Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:12:30 PM EDT
[#1]
"your favorite President, me". ?? and heads exploded everywhere. Oh, he's so mean.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:14:57 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote

Know what's under all the black? Nothing, as this way they can make it up, whenever they want to. It buys time, and keeps everyone's attention on it.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:16:29 PM EDT
[#3]

Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:19:03 PM EDT
[#4]
Yeah, they use an 8 1/2" x 11" sharpie.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:19:36 PM EDT
[#5]
I am totally sure it will not be redacted to try to create a narrative, no way.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:20:47 PM EDT
[#6]
If they used a ink jet printer that is a lot of ink cartridges.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:20:54 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So it looks like someone sprinkled 'a lot of classified records.' in boxes that Trump's people returned because they were sent to them by mistake.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So it looks like someone sprinkled 'a lot of classified records.' in boxes that Trump's people returned because they were sent to them by mistake.
24. On February 9, 2022, the Special Agent in Charge of NARA's Office of the

Inspector General sent the NARA Referral via email to DOJ. The NARA Referral stated that
according to NARA's White House Liaison Division Director, a preliminary review of the
FIFTEEN BOXES indicated that they contained "newspapers, magazines, printed news articles,
photos, miscellaneous print-outs, notes, presidential correspondence, personal and post presidential records, and 'a lot of classified records.' Of most significant concern was that highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified."


A lot defined
The FIFTEEN BOXES Provided to N4.RA Contain Classified Information
4 7. From May 16-18, 2022, FBI agents conducted a prelimina1y review of the
FIFTEEN BOXES provided to NARA and identified documents with classification markings in
fourteen of the FIFTEEN BOXES. A prelin1ina1y triage of the documents with classification
markings revealed the following approximate numbers: 184 unique docmnents bearing
classification markings, including 67 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents
marked as SECRET, and 25 documents marked as TOP SECRET. Fm1her, the FBI agents
observed markings reflecting the following compa11ments/dissemination controls: HCS, FISA,
ORCON, NOFORN, and SI. Based on my training and experience, I know that documents
classified at these levels typically contain NDI. Several of the documents also contained what
appears to be FPOTUS 's handwritten notes.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:21:46 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


Not far off. This is the actual thing: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854.102.1.pdf

It basically says:

I am a supecop with lots of training. Trump is a villain, I have seen his villanous ways.
In particular:



Then there was



I have observed a



Russia, Russia, Russia ... and in addition

Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:22:47 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If they used a ink jet printer that is a lot of ink cartridges.
View Quote

Our tax dollars hard at work.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:23:01 PM EDT
[#10]
They did a search warrant on Hillary’s apartment email server from when she was Secretary of State.

Right?

They did that…

Didn’t they?

Oh, that’s right….
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:24:25 PM EDT
[#11]
Every day more and more stuff like this comes out, it just reinforces what I already know. Democrats are evil.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:25:44 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Yip.  Its going to back fire.  They will redact everything and as you said, it will just support President Trump.

They created a no win situation for themselves.  Post it unredacted and the truth about it being a constitutional witch hunt comes out.  Post it heavily redacted and it is evidence of a constitutional witch hunt being covered up.

https://www.cnet.com/a/img/resize/fe0477ede996f144ab9ff549f30e5257914a7cd4/2019/04/18/18b16df7-9455-4f68-b93a-087061126f49/blackoutmuellermeme.jpg?auto=webp&fit=crop&height=900&width=1200


Rick rolled by a fucking redacted affidavit...
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:26:11 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They did a search warrant on Hillary’s apartment email server from when she was Secretary of State.

Right?

They did that…

Didn’t they?

Oh, that’s right….
View Quote



Hillary had been through enough
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:26:39 PM EDT
[#14]
Media reports to get warrant?
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:29:06 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


A lot defined
View Quote


And there was absolutely no attempt to determine if the documents marked classified were actually classified.  They didn’t attempt to find out because they didn’t want the answer.

Well, they may have really known the documents are no longer classified, but the deniability of that knowledge was the basis for their weak ass story.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:31:21 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Media reports to get warrant?
View Quote


Same modus operandi used in the FISA Russia nonsense; circular reporting.

Feds leak info to select reporters.  Reporters write the story. Feds use the media report for PC.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:31:37 PM EDT
[#17]
Reading the affidavit, they are trying to charge Trump with the shit Clinton actually did and she didn't have the protection of holding the position of POTUS.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:33:36 PM EDT
[#18]
FBI is searching for Classified documents, but will be searching your office looking at attorney client privilege stuff too, because it might not be privileged.

SEARCH PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING POTENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

The following procedures will be followed at the time of the search in order to protect
against disclosures of attorney-client privileged material:

81. These procedures will be executed by: (a) law enforcement personnel conducting
this investigation (the "Case Team"); and (b) law enforcement personnel not participating in the
investigation of the matter, who will search the "45 Office" and be available to assist in the event
that a procedure involving potentially attorney-client privileged information is required (the
"Privilege Review Team").

82. The Case Team will be responsible for searching the TARGET PREMISES.
However, the Privilege Review Team will search the "45 Office" and conduct a review of the seized
materials from the "45 Office" to identify and segregate documents or data containing potentially
attorney-client privileged information.

83. If the Privilege Review Team determines the documents or data are not potentially
attorney-client privileged, they will be provided to the law-enforcement personnel assigned to the
investigation. If at any point the law-enforcement personnel assigned to the investigation
subsequently identify any data or documents that they consider may be potentially attorney-client
privileged, they will cease the review of such identified data or documents and refer the materials
to the Privilege Review Team for further review by the Privilege Review Team.

84. If the Privilege Review Team determines that documents are potentially attorney client privileged or merit further consideration in that regard, a Privilege Review Team attorney
may do any of the following: (a) apply ex parte to the court for a determination whether or not the
documents contain attorney-client privileged material; (b) defer seeking court intervention and
continue to keep the documents inaccessible to law-enforcement personnel assigned to the
investigation; or (c) disclose the documents to the potential privilege holder, request the privilege
holder to state whether the potential privilege holder asserts attorney-client privilege as to any
documents, including requesting a particularized privilege log, and seek a ruling from the court
regarding any attorney-client privilege claims as to which the Privilege Review Team and the
privilege-holder cannot reach agreement.
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:34:05 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


And there was absolutely no attempt to determine if the documents marked classified were actually classified.  They didn’t attempt to find out because they didn’t want the answer.

Well, they may have really known the documents are no longer classified, but the deniability of that knowledge was the basis for their weak ass story.
View Quote


Even worse. They included Trump's legal teams letter saying all boxes were declassified and others also backed that up. They are basically saying the President has no authority to declassify.  Everything in the affidavit that is unredacted speaks to stuff already returned. There is nothing in there saying exactly what exactly they were looking for and why they had any reason to believe it was there, and still classified.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:34:07 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Are you posting from the future?
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:36:58 PM EDT
[#21]
This should be a fair review.
Uncivil Law: Trump Search Detailed Revealed
Trump Search Detailed Revealed
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:37:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Same modus operandi used in the FISA Russia nonsense; circular reporting.

Feds leak info to select reporters.  Reporters write the story. Feds use the media report for PC.
View Quote

Link Posted: 8/26/2022 1:48:00 PM EDT
[#23]
It wouldn't surprise me if it was so redacted that all we ended up reading was words like:
"the, and, 2000, president, cat, secret, national security, golf, mara-logo, criminal."   In other words, so redacted that there is no useful information for anyone to read.  

Depending on who gets to do the redacting of the document, it could range anywhere from useless, to something that could bring down a government.  I would bet on whatever is released being pretty useless.
Link Posted: 8/26/2022 5:21:05 PM EDT
[#24]
Or what?

Nothing. That's what.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top