Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 7
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 7:57:33 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I understand what you mean by the different body language. Fleeing vs running with an aggressive purpose.

As to the second part regarding the hypothetical, I was responding to your post:

"And if she had shot at the cops, was she doing so or looking like she was about to when she was shot? Having shot at cops in the past is not (or was not) justification for lethal force later."



View Quote

Gotcha. I should clarify that I meant the fact that she had shot at the cops in the past is not justification all by itself. It would be a heavily weighted factor, but if everything else about the situation suggested she was trying to surrender or trying to get away from her father, then all by itself the fact she had previously shot at the cops wouldn't be enough by itself to justify potential deadly force.

IE, if she was running towards them with her palms held towards them with her head ducked low (like when they'd go to the choppers on M*A*S*H) and yelling "Help me! Help me!" then I would say not justified. If she was running towards  them while looking directly at them with her arms hidden or tucked close to her body, then justified.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 8:55:17 AM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Gotcha. I should clarify that I meant the fact that she had shot at the cops in the past is not justification all by itself. It would be a heavily weighted factor, but if everything else about the situation suggested she was trying to surrender or trying to get away from her father, then all by itself the fact she had previously shot at the cops wouldn't be enough by itself to justify potential deadly force.

IE, if she was running towards them with her palms held towards them with her head ducked low (like when they'd go to the choppers on M*A*S*H) and yelling "Help me! Help me!" then I would say not justified. If she was running towards  them while looking directly at them with her arms hidden or tucked close to her body, then justified.
View Quote


Well then we are in complete agreement.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 9:46:40 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Well then we are in complete agreement.
View Quote

That's not how GD works.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 10:12:00 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

That's not how GD works.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Well then we are in complete agreement.

That's not how GD works.


I disagree with you on that.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 10:13:44 AM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I disagree with you on that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Well then we are in complete agreement.

That's not how GD works.


I disagree with you on that.

That’s the spirit
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 10:17:47 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Hard to judge without having been there.  If you’ve ever had training on what to do if taken hostage they emphasize not to initiate movement toward a rescue team because you may be perceived as a threat.  That’s not to say a 15 year old girl should have known that, but to point out that this is a known problem and these cops are certainly not the first to make such a mistake.

ETA:  My exposure to this is in a military context where the assumption is that any rescue will most likely be conducted by HSLD types, not local yokel cops.
View Quote



Interesting....  mainly because while I have zero training on how to be a good hostage, I have plenty on how to deal with hostages running towards me... “self rescue”, “breakout”, etc.  (SWAT).

Matter of fact, most training scenarios like that we were trying to encourage them to run towards us if they had a clear get away, and we would creep as close as possible to the hostage(s) to facilitate getting to them quickly and getting ourselves in between them and the hostage taker.  

It is a pretty basic thing- if they can get away, they should.  We will react as needed to meet them and protect them.  Far more effective than sitting there as a hostage and hoping for the best if police have to force an entry.

A hostage taker separated from all the hostages is just another dipshit barricaded suspect- a much simpler scenario than a hostage situation.  

So my take on it is to always escape if given the opportunity...  Your advice is contrary to what I know from being the guy in these training scenarios (and a few real ones here and there) for 15 years.  Any SWAT person worth a shit knows hostages may break free at any time, and are hoping it happens.  

Being a hostage in a military setting may be different, but basically your advice is bad for typical stuff a citizen here may find themselves involved in.  Safer to make a break for it if given a clear opportunity, than hoping for an entry to be made by police or a successful negotiation.  Because negotiation take a long time, and you are at the whim of the suspect.  Forced entry on hostage situations is rare and risky.  People self rescuing, on the other hand, is pretty common in these situations, and really simplifies the problem.  

TLDR- Your advice is bad for US LE response (most of the time...)
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 10:54:51 AM EST
[#7]
Forgot to mention- doesn’t sound like this kid was a true hostage anyhow.  

In a 50 mile rolling gunfight, If she was engaging them with a rifle, I am certain they knew she was shooting at them and she had moved from the “kidnapped kid” category to a “deadly threat” category in their minds.  So if she then bailed and ran at them in anything other than a clear surrender posture, it is understandable that she got shot, armed or not, as you would assume she was still of the same intent and likely had a pistol.

(And- If her father “forced” her to shoot at PD cars while he was driving, she could have just shot the ground, no way he could know the difference.  Instead she hit the windshields and disabled one car....so if she did that, well too bad for her I guess...no loss to society).


Not entirely uncommon for kidnapping “victims” to turn out to be willing accomplices.  I was involved in resolving one incident where an LEO had been shot trying to rescue a “hostage” who turned out to not be...

Still she could have survived if she had done an obvious surrender.  I am going with the PD on this one unless we see footage of her with her hands up and following commands, and then she gets shot.  

TLDR- don’t shoot at police and then expect them to not consider you a threat in some manner or other.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 1:42:55 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I disagree with you on that.
View Quote

@Creatyre
You'll do well here.

Log out and log back in.
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 7:34:42 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




Matter of fact, most training scenarios like that we were trying to encourage them to run towards us if they had a clear get away, and we would creep as close as possible to the hostage(s) to facilitate getting to them quickly and getting ourselves in between them and the hostage taker.  

It is a pretty basic thing- if they can get away, they should.  We will react as needed to meet them and protect them.  
View Quote


You are a good cop and we need more of you.  Thank you.  
Link Posted: 9/30/2022 7:38:37 PM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That girl stood a better chance with the Uvalde police.
View Quote


Guaranteed survival
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 2:33:08 AM EST
[#11]
Did that dude have Frankenstein tattooed on his throat?

Thought I’d seen it all…

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 2:57:06 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
OK noted never run towards cops.
View Quote

No, never interact with cops if you can help it. The best interaction with them is one you never have.

Don't help, hinder, or get near them.

They aren't a Rockwell painting on the fucking Saturday Evening Post. That shit died after 9/11.

They will kill your ass even if you comply. They are hamstrung by politics to where they have two tools- taser or gun.

If you want help, call the paramedics or firefighters. If you want trouble, call a cop.
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 5:01:00 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Did that dude have Frankenstein tattooed on his throat?

Thought I’d seen it all…

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/18447/CBA71F0F-E7E7-4A48-B77A-2C34954ED394_jpe-2546052.JPG
View Quote

It could be Herman Munster.
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 5:29:15 AM EST
[#14]
Very convenient that the girl running toward them was also definitely shooting at them. I guess the cops dodged a bullet in more than one way on this one. I'm guessing there will be no video of the girl shooting at any point in this.
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 6:28:27 AM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No, never interact with cops if you can help it. The best interaction with them is one you never have.

Don't help, hinder, or get near them.

They aren't a Rockwell painting on the fucking Saturday Evening Post. That shit died after 9/11.

They will kill your ass even if you comply. They are hamstrung by politics to where they have two tools- taser or gun.

If you want help, call the paramedics or firefighters. If you want trouble, call a cop.
View Quote


Black lives matter, Montana chapter
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 7:39:44 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Black lives matter, Montana chapter
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

No, never interact with cops if you can help it. The best interaction with them is one you never have.

Don't help, hinder, or get near them.

They aren't a Rockwell painting on the fucking Saturday Evening Post. That shit died after 9/11.

They will kill your ass even if you comply. They are hamstrung by politics to where they have two tools- taser or gun.

If you want help, call the paramedics or firefighters. If you want trouble, call a cop.


Black lives matter, Montana chapter










Stay blind.
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 7:45:32 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

No, never interact with cops if you can help it. The best interaction with them is one you never have.

Don't help, hinder, or get near them.

They aren't a Rockwell painting on the fucking Saturday Evening Post. That shit died after 9/11.

They will kill your ass even if you comply. They are hamstrung by politics to where they have two tools- taser or gun.

If you want help, call the paramedics or firefighters. If you want trouble, call a cop.


Black lives matter, Montana chapter


https://s.abcnews.com/images/US/police-rt-er-200604_hpMain_16x9_1600.jpg

https://globalazmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Georgia-state-trooper-kneel-for-God.jpg

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/7bb4740f750a02a50fd46c30bd75c330bad2df6e/c=0-113-1750-1097/local/-/media/2020/09/17/WorcesterTelegram/ghows-WT-200609424-7c762633.jpg

https://preview.redd.it/0gnbeqrwfkz71.jpg?auto=webp&s=e12b96715350da20c880f93b6c9ee81431d762d9

Stay blind.

Attachment Attached File


It is excellent advice to avoid police as much as possible. They are armed strangers and could easily assume you are a bad guy.
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 8:14:32 AM EST
[#19]
Link Posted: 10/1/2022 9:12:09 AM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

There are only a handful of good apples. Most are one day away from becoming a bad apple. Prepare and act accordingly.
View Quote


A much better percentage of good apples there than in GD.
Link Posted: 10/3/2022 8:55:07 AM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Bad apples. Your point?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes


That stupid cliche again? The sheer kneeling numbers speaks to the fuck-you-pay-me culture that has consumed government. They could've walked away from all the capitulation to riot terrorists & mask mandates. But they didn't. When the time comes & the ante is upped, still more will comply. Because priorities.

Link Posted: 10/3/2022 9:06:36 AM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Interesting....  mainly because while I have zero training on how to be a good hostage, I have plenty on how to deal with hostages running towards me... “self rescue”, “breakout”, etc.  (SWAT).

Matter of fact, most training scenarios like that we were trying to encourage them to run towards us if they had a clear get away, and we would creep as close as possible to the hostage(s) to facilitate getting to them quickly and getting ourselves in between them and the hostage taker.  

It is a pretty basic thing- if they can get away, they should.  We will react as needed to meet them and protect them.  Far more effective than sitting there as a hostage and hoping for the best if police have to force an entry.

A hostage taker separated from all the hostages is just another dipshit barricaded suspect- a much simpler scenario than a hostage situation.  

So my take on it is to always escape if given the opportunity...  Your advice is contrary to what I know from being the guy in these training scenarios (and a few real ones here and there) for 15 years.  Any SWAT person worth a shit knows hostages may break free at any time, and are hoping it happens.  

Being a hostage in a military setting may be different, but basically your advice is bad for typical stuff a citizen here may find themselves involved in.  Safer to make a break for it if given a clear opportunity, than hoping for an entry to be made by police or a successful negotiation.  Because negotiation take a long time, and you are at the whim of the suspect.  Forced entry on hostage situations is rare and risky.  People self rescuing, on the other hand, is pretty common in these situations, and really simplifies the problem.  

TLDR- Your advice is bad for US LE response (most of the time...)
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hard to judge without having been there.  If you’ve ever had training on what to do if taken hostage they emphasize not to initiate movement toward a rescue team because you may be perceived as a threat.  That’s not to say a 15 year old girl should have known that, but to point out that this is a known problem and these cops are certainly not the first to make such a mistake.

ETA:  My exposure to this is in a military context where the assumption is that any rescue will most likely be conducted by HSLD types, not local yokel cops.



Interesting....  mainly because while I have zero training on how to be a good hostage, I have plenty on how to deal with hostages running towards me... “self rescue”, “breakout”, etc.  (SWAT).

Matter of fact, most training scenarios like that we were trying to encourage them to run towards us if they had a clear get away, and we would creep as close as possible to the hostage(s) to facilitate getting to them quickly and getting ourselves in between them and the hostage taker.  

It is a pretty basic thing- if they can get away, they should.  We will react as needed to meet them and protect them.  Far more effective than sitting there as a hostage and hoping for the best if police have to force an entry.

A hostage taker separated from all the hostages is just another dipshit barricaded suspect- a much simpler scenario than a hostage situation.  

So my take on it is to always escape if given the opportunity...  Your advice is contrary to what I know from being the guy in these training scenarios (and a few real ones here and there) for 15 years.  Any SWAT person worth a shit knows hostages may break free at any time, and are hoping it happens.  

Being a hostage in a military setting may be different, but basically your advice is bad for typical stuff a citizen here may find themselves involved in.  Safer to make a break for it if given a clear opportunity, than hoping for an entry to be made by police or a successful negotiation.  Because negotiation take a long time, and you are at the whim of the suspect.  Forced entry on hostage situations is rare and risky.  People self rescuing, on the other hand, is pretty common in these situations, and really simplifies the problem.  

TLDR- Your advice is bad for US LE response (most of the time...)


I’ve had both trainings. He’s not wrong. He’s talking about a service member being held/tortured when an unexpected rescue is launched. You go prone, cover your head, don’t move and wait until the shooting stops and they start asking questions and deadchecking.

For a civi being held in a house or whatever by a crackhead or a burglar or the drunk husband yeah absolutely get away and run to the fuzz and start giving them intel.

But when the door is busted and the dying starts you should lay flat. It’s a matter of timing. Not every team is tier 1. As possibly evidenced here.
Page / 7
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top