I'm going to make an educated guess that there are similar posts and/or links posted the same day they were here.

Doesn't hurt my feelings.....

Best laugh I've had in days......

On 1 reply to my post you gave a laugh icon,

On another post, not 1 word of your own, just cut and paste, and not even a link in it......

I love your no-post post......

He is a master level troll.

I don't know, he seems pretty fucking stupid

Could be a head injury, Alzheimer's, or CJD.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/360189-trump-tweeted-about-podesta-emails-15-minutes-after-wikileaks-asked

And?

popcorn.gif

ok and?

You seem more upset about your girls e-mails and podestas emails being released than you  do what was in them.

These guys are right you are a Leftist. If nothing else says you are a Clinton supporter, the fact that the e-mails were released, instead of the content of them, that is it.

So we're back to felony tweeting?

Hey, Good For You......

Still no comments, BUT it least this time you got the link in the post.......

Holy Shit, is anyone watching Hannity?  I need to call my Dr because I will have a freedom boner for longer than 4 hours after this.

yep.  my jaw is still on the floor.

What'd I miss?

Oh shit Trump Jr talked to a transparency site, and Trump made reference to it. OMG, not illegal, but OMG
It was so planned and coordinated that it sunk Hitlery in the polls, and completely baffled our IC, even though they knew it was the Russians because Crowdstrike showed them computer stuff.

The hero, Comey saved Shitlery, because he thought those emails were floating around and would be released. He fucked up, no one released her emails,yet, but that's what the FBI does.
Your boy Mueller is now fucking up, he hasn't indicted Trump Jr on this old information that he saw months ago when Jr turned everything in, in June. The FBI hasn't even raided his house yet. The democrats attempt at releasing old information is just sad. No attempt at connecting him to Page or Popopatomous, who are still not indicted for collusion. What a sad unfulfilling nothing burger.

Yup.  And when put into the context of what was discovered by wiki leaks,  the picture is all too clear

Hannity laid out the 5 Clinton scandals that will be investigated
1. Uranium 1 Pay to Play
2.  Email Server containing classified / SAP data and 30k deleted emails.  
3.  Imran Awan spy ring in congress
4. Fake Fusion GPS dossier used to have NSA/FBI spy on Trump
5.  Stolen democrat primary from Bernie Sanders and money laundering DNC donations.

"It's not me guys, it's someone with same username that posts in same sentence structure and same phrases but it's NOT me!!!!"

im sure you'll see soon.  15 min synopsis with flow chart explaining......well you know....very well put together.  Hannity is a Godsend! FU TSBS

Sounds..... familiar

Stop...too much info...

ETA: Added correct video

And constantly posts that stupid fucking emote of the fist pounding laughing fucking emote.  Fuck them both (same dude/it) post the same style crap and emotes....  I used to want them/it to go away.  But I enjoy the buffoonery so much nowadays.  Im loving this, my favorite thread evaaaaar!

Attached File


Hannity broke it all down. Also alluded to Jeff Session's hesitancy on appointing a Special Prosecuter being due to the fact that he is already conducting the investigation himself.

 Yep, they're still going at it on Hannity

The code for it is [ lol ] without the spaces if you were curious.

Attached File

...investigated by the swamp so they can say "we investigated ourselves & found that we did nothing wrong."

I don't know why Hannity keeps trying to tell us what a great guy the lazy swamp creature Sessions is.

And the same focus on Trump.

In your head, innuendo and grandiose Trump crimes should appear.

They don't, ... shit.

It's just Trump taking orders from a Russian Intel cut-out. No big deal apparently.

...Hillary wanted droned, so her crimes wouldn't be revealed...

You'd have been ok with that, wouldn't you?

@Top_Secret
@Bullet_Sponge

What is your analysis of the case being made against HRC?

The reason being is this entire investigation is a nothing burger.

Oh Christ, I knew the Sponge was a democrat within two seconds of reading his first political post.

Nothing burger with a side of three indictments so far.

Is it still going to be a nothingburger when charges against Flynn drop?

That has nothing to do with Trump colluding with Putin.

Sorry...........it is and will always be a nothing burger.

It's likely garbage?

Shep Smith just took apart the Uranium One conspiracy theory in what amounts to a methodical annihilation of his own network's coverage of the story. pic.twitter.com/D439QyIBWU

Matthew Gertz  (@MattGertz) November 14, 2017

Uh huh............Russians donate over $100 million to the Clinton Foundation out of the kindness of their hearts.....got it.

I guess everyone is correct about Shep..........but what should I expect form a guy who voted for Hillary.

I saw that segment, all it did bring the whole obama admin into the storm

What is the benefit for the US gov't for handing over control of more than 20% of our uranium to one of our biggest fores (according to the dems who over saw this whole deal)?

Shep=B_S

T_S=Shep

Here is the transcript but I'll assume it will be ignored due to the usual ad-hominems. AKA "I will not address or argue against he says because Shep is a liberal shill cuck and I refuse to listen to him."



DONALD TRUMP: Hillary Clinton's State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America's uranium holdings to Russia. Well, nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

(END VIDEO)

SMITH: That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways. First, the Clinton State Department had no power to veto or approve that transaction. It could do neither. Here's how it does work. By law, when a foreign company wants to buy anything with potential national security implications, an interagency committee of the federal government must approve it. The committee was given a broad mandate under President Reagan to advise the president on foreign investment transactions. That committee is called CFIUS, or the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. It includes nine department heads. The secretary of the treasury is the chairperson. The rest are the heads of the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, State, and Energy, plus the office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. That's CFIUS. The nine department heads all approved the sale of Uranium One. It was unanimous, not a Hillary Clinton approval. We don't know definitively whether Secretary Clinton participated at all directly. The then-Secretary of State -- I should say Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernando represented State on CFIUS. He says she did not, reporting that the secretary never intervened.

Further, neither Secretary Clinton nor the committee as a whole could stop any deal of this kind. The committee members evaluate a sale of anything potentially related to national security. By law, if one member objects, the president and only the president can veto such a transaction. No committee member of the nine objected. Federal approvals were also needed. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the sale on November the 24th of 2010 and in doing so, stipulated that no uranium produced may be exported.

So where does the uranium go? Well, the Energy Information Administration or EIA reports that unless special permission is granted by the Department of Energy or other governmental agencies, Uranium One sells the uranium that it mines in the United States to civilian power reactors in the United States. But operators of those reactors have many other sources for their uranium. Last year, 89 percent of uranium used by power plants in the U.S. came from foreign producers, according to the EIA.

Regarding the donations to the Clinton Foundation, again, the accusation is that Hillary Clinton's State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America's uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. Here, the timing is inaccurate. Most of those donations were from one man, Frank Giustra, the founder of the company in Canada. He gave $131 million to the Clinton Foundation. But Giustra says he sold his stake in the company back in 2007. That is three years before the uranium/Russia deal and a year and a half before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state. We can’t independently verify his statement, but if true, the donation to the Clinton Foundation from confirmed Uranium One investors drops from more than $145 million to $4 million. The Clinton Foundation did not disclose those donations. After a New York Times story exposed them, the foundation reported it made mistakes, saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity but did not specify the names of the donors to that charity who had associations to the uranium company.

Even so, the accusation is predicated on the charge that Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She did not. A committee of nine evaluated the sale, the president approved the sale, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the uranium was exported for use by the U.S. to Russia. That is Uranium One.

If we put millions of dollars (probably tens of millions already) of investigative resources against the Pope we could find some insignificant administrative laws he violated too.

Shep would be more at home on CNN sucking Anderson Cooper's dick. At best, he's another swampy NeverTrumper dickhead, at worst he's a flaming lunatic liberal "resist" asshole.

I saw his little "breakdown" of the Uranium 1 deal yesterday. Same exact tired Dem talking points to desperately convince us Hillary had no part of it and is pure as the driven snow.

@Top_Secret
@Bullet_Sponge

What is your analysis of the case being made against HRC?






It's likely garbage?

Shep Smith just took apart the Uranium One conspiracy theory in what amounts to a methodical annihilation of his own network's coverage of the story. pic.twitter.com/D439QyIBWU

Matthew Gertz  (@MattGertz) November 14, 2017

Lol. Seriously? It's likely garbage because Obama and 8 other of his government appointees signed off on it? That's what makes this a nothingburger?

If that 20 second weak ass clip is what you and you lefitist buddies consider a "methodical annialation", you're in trouble.

It sure keeps one of Hannity's interns busy making silly charts.

Investigate away. I haven't seen anything compelling yet - seems hard to make a "quid pro quo" accusation when you're talking about 1/9th of the approval chain and we haven't even established that Clinton was even involved in the decision-making process at all.

Shep takes it from the other team. And loves it!

Have we circled back to you dodging the question about how these indictments don't have anything to do with Trump campaign collusion?

[inserts twitter link]

But those wire transfers to Nigeria are a smoking gun.  

Seriously, who wouldn’t pay millions and millions of dollars just to hear Willie talk?