Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 1/4/2019 9:57:05 AM EST
[#1]
Seeing that plane at the museum in Dayton is on my short list of things to do this year.
Link Posted: 1/4/2019 10:52:27 AM EST
[#2]
Impressive. LOVE that footage!

She IS a bird you should see in person. VERY cool!
Link Posted: 1/4/2019 12:12:53 PM EST
[#3]
In Scott Crossfield's book, he wrote about the program being cancelled.
A lot of money was being spent on the space race, so between that and Robert McNamara, it got the axe.
He said that they were concerned that the X-15 program would get cut.  Fortunately it didn't, because it gave us a lot of data.
Link Posted: 1/4/2019 12:18:23 PM EST
[#4]
During the seventh flight, on March 4th, White and Fulton shattered records again, sustaining supersonic flight for 60 minutes, reaching a top speed of Mach 1.85. The eighth flight introduced the last of the four pilots, North American's Van Shepard, to the aircraft, and saw Mach 2 fall to the six J93 engines. The eighth flight also demonstrated how quickly Mach 2 could take the Valkyrie where the pilots didn't plan on going, as a momentary glitch in the single TACAN system led to an inadvertent "booming" of Las Vegas that early morning. On the tenth flight, the Valkyrie sustained 74 minutes of supersonic flight, including 50 minutes beyond Mach 2.

May 7th, 1965 was AV/1's 12th flight, with Al White and Fitz Fulton at the controls. Traveling at Mach 2.58 (almost 1700mph), a 'thump' was heard in the cockpit, soon followed by a number of engine-related alarms. Engines three, four, five, and six were shut down right away. As the chase planes caught up, they reported that the horizontal splitter (the very apex of the delta wing) had torn away. Wind tunnel testing and theory said that the splitter would only face upward loads. Reality proved different, as sharp downward loads caused the splitter to break up, with debris going into the engine intakes and doing severe damage to the engines. For the final approach, the number five engine was restarted to provide some thrust from the right side, and the XB-70 landed on the long lake bed without major incident. All six engines, nearly one-sixth of the 38 ever built, were destroyed beyond repair. After this flight, the splitter itself was replaced with a single solid piece in place of the honeycomb unit that had failed.

At this point, concerns about the integrity of the honeycomb skin began, and the next 4 flights concerned themselves with "heat soaking" the skin for sustained periods of time. For the first time, the XB-70's ability to reach Mach 3 was questioned.













More
Link Posted: 1/4/2019 8:19:30 PM EST
[#5]
@Southernman077
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Southernman077: I wonder how it would have done in Linebacker II.
View Quote
The B-70 would have performed very poorly as a conventional bomber, and the B-60 would have preformed better than the B-52 as a dedicated conventional bombtruck.  The B-52 is a great bomber, I'm not saying otherwise.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top