User Panel
|
Quoted:
Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is. Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you? |
|
Quoted:
Are you arguing the EO is unconstitutional or otherwise without sufficient authority or merit or lacking in authority or merit? Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet? Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with my assets. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Nope - got no problems with the EO. It's actually a good move. Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with my assets. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet? Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with my assets. |
|
Quoted:
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is. Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you? Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot. |
|
Quoted:
Facts are indisputable. This account of Comey's has been disputed. Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is. Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you? Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot. |
|
|
Quoted:
Unless the room was bugged, it is hearsay. BFD. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it. |
|
Quoted:
Well, you say you read it. Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO? It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. |
|
Quoted:
Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is. Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you? Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot. Eta- |
|
Quoted:
Seems like some context would help understand a request for loyalty. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it. |
|
|
Quoted: Indirectly? Sure. Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids. It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Indirectly? Sure. Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids. It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO? It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. |
|
|
Quoted:
So if the bribes to the cf are true involving u1, you don't think the assets should be seized? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Indirectly? Sure. Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids. It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. It's not. |
|
Quoted:
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO? It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. |
|
Quoted:
An executive order can order a law enforcement agency to enforce a law already on the books that they may generally not through agreements or such. So yeah, people gonna get their shit taken by executive order. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted:
I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Indirectly? Sure. Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids. It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. It's not. |
|
|
Quoted:
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture? You might be right about that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture? You might be right about that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Sure. If were were talking about regular asset forfeiture...which we're not. You might be right about that. But it's cool - I'm sure they're gonna be hooking up a tow truck to Mueller's Cadillac any day now. That'll show the Deep State! |
|
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen? Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO? It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think. |
|
Quoted:
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. ETA: I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses. You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized. |
|
Quoted from another thread..it appears the underscore brothers' hero's may not be quite the hero's they think they are...can't make this shit up...
Quoted:
Some great comments in this interview. Here are a few Kallstrom: Well I think there's a lot of patriots that have had it up to here with what's going on, and they're going to step forward and tell people what the shenanigans have been. How they shut down the Clinton Foundation investigation, how other things were done that are so anti-what the FBI and the United States and this country is about. ll the collusion is with the Democrats, and it's very very depressing to be FBI agents. 99 percent are hard working patriotic guys and girls that come to work for the good of the country. Varney: I want to summarize this. I want to be very clear about it. I have said in my opinion there is a cabal active within the FBI and the Justice Department. Kallstrom: Yes Varney: Which hates trump, which protected Hillary Clinton and tried to bring down Donald Trump. And that is an extraordinary story of interference in an American presidential election. Kallstrom: yes, yes, yes. It is. Without question that's what it was. Just like the whole "so-called" Clinton investigation, it was phony from the beginning; No grand jury, giving witnesses immunity, putting all the subjects in one room at the same time. I mean it's crazy. It's nuts what they did. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that. There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it? |
|
Quoted:
Sure it does. It is the purpose of the eo. To direct the treasury dept to seize assets for that very thing. With no notice. I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it? |
|
|
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that. There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation. ETA: I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses. You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. ETA: I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses. You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized. Bullet Spoo is freaking out about Trumps new EO. I picture him replying to this thread on his phone at an ATM trying to withdraw another $200. Relax Spoo, you're way down on the food chain. That being said it's not a bad idea to straighten up and fly right. Just Sayin. |
|
Quoted: No it would be...nothing...because this EO isn't POTUS giving himself some new powers to seize USP assets. But it's cool - I'm sure they're gonna be hooking up a tow truck to Mueller's Cadillac any day now. That'll show the Deep State! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that. There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation. ETA: I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses. You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general. The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc. It's not. ETA: I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses. You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized. |
|
How could McCabe verify Comey's stance that Trump asked for his loyalty? Was he there?
|
|
The national emergency eo about human trafficking and corruption should fit in well with the cf and hati.
Any opinions on that, b_s? |
|
Quoted:
It's from Zero Hedge. You absolutely can make that shit up - because they probably did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
"And while I cannot as of yet reveal this information, it is certainly NOT something I would celebrate if I was BuzzFeed." http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/21/media/buzzfeed-dossier-source-lawsuit/index.html View Quote Sources are given protections? Why can’t he be an unnamed source himself and tell a different news agency who it is? |
|
|
Comey knew what was going on, Strzok knew what was going on, his squeeze knew, Andy McCabe knew, Comey's buddy Mueller knew, what was going on in the FBI, knew what was going on with the FISA, Rosenstein knew, everyone at ROSATOM knew what was going on..........there is no evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians Just what the Hell is Mueller investigating?
|
|
Quoted:
How could McCabe verify Comey's stance that Trump asked for his loyalty? Was he there? View Quote McCabe being preferential to the Dems as earlier reported would fall right in line with the Strzok exchanges which are now making it much clearer that a group within the FBI was much more concerned with partisan politics and engineered outcomes than doing their job impartially. While Zero Hedge is not worth quoting imo, there is enough evidence lining up to make a Clinton Cabal within the FBI quite plausable. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Totally normal behavior... For a mob boss. fake news link again do you guys really believe that bullshit? and for good measure Do you want this country to survive as a Capitalistic Republic ? Did you take the bus to school ? Or Did you take your lunch ? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] Though it's hard. |
|
Quoted:
Seizing assets in Haiti? Have fun with that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.