Quote History Quoted:
What size barrel and gas system did you have on the enhanced LMT carrier? Only asking bc I just picked one up for myself recently but havent tested it
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:Quoted:
There are a bunch of bandaids to deal with the extra gas on an AR. But the only one that actually addresses the problem is restricting the gas at the port with an adjustable gas block or smaller port. Or reducing the flow restriction in the suppressor, but that isn’t ideal. It is however a good option for non adjustable gas systems.
A lot of guys prefer heavier buffers/springs or bootleg gas carriers but all they are doing is managing the extra gas that makes it to the receiver. Doing so just gives you a gassier and/or louder rifle as you vent more gas next to the shooter’s ear. Some like “flow through” designs but that is inherently less efficient as the gas spends less time expanding/slowing/cooling to lower the energy which is what needs to happen to lower the report. You want as much gas to go into the suppressor for as long as possible while limiting the amount that gets sent back to the action to the amount needed for reliable operation.
I think too many people take the approach of throwing shit at a rifle because others told them it is needed or worked for them without thinking about the system as a whole. Because of that they end up causing more new and exciting problems. I did the same with an LMT enhanced carrier that wasn’t right for the application I used it for and my rifle wouldn’t run for shit. The AR gas system is pretty simple, but it is designed to operate with a certain amount of pressure for a certain period of time. If you add/subtract length after the port you affect the amount of time that pressure is applied (same goes for adding a suppressor).
What you need is going to be unique to your setup. A 20” AR can have a nice small gas port and give a gently but longer lasting impulse. While a 10.5” will have a harder impulse that doesn’t last because of the short dwell time requiring a bigger port to function. Adding a suppressor to the latter means you increased the time pressure is present for that much larger port, so the best option is to shrink that port a bit as you would with a longer barrel. While adding a suppressor to a 20” is much less disruptive since the rifle is set up for a longer dwell time by default.
-Mike
What size barrel and gas system did you have on the enhanced LMT carrier? Only asking bc I just picked one up for myself recently but havent tested it
My issues were on a factory LMT 14.5” upper (carbine gas). With an H1 buffer, I had problems with anything (factory ammo) not pushing stout 556 pressures. I think I am an outlier on this as most that have problems with LMT E-carriers have really short dwell times on 10.3, 10.5, etc and it makes sense knowing how the carrier delays the operation.
But I put a standard carrier in and it ran 100% even with underpowered 223 loads.
It is like any of the other components people add to the operating system. It is there to solve a problem and does it well, but if you don’t have a problem tinkering might just give you a new and exciting problem to chase.
LMT sells these to help in overgassed applications especially in full auto. That wasn’t the problem I had and I was dumb for buying it in my case. LMT used a pretty small gas port back then (probably still do) and it just wasn’t a good fit.
Lucky for me when I went to sell it later they were what the cool kids were running and I sold it for double what I paid.
-Mike