User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:31:30 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wonder what kind of dental plan a white shoes law firm offers... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:32:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm a slow country guy, what in the fuck is a white shoes law firm? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: I wonder what kind of dental plan a white shoes law firm offers... What Mueller left to work this case. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:33:25 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:34:56 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A prosecutor doesn't normally "analyze the servers". Some underpaid/underappreciated CART guys would do that... 
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:36:29 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryAt this point in time, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about Andy or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:37:07 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What you mean is the guy who was appointed by Obama and the guy whose wife worked for the company that conspired against Trump and the guy and his mistress who were conspiring against Trump (in other words a bunch of democrat appointees, activists and sub-contract employees who happen to run the FBI) took the DNC’s word for it that Russia hacked their computers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:38:09 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
At this point in time, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about Andy or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Feel free to add to the list.  Answer this question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:38:25 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-adds-veteran-cyber-prosecutor-to-special-counsel-team/2018/01/10/860f3364-f585-11e7-b34a-b85626af34ef_story.html?utm_term=.bfa3c19ac1cd Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has added a veteran cyber prosecutor to his team, filling what has long been a gap in expertise and potentially signaling a recent focus on computer crimes.
Ryan K. Dickey was assigned to Mueller's team in early November from the Justice Department's computer crime and intellectual-property section, said a spokesman for the special counsel's office. He joined 16 other lawyers who are highly respected by their peers but who have come under fire from Republicans wary of some of their political contributions to Democrats. Dickey's addition is particularly notable because he is the first publicly known member of the team specializing solely in cyber issues. The others' expertise is mainly in a variety of white-collar crimes, including fraud, money laundering and public corruption, though Mueller also has appellate specialists and one of the government's foremost experts in criminal law. Interesting development - and doesn't exactly point to an investigation that's "wrapping up". What's much more interesting is that the FBI was sharing counter intelligence information with a foreign agent that was being paid by the Clintons. Remember when Comey testified that his head of CI, Bill Preistap, told him not to tell congress about the investigation because it was too sensitive, lol. Feinstein just threw your team under the bus. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:40:01 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Attribution in this case went a bit past "they took the DNC's word for it". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. ...waiting... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:44:24 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
@Bullet_Sponge Answer this question. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Feel free to add to the list. Answer this question. 
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:45:48 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool me too. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: That's code for "87 percent of the posts in the thread consist of personal attacks, whataboutism, non sequiturs and a couple of 'tards spamming the same question over and over again", right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:46:58 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. you MUST have an opinion |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:48:23 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryMueller would certainly want his people to stay in power, nothing like having an attorney that is friends with the corrupt FBI director that was fired. I wonder how many times Comey decided one of Mueller's clients wasn't worth going after, no intent, you know how it works. Mueller's worth as a powerful highly connected attorney will be shit after they finish getting his people out of the FBI. I bet he's pissed, along with his team of Clinton loyalist that also had people on the inside.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:49:00 PM EDT
[#14]
At this point in time, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about Andy or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:53:36 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Attribution in this case went a bit past "they took the DNC's word for it". |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:53:52 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Attribution in this case went a bit past "they took the DNC's word for it". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. Does the FBI usually accept the opinion of potentially conflicted third parties during investigations or is that something they only do when high level democrats are involved? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:53:55 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
or, you could just answer the question to the best of your ability, and he will stop you MUST have an opinion Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. you MUST have an opinion |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:55:05 PM EDT
[#18]
Please knock off
(A) Personal attacks and (B) Spamming the thread repeatedly with the same copy-pasta Just because the majority of people may not like the OP is not license to engage in personal attacks, or to try to get the thread locked by spamming it or by any other means. If you cannot control yourself, then the solution is probably to stop posting in his threads. 
In fact, if NOBODY posted in this thread, it would quickly disappear. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:55:08 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How would you know? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: A prosecutor doesn't normally "analyze the servers". Some underpaid/underappreciated CART guys would do that...
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:56:07 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Somehow I doubt this... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. you MUST have an opinion our msnbc handlers will be able to spin whatever happens |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:56:08 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: When did the FBI’s forensic computer analysts examine the servers. Does the FBI usually accept the opinion of potentially conflicted third parties during investigations or is that something they only do when high level democrats are involved? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:57:04 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When did the FBI’s forensic computer analysts examine the servers. Does the FBI usually accept the opinion of potentially conflicted third parties during investigations or is that something they only do when high level democrats are involved? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. Does the FBI usually accept the opinion of potentially conflicted third parties during investigations or is that something they only do when high level democrats are involved? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:58:56 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Attribution in this case went a bit past "they took the DNC's word for it". |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:59:22 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I look forward to someone's attorney putting this argument into a criminal court document... Then your homie 0bama, used the FISA warrant to spy on the opposing political candidate. Chicago-corruption on a national level. A first-year law student could argue this in any court, its so blatant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:59:46 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please knock off (A) Personal attacks and (B) Spamming the thread repeatedly with the same copy-pasta Just because the majority of people may not like the OP is not license to engage in personal attacks, or to try to get the thread locked by spamming it or by any other means. If you cannot control yourself, then the solution is probably to stop posting in his threads.
In fact, if NOBODY posted in this thread, it would quickly disappear. I'm genuinely curious. Do you as Site Staff find it the least bit strange that an account averaged 7 posts A YEAR never starting a thread in GD. Then on election night it became a 4000 post a year thread starting machine? Especially coupled with the fact we know certain political organizations were encouraging members to find old accounts on forums and take them over? Btw, I agree with you coc should be followed, regardless of op. Just curious what you think. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 8:59:46 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What’s the tab for this cocksucker? This is getting expensive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:01:56 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"At this point in time, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about Andy or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans?" ...waiting... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Besides the FBI (along with the rest of the IC) has already publicly attributed the DNC data breach to the Russian government. ...waiting... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:02:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FISA warrant was achieved under false/fabricated information to be retroactive PC for whole investigation. Then your homie 0bama, used the FISA warrant to spy on the opposing political candidate. Chicago-corruption on a national level. A first-year law student could argue this in any court, its so blatant. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: I look forward to someone's attorney putting this argument into a criminal court document... Then your homie 0bama, used the FISA warrant to spy on the opposing political candidate. Chicago-corruption on a national level. A first-year law student could argue this in any court, its so blatant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:05:14 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Might as well dust of the unanswered copy pasta. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Might as well dust of the unanswered copy pasta. At this point in time, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about Andy or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans? Crickets |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:09:29 PM EDT
[#30]
In this thread, OP reinforces the reasons everybody hates the FBI and wants to see them all homeless and suffering on the streets. Well, maybe not every single dunce agent.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:11:08 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
or, you could just answer the question to the best of your ability, and he will stop you MUST have an opinion Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. you MUST have an opinion |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:11:22 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Interesting theory. Like I said - I look forward to Manafort,, Flynn and/or GP's attorney making this argument in court... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:11:37 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @DK-prof I'm genuinely curious. Do you as Site Staff find it the least bit strange that an account averaged 7 posts A YEAR never starting a thread in GD. Then on election night it became a 4000 post a year thread starting machine? Especially coupled with the fact we know certain political organizations were encouraging members to find old accounts on forums and take them over? Btw, I agree with you coc should be followed, regardless of op. Just curious what you think. I do agree with you that it certainly LOOKS LIKE an old account that was rarely used, owned by someone of the left of the political spectrum. However, there are also clearly Republicans that just simply CANNOT STAND Trump, and have sort of “lost it” after he won the election (for whatever reason). But, ultimately, even if he is some sort it DU “mole” or leftist provocateur or whatever, it really doesn’t matter from a Site perspective, since it’s not a violation of the CoC. I don’t see any egregious attempts by him to constantly troll people or disrupt the site. This thread,for example, is one that people can simply ignore and choose to not post in. If he starts to become disruptive to the site, of course Staff will take action. But most of the disruption seems to be from people who have difficulty controlling their OWN behavior, and cannot help but attack him. Ignore him, and he will either (A) gradually stop posting ... or (B) start to become more disruptive, which will lead to mod/staff action. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:13:17 PM EDT
[#34]
My head is gonna explode if I hear Russia shit on the news one more time. So sick of this bullshit!!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:15:20 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To a certain extent, I really don’t care - since the site has never had a political requirement or litmus test (unlike political sites like DU or conservativetreehouse, etc.). I do agree with you that it certainly LOOKS LIKE an old account that was rarely used, owned by someone of the left of the political spectrum. However, there are also clearly Republicans that just simply CANNOT STAND Trump, and have sort of “lost it” after he won the election (for whatever reason). But, ultimately, even if he is some sort it DU “mole” or leftist provocateur or whatever, it really doesn’t matter from a Site perspective, since it’s not a violation of the CoC. I don’t see any egregious attempts by him to constantly troll people or disrupt the site. This thread,for example, is one that people can simply ignore and choose to not post in. If he starts to become disruptive to the site, of course Staff will take action. But most of the disruption seems to be from people who have difficulty controlling their OWN behavior, and cannot help but attack him. Ignore him, and he will either (A) gradually stop posting ... or (B) start to become more disruptive, which will lead to mod/staff action. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: @DK-prof I'm genuinely curious. Do you as Site Staff find it the least bit strange that an account averaged 7 posts A YEAR never starting a thread in GD. Then on election night it became a 4000 post a year thread starting machine? Especially coupled with the fact we know certain political organizations were encouraging members to find old accounts on forums and take them over? Btw, I agree with you coc should be followed, regardless of op. Just curious what you think. I do agree with you that it certainly LOOKS LIKE an old account that was rarely used, owned by someone of the left of the political spectrum. However, there are also clearly Republicans that just simply CANNOT STAND Trump, and have sort of “lost it” after he won the election (for whatever reason). But, ultimately, even if he is some sort it DU “mole” or leftist provocateur or whatever, it really doesn’t matter from a Site perspective, since it’s not a violation of the CoC. I don’t see any egregious attempts by him to constantly troll people or disrupt the site. This thread,for example, is one that people can simply ignore and choose to not post in. If he starts to become disruptive to the site, of course Staff will take action. But most of the disruption seems to be from people who have difficulty controlling their OWN behavior, and cannot help but attack him. Ignore him, and he will either (A) gradually stop posting ... or (B) start to become more disruptive, which will lead to mod/staff action.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:16:24 PM EDT
[#36]
There's @DK-Prof with his facts and logic again. Where'd they get this guy???
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:20:33 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have a slight quibble with your "left of the political spectrum" comment. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:22:22 PM EDT
[#38]
I want Muller's head on a pike outside the whitehouse.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:23:01 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Attribution in this case went a bit past "they took the DNC's word for it". |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:24:08 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. I'm not a fan of rewarding childish behavior. I'll let the guy nursing a grudge keep banging away on CTRL-V until a mod gets sick of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:26:28 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please knock off (A) Personal attacks and (B) Spamming the thread repeatedly with the same copy-pasta Just because the majority of people may not like the OP is not license to engage in personal attacks, or to try to get the thread locked by spamming it or by any other means. If you cannot control yourself, then the solution is probably to stop posting in his threads.
In fact, if NOBODY posted in this thread, it would quickly disappear. All he has to do is answer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:26:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My point was based mainly on how the ONI's report spoke of Russian intentions. You're not getting that solely based on technical analysis of dead iron. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:27:56 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Interesting theory. Like I said - I look forward to Manafort,, Flynn and/or GP's attorney making this argument in court... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:28:01 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My point was based mainly on how the ONI's report spoke of Russian intentions. You're not getting that solely based on technical analysis of dead iron.  . The FBI is an embarrassment to everyone that has ever sworn an oath to our country.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:29:36 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please knock off (A) Personal attacks and (B) Spamming the thread repeatedly with the same copy-pasta Just because the majority of people may not like the OP is not license to engage in personal attacks, or to try to get the thread locked by spamming it or by any other means. If you cannot control yourself, then the solution is probably to stop posting in his threads.
In fact, if NOBODY posted in this thread, it would quickly disappear. Anyways I have a different topic, hey BS, are you of the opinion that nothing that's come out about BRUCE OHR or his wife should be looked into in regards to conflict of interest, or, regarding his wife, quid pro quo shenanigans? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:30:21 PM EDT
[#46]
Hired back in November and we're just hearing about it now?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:31:34 PM EDT
[#47]
How about this one: Should the evidence presented to obtain the FISA warrant be disclosed to the appropriate oversight committee immediately?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:32:29 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hired back in November and we're just hearing about it now?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:39:03 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm sure we'll find out soon his neighbor once put out a yard sign for a Democrat running for school board - ergo his whole investigation is null and void. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2018 9:39:08 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There's @DK-Prof with his facts and logic again. Where'd they get this guy??? I think he should be censured...somehow. Or shunned. We can still shun, can we not? Good god. I get a few drinks in me and my ancestral Puritan comes right out.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
