User Panel
Wow, I might be able to switch back to a pistol grip, from paddle grips
Hard to believe |
|
Quoted: CADOJ will appeal Saint Benitez's decision to a 3 judge panel of the 9th. The 9th will accept whatever pablum arguments CADOJ puts forth and will issue an injunction on Benitez's decision. The injunction will be appealed to SCOTUS but before it gets heard the 9th will re-hear it en banc resetting the fuck you SCOTUS clock. The matter will be kept tied up in the 9th circuit court for a decade and then the matter will be quietly dropped with the plaintiff's eventually die from old fucking age. We'll get a solid week or so of freedom at the very beginning and we'll drain the national supplies of whatever Saint Benitez makes legal again. Eventually SCOTUS will have to do something about the 9th fucking off natural rights which means they'll move to censure the judges that were paneled for the case if by then the left hasn't stacked that particular deck with ultra-leftist activist judges. Nothing will change until the great conflagration and then there won't be any regulations at all. View Quote The 9th 3 judge panels seem to do a decent job of calling bullshit when they see it. It's the en banc panels that are 50 for 50 of anti gun rulings. Kharn |
|
Quoted: Judge Benitez got the Assault Weapon ban case back from the Ninth on August 3rd, 2022. Miller V. Bonta Judge Benitez gave them (20) days to file their new Points & Authorities (P’s & A’s). That would be this week. Tic-Toc Mo-fo’s were waiting….. View Quote After what the state has done to CCW it will be interesting to see what their next move is. My guess is that Benetiz might have something to say about that or weigh/consider the flat out retalitory nature of California's most recent move. |
|
Quoted: After what the state has done to CCW it will be interesting to see what their next move is. My guess is that Benetiz might have something to say about that or weigh/consider the flat out retalitory nature of California's most recent move. View Quote Why does he give them any time at all to refile? He already ruled it bad correct? |
|
Help GD.
Stripped lowers have been legal to purchase in California notwithstanding the AWB. So assuming one de-neuters the ARs in the safe, and with the understanding that braces/pistols/NFA is still a no-go, what’s the newly-legal must-have ‘thing’? CZ Skorpion or SP5 with a 16” barrel? |
|
|
Quoted: Why does he give them any time at all to refile? He already ruled it bad correct? View Quote Maybe to see if they slam their dicks in the door even further? If they are quiet you are left knowing they plan something. Atleast if they are given an opportunity to blab you might get a peek at what it is they are planning. |
|
Quoted: I never fallowed that dumb AW law anyway. They simply can’t enforce 90% of the bullshit laws. View Quote The CA AWB had to be one of the biggest joke ever. There’s literally loopholes to all of it with mag-locks, to featureless, freedom weeks mags, and off roster schemes; CA peeps can own just about anything now. Sure there are a few absolute no-go’s, but they’re far and few between. Non assembled lowers are reasonably inexpensive and available at most LGS. I have several. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: The CA AWB had to be one of the biggest joke ever. There’s literally loopholes to all of it with mag-locks, to featureless, freedom weeks mags, and off roster schemes; CA peeps can own just about anything now. Sure there are a few absolute no-go’s, but they’re far and few between. Non assembled lowers are reasonably inexpensive and available at most LGS. I have several. View Quote LOL lets see you buy a pistol not on the roster from someone out of state. The cucks of California have no idea what liberty is. I fought for decades in Cali, obeyed none of their draconian laws, but couldn't take all the cucks that thought victory was what California told them victory was. You fit in that category of obedient California citizen |
|
|
|
Quoted: Judge Benitez will rule just like he did last time that the assualt weapon ban is illegal. This will open the door to AW’s in California. Of course CAL-DOJ will appeal, but I don’t believe Judge Benitez will ‘stay it’ because the DOJ does not have a chance to prevail based on Bruen. Eta: this means once the order is signed, the guns will flow freely, just like the magazines did in freedom week. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What does this mean? Judge Benitez will rule just like he did last time that the assualt weapon ban is illegal. This will open the door to AW’s in California. Of course CAL-DOJ will appeal, but I don’t believe Judge Benitez will ‘stay it’ because the DOJ does not have a chance to prevail based on Bruen. Eta: this means once the order is signed, the guns will flow freely, just like the magazines did in freedom week. Once Benitez rules against the AWB ban, doesn't that immediately allow people to un-neuter their guns? Much like the magazine "freedom week" did for magazines. It effectively killed the restriction on normal capacity mags. Because untold quantities flowed into the state that week, it made it impossible to determine what was new, old, etc. Even if his upcoming ruling is stayed by the 9th, it will take a few days. During that time, people can return their guns to normal configuration, correct? What I'm unclear on is if a stay then compels them to neuter them again. I'm not so sure it does. This could be awesome news for our brothers in CA |
|
Quoted: LOL lets see you buy a pistol not on the roster from someone out of state. The cucks of California have no idea what liberty is. I fought for decades in Cali, obeyed none of their draconian laws, but couldn't take all the cucks that thought victory was what California told them victory was. You fit in that category of obedient California citizen View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The CA AWB had to be one of the biggest joke ever. There’s literally loopholes to all of it with mag-locks, to featureless, freedom weeks mags, and off roster schemes; CA peeps can own just about anything now. Sure there are a few absolute no-go’s, but they’re far and few between. Non assembled lowers are reasonably inexpensive and available at most LGS. I have several. LOL lets see you buy a pistol not on the roster from someone out of state. The cucks of California have no idea what liberty is. I fought for decades in Cali, obeyed none of their draconian laws, but couldn't take all the cucks that thought victory was what California told them victory was. You fit in that category of obedient California citizen Unless you have a closet full of non registered machine guns, you're doing the same thing you're accusing Californians of. |
|
As a former Californian born and raised I hope CA DOJ gets taken to the preverbal wood shed and so much gets struck down it will make heads spin.
|
|
|
Benitez will slap Cali DOJ like the bitches they are. 9th will still use 2 step or whatever they can to conclude the AWB is legal. SCROTUS will ignore it because outside of Thomas and Alito none of the others care about guns.
|
|
Quoted: Mag lock it. All evil features are allowed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Wow, I might be able to switch back to a pistol grip, from paddle grips Hard to believe Mag lock it. All evil features are allowed. If this AW law goes away, swap the paddle for a grip |
|
Quoted: Supreme Court's 6-3 Decision Creates An End To California Ammo Ban https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbbWkfGbhnY Update on the Rhode v. Bonta California ammunition ban case. The state of California is now arguing Bruen has no impact on this case and that the 9th Circuit should remand the case back to judge Benitez. View Quote The ammo ban failed at one point due to some commerce law. Then past some how second time around. If you drive out of state, buy ammo, and try to bring it back, you "broke the law". If someone who lives out of state brings you ammo, thats legal. [Carve out for Leland Yee's freinds] In 2014 any rifle purchase is logged like handguns... Before hand, the doj was supposed to destroy any info after the background check. Then it came out that they had been breaking that law by keeping those records. In california, [don't know if its the same everywhere] if they wright up a document saying that its legal to do something, and sign it, it now means anyone who did it prior is excused from breaking the law. <--how nice for them. The whole reason for the background check crap on ammo, was to find out what people are feeding that they don't have records of. Another thread on it with more info... https://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=2576188&tl=Assault-Weapons-Ban-Case-FAST-TRACKED-By-Judge-Benitez |
|
Quoted: Judge Benitez will rule just like he did last time that the assualt weapon ban is illegal. This will open the door to AW’s in California. Of course CAL-DOJ will appeal, but I don’t believe Judge Benitez will ‘stay it’ because the DOJ does not have a chance to prevail based on Bruen. Eta: this means once the order is signed, the guns will flow freely, just like the magazines did in freedom week. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What does this mean? Judge Benitez will rule just like he did last time that the assualt weapon ban is illegal. This will open the door to AW’s in California. Of course CAL-DOJ will appeal, but I don’t believe Judge Benitez will ‘stay it’ because the DOJ does not have a chance to prevail based on Bruen. Eta: this means once the order is signed, the guns will flow freely, just like the magazines did in freedom week. What does this means for other states that still have AWBs enacted? |
|
Quoted: What does this means for other states that still have AWBs enacted? View Quote This will cover only the California AW ban, but.....If it makes it back to the Ninth and they uphold it, then any state within the Ninth will be GTG. I suspect the liberal Ninth will not let it get that far, they will refuse to hear it and it will stay in California for the time being. |
|
Quoted: Judge Benitez will rule just like he did last time that the assualt weapon ban is illegal. This will open the door to AW’s in California. Of course CAL-DOJ will appeal, but I don’t believe Judge Benitez will ‘stay it’ because the DOJ does not have a chance to prevail based on Bruen. Eta: this means once the order is signed, the guns will flow freely, just like the magazines did in freedom week. View Quote Thanks for the translation to we out of staters who don't follow it as closely. Good luck! Let the EBRs flow! |
|
Quoted: If the CA AWB sticks, CA might be back on the menu for possible places to live. I don't want to take a job any place where a mis-packed item that is NBD in the free world = felony territory there. View Quote Hey dude, it just means you can have a pistol grip and regular mags, not that you won't get taxed to death. |
|
|
Quoted: LOL lets see you buy a pistol not on the roster from someone out of state. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The CA AWB had to be one of the biggest joke ever. There’s literally loopholes to all of it with mag-locks, to featureless, freedom weeks mags, and off roster schemes; CA peeps can own just about anything now. Sure there are a few absolute no-go’s, but they’re far and few between. Non assembled lowers are reasonably inexpensive and available at most LGS. I have several. LOL lets see you buy a pistol not on the roster from someone out of state. There’s a legal way to do it. Underutilized, but legit. |
|
Quoted: I posted this in the other thread regarding Judge Benitez putting this on the fast track, but I think it bears repeating: Me too! As a person who was born and raised in California and spent the better part of my life there, I was so sad to see what my home state had become. I can't wait to see Judge Benitez go in hard and dry. I can't wait to hear Newsom and his multitude of liberal, commie, dick sucking, sperm farting, twinkle toed, mindless, godless, bed wetting fucktards cry out in unison: https://i.postimg.cc/qMhkFvCY/yelling-protester.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I posted this in the other thread regarding Judge Benitez putting this on the fast track, but I think it bears repeating: Quoted: Please baby Jesus let Saint Benitez break it off in Newsoms ass. I've waited my entire adult life for this. Me too! As a person who was born and raised in California and spent the better part of my life there, I was so sad to see what my home state had become. I can't wait to see Judge Benitez go in hard and dry. I can't wait to hear Newsom and his multitude of liberal, commie, dick sucking, sperm farting, twinkle toed, mindless, godless, bed wetting fucktards cry out in unison: https://i.postimg.cc/qMhkFvCY/yelling-protester.jpg Did we just become best friends |
|
Quoted: I never fallowed that dumb AW law anyway. They simply can’t enforce 90% of the bullshit laws. View Quote All is well until you get pulled over for a tail light. That happened to a friend at work. He bought a California approved bullet button rifle and didn't know it needs to be registered. He got felony charges. |
|
Quoted: Nope. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/styles/lead/public/circuit_map_in_agency_palette-full-size.png View Quote It might help Washington, though. |
|
Tic Toc? is it one of thsoe gay assed videos? WTf is with the Tic Toc
|
|
|
Inter family transfer from your parents or your children living in another state. Not all California FFLs are familiar with it but the good ones are. |
|
|
Quoted: how in the hell, exactly, do you sterilize an 80% build? autoclave? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: ATF rule 80% lowers sold after that date have to be sterilized. Sorry to sidetrack the thread. how in the hell, exactly, do you sterilize an 80% build? autoclave? The new “rule” goes into effect on 8/24. It’s written as well as any of their drivel. It’s this way but that way but sometimes this way but sometimes not. AFT PMF Rule Summary |
|
Quoted: Inter family transfer from your parents or your children living in another state. Not all California FFLs are familiar with it but the good ones are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There’s a legal way to do it. Underutilized, but legit. @SteveH do tell? Inter family transfer from your parents or your children living in another state. Not all California FFLs are familiar with it but the good ones are. Or grandchildren or grandparents. The problem is a lot of Californians don’t have out-of-state direct line family members. I do, but my tastes are expensive and it would have to be a gift. |
|
|
Quoted: Separate thread, SB918. Bad bad juju. I believe the FPC will file suit immediately and ask for an injunction. It should be granted. Eta: Newson and his minions are freaking out because of Bruen. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That’s great! What’s this BS about a ccw bill that will render Ca ccws basically worthless? Separate thread, SB918. Bad bad juju. I believe the FPC will file suit immediately and ask for an injunction. It should be granted. Eta: Newson and his minions are freaking out because of Bruen. I hope it keeps them up at night. I hope they wake up at night in terror thinking about all the citizens of California being able to defend themselves and their loved ones without fear of prosecution. I hope they have nightmares of no longer being able to rule with impunity, and wake up and realize it wasnt a dream. California in the 70's/80's was a place of magic and wonder. The leftists have made it uninhabitable. Fuck them and their "ideals" that have damaged this great country and that once great state. |
|
Quoted: It means waiting to see if Californias get their balls back. Californians are afraid of the constitution and don't know how freedom works View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What does this mean? It means waiting to see if Californias get their balls back. Californians are afraid of the constitution and don't know how freedom works |
|
|
Quoted: Or grandchildren or grandparents. The problem is a lot of Californians don’t have out-of-state direct line family members. I do, but my tastes are expensive and it would have to be a gift. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There’s a legal way to do it. Underutilized, but legit. @SteveH do tell? Inter family transfer from your parents or your children living in another state. Not all California FFLs are familiar with it but the good ones are. Or grandchildren or grandparents. The problem is a lot of Californians don’t have out-of-state direct line family members. I do, but my tastes are expensive and it would have to be a gift. Good reason to send your kids to college out of state |
|
|
Quoted: Are you 15? Tic toc is an expression of time passing, long before a song or an app. View Quote Except in English it's generally expressed as ticktock. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ticktock |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.