User Panel
Posted: 1/23/2023 2:35:11 PM EST
Old Roman Map has Atlantis at the Eye of the Sahara Lost Roman Map has ATLANTIS at Eye of Sahara Africa! (Richat Structure) I didn’t even know such a structure existed. |
|
|
|
Plato claimed it was beyond the Pillars of Hercules, but didn’t say where it was…….. that’s a plausible theory, but I’d still think it is somewhere in the depths of the Atlantic
|
|
I tend to agree more with Randall Carson about Atlantis.
Not saying that the Richat structure didn’t have an Atlantis connection. Maritime people get around. |
|
I have a Capt’n Crunch treasure map, it is equally as accurate.
The was no Atlantis, if there was someone would have shown up wanting reparations. |
|
I've seen a few things on that structure and saw these guys on Rogan last week. Makes for a compelling case in many of the things he points out. I don't get why more research has not been done there and having that research easily available.
|
|
|
|
|
The worst part of Atlantis was trying to hit those speeding buzz ships.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: I have a Capt’n Crunch treasure map, it is equally as accurate. The was no Atlantis, if there was someone would have shown up wanting reparations. At one time there was no Troy……. Are you suggesting archaeological evidence can change how an idea is perceived? |
|
The only problem I see with that theory: there are a considerable number of very ancient artifacts (hand axes, etc.) that have been dug up within the concentric rings. Many of those artifacts are in excess of 1 million years old, and date back to some of the earliest tool users that we know about.
So if a huge flood washed through and wiped out the city 12,000 years ago, why would it leave behind only artifacts that are hundreds of thousands (or potentially a million plus) years old? One could argue that stone age tribesmen frequented the area _after_ the city was wiped out - but in that case, shouldn't those artifacts be newer? |
|
Quoted: I've seen a few things on that structure and saw these guys on Rogan last week. Makes for a compelling case in many of the things he points out. I don't get why more research has not been done there and having that research easily available. View Quote There has been archaeological research at that site. But it's not mentioned in the video, presumably because it doesn't support the Atlantis theory. (see my previous post). |
|
Yup. Dimensions, structure, springs, location, mining, the legendary first king Atlas. It all lines up.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I've seen a few things on that structure and saw these guys on Rogan last week. Makes for a compelling case in many of the things he points out. I don't get why more research has not been done there and having that research easily available. View Quote They talked about it on Rogan. People have built their whole careers and reputations on the “standard” idea of history. To go against it is hard work. Close to impossible if you’re in the system. Kind of like going against the church at one time. Any time you question history someone will have a problem with it. |
|
90 degree magnetic pole shift every 6500ish years caused the destruction, flooding, etc
|
|
It was so obviously the Minoans I don’t know why this is still discussed.
|
|
I love Bright Insight, that dude does work that mainstream doesn't want to touch.
He's a vet too. |
|
Fell down this rabbit hole after the JRE clip
With everything going to shit it's kinda cool finding everything we've been taught in the West is as accurate as a weather forecast without computers. |
|
|
|
They are trying to stop the glaciers from melting so it doesnt get discovered, what are they hiding?
|
|
|
|
|
I like his content but he repeats himself too much, as Drsalee noticed as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: The only problem I see with that theory: there are a considerable number of very ancient artifacts (hand axes, etc.) that have been dug up within the concentric rings. Many of those artifacts are in excess of 1 million years old, and date back to some of the earliest tool users that we know about. So if a huge flood washed through and wiped out the city 12,000 years ago, why would it leave behind only artifacts that are hundreds of thousands (or potentially a million plus) years old? One could argue that stone age tribesmen frequented the area _after_ the city was wiped out - but in that case, shouldn't those artifacts be newer? View Quote Unless stone aged tribesmen traveled through the area soon after it happened to find out why the fabled Atlantis no longer sent their tax collectors around. |
|
Quoted: Are you suggesting archaeological evidence can change how an idea is perceived? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I have a Capt’n Crunch treasure map, it is equally as accurate. The was no Atlantis, if there was someone would have shown up wanting reparations. At one time there was no Troy……. Are you suggesting archaeological evidence can change how an idea is perceived? Yes, to some extent.......... |
|
Welcome to the rabbit hole
Look forward to your threads on the scablands, Carolina Bays, mid Atlantic trench, and on and on… Atlantis was a real place. It really did get consumed by the sea. |
|
Quoted: Plato claimed it was beyond the Pillars of Hercules, but didn’t say where it was…….. that’s a plausible theory, but I’d still think it is somewhere in the depths of the Atlantic View Quote It was a kingdom or something. They cover this possibility being Atlantis and the Azores… so both can be right. It’s all in the rabbit hole. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.