliens yet, what we are seeing are glimpses of the programmers, and when you "die" you get to go up to "heaven," the next level of the program. It explains so much. As far as Lockheed being the gatekeepers, it certainly has nothing to do with the F-22 or F-35. I built 9 of the first 11 F-22 prototypes, and it's good old fashioned titanium (that I think we were getting from Russia ) and carbon composite that was being laid up on machines in another part of the building and baked in ovens large enough to fit a 747 fuselage in, with bits and pieces of aluminum and other traditional materials thrown in where weight was a factor but strength wasn't. No alien tach that I saw. Still a cool-as-hell plane though. I wasn't implying the F22 and others were alien tech, just that Lockheed seems to be the only one coming up with wicked new designs and has Skunk works while Boeing and others didn't/couldn't/wouldn't have their own secret development site away from prying eyes. Lue said in a couple interviews that "technology and methods were given to only one aerospace company and kept secret from all the others". Boeing is/has been developing, building, and selling tens of thousands of 7xx passenger aircraft but not turning anything like the profit that Lockheed has done over same time frame despite much lower volume of aircraft production, even getting bought out by their own stock. Add in the Wilson Memo which was submitted leaked and very recently declassified, speaks directly to a Private aerospace company holds the keys to the majority of the UFO info (not even Pentagon has full access) and Lockheed is just my guess as to which company that is. Ben Rich: We now have the technology to take ET home - Sirius Documentary scene |
|
Quoted: As far as secrets, this is covered in "Behold, A Pale Horse" (thread in this forum on that) stated that the F117 was designed and created in the late 60s / early 70s and there were NO leaks regarding it until it was disclosed after one was shot down in the Balkans/Kosovo war/"police action" in the late 80s. That completely kills the age old argument of "no way something hundreds of people are in on could be kept perfectly secret - somebody would talk" (mostly used when saying there's now way the whole crew of a ship could keep any secrets). View Quote I'm with you for most of that, but the nighthawk was actually shot down in 1999, and publicly revealed in 1990. |
|
Quoted: I'm with you for most of that, but the nighthawk was actually shot down in 1999, and publicly revealed in 1990. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As far as secrets, this is covered in "Behold, A Pale Horse" (thread in this forum on that) stated that the F117 was designed and created in the late 60s / early 70s and there were NO leaks regarding it until it was disclosed after one was shot down in the Balkans/Kosovo war/"police action" in the late 80s. That completely kills the age old argument of "no way something hundreds of people are in on could be kept perfectly secret - somebody would talk" (mostly used when saying there's now way the whole crew of a ship could keep any secrets). I'm with you for most of that, but the nighthawk was actually shot down in 1999, and publicly revealed in 1990. Sign of getting old, when things 10 years apart seem to have happened right almost the same day. |
|
Quoted: Some claim the B-2 uses alien technolgy https://discover.hubpages.com/politics/How-The-B2-Bomber-Is-Actually-Powered-By-Electrogravitics#:~:text=The%20B2%20Stealth%20Bomber%20uses%20it's%20jet%20engines,charged%20with%20negative%20electrons%20to%20create%20gravitational%20repulsion View Quote I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. |
|
Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. Again, I'm not saying alien technology in our aircraft. It revolves around the company spoken about in the recently declassified (formerly only leaked) Wilson Memos Lockheed is mentioned by Name on Page 5 "Lockheed slides" in some Vegas meeting, and on Page 8 "Private Aerospace company has complete control of access, won't name them — Core Secret" Reading the whole 15 pages will help get a lot of people on the same page. These were submitted as evidence and thus declassified in the recent UAP congressional hearings. The Memos even say not Pentagon/President/Congress have full access to their info anymore, and the very VERY narrow slit which fits "Need to Know" for the TS/SCI SAP (Top Secret / Secure Compartmentalized Information / Special Access Program) access privileges of any sort. It is known that Obama sold Several SAP programs to global highest bidders, and also domestic by getting around 4th Amendment by "buying" Google profile data and then mixing and matching with NSA/FBI information to have dirt on Anybody. Nobody can pass a full FISA Check with the 3 degrees rule and be found clean. Everybody inadvertently breaks laws, often while trying to follow other laws. Nobody actually knows how many laws we have, so it's easy to have a nation of criminals to blackmail and frame / plant whatever evidence they'd like Source on SAP TS/SCI leaks in event of living under rock (aka tiny portion RussiaGate, the actual damage and loss of civilian control of .gov is far, FAR worse, especially now that private companies have all the dirt on everybody which is shared back to the .gov). Example of the Google private data.. FBI wants to hassle somebody, they look at their FISA database and pick something at Random, then have it leaked to the New York Times, who then publishes and article on it, at which point InstaTwitFaceoogle and rest of tech then share their supporting evidence with the FBI who then use it to leak more and net/release others based on cooperation or not. It's a self licking ice cream cone, and when there is ZERO oversight as we see in the "UFO Department/AATIP/et al", you can be damn sure it's abused as much or worse for selling super tiny little secrets/details. So it's not about the tech in various craft, though the fuel movement in B2 is a cool tidbit, IIRC, SR71 had something similar scooting fuel around to maintain trim due to the rate it burned fuel, while the B2 might be using it to "un-trim" the craft, so similar concept opposite purpose. In a nutshell, here in UFO forum on first page, we have videos, documents, and all that, we don't have any 100% definite answers, but we're getting a good idea of the rough shape the truth might be, or at least some solid examples of what doesn't fit in with things known. We know a lot more of what was BS than we did 4 years ago. Most of us don't agree on what our favorite working theories are. I don't know of anybody that "is certain of the truth", except for the people absolutely positive it's all BS. There was a video posted just above which I think came closest to what is hinted at regarding ESP - "All of Time and Space are connected" regarding the ability to "bring ET home". That video is just above, in This Post |
|
Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. Until recently, I had a hard time with the Wilson Memo and it’s implications because I have a lifelong career in technology. I’ve seen clear chains of incremental advances over decades. Billions of man hours, millions of tiny innovations. The patent office is a shrine to American ingenuity. I think, if it’s true, that alien tech isn’t being used, but it’s the inspiration for the human advances. A lot of people will credit science fiction ideas, especially Trek and Foundation, for giving them ideas and motivation to create our modern world and it’s technology. Perhaps much of what alien tech really is just seeing it, and the guy mentions at the next engineering meeting “what if we could do ______”, and then the wheels turn to make it happen. A wellspring of ideas. Or… if the future humans theory is true… perhaps a recovered craft has computers that are accessible by contemporary people. Maybe it has a database of the patent office for the next thousand years. |
|
Quoted: Until recently, I had a hard time with the Wilson Memo and it’s implications because I have a lifelong career in technology. I’ve seen clear chains of incremental advances over decades. Billions of man hours, millions of tiny innovations. The patent office is a shrine to American ingenuity. I think, if it’s true, that alien tech isn’t being used, but it’s the inspiration for the human advances. A lot of people will credit science fiction ideas, especially Trek and Foundation, for giving them ideas and motivation to create our modern world and it’s technology. Perhaps much of what alien tech really is just seeing it, and the guy mentions at the next engineering meeting “what if we could do ______”, and then the wheels turn to make it happen. A wellspring of ideas. Or… if the future humans theory is true… perhaps a recovered craft has computers that are accessible by contemporary people. Maybe it has a database of the patent office for the next thousand years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. Until recently, I had a hard time with the Wilson Memo and it’s implications because I have a lifelong career in technology. I’ve seen clear chains of incremental advances over decades. Billions of man hours, millions of tiny innovations. The patent office is a shrine to American ingenuity. I think, if it’s true, that alien tech isn’t being used, but it’s the inspiration for the human advances. A lot of people will credit science fiction ideas, especially Trek and Foundation, for giving them ideas and motivation to create our modern world and it’s technology. Perhaps much of what alien tech really is just seeing it, and the guy mentions at the next engineering meeting “what if we could do ______”, and then the wheels turn to make it happen. A wellspring of ideas. Or… if the future humans theory is true… perhaps a recovered craft has computers that are accessible by contemporary people. Maybe it has a database of the patent office for the next thousand years. I'll never say anything is impossible, because it likely isn't. But, I like to err on the side of caution. Literally every mainstream scientist you encounter will tell you that travelling at or faster than C isn't possible. At a certain point, you have to believe the math and science...or you don't. Then you delve into the realm of speculation, fiction, and the like. It's not really any different than religious belief. Belief can never be proven or disproven when it comes to God, because if God wants to, they can keep the knowledge from you. They're omnipotent after all. Aliens just replace God in this statement. You can't prove or disprove aliens, because...technology. They won't let you. Until we have an alien ship hovering over the city blowing up buildings, or opening up to reveal and share the secrets of the universe, I'll choose to stick with currently known science. Unfortunately, currently known science has a contradiction in it...the Fermi paradox butts up against the rest of everything. That's why it's called a paradox. Science tells us that we should see aliens everywhere due to the size and composition of the universe, and simultaneously tells us FTL, or anything even close to it, is likely impossible, meaning we'll never see aliens because they can never get here (nor can we ever get there). Or they have to be so unbelievably advanced as to be incomprehensible, indistinguishable from gods. At which point, it just becomes belief instead of fact again. I joke about the universe being a simulation, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. It explains all of the problems in physics, religion, etc. The reason I think it's NOT the case is how neatly it explains it all. Too neatly. Which just brings me around full circle, back to a state of unknowing. In such a state, the only thing that rectifies the situation is actual PROOF. Not speculation, not belief, not even what some claim is evidence. PROOF. An alien spacecraft hovering over a city, that I can view with my own eyes, my own mind, the best interpretation of reality I can get. Or, one of the Devs/Gods showing up and confirming it's all a simulation. Something I can grab onto, hold onto. I suppose this is my failing in the end. I want to believe in things, but...I don't. Not without direct, definitive proof. I can perform any number of experiments in a variety of fields and come up with those definitive answers. Everything else is just speculation and belief. I won't criticize someone for that, I just won't join in. |
|
Quoted: I'll never say anything is impossible, because it likely isn't. But, I like to err on the side of caution. Literally every mainstream scientist you encounter will tell you that travelling at or faster than C isn't possible. At a certain point, you have to believe the math and science...or you don't. Then you delve into the realm of speculation, fiction, and the like. It's not really any different than religious belief. Belief can never be proven or disproven when it comes to God, because if God wants to, they can keep the knowledge from you. They're omnipotent after all. Aliens just replace God in this statement. You can't prove or disprove aliens, because...technology. They won't let you. Until we have an alien ship hovering over the city blowing up buildings, or opening up to reveal and share the secrets of the universe, I'll choose to stick with currently known science. Unfortunately, currently known science has a contradiction in it...the Fermi paradox butts up against the rest of everything. That's why it's called a paradox. Science tells us that we should see aliens everywhere due to the size and composition of the universe, and simultaneously tells us FTL, or anything even close to it, is likely impossible, meaning we'll never see aliens because they can never get here (nor can we ever get there). Or they have to be so unbelievably advanced as to be incomprehensible, indistinguishable from gods. At which point, it just becomes belief instead of fact again. I joke about the universe being a simulation, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. It explains all of the problems in physics, religion, etc. The reason I think it's NOT the case is how neatly it explains it all. Too neatly. Which just brings me around full circle, back to a state of unknowing. In such a state, the only thing that rectifies the situation is actual PROOF. Not speculation, not belief, not even what some claim is evidence. PROOF. An alien spacecraft hovering over a city, that I can view with my own eyes, my own mind, the best interpretation of reality I can get. Or, one of the Devs/Gods showing up and confirming it's all a simulation. Something I can grab onto, hold onto. I suppose this is my failing in the end. I want to believe in things, but...I don't. Not without direct, definitive proof. I can perform any number of experiments in a variety of fields and come up with those definitive answers. Everything else is just speculation and belief. I won't criticize someone for that, I just won't join in. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. Until recently, I had a hard time with the Wilson Memo and it’s implications because I have a lifelong career in technology. I’ve seen clear chains of incremental advances over decades. Billions of man hours, millions of tiny innovations. The patent office is a shrine to American ingenuity. I think, if it’s true, that alien tech isn’t being used, but it’s the inspiration for the human advances. A lot of people will credit science fiction ideas, especially Trek and Foundation, for giving them ideas and motivation to create our modern world and it’s technology. Perhaps much of what alien tech really is just seeing it, and the guy mentions at the next engineering meeting “what if we could do ______”, and then the wheels turn to make it happen. A wellspring of ideas. Or… if the future humans theory is true… perhaps a recovered craft has computers that are accessible by contemporary people. Maybe it has a database of the patent office for the next thousand years. I'll never say anything is impossible, because it likely isn't. But, I like to err on the side of caution. Literally every mainstream scientist you encounter will tell you that travelling at or faster than C isn't possible. At a certain point, you have to believe the math and science...or you don't. Then you delve into the realm of speculation, fiction, and the like. It's not really any different than religious belief. Belief can never be proven or disproven when it comes to God, because if God wants to, they can keep the knowledge from you. They're omnipotent after all. Aliens just replace God in this statement. You can't prove or disprove aliens, because...technology. They won't let you. Until we have an alien ship hovering over the city blowing up buildings, or opening up to reveal and share the secrets of the universe, I'll choose to stick with currently known science. Unfortunately, currently known science has a contradiction in it...the Fermi paradox butts up against the rest of everything. That's why it's called a paradox. Science tells us that we should see aliens everywhere due to the size and composition of the universe, and simultaneously tells us FTL, or anything even close to it, is likely impossible, meaning we'll never see aliens because they can never get here (nor can we ever get there). Or they have to be so unbelievably advanced as to be incomprehensible, indistinguishable from gods. At which point, it just becomes belief instead of fact again. I joke about the universe being a simulation, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. It explains all of the problems in physics, religion, etc. The reason I think it's NOT the case is how neatly it explains it all. Too neatly. Which just brings me around full circle, back to a state of unknowing. In such a state, the only thing that rectifies the situation is actual PROOF. Not speculation, not belief, not even what some claim is evidence. PROOF. An alien spacecraft hovering over a city, that I can view with my own eyes, my own mind, the best interpretation of reality I can get. Or, one of the Devs/Gods showing up and confirming it's all a simulation. Something I can grab onto, hold onto. I suppose this is my failing in the end. I want to believe in things, but...I don't. Not without direct, definitive proof. I can perform any number of experiments in a variety of fields and come up with those definitive answers. Everything else is just speculation and belief. I won't criticize someone for that, I just won't join in. Proof of what? This thread is about a slideshow. Others are about interviews and some are about books. All have some explainable facets and some strange ones. It's broadening of horizons. As far as aliens, even several in the UFO sector have said that UFO's are NOT alien, but they aren't from man's Earth , either. It's like working on crossword or Sudoku puzzles to piece together what might be being stated or maybe not. Learning more tidbits of science about everything from paranormal psychology to abnormal psych to aerospace technology and professional pilots recounting their stories of encounters, a few with imagery taken directly off aircraft FLIR and visible Imagery recordings. We don't know, there's no proof needed to say "this is all interesting information but we still don't know what much of it means". The Wilson Memos are proof that activity regarding some technology of unknown/unstated origin is compartmentalized at levels where elected .gov officials aren't allowed access to that info. That doesn't mean aliens or anything else, it does show another shiny spot of the corruption polish all over our .gov, however. A few years ago, those same pages were "fake document leaks". Suddenly, that has been shown to be the exact opposite of the truth. If wanting instant incontrovertible proof of Aliens (or whatever you feel conversation is about), and something which can't be looked at the way "Natural Philosophers" would have seen things 500 years ago, with the greats of Maxwell and Newton, just stay in GD and ignore this entire forum as nothing presented is anything you'll accept. Locking on and going after a single detail in a thread to show "it is absolutely wrong" is a bit pointless when nobody is really saying "it is absolutely right", more of a "its been suggested" level of certainty. Especially when new documents are filed in hearings and then opened to the public, several of which give information entirely different than what we were told on that same topic a decade ago. Which to believe? All of them, just keep piecing together and that's what makes up the chat in this forum. There's no "this is right so everything else is wrong", as we don't have any clue exactly what characteristic we're talking about on a topic or if they're related and assumptions are made. Just having them documented to look through later is a goal in and of itself. |
|
Quoted: The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. You know else was cylindrical? The space craft that came looking for the whales in Star Trek 4….. What’d they know? |
|
Quoted: You know else was cylindrical? The space craft that came looking for the whales in Star Trek 4….. What’d they know? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So, @sq40, I have an interesting thought about this- This thing that they got pictures of? Sure looks a LOT like the artist renditions of Oumaumau, doesnt it? This is the first time I have heard of this sighting/ seen pictures of, but couldnt help but think that I have seen this before. Then, thinking on it, I realized where I have seen it , or at least something as similar. Oumaumau, that “astroid” that slowed as it got near Earth then sped up after ! The cigar shape has been one of the most common UFOs ever reported. Really that’s what the tictac is, cigar shaped, but white instead of black or gray. Oumaumau also appeared to have been a large cigar shape too. What I find telling is this. The cigar shape is a pressure vessel. We use the same engineering and math to build cylinders to hold liquid gasses in our atmosphere where they would boil off. A home propane tank is a perfect example. If you wanted to transport a liquid medium through low pressure, like atmosphere or space, that shape is perfect. You know else was cylindrical? The space craft that came looking for the whales in Star Trek 4….. What’d they know? Interestingly, Star Trek IV was a bit of a watershed moment in using popular culture science fiction to drive a real world result. Save the Whales got an enormous boost in world support, and blue whales now thriving. https://splinternews.com/30-years-ago-star-trek-predicted-that-humpback-whales-1793861752 It’s not inconceivable that the film was also used to broadly introduce the idea that there is intelligent life in the sea, that may have a relationship with visiting alien species. |
|
Quoted: Proof of what? This thread is about a slideshow. Others are about interviews and some are about books. All have some explainable facets and some strange ones. It's broadening of horizons. As far as aliens, even several in the UFO sector have said that UFO's are NOT alien, but they aren't from man's Earth , either. It's like working on crossword or Sudoku puzzles to piece together what might be being stated or maybe not. Learning more tidbits of science about everything from paranormal psychology to abnormal psych to aerospace technology and professional pilots recounting their stories of encounters, a few with imagery taken directly off aircraft FLIR and visible Imagery recordings. We don't know, there's no proof needed to say "this is all interesting information but we still don't know what much of it means". The Wilson Memos are proof that activity regarding some technology of unknown/unstated origin is compartmentalized at levels where elected .gov officials aren't allowed access to that info. That doesn't mean aliens or anything else, it does show another shiny spot of the corruption polish all over our .gov, however. A few years ago, those same pages were "fake document leaks". Suddenly, that has been shown to be the exact opposite of the truth. If wanting instant incontrovertible proof of Aliens (or whatever you feel conversation is about), and something which can't be looked at the way "Natural Philosophers" would have seen things 500 years ago, with the greats of Maxwell and Newton, just stay in GD and ignore this entire forum as nothing presented is anything you'll accept. Locking on and going after a single detail in a thread to show "it is absolutely wrong" is a bit pointless when nobody is really saying "it is absolutely right", more of a "its been suggested" level of certainty. Especially when new documents are filed in hearings and then opened to the public, several of which give information entirely different than what we were told on that same topic a decade ago. Which to believe? All of them, just keep piecing together and that's what makes up the chat in this forum. There's no "this is right so everything else is wrong", as we don't have any clue exactly what characteristic we're talking about on a topic or if they're related and assumptions are made. Just having them documented to look through later is a goal in and of itself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I heard a lot of stories about the B-2 from the people who had worked on it, then been moved over to the F-22 due to their experience. No one mentioned alien tech. On the other hand, they told me cool stories like this: did you know, the way the B-2 supposedly turns while in stealth "mode," when it can't use control surfaces or it will compromise it's stealth characteristics, is by moving fuel? It has three massive pumps in the fuselage that move the fuel from one wing to the other to alter the center of gravity and make the plane turn. Then it's pumped back and levelled out. Supposedly. I'm not sure if that's common knowledge in this day and age, or just some tale spun by a co-worker telling it to hide the fact he worked with alien tech. In any event, I thought it was a "cool as hell" factoid. Nothing that I've ever seen about the F-117, F-22, F-35, or B-2 indicates alien tech to me. Good old-fashioned American know-how, applied science, applied theory, and test-and-see knowledge. How do we make out composite lay-up process better? Does this coating absorb radar better than that one? How far can we make the radar see without giving away our own position? How fast can we shit all the smart missiles out of the rotary racks so we don't get seen doing it? It's not alien tech. It's hard fucking work by people. I honestly get a little offended by Ancient Aliens nonsense that humans have never achieved anything on their own, that it's all aliens. It gets annoying. Until recently, I had a hard time with the Wilson Memo and it’s implications because I have a lifelong career in technology. I’ve seen clear chains of incremental advances over decades. Billions of man hours, millions of tiny innovations. The patent office is a shrine to American ingenuity. I think, if it’s true, that alien tech isn’t being used, but it’s the inspiration for the human advances. A lot of people will credit science fiction ideas, especially Trek and Foundation, for giving them ideas and motivation to create our modern world and it’s technology. Perhaps much of what alien tech really is just seeing it, and the guy mentions at the next engineering meeting “what if we could do ______”, and then the wheels turn to make it happen. A wellspring of ideas. Or… if the future humans theory is true… perhaps a recovered craft has computers that are accessible by contemporary people. Maybe it has a database of the patent office for the next thousand years. I'll never say anything is impossible, because it likely isn't. But, I like to err on the side of caution. Literally every mainstream scientist you encounter will tell you that travelling at or faster than C isn't possible. At a certain point, you have to believe the math and science...or you don't. Then you delve into the realm of speculation, fiction, and the like. It's not really any different than religious belief. Belief can never be proven or disproven when it comes to God, because if God wants to, they can keep the knowledge from you. They're omnipotent after all. Aliens just replace God in this statement. You can't prove or disprove aliens, because...technology. They won't let you. Until we have an alien ship hovering over the city blowing up buildings, or opening up to reveal and share the secrets of the universe, I'll choose to stick with currently known science. Unfortunately, currently known science has a contradiction in it...the Fermi paradox butts up against the rest of everything. That's why it's called a paradox. Science tells us that we should see aliens everywhere due to the size and composition of the universe, and simultaneously tells us FTL, or anything even close to it, is likely impossible, meaning we'll never see aliens because they can never get here (nor can we ever get there). Or they have to be so unbelievably advanced as to be incomprehensible, indistinguishable from gods. At which point, it just becomes belief instead of fact again. I joke about the universe being a simulation, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. It explains all of the problems in physics, religion, etc. The reason I think it's NOT the case is how neatly it explains it all. Too neatly. Which just brings me around full circle, back to a state of unknowing. In such a state, the only thing that rectifies the situation is actual PROOF. Not speculation, not belief, not even what some claim is evidence. PROOF. An alien spacecraft hovering over a city, that I can view with my own eyes, my own mind, the best interpretation of reality I can get. Or, one of the Devs/Gods showing up and confirming it's all a simulation. Something I can grab onto, hold onto. I suppose this is my failing in the end. I want to believe in things, but...I don't. Not without direct, definitive proof. I can perform any number of experiments in a variety of fields and come up with those definitive answers. Everything else is just speculation and belief. I won't criticize someone for that, I just won't join in. Proof of what? This thread is about a slideshow. Others are about interviews and some are about books. All have some explainable facets and some strange ones. It's broadening of horizons. As far as aliens, even several in the UFO sector have said that UFO's are NOT alien, but they aren't from man's Earth , either. It's like working on crossword or Sudoku puzzles to piece together what might be being stated or maybe not. Learning more tidbits of science about everything from paranormal psychology to abnormal psych to aerospace technology and professional pilots recounting their stories of encounters, a few with imagery taken directly off aircraft FLIR and visible Imagery recordings. We don't know, there's no proof needed to say "this is all interesting information but we still don't know what much of it means". The Wilson Memos are proof that activity regarding some technology of unknown/unstated origin is compartmentalized at levels where elected .gov officials aren't allowed access to that info. That doesn't mean aliens or anything else, it does show another shiny spot of the corruption polish all over our .gov, however. A few years ago, those same pages were "fake document leaks". Suddenly, that has been shown to be the exact opposite of the truth. If wanting instant incontrovertible proof of Aliens (or whatever you feel conversation is about), and something which can't be looked at the way "Natural Philosophers" would have seen things 500 years ago, with the greats of Maxwell and Newton, just stay in GD and ignore this entire forum as nothing presented is anything you'll accept. Locking on and going after a single detail in a thread to show "it is absolutely wrong" is a bit pointless when nobody is really saying "it is absolutely right", more of a "its been suggested" level of certainty. Especially when new documents are filed in hearings and then opened to the public, several of which give information entirely different than what we were told on that same topic a decade ago. Which to believe? All of them, just keep piecing together and that's what makes up the chat in this forum. There's no "this is right so everything else is wrong", as we don't have any clue exactly what characteristic we're talking about on a topic or if they're related and assumptions are made. Just having them documented to look through later is a goal in and of itself. I'm aware my mindset isn't ideal for these sorts of topics. As I said, it's likely my failing. I still find them interesting, which is why I wander in here from time to time. |
|
|
|
View Quote Doubtful. There is a group of people interested in the "Nazi Bell". There is a whole theory of a "Breakway Civilization" which occurred in the same timeframe as US Operation Paperclip, where all the Tech and "Aryan Race" (some suppose they were 'aliens' which propelled German Tech in the early and mid 20th Century until their facilities were bombed to oblivion) spread to South America and Antarctica and continued development but stayed isolated and peaceful from the rest of the world. Little outside the topic of this thread though, there's several websites on it with different variations on the same theme. One site covering a bit of it Another site related to the "bell" itself Theories of what the UFOs and all the other stuff might have in common which includes a breakway civilization. It gets pretty fringe really quick on those sites, so suspend disbelief before clicking. |
|
When you think about advanced technology, it’s really interesting how much effort, how many people, the resources it takes to even create a modern $200 microprocessor.
This Intel Fab tour is a great way to see just how much goes into our consumer technology. Thinking of a breakaway civilization, and what they would have to do to even parallel our modern tech is mind blowing. I Can Die Now. - Intel Fab Tour! |
|
Quoted: Doubtful. There is a group of people interested in the "Nazi Bell". https://i.imgur.com/44Aq0g0.jpg There is a whole theory of a "Breakway Civilization" which occurred in the same timeframe as US Operation Paperclip, where all the Tech and "Aryan Race" (some suppose they were 'aliens' which propelled German Tech in the early and mid 20th Century until their facilities were bombed to oblivion) spread to South America and Antarctica and continued development but stayed isolated and peaceful from the rest of the world. Little outside the topic of this thread though, there's several websites on it with different variations on the same theme. One site covering a bit of it Another site related to the "bell" itself Theories of what the UFOs and all the other stuff might have in common which includes a breakway civilization. It gets pretty fringe really quick on those sites, so suspend disbelief before clicking. View Quote That Burning Blogger article is really interesting. Richard Dolan is a big proponent of the Breakaway Civilization theory and has a lot of good videos on the topic. I can't really buy into it, but it is an interesting possibility, maybe on a smaller scale than what is claimed I could see. Also Harbinson's novel Genesis is an interesting take on the subject. |
|
Quoted: Doubtful. There is a group of people interested in the "Nazi Bell". https://i.imgur.com/44Aq0g0.jpg There is a whole theory of a "Breakway Civilization" which occurred in the same timeframe as US Operation Paperclip, where all the Tech and "Aryan Race" (some suppose they were 'aliens' which propelled German Tech in the early and mid 20th Century until their facilities were bombed to oblivion) spread to South America and Antarctica and continued development but stayed isolated and peaceful from the rest of the world. Little outside the topic of this thread though, there's several websites on it with different variations on the same theme. One site covering a bit of it Another site related to the "bell" itself Theories of what the UFOs and all the other stuff might have in common which includes a breakway civilization. It gets pretty fringe really quick on those sites, so suspend disbelief before clicking. View Quote Interesting. Never heard about that bell before or the ancient Indian poems describing something similar. Makes one wonder if those ocean diving craft at the top of the thread are harvesting mercury for fuel. They can have all they want, it just ends up in the fish we eat. |
|
Quoted: That Burning Blogger article is really interesting. Richard Dolan is a big proponent of the Breakaway Civilization theory and has a lot of good videos on the topic. I can't really buy into it, but it is an interesting possibility, maybe on a smaller scale than what is claimed I could see. Also Harbinson's novel Genesis is an interesting take on the subject. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Doubtful. There is a group of people interested in the "Nazi Bell". https://i.imgur.com/44Aq0g0.jpg There is a whole theory of a "Breakway Civilization" which occurred in the same timeframe as US Operation Paperclip, where all the Tech and "Aryan Race" (some suppose they were 'aliens' which propelled German Tech in the early and mid 20th Century until their facilities were bombed to oblivion) spread to South America and Antarctica and continued development but stayed isolated and peaceful from the rest of the world. Little outside the topic of this thread though, there's several websites on it with different variations on the same theme. One site covering a bit of it Another site related to the "bell" itself Theories of what the UFOs and all the other stuff might have in common which includes a breakway civilization. It gets pretty fringe really quick on those sites, so suspend disbelief before clicking. That Burning Blogger article is really interesting. Richard Dolan is a big proponent of the Breakaway Civilization theory and has a lot of good videos on the topic. I can't really buy into it, but it is an interesting possibility, maybe on a smaller scale than what is claimed I could see. Also Harbinson's novel Genesis is an interesting take on the subject. I like Graham Hancock’s take that there was advanced (iron age or pre industrial Revolution) civilization that was wiped away during the Younger Dryas Event, Joe Rogan Experience #1284 - Graham Hancock Richard Cassaro backs that up with his study of Triptych Architecture and how virtually every religion on Earth has a common root that predates the Younger Dryas event. Failed To Load Title Putting them together, it paints a picture that there was a globalized civilization prior to about 12,500 years ago. A likely commentary impact put us back to the stone age. |
|
View Quote Ok, that is an awesome image. Has the Smithsonian put toghether their Horton or is this something else? My Google fu is failing me and it's killing me, what is this from?? |
|
Quoted: I like Graham Hancock’s take that there was advanced (iron age or pre industrial Revolution) civilization that was wiped away during the Younger Dryas Event, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxmw9eizOAo Richard Cassaro backs that up with his study of Triptych Architecture and how virtually every religion on Earth has a common root that predates the Younger Dryas event. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZuK72eQGwA Putting them together, it paints a picture that there was a globalized civilization prior to about 12,500 years ago. A likely commentary impact put us back to the stone age. View Quote I think the revelations of the Younger Dryas event are really fascinating and really are starting to tie a lot of things together. Really makes for legitimacy of global flooding events and a total reset. I'm really finding the Gobleke Tepe and other current discoveries in that area interesting. I absolutely believe we have forgotten far more than we know. But... I don't claim to have any real understanding of any of it. |
|
Quoted: I think the revelations of the Younger Dryas event are really fascinating and really are starting to tie a lot of things together. Really makes for legitimacy of global flooding events and a total reset. I'm really finding the Gobleke Tepe and other current discoveries in that area interesting. I absolutely believe we have forgotten far more than we know. But... I don't claim to have any real understanding of any of it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I like Graham Hancock’s take that there was advanced (iron age or pre industrial Revolution) civilization that was wiped away during the Younger Dryas Event, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxmw9eizOAo Richard Cassaro backs that up with his study of Triptych Architecture and how virtually every religion on Earth has a common root that predates the Younger Dryas event. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZuK72eQGwA Putting them together, it paints a picture that there was a globalized civilization prior to about 12,500 years ago. A likely commentary impact put us back to the stone age. I think the revelations of the Younger Dryas event are really fascinating and really are starting to tie a lot of things together. Really makes for legitimacy of global flooding events and a total reset. I'm really finding the Gobleke Tepe and other current discoveries in that area interesting. I absolutely believe we have forgotten far more than we know. But... I don't claim to have any real understanding of any of it. It is fascinating, and as a former archaeologist who has watched form the sidelines as the long-term conventions are being overturned (by Gobekli Tepe and the similar site, K-something Tepe, for example), I've always thought it was perfectly plausible. It's just got one problem, it's not provable. It's super-convenient that this advanced culture thousands of years ago all lived entirely along the coasts, and were wiped off the map when sea levels rose 400 feet over a thousand years or so. So, any actual evidence would have been under hundreds of feet of water for thousands of years, and thus...gone. So, it enters the realm of the speculative. I'm just hoping these new, much more ancient sites showing reasonably advanced stonework and urban planning techniques by "hunter gatherers" over 12,000 years ago makes people take a good, hard look at things like Baalbek and the Sphinx. I've been to Egypt. Inside a couple pyramids. And some tombs. I've been in the Sphinx enclosure, ran my hands along it, touched it. Every picture I see of it just screams out "I'm older than everything around me! My head is way too small for my body! I used to have the head of a lion or a jackal, and after sitting here for thousands of years, newer people decided to build their sacred sites and pyramids next to me, and re-carved my weathered and unrecognizable head into their own face!" Yeah. Try saying that in the archaeological community. You get laughed at and lose your funding instantly. No, that's not why I'm no longer an archaeologist. They have zero imagination, and if you think you've ever seen a rigidly-controlled hierarchical structure in government, a corporation, a religion...let me tell you. They have NOTHING on archaeologists. |
|
Quoted: It is fascinating, and as a former archaeologist who has watched form the sidelines as the long-term conventions are being overturned (by Gobekli Tepe and the similar site, K-something Tepe, for example), I've always thought it was perfectly plausible. It's just got one problem, it's not provable. It's super-convenient that this advanced culture thousands of years ago all lived entirely along the coasts, and were wiped off the map when sea levels rose 400 feet over a thousand years or so. So, any actual evidence would have been under hundreds of feet of water for thousands of years, and thus...gone. So, it enters the realm of the speculative. I'm just hoping these new, much more ancient sites showing reasonably advanced stonework and urban planning techniques by "hunter gatherers" over 12,000 years ago makes people take a good, hard look at things like Baalbek and the Sphinx. I've been to Egypt. Inside a couple pyramids. And some tombs. I've been in the Sphinx enclosure, ran my hands along it, touched it. Every picture I see of it just screams out "I'm older than everything around me! My head is way too small for my body! I used to have the head of a lion or a jackal, and after sitting here for thousands of years, newer people decided to build their sacred sites and pyramids next to me, and re-carved my weathered and unrecognizable head into their own face!" Yeah. Try saying that in the archaeological community. You get laughed at and lose your funding instantly. No, that's not why I'm no longer an archaeologist. They have zero imagination, and if you think you've ever seen a rigidly-controlled hierarchical structure in government, a corporation, a religion...let me tell you. They have NOTHING on archaeologists. View Quote As an archeologist, have you seen Patterns Of Evidence: Exodus? If so, what’s your opinion on the proposed time shift to match Egyptian events? It’s free to watch here, https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/patterns-of-evidence-the-exodus-2015-1-1 |
|
Quoted: As an archeologist, have you seen Patterns Of Evidence: Exodus? If so, what’s your opinion on the proposed time shift to match Egyptian events? It’s free to watch here, https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/patterns-of-evidence-the-exodus-2015-1-1 View Quote I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma. |
|
Quoted: I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As an archeologist, have you seen Patterns Of Evidence: Exodus? If so, what’s your opinion on the proposed time shift to match Egyptian events? It’s free to watch here, https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/patterns-of-evidence-the-exodus-2015-1-1 I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma. That’s an interesting statement in a few ways. It’s easy to see how closed minded academia is on something like climate change. And how it’s an orthodoxy on disease now. I’m curious if there are some background forces, financially or politically, that make egyptology so off limits? (Ironically, That documentary was heavily funded by the Israeli government.) |
|
Quoted: I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma. View Quote
|
|
Quoted: That’s an interesting statement in a few ways. It’s easy to see how closed minded academia is on something like climate change. And how it’s an orthodoxy on disease now. I’m curious if there are some background forces, financially or politically, that make egyptology so off limits? (Ironically, That documentary was heavily funded by the Israeli government.) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As an archeologist, have you seen Patterns Of Evidence: Exodus? If so, what’s your opinion on the proposed time shift to match Egyptian events? It’s free to watch here, https://pluto.tv/on-demand/movies/patterns-of-evidence-the-exodus-2015-1-1 I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma. That’s an interesting statement in a few ways. It’s easy to see how closed minded academia is on something like climate change. And how it’s an orthodoxy on disease now. I’m curious if there are some background forces, financially or politically, that make egyptology so off limits? (Ironically, That documentary was heavily funded by the Israeli government.) The Egyptian government alone has a seriously vested interest in maintaining the tourist industry. They appoint "gatekeepers," such as the former Head of Antiquities, Zahi In other areas of archaeology, it's not quite as bad, because it isn't the government interfering. That said, there is a very strong resistance to overturn anything that was written after the dawn of "modern archaeology," i.e. after we started using actual techniques and studying things for knowledge instead of just racing to fill a national museum by robbing graves. It's a lineage of tribal knowledge passed from one professor to his grad students (and future professors), and seriously questioning the established history gets you ostracized, your funding dries up, etc. Change DOES happen, but it's very slow, almost glacial, and requires mountains of evidence. Even then, the establishment tries to fit it into the existing framework, modifying as little as possible. That's the nature of a "soft" science. It's not physics, where you can perform an experiment in a supercollider, examine the results over thousands of iterations, see how they fit into or alter the math and standard models, and then have other people replicate and verify your results. Archaeological digs are a "one and done." Once it's gone, there is no repeating it. Researchers get VERY protective of their sites, research, and conclusions. Decades and decades of this has led to the culture I described. I make it sound horrible, but, in reality, there's a very solid bedrock foundation of knowledge underpinning the discipline. We know a lot about history that we would never have known without archaeology. But, where physicists literally shit themselves with excitement over new discoveries and change, archaeologists shit themselves in dread. "Will this invalidate my entire career's work?" Of course, physicists can be stubborn too, just look at the various debates through it's history. Many of which are still ongoing. A lot of physicists will choose a particular hill (string theory, the Copenhagen interpretation, whatever) and die there. Human nature. |
|
Quoted: I don't know any more than the average American (which isn't much) about Egyptology, but this guy just took a trip there and says his group was given two hours of unrestricted access to the pyramids at a time they were closed to the public.
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma.
Lol. I went with a tour group based out of Poland that had a serious "in" with the Egyptian Government. So much so that when the Military Police interrupted one of our outing looking for bribes, and our tour guide refused and was hauled into one of their jeeps, the guy from Poland showed up, made a phone call, and the Military got their dicks slapped. HARD. They were fucking with the money, in the wrong way. Plenty of bribes in the form of baksheesh got handed out to local police, tourist police, etc., as expected, but those guys were a little brazen about it. We got behind-the-scenes access to the Great Pyramid, Red Pyramid, Sphinx, Luxor, and many other places for two weeks. It was EPIC. I could list the sites we visited, from Cairo all the way to the rebuilt Abu Simbel, and a lot of the time we were there alone for as much time as we wanted. That guy is a "I want to believe" guy. That's fine. But the fact that the ancient Egyptians happened to build out of beautiful, sturdy, and most importantly AVAILABLE stones with quartz, granite, etc., doesn't mean they were building stargates with piezoelectric materials. I mean...holy shit. That's a SERIOUS leap. Remember, extraordinary claims require something something something. |
|
Quoted: Lol. I went with a tour group based out of Poland that had a serious "in" with the Egyptian Government. So much so that when the Military Police interrupted one of our outing looking for bribes, and our tour guide refused and was hauled into one of their jeeps, the guy from Poland showed up, made a phone call, and the Military got their dicks slapped. HARD. They were fucking with the money, in the wrong way. Plenty of bribes in the form of baksheesh got handed out to local police, tourist police, etc., as expected, but those guys were a little brazen about it. We got behind-the-scenes access to the Great Pyramid, Red Pyramid, Sphinx, Luxor, and many other places for two weeks. It was EPIC. I could list the sites we visited, from Cairo all the way to the rebuilt Abu Simbel, and a lot of the time we were there alone for as much time as we wanted. That guy is a "I want to believe" guy. That's fine. But the fact that the ancient Egyptians happened to build out of beautiful, sturdy, and most importantly AVAILABLE stones with quartz, granite, etc., doesn't mean they were building stargates with piezoelectric materials. I mean...holy shit. That's a SERIOUS leap. Remember, extraordinary claims require something something something. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I haven't. But Egyptology is just a hobby. My focus in school was Mesoamerican Prehistory. In reality, I did most of my actual fieldwork on Native American sites and such. But, I can tell you with assurance, if that author and show questions the official narrative of Egyptology, it will never be taken seriously no matter how much evidence he presents or how solid his case. If Archaeology was a fortress with the drawbridge up to defend against new ideas, Egyptology is a sealed vault at the center of that fortress. The worst of it, when it comes to parroting dogma.
Lol. I went with a tour group based out of Poland that had a serious "in" with the Egyptian Government. So much so that when the Military Police interrupted one of our outing looking for bribes, and our tour guide refused and was hauled into one of their jeeps, the guy from Poland showed up, made a phone call, and the Military got their dicks slapped. HARD. They were fucking with the money, in the wrong way. Plenty of bribes in the form of baksheesh got handed out to local police, tourist police, etc., as expected, but those guys were a little brazen about it. We got behind-the-scenes access to the Great Pyramid, Red Pyramid, Sphinx, Luxor, and many other places for two weeks. It was EPIC. I could list the sites we visited, from Cairo all the way to the rebuilt Abu Simbel, and a lot of the time we were there alone for as much time as we wanted. That guy is a "I want to believe" guy. That's fine. But the fact that the ancient Egyptians happened to build out of beautiful, sturdy, and most importantly AVAILABLE stones with quartz, granite, etc., doesn't mean they were building stargates with piezoelectric materials. I mean...holy shit. That's a SERIOUS leap. Remember, extraordinary claims require something something something. I saw an infographic today that made me think of this. The theory is that the great pyramid is a lighthouse with an always on maser. Attached File |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.