Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 214
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:10:45 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
View Quote
Are you arguing the EO is unconstitutional or otherwise without sufficient authority or merit or lacking in authority or merit?

Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:11:41 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
McCabe is a liar,  Comey is a proven liar and a leaker.  All my president has done this year is make liberals cry,  my portfolio sky rocket and to top it off he just got a bill thru that will cut my taxes. I think I'll take Trump
Just because he tells lies you like to hear doesn't make them the truth. Telling facts you don't like about Trump doesn't make them lies.
Let's hear some Trump "facts"?
There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.


Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you?
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:13:00 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Are you arguing the EO is unconstitutional or otherwise without sufficient authority or merit or lacking in authority or merit?

Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Are you arguing the EO is unconstitutional or otherwise without sufficient authority or merit or lacking in authority or merit?

Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet?
Nope - got no problems with the EO.  It's actually a good move.

Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with  my assets.  
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:13:15 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
View Quote
How many tampons could one buy with the tax savings you'll be getting?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:14:20 PM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
View Quote
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:14:53 PM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Nope - got no problems with the EO.  It's actually a good move.

Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with  my assets.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Are you arguing the EO is unconstitutional or otherwise without sufficient authority or merit or lacking in authority or merit?

Are there any HufPo or Cracked articles to back this up yet?
Nope - got no problems with the EO.  It's actually a good move.

Some 'tards earlier were implying that this EO was going to be used to seize the assets of Mueller, Comey...oh along with  my assets.  
You foresee no scenario whatsoever at any time in the future where any of these folks could be caught in some net given the broad content of the EO?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:14:57 PM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
McCabe is a liar,  Comey is a proven liar and a leaker.  All my president has done this year is make liberals cry,  my portfolio sky rocket and to top it off he just got a bill thru that will cut my taxes. I think I'll take Trump
Just because he tells lies you like to hear doesn't make them the truth. Telling facts you don't like about Trump doesn't make them lies.
Let's hear some Trump "facts"?
There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.


Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you?
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
Facts are indisputable. This account of Comey's has been disputed.

Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:16:22 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Facts are indisputable. This account of Comey's has been disputed.

Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
McCabe is a liar,  Comey is a proven liar and a leaker.  All my president has done this year is make liberals cry,  my portfolio sky rocket and to top it off he just got a bill thru that will cut my taxes. I think I'll take Trump
Just because he tells lies you like to hear doesn't make them the truth. Telling facts you don't like about Trump doesn't make them lies.
Let's hear some Trump "facts"?
There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.


Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you?
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
Facts are indisputable. This account of Comey's has been disputed.

Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot.
Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:17:07 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.
View Quote
Unless the room was bugged, it is hearsay.  BFD.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:18:36 PM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Unless the room was bugged, it is hearsay.  BFD.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.
Unless the room was bugged, it is hearsay.  BFD.
Seems like some context would help understand a request for loyalty.

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:19:37 PM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:20:39 PM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
McCabe is a liar,  Comey is a proven liar and a leaker.  All my president has done this year is make liberals cry,  my portfolio sky rocket and to top it off he just got a bill thru that will cut my taxes. I think I'll take Trump
Just because he tells lies you like to hear doesn't make them the truth. Telling facts you don't like about Trump doesn't make them lies.
Let's hear some Trump "facts"?
There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.


Wow, you actually don't know what a fact is, do you?
Things that happened are generally referred to as facts.
Facts are indisputable. This account of Comey's has been disputed.

Again, it's clear you literally don't know what a fact is. That explains a lot.
Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes.
Quite a bind you're in here... Admit you have no idea what a fact is, or pretend you didn't know this was ever even disputed, which would indicate how little you know about the actual facts.

Eta-

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:20:49 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Seems like some context would help understand a request for loyalty.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

There are plenty that have been ignored. The one that McCabe backed up today was that Trump asked the FBI Director for a loyalty pledge. Something that is pretty un-American any way you look at it.
Unless the room was bugged, it is hearsay.  BFD.
Seems like some context would help understand a request for loyalty.

Context like Trump knowing Flynn was under investigation?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:20:51 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes.
View Quote
Comey is a liar.  His statements, without backup documentation, are not facts.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:22:03 PM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
View Quote
So if the bribes to the cf are true involving u1, you don't think the assets should be seized?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:22:04 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible...
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:23:09 PM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Has Trump disputed the loyalty pledge? Lordy I hope there are tapes.
View Quote
If there are, then the question becomes "why?"

What are the legalities of recording a private conversation with the President without his knowledge?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:24:49 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So if the bribes to the cf are true involving u1, you don't think the assets should be seized?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
So if the bribes to the cf are true involving u1, you don't think the assets should be seized?
I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:26:07 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible...
Sure.  If were were talking about regular asset forfeiture...which we're not.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:26:40 PM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
An executive order can order a law enforcement agency to enforce a law already on the books that they may generally not through agreements or such.

So yeah, people gonna get their shit taken by executive order.
View Quote
This suddenly seems more relevant. Future proves the past.
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:28:11 PM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
So if the bribes to the cf are true involving u1, you don't think the assets should be seized?
I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
Wishcasting

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:29:38 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Sure.  If were were talking about regular asset forfeiture...which we're not.
View Quote
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture?

You might be right about that.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:32:13 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture?

You might be right about that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Sure.  If were were talking about regular asset forfeiture...which we're not.
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture?

You might be right about that.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:32:16 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture?

You might be right about that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Sure.  If were were talking about regular asset forfeiture...which we're not.
So this is would be super special asset forfeiture?

You might be right about that.
No it would be...nothing...because this EO isn't POTUS giving himself some new powers to seize USP assets.

But it's cool - I'm sure they're gonna be hooking up a tow truck to Mueller's Cadillac any day now.  That'll show the Deep State!  
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:32:49 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
View Quote
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:34:37 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Is that what today's EO did - in regards to a US citizen?
Well, you say you read it.

Could a US citizen be affected by today's EO?
Indirectly?  Sure.  Don't do business with sanctioned individuals, kids.

It's still not getting used to seize Mueller's car out of his driveway no matter what the gentlemen in the red truck hats think.
Wouldn't that depend on where the proceeds used for the car came from. In fact maybe it doesn't, since money is fungible...
Or maybe where the funds are located?  You think they keep them in a checking account down on Main St USA?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:34:37 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.

ETA:  I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses.  You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:39:02 PM EST
[#28]
Quoted from another thread..it appears the underscore brothers' hero's may not be quite the hero's they think they are...can't make this shit up...

Quoted:
Some great comments in this interview. Here are a few

Kallstrom: Well I think there's a lot of patriots that have had it up to here with what's going on, and they're going to step forward and tell people what the shenanigans have been. How they shut down the Clinton Foundation investigation, how other things were done that are so anti-what the FBI and the United States and this country is about.

ll the collusion is with the Democrats, and it's very very depressing to be FBI agents. 99 percent are hard working patriotic guys and girls that come to work for the good of the country.

Varney: I want to summarize this. I want to be very clear about it. I have said in my opinion there is a cabal active within the FBI and the Justice Department.

Kallstrom: Yes

Varney: Which hates trump, which protected Hillary Clinton and tried to bring down Donald Trump. And that is an extraordinary story of interference in an American presidential election.

Kallstrom: yes, yes, yes. It is. Without question that's what it was. Just like the whole "so-called" Clinton investigation, it was phony from the beginning; No grand jury, giving witnesses immunity, putting all the subjects in one room at the same time. I mean it's crazy. It's nuts what they did.

View Quote
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:40:24 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.
Sure it does. It is the purpose of the eo. To direct the treasury dept to seize assets for that very thing. With no notice.
I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:42:05 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sure it does. It is the purpose of the eo. To direct the treasury dept to seize assets for that very thing. With no notice.
I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.
Sure it does. It is the purpose of the eo. To direct the treasury dept to seize assets for that very thing. With no notice.
I wonder how many folks close to cankles are moving money since he issued it?
Alright.  Well make sure to let me know when it happens...
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:43:21 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted from another thread..it appears the underscore brothers' hero's may not be quite the hero's they think they are...can't make this shit up...
SNIP

View Quote
It's from Zero Hedge.  You absolutely can make that shit up - because they probably did.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:46:56 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.

ETA:  I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses.  You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.

ETA:  I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses.  You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized.
LOL.

Bullet Spoo is freaking out about Trumps new EO.

I picture him replying to this thread on his phone at an ATM trying to withdraw another $200.

Relax Spoo, you're way down on the food chain.

That being said it's not a bad idea to straighten up and fly right.

Just Sayin.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:49:30 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No it would be...nothing...because this EO isn't POTUS giving himself some new powers to seize USP assets.

But it's cool - I'm sure they're gonna be hooking up a tow truck to Mueller's Cadillac any day now.  That'll show the Deep State!  
View Quote
There's some more of that wishcasting you've been telling us about. You didn't answer my question on anyone's future susceptibility or peril but we both already know the answer.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:51:11 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.

ETA:  I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses.  You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm simply talking about this EO - not asset forfeiture in general.  The MAGA-heads were acting like it was some huge bombshell because it was going to be used against Clinton / Comey / Mueller / Me / The Cookie Monster / etc.

It's not.
I am talking about the same eo. Please answer the question.
Then this EO would have nothing to do with that.  There's already plenty of LEO authority to seize assets in such a situation.

ETA:  I guess if you're talking about the Russians who allegedly gave the bribes...you might...if you could tie them to some human rights abuses.  You're still not getting Clinton / Mueller / Comey / [RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES] asset's seized.
You conveniently ignored the directive regarding corruption that appears in the EO maybe a dozen times...
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:54:24 PM EST
[#35]
How could McCabe verify Comey's stance that Trump asked for his loyalty?  Was he there?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:54:42 PM EST
[#36]
The national emergency eo about human trafficking and corruption should fit in well with the cf and hati.
Any opinions on that, b_s?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:57:42 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's from Zero Hedge.  You absolutely can make that shit up - because they probably did.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted from another thread..it appears the underscore brothers' hero's may not be quite the hero's they think they are...can't make this shit up...
SNIP

It's from Zero Hedge.  You absolutely can make that shit up - because they probably did.
I seem to recall zerohedge saying we would be living in a Mad Max style apocalypse by now.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:58:50 PM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Alright.  Well make sure to let me know when it happens...
View Quote
You already stipulated there was nothing unconstitutional about the EO nor did it lack in authority or merit.

Like an octopus on roller skates at this point.

Rough day at the office today getting hammered...

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:59:07 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"And while I cannot as of yet reveal this information, it is certainly NOT something I would celebrate if I was BuzzFeed."

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/21/media/buzzfeed-dossier-source-lawsuit/index.html
View Quote
Wait... Da fuq did I just read? Guy found out Buzzfeeds source of the dossier but is not allowed to tell?

Sources are given protections? Why can’t he be an unnamed source himself and tell a different news agency who it is?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 9:59:32 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The national emergency eo about human trafficking and corruption should fit in well with the cf and hati.
Any opinions on that, b_s?
View Quote
Seizing assets in Haiti?  Have fun with that.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:01:09 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I seem to recall zerohedge saying we would be living in a Mad Max style apocalypse by now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted from another thread..it appears the underscore brothers' hero's may not be quite the hero's they think they are...can't make this shit up...
SNIP

It's from Zero Hedge.  You absolutely can make that shit up - because they probably did.
I seem to recall zerohedge saying we would be living in a Mad Max style apocalypse by now.
Actually that was you and B_S about this time last year...

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:01:42 PM EST
[#42]
Comey knew what was going on, Strzok knew what was going on, his squeeze knew, Andy McCabe knew, Comey's buddy Mueller knew, what was going on in the FBI, knew what was going on with the FISA, Rosenstein knew, everyone at ROSATOM knew what was going on..........there is no evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians Just what the Hell is Mueller investigating?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:02:03 PM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How could McCabe verify Comey's stance that Trump asked for his loyalty?  Was he there?
View Quote
I'm wondering this myself.

McCabe being preferential to the Dems as earlier reported would fall right in line with the Strzok exchanges which are now making it much clearer that a group within the FBI was much more concerned with partisan politics and engineered outcomes than  doing their job impartially.

While Zero Hedge is not worth quoting imo, there is enough evidence lining up to make a Clinton Cabal within the FBI quite plausable.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:04:32 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

[RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES]
View Quote
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:06:04 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

[RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES]
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
When did we not?

Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:06:25 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Totally normal behavior...

For a mob boss.
mc cabe and comey are mother fucking liars

fake news link again

do you guys really believe that bullshit?

and for good measure

If you believe Donald Trump to be the arbiter of truth, you are probably incapable of discerning what a liar is.
How is he doing with his MAGA agenda ?

Do you want this country to survive as a Capitalistic Republic ?

Did you take the bus to school ?

Or

Did you take your lunch ?
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:09:45 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When did we not?

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

[RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES]
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
When did we not?

It's the Christmas Season; I'm trying to be nice.
Though it's hard.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:24:01 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Seizing assets in Haiti?  Have fun with that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
The national emergency eo about human trafficking and corruption should fit in well with the cf and hati.
Any opinions on that, b_s?
Seizing assets in Haiti?  Have fun with that.
The cf took in huge donations meant for hati relief. Spent only a pittance of it, and were embroiled in an "orphan" assistance program that was pretty shady, to the point a reporter was murdered checking it out. This day must really suck for you.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:30:59 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Yeah,  a president asking for loyalty from his FBI director,  crazy
View Quote
Considering all that’s come out about that agency over the last six months.  He’d be a dumbass if he didn’t.
Link Posted: 12/21/2017 10:52:52 PM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

[RANDOM PERSON ARFCOM HATES]
This is where you go off the reservation and we discount everything else you say.
Somebody actual has believed something/anything these guys say? I mean I understand when they first posted they got the benefit of the doubt for a few post until their shtick  showed thru, but that was a long, long time ago far from where we are today..
Page / 214
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top