User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:06:16 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
You use the same little idioms that everyone else does when they rationalize voting for a shitty candidate. Maybe you all should stop willingly voting for shitheads and start throwing your votes behind the good candidates. Getting Obama out of office isn't paramount when you're going to be replacing him with a rich, white, Mormon Obama (who also appoints liberals to the bench). ETA: Go ahead, vote for Romney if he's the candidate. Don't ever call yourself a Second Amendment supporter though. Yes, getting Obama out of office is paramount. I see you have a problem with: Class envy white people LDS Might want to work on that a bit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:07:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Yes, getting Obama out of office is paramount. Then would the GOP PLEASE STOP fielding religious ZEALOTS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:08:25 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah, Obama ain't such a bad guy. I guess I'll vote third party. Anyone who knows how presidential politics works understands what that accomplishes. Oh, I understand completely. I voted for Perot in '92, and look where that got us. The reality is that by voting for a candidate, it means we support his platform. I cannot support a guy who wants to inject personal religion into the public square to the degree that he does. Not going to cast my vote for an American Taliban candidate just because he is the major alternative to Obama.. I see. You have a history of throwing away your vote. I hope you learned a lesson from it, but it appears you didn't at all. Thanks for the '94 AWB by the way. That work out exactly as you planned? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:09:51 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes, getting Obama out of office is paramount. Then would the GOP PLEASE STOP fielding religious ZEALOTS. Main stream Catholic beliefs = zealots? 
It's funny and sad at the same time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:11:39 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: Quoted: Jan lost some of my respect today by supporting Rummney . Right now, I don't care which RINO the worthless republican party throws out there I WILL vote for them over hussein obongo. Looks like we're in the minority here from the looks of GD they will let the republic burn to prove a point of how superior they are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:42:41 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
I see. You have a history of throwing away your vote. I hope you learned a lesson from it, but it appears you didn't at all. Thanks for the '94 AWB by the way. That work out exactly as you planned? First you say I never vote Republican..now you say that because I vote for a candidate I like, I am throwing my vote away. I disagree. I will not vote for an American taliban just because he is the main opponent to Obama. We are in this boat because some GOP'ers have been trying to impose litmus and purity tests on their candidates for years now. So the zealots within the Party have ensured that the front runners in the election are zealots that cannot win an election. Who is REALLY throwing away their candidate,given that? Quoted:
Main stream Catholic beliefs = zealots? It's funny and sad at the same time. Santorums views run closer to Romes conservative version of Catholicism than the more liberal American Catholicism that most Americans espouse. I think more American Catholics will have an issue with him than you give them credit for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 1:58:48 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see. You have a history of throwing away your vote. I hope you learned a lesson from it, but it appears you didn't at all. Thanks for the '94 AWB by the way. That work out exactly as you planned? First you say I never vote Republican..now you say that because I vote for a candidate I like, I am throwing my vote away. I disagree. I will not vote for an American taliban just because he is the main opponent to Obama. We are in this boat because some GOP'ers have been trying to impose litmus and purity tests on their candidates for years now. So the zealots within the Party have ensured that the front runners in the election are zealots that cannot win an election. Who is REALLY throwing away their candidate,given that? Quoted:
Main stream Catholic beliefs = zealots? It's funny and sad at the same time. Santorums views run closer to Romes conservative version of Catholicism than the more liberal American Catholicism that most Americans espouse. I think more American Catholics will have an issue with him than you give them credit for. I've had to start wearing long-sleeved shirts to hide my Pope Benedict XVI tattoo. You could still see them when I wore my sweater vest. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:00:07 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see. You have a history of throwing away your vote. I hope you learned a lesson from it, but it appears you didn't at all. Thanks for the '94 AWB by the way. That work out exactly as you planned? First you say I never vote Republican..now you say that because I vote for a candidate I like, I am throwing my vote away. I disagree. I will not vote for an American taliban just because he is the main opponent to Obama. We are in this boat because some GOP'ers have been trying to impose litmus and purity tests on their candidates for years now. So the zealots within the Party have ensured that the front runners in the election are zealots that cannot win an election. Who is REALLY throwing away their candidate,given that? Quoted:
Main stream Catholic beliefs = zealots? It's funny and sad at the same time. Santorums views run closer to Romes conservative version of Catholicism than the more liberal American Catholicism that most Americans espouse. I think more American Catholics will have an issue with him than you give them credit for. "American taliban"? That is the most rediculous thing I have seen posted in a long long time. I can see the democratic talking points have worked exactly as intended. Very sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:05:30 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
"American taliban"? That is the most rediculous thing I have seen posted in a long long time. I can see the democratic talking points have worked exactly as intended. Very sad. Santorums views are an American version of extreme personal religion being injected into what should be a neutral public arena. You support him because his views happen to be similar to your own. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:08:52 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
"American taliban"? That is the most ridiculous thing I have seen posted in a long long time. I can see the democratic talking points have worked exactly as intended. Very sad. Santorums views are an American version of extreme personal religion being injected into what should be a neutral public arena. You support him because his views happen to be similar to your own. Wow. I've read everything now. Spoken like an Obama voter. You just topped your own ridiculous statement. I didn't think it could be done. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:12:50 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: "American taliban"? That is the most rediculous thing I have seen posted in a long long time. I can see the democratic talking points have worked exactly as intended. Very sad. Santorums views are an American version of extreme personal religion being injected into what should be a neutral public arena. You support him because his views happen to be similar to your own. Wow. I've read everything now. Spoken like an Obama voter. If it comes down to a Santorum/Obama race , TC556 is an Obama voter, by default. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:13:56 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Wow. I've read everything now. Spoken like an Obama voter. You just topped your own ridiculous statement. I didn't think it could be done. No, spoken as someone who thinks that religious matters belong on the house & place of worship, not as campaign platform issues or comments on the campaign speech circuit. Quoted:
If it comes down to a Santorum/Obama race , TC556 is an Obama voter, by default. The GOP needed to worry less about litmus tests and political purity tests for its candidates and more about finding and cultivating the next Reagan. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:20:58 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow. I've read everything now. Spoken like an Obama voter. You just topped your own ridiculous statement. I didn't think it could be done. No, spoken as someone who thinks that religious matters belong on the house & place of worship, not as campaign platform issues or comments on the campaign speech circuit. You do realize that the Santorum clips making the round for the DNC talking points are from years ago, right? And some were when he was speaking to religious congregations, right? And all were set up out of context, correct? It is sad to see someone so brainwashed. I mourn for this country of ours. 
Edit: Reagan? He was a religious man. He would not have lived up to your litmus test. Leftists hated him as much as you hate Santorum. Interesting coincidence, huh? I think not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:22:03 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
You do realize that the Santorum clips making the round for the DNC talking points are from years ago, right? And some were when he was speaking to religious congregations, right? And all were set up out of context, correct? It is sad to see someone so brainwashed. I mourn for this country of ours. Are they his beliefs? Yes? Has he recanted his comments? No. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:23:23 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
You do realize that the Santorum clips making the round for the DNC talking points are from years ago, right? And some were when he was speaking to religious congregations, right? And all were set up out of context, correct? It is sad to see someone so brainwashed. I mourn for this country of ours. Are they his beliefs? Yes? Has he recanted his comments? No. They are main stream catholic beliefs. Why would he recant them? Are you this dense or just a leftist? Or are you a Paulbot? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:25:09 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
They are main stream catholic beliefs. Why would he recant them? Are you this dense or just a leftist? I already covered this in an earlier post. They are not mainstream American Catholic beliefs. His views are closer to the Popes more conservative stances. There is a difference, and I think that you'll be surprised at the number of American Catholics who will disagree with Santorum. Paul is an idiot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:27:37 PM EDT
[#17]
Can we dispense with the notion that Brewer is a "true patriot" now?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:28:04 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
Quoted:
They are main stream catholic beliefs. Why would he recant them? Are you this dense or just a leftist? I already covered this in an earlier post. They are not mainstream American Catholic beliefs. His views are closer to the Popes more conservative stances. There is a difference, and I think that you'll be surprised at the number of American Catholics who will disagree with Santorum. Paul is an idiot.  The part in red tells me you are completely clueless. Congratulation.
Paul isn't the only one who is an idiot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:30:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
The part in red tells me you are completely clueless. Congratulation. Paul isn't the only one who is an idiot. Your post tells me that you believe that American Catholics are a monolithic entity who vote in conformity with what the Pope declares. That isn't true now anymore than it was when the concern was expressed in the 1960 election. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:35:03 PM EDT
[#20]
I'm really loving my "soon-to-be" Governor from my "soon-to-be" Home state.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:37:00 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The part in red tells me you are completely clueless. Congratulation. Paul isn't the only one who is an idiot. Your post tells me that you believe that American Catholics are a monolithic entity who vote in conformity with what the Pope declares. That isn't true now anymore than it was when the concern was expressed in the 1960 election. We are discussing Catholic beliefs, not voting patterns It's obvious you can't focus on the topic at hand because of your religious hate. Catholic doctrine is Catholic doctrine. It is one church. Because some in the US don't choose to follow Catholic doctrine doesn't make some type of "american catholic beliefs" sect exist. That only occurs in your mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:47:49 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted: Quoted: If it comes down to a Santorum/Obama race , TC556 is an Obama voter, by default. The GOP needed to worry less about litmus tests and political purity tests for its candidates and more about finding and cultivating the next Reagan. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:49:38 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
We are discussing Catholic beliefs, not voting patterns It's obvious you can't focus on the topic at hand because of your religious hate. Catholic doctrine is Catholic doctrine. It is one church. Because some in the US don't choose to follow Catholic doctrine doesn't make some type of "american catholic beliefs" sect exist. That only occurs in your mind. Are you denying that American Catholicism is a more liberal varient than what is pushed by the Vatican? I think the term Cafeteria Catholic comes to mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 2:55:09 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Quoted:
We are discussing Catholic beliefs, not voting patterns It's obvious you can't focus on the topic at hand because of your religious hate. Catholic doctrine is Catholic doctrine. It is one church. Because some in the US don't choose to follow Catholic doctrine doesn't make some type of "american catholic beliefs" sect exist. That only occurs in your mind. Are you denying that American Catholicism is a more liberal varient than what is pushed by the Vatican? I think the term Cafeteria Catholic comes to mind. So you can't differential between Catholic doctrine and stuff people who call themselves Catholic do. Gotcha. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2012 3:00:03 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
So you can't differential between Catholic doctrine and stuff people who call themselves Catholic do. Gotcha. I can differentiate between what the Vatican says is official policy and how Catholics choose to actually follow that edict. Like I said, I think you'll find a whole lot of Catholics looking at Santorums ramblings, shaking their heads and not voting for him Guess we;ll find out in November |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
