User Panel
Posted: 10/5/2019 12:05:26 PM EDT
Holy crap. 208hp per liter on a PRODUCTION ENGINE. For torque it makes 369ftlbs.
I know tuners have been making even bigger numbers for years but this will be a factory motor with a warranty. Big. https://www.caranddriver.com/news/amp27813840/mercedes-amg-m139-four-cylinder-engine-specs/ |
|
Being able to mass produce and warranty something like that is damn impressive.
|
|
I'd be changing the oil & plugs like crazy in that.
Typical US consumers don't maintain their vehicles very well. On a high-tuned poodle engine that's a recipe for kabooms. |
|
Unless it is in a car of comparable size and weight to a lotus exige...
I dont care. |
|
|
|
It made big news when they released specs a few months ago. Good to see them pushing the envelope on automotive IC engines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I'd be changing the oil & plugs like crazy in that. Typical US consumers don't maintain their vehicles very well. On a high-tuned poodle engine that's a recipe for kabooms. View Quote Modern oil does well in high temp environments for many miles. Modern ECU's will pull power and even shut off cylinders well before a plug gets bad enough to cause a kaboom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does it make choo choo noises?
How much more can be squeezed out of it with a tune and E85? Will it fit in an early 70s 300d? I love V8s as much as anybody but I can appreciate a high strung boosted 4 banger too. |
|
Very impressive and would be incredible in a sub 3k pound RWD.
I wonder how much, if any, of this is a result from their current dominance in Formula 1. |
|
There was a big jump in power (and complications) with direct injection.
They have forced induction pretty well dialed also. Put these 2 together and you get some damn impressive numbers. Problem is the motors are built to the very minimum to handle that power. Used to be you could easily grab another 100hp with just a tune (FI), and the motor was good for 2x its stock output if you started throwing bolt ons at it. Now it seems they are so close to the ragged edge out of the factory, you risk shit like wiping the rings off the pistons if you turn them up. Its like they gave up on keeping people out of the ecu, so they figured theyd give them a reason not to poke at it in the 1st place |
|
HP per liter is a useless metric. Power/weight is what's important, along with efficiency and reliability.
|
|
This is the predecessor engine to the one that this thread is about, with some work done to it, of course:
Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted:
Gives me a headache just looking at it. https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/19c0488-001-source-1559923678.jpg?resize=640:* View Quote Looks like a rocket motor |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
HP per liter is a useless metric. Power/weight is what's important, along with efficiency and reliability. View Quote Now if we are talking about a whole car then yes the power to weight ratio would be the measuring stick. |
|
Quoted:
1. Think it'd fit in my Tundra? 2. Could it beat 16 MPG? https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/19c0488-001-source-1559923678.jpg?resize=640:* View Quote Maybe. |
|
|
After reading that Seems like a lot of things that can go wrong.
|
|
|
it's just cylinder pressure...thats right around the bmep of current production diesel engines and they run forever in applications that use every drop of torque at high duty cycles.
once you add turbos it's just a matter of building things heavy enough to put up with the amount of power you want. built it to put up with cylinder pressure and the rpm will make the HP |
|
Quoted:
And that is what is sad. It totally could happen. But it wont. A pocket rocket AMG would be impressive as hell. But it will go into some 3600+ pound sedan with a 87 speed transmission and I still wont give a shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That will never happen. But it wont. A pocket rocket AMG would be impressive as hell. But it will go into some 3600+ pound sedan with a 87 speed transmission and I still wont give a shit. Looks like it's destined for a big 4 door sedan though. |
|
Quoted:
HP per liter is just as apples to oranges when comparing NA to FI. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: You are comparing apples and oranges. When looking at an engine itself HP per liter is the metric. Now if we are talking about a whole car then yes the power to weight ratio would be the measuring stick. I swear some people on this forum just love to argue or be contrarians. From a production car standpoint achieving 208hp per liter is an accomplishment even if the engine isn't NA. |
|
To put things in perspective for our knuckle dragger members this would be like Chevy putting a turbocharged 350 into a production car that makes 1185hp.
Now tell me this isn't a major achievement. |
|
|
Quoted:
You are so wrong. http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-vyv0jn/product_images/uploaded_images/19301326-dyno.jpg?t=1405954582 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Your LS3 has less power under the curve then even this 4 banger. You'd have to get to near 4K RPMs before your LS3 puts out more torque. http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-vyv0jn/product_images/uploaded_images/19301326-dyno.jpg?t=1405954582 And these newer turbo engines from Germany are under rated from the factory. That engine is closer to 400ft/lbs of torque. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.