User Panel
Quoted: I don't know why they're so surprised. They've already found palm trees under the ice. They've found caves at the highest peaks with graveyards full of dinosaur bones as if they were trying to escape being slaughtered en masse. It all makes sense if you accept that there was a global flood and Noah. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I don't think that you can have a religious thread without science/atheist disputes being posted either. It's not one-sided. View Quote On the other hand, threads like this have nothing to do with religion, either for or against, and the nut cases feel compelled to come in and start preaching. Many a good thread has been derailed here lately. |
|
|
I th9ught they were shocked at life beneath Antarctica like 30 years ago.
|
|
|
I'm absolutely positive there's incredible amounts of cool stuff we haven't discovered yet in Antarctica.
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: I'm absolutely positive there's incredible amounts of cool stuff we haven't discovered yet in Antarctica. Such as cheap 9mm. Keep drilling boys. Probably a stupid fish or something. But the Nazis used 9mm so they probably stocked it on their secret moon launch base |
|
|
Quoted: the only thing thats caused more people to die than socialist is religious justifications. seems reasonable, pretty much every time we make a statement of "life can't just survive in ABC" we get proven wrong at some point. View Quote LOL so Christians have killed more people than: Hitler, Moa, Stalin, Pol Pot, Ho Ho Ho Chiemen? |
|
Quoted: I don’t know why they’re so surprised. They’ve already found palm trees under the ice. They’ve found caves at the highest peaks with graveyards full of dinosaur bones as if they were trying to escape being slaughtered en masse. It all makes sense if you accept that there was a global flood and Noah. View Quote Noah makes no sense. Plate tectonics though does. What caves are found in the highest peaks with dinosaur bones? |
|
|
Quoted: The difference is that threads specifically about religion invite discussion by parties on either side of the issue. They're fair game by their very nature. (Although it should be noted that there's an entire board here devoted to religious discussions and you don't seem to have atheists trashing them regularly for some reason.) On the other hand, threads like this have nothing to do with religion, either for or against, and the nut cases feel compelled to come in and start preaching. Many a good thread has been derailed here lately. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I don't think that you can have a religious thread without science/atheist disputes being posted either. It's not one-sided. On the other hand, threads like this have nothing to do with religion, either for or against, and the nut cases feel compelled to come in and start preaching. Many a good thread has been derailed here lately. Fair enough. I can't argue with any of that. |
|
|
|
Meh. Personally I'm sick of the atheists and their fascination with making the God of the bible something they can comprehend and dismiss all so their ego isn't damaged.
Science turned into religion long ago but pride keeps us from seeing the totality of it. |
|
Just proves there is no place on this earth that you can go and be left alone without someone coming along and fucking with you.
|
|
|
|
I bet there is so much oil under Antarctica it's not even funny!
|
|
|
This makes no sense. They say they "shouldn't be there", yet science has known for quite some time about a variety of life forms that are born, live and die in darkness thousands of feet below the surface of the ocean. There are even terrestrial animals that live in caves underground their entire lives without ever seeing the sun. So it shouldn't be surprising they found some critters under an ice sheet that get by without sunlight
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Next stop, life on Mars. And that moon that has liquid water under miles of ice. View Quote Not the same thing. All life on earth evolved from more favorable conditions to adapt to more hostile locations. There was never a more favorable condition on Mars or the Moon for life to get started and then adapt. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What's with all the nutty religious people popping up lately? The religious fanaticism here is pretty fucking gross https://i.imgur.com/1I6bsUi.gif All of your join dates did not disappoint. |
|
Quoted: The difference is that threads specifically about religion invite discussion by parties on either side of the issue. They're fair game by their very nature. (Although it should be noted that there's an entire board here devoted to religious discussions and you don't seem to have atheists trashing them regularly for some reason.) On the other hand, threads like this have nothing to do with religion, either for or against, and the nut cases feel compelled to come in and start preaching. Many a good thread has been derailed here lately. View Quote Science and dogma are antithetical. Dogmatists like to call science a religion because they displace each other. The scientific method is the rejection of dogmatism and vice versa. It's kinda always been that way here. The modern conservative movement began with the scopes trial and the 42% of Americans who reject science are almost all on the right. It's been a dilemma, don't think it matters much anymore now the right is collapsing, largely because it doesn't get the benefits of the scientific method. |
|
Quoted: Follow the Science!* *Except when it's obvious that the science doesn't have all the answers, and is populated with arrogant assholes that are willing to fake data for grant money or push an agenda. Luckily there are a few true geniuses that actually advance the field. View Quote Unlike religion science seeks answers. It doesn't pretend to possess them. Scientists actually get excited when presented with new information. When that information doesn't fit the previous paradigm the paradigm shifts. |
|
Leave it to GD to turn a really cool topic into a atheist vs theistic purse swinging contest
|
|
Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the Word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
Hebrews 11:3 The Biblle even refers to the quantum level. |
|
Quoted: There are more religions than just christianity. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: LOL so Christians have killed more people than: Hitler, Moa, Stalin, Pol Pot, Ho Ho Ho Chiemen? There are more religions than just christianity. Yeah Ufology and Q-ology seem to be in the lead with the nutjobs here. |
|
|
Quoted: Science and dogma are antithetical. Dogmatists like to call science a religion because they displace each other. The scientific method is the rejection of dogmatism and vice versa. It's kinda always been that way here. The modern conservative movement began with the scopes trial and the 42% of Americans who reject science are almost all on the right. It's been a dilemma, don't think it matters much anymore now the right is collapsing, largely because it doesn't get the benefits of the scientific method. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The difference is that threads specifically about religion invite discussion by parties on either side of the issue. They're fair game by their very nature. (Although it should be noted that there's an entire board here devoted to religious discussions and you don't seem to have atheists trashing them regularly for some reason.) On the other hand, threads like this have nothing to do with religion, either for or against, and the nut cases feel compelled to come in and start preaching. Many a good thread has been derailed here lately. Science and dogma are antithetical. Dogmatists like to call science a religion because they displace each other. The scientific method is the rejection of dogmatism and vice versa. It's kinda always been that way here. The modern conservative movement began with the scopes trial and the 42% of Americans who reject science are almost all on the right. It's been a dilemma, don't think it matters much anymore now the right is collapsing, largely because it doesn't get the benefits of the scientific method. Apparently you’ve never met a scientist with an agenda. |
|
|
Quoted: If Charles Darwin left this world not accepting Christ, then he is in unimaginable torment this very instant. Not my rules, I wish Hell didn't exist but it does. You'd be wise not to follow him there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So is Charles Darwin. If Charles Darwin left this world not accepting Christ, then he is in unimaginable torment this very instant. Not my rules, I wish Hell didn't exist but it does. You'd be wise not to follow him there. Somehow, I think that call is above your pay grade |
|
Quoted: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2267737-life-found-beneath-antarctic-ice-sheet-shouldnt-be-there/#Echobox=1613372718 The inadvertent discovery of sea life on a boulder beneath an Antarctic ice shelf challenges our understanding of how organisms can live in environments far from sunlight, according to a team of biologists. The researchers drilled through the 900-metre-thick Filchner-Ronne ice shelf and dropped a camera down the hole in search of mud on the seabed. To their surprise, it revealed a boulder ringed by animals. Footage appears to show 16 sponges, accompanied by 22 unidentified animals that could include barnacles. It is the first time that immobile life like these creatures has been found beneath an Antarctic ice sheet. View Quote So living organisms usually have heat.....these sea life have melted the polar regions .... (<<<--find your S meter with this statement) Not sure if the dems would consider the sea life as a fetus or an illegal immigrant.... Cool though...just proves that "science predictions" aren't to be totally trusted. |
|
Quoted: I don't know why they're so surprised. They've already found palm trees under the ice. They've found caves at the highest peaks with graveyards full of dinosaur bones as if they were trying to escape being slaughtered en masse. It all makes sense if you accept that there was a global flood and Noah. View Quote Any links or references for these comments? I've never heard of either and it sounds interesting |
|
I am going out on a limb and guess that their funding was about to run out. They didn’t like the thought of getting real jobs and reported something they already knew was there
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.